Searched +hist:98 +hist:f842e6 (Results 1 - 18 of 18) sorted by relevance
/linux-master/init/ | ||
H A D | version.c | diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
/linux-master/ipc/ | ||
H A D | msgutil.c | diff d6a2946a Tue May 14 16:46:20 MDT 2019 Li Rongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com> ipc: prevent lockup on alloc_msg and free_msg msgctl10 of ltp triggers the following lockup When CONFIG_KASAN is enabled on large memory SMP systems, the pages initialization can take a long time, if msgctl10 requests a huge block memory, and it will block rcu scheduler, so release cpu actively. After adding schedule() in free_msg, free_msg can not be called when holding spinlock, so adding msg to a tmp list, and free it out of spinlock rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: rcu: Tasks blocked on level-1 rcu_node (CPUs 16-31): P32505 rcu: Tasks blocked on level-1 rcu_node (CPUs 48-63): P34978 rcu: (detected by 11, t=35024 jiffies, g=44237529, q=16542267) msgctl10 R running task 21608 32505 2794 0x00000082 Call Trace: preempt_schedule_irq+0x4c/0xb0 retint_kernel+0x1b/0x2d RIP: 0010:__is_insn_slot_addr+0xfb/0x250 Code: 82 1d 00 48 8b 9b 90 00 00 00 4c 89 f7 49 c1 ee 03 e8 59 83 1d 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 39 eb 48 89 9d 58 ff ff ff <41> c6 04 06 f8 74 66 4c 8d 75 98 4c 89 f1 48 c1 e9 03 48 01 c8 48 RSP: 0018:ffff88bce041f758 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffffffff8471bc50 RCX: ffffffff828a2a57 RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: dffffc0000000000 RDI: ffff88bce041f780 RBP: ffff88bce041f828 R08: ffffed15f3f4c5b3 R09: ffffed15f3f4c5b3 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed15f3f4c5b2 R12: 000000318aee9b73 R13: ffffffff8471bc50 R14: 1ffff1179c083ef0 R15: 1ffff1179c083eec kernel_text_address+0xc1/0x100 __kernel_text_address+0xe/0x30 unwind_get_return_address+0x2f/0x50 __save_stack_trace+0x92/0x100 create_object+0x380/0x650 __kmalloc+0x14c/0x2b0 load_msg+0x38/0x1a0 do_msgsnd+0x19e/0xcf0 do_syscall_64+0x117/0x400 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: rcu: Tasks blocked on level-1 rcu_node (CPUs 0-15): P32170 rcu: (detected by 14, t=35016 jiffies, g=44237525, q=12423063) msgctl10 R running task 21608 32170 32155 0x00000082 Call Trace: preempt_schedule_irq+0x4c/0xb0 retint_kernel+0x1b/0x2d RIP: 0010:lock_acquire+0x4d/0x340 Code: 48 81 ec c0 00 00 00 45 89 c6 4d 89 cf 48 8d 6c 24 20 48 89 3c 24 48 8d bb e4 0c 00 00 89 74 24 0c 48 c7 44 24 20 b3 8a b5 41 <48> c1 ed 03 48 c7 44 24 28 b4 25 18 84 48 c7 44 24 30 d0 54 7a 82 RSP: 0018:ffff88af83417738 EFLAGS: 00000282 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88bd335f3080 RCX: 0000000000000002 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88bd335f3d64 RBP: ffff88af83417758 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed13f3f745b2 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 is_bpf_text_address+0x32/0xe0 kernel_text_address+0xec/0x100 __kernel_text_address+0xe/0x30 unwind_get_return_address+0x2f/0x50 __save_stack_trace+0x92/0x100 save_stack+0x32/0xb0 __kasan_slab_free+0x130/0x180 kfree+0xfa/0x2d0 free_msg+0x24/0x50 do_msgrcv+0x508/0xe60 do_syscall_64+0x117/0x400 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Davidlohr said: "So after releasing the lock, the msg rbtree/list is empty and new calls will not see those in the newly populated tmp_msg list, and therefore they cannot access the delayed msg freeing pointers, which is good. Also the fact that the node_cache is now freed before the actual messages seems to be harmless as this is wanted for msg_insert() avoiding GFP_ATOMIC allocations, and after releasing the info->lock the thing is freed anyway so it should not change things" Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1552029161-4957-1-git-send-email-lirongqing@baidu.com Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yu <zhangyu31@baidu.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
H A D | namespace.c | diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
/linux-master/kernel/ | ||
H A D | utsname.c | diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
H A D | pid_namespace.c | diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98ed57ee Thu May 31 17:26:42 MDT 2012 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> sysctl: make kernel.ns_last_pid control dependent on CHECKPOINT_RESTORE For those who doesn't need C/R functionality there is no need to control last pid, ie the pid for the next fork() call. Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
H A D | user.c | diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
H A D | user_namespace.c | diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 6164281a Wed Jan 12 18:00:46 MST 2011 Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> user_ns: improve the user_ns on-the-slab packaging Currently on 64-bit arch the user_namespace is 2096 and when being kmalloc-ed it resides on a 4k slab wasting 2003 bytes. If we allocate a separate cache for it and reduce the hash size from 128 to 64 chains the packaging becomes *much* better - the struct is 1072 bytes and the hole between is 98 bytes. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/__initcall/module_init/] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
H A D | pid.c | diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
/linux-master/include/linux/ | ||
H A D | utsname.h | diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
H A D | ipc_namespace.h | diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
H A D | pid_namespace.h | diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
H A D | user_namespace.h | diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 6164281a Wed Jan 12 18:00:46 MST 2011 Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> user_ns: improve the user_ns on-the-slab packaging Currently on 64-bit arch the user_namespace is 2096 and when being kmalloc-ed it resides on a 4k slab wasting 2003 bytes. If we allocate a separate cache for it and reduce the hash size from 128 to 64 chains the packaging becomes *much* better - the struct is 1072 bytes and the hole between is 98 bytes. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/__initcall/module_init/] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
H A D | proc_fs.h | diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
/linux-master/fs/proc/ | ||
H A D | namespaces.c | diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
/linux-master/fs/ | ||
H A D | mount.h | diff 98d2b430 Wed Oct 25 08:01:59 MDT 2023 Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> add unique mount ID If a mount is released then its mnt_id can immediately be reused. This is bad news for user interfaces that want to uniquely identify a mount. Implementing a unique mount ID is trivial (use a 64bit counter). Unfortunately userspace assumes 32bit size and would overflow after the counter reaches 2^32. Introduce a new 64bit ID alongside the old one. Initialize the counter to 2^32, this guarantees that the old and new IDs are never mixed up. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231025140205.3586473-2-mszeredi@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
H A D | namespace.c | diff 98d2b430 Wed Oct 25 08:01:59 MDT 2023 Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> add unique mount ID If a mount is released then its mnt_id can immediately be reused. This is bad news for user interfaces that want to uniquely identify a mount. Implementing a unique mount ID is trivial (use a 64bit counter). Unfortunately userspace assumes 32bit size and would overflow after the counter reaches 2^32. Introduce a new 64bit ID alongside the old one. Initialize the counter to 2^32, this guarantees that the old and new IDs are never mixed up. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231025140205.3586473-2-mszeredi@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> diff 6ac39281 Wed May 03 05:18:42 MDT 2023 Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> fs: allow to mount beneath top mount Various distributions are adding or are in the process of adding support for system extensions and in the future configuration extensions through various tools. A more detailed explanation on system and configuration extensions can be found on the manpage which is listed below at [1]. System extension images may – dynamically at runtime — extend the /usr/ and /opt/ directory hierarchies with additional files. This is particularly useful on immutable system images where a /usr/ and/or /opt/ hierarchy residing on a read-only file system shall be extended temporarily at runtime without making any persistent modifications. When one or more system extension images are activated, their /usr/ and /opt/ hierarchies are combined via overlayfs with the same hierarchies of the host OS, and the host /usr/ and /opt/ overmounted with it ("merging"). When they are deactivated, the mount point is disassembled — again revealing the unmodified original host version of the hierarchy ("unmerging"). Merging thus makes the extension's resources suddenly appear below the /usr/ and /opt/ hierarchies as if they were included in the base OS image itself. Unmerging makes them disappear again, leaving in place only the files that were shipped with the base OS image itself. System configuration images are similar but operate on directories containing system or service configuration. On nearly all modern distributions mount propagation plays a crucial role and the rootfs of the OS is a shared mount in a peer group (usually with peer group id 1): TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION MNT_ID PARENT_ID / / ext4 shared:1 29 1 On such systems all services and containers run in a separate mount namespace and are pivot_root()ed into their rootfs. A separate mount namespace is almost always used as it is the minimal isolation mechanism services have. But usually they are even much more isolated up to the point where they almost become indistinguishable from containers. Mount propagation again plays a crucial role here. The rootfs of all these services is a slave mount to the peer group of the host rootfs. This is done so the service will receive mount propagation events from the host when certain files or directories are updated. In addition, the rootfs of each service, container, and sandbox is also a shared mount in its separate peer group: TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION MNT_ID PARENT_ID / / ext4 shared:24 master:1 71 47 For people not too familiar with mount propagation, the master:1 means that this is a slave mount to peer group 1. Which as one can see is the host rootfs as indicated by shared:1 above. The shared:24 indicates that the service rootfs is a shared mount in a separate peer group with peer group id 24. A service may run other services. Such nested services will also have a rootfs mount that is a slave to the peer group of the outer service rootfs mount. For containers things are just slighly different. A container's rootfs isn't a slave to the service's or host rootfs' peer group. The rootfs mount of a container is simply a shared mount in its own peer group: TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION MNT_ID PARENT_ID /home/ubuntu/debian-tree / ext4 shared:99 61 60 So whereas services are isolated OS components a container is treated like a separate world and mount propagation into it is restricted to a single well known mount that is a slave to the peer group of the shared mount /run on the host: TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION MNT_ID PARENT_ID /propagate/debian-tree /run/host/incoming tmpfs master:5 71 68 Here, the master:5 indicates that this mount is a slave to the peer group with peer group id 5. This allows to propagate mounts into the container and served as a workaround for not being able to insert mounts into mount namespaces directly. But the new mount api does support inserting mounts directly. For the interested reader the blogpost in [2] might be worth reading where I explain the old and the new approach to inserting mounts into mount namespaces. Containers of course, can themselves be run as services. They often run full systems themselves which means they again run services and containers with the exact same propagation settings explained above. The whole system is designed so that it can be easily updated, including all services in various fine-grained ways without having to enter every single service's mount namespace which would be prohibitively expensive. The mount propagation layout has been carefully chosen so it is possible to propagate updates for system extensions and configurations from the host into all services. The simplest model to update the whole system is to mount on top of /usr, /opt, or /etc on the host. The new mount on /usr, /opt, or /etc will then propagate into every service. This works cleanly the first time. However, when the system is updated multiple times it becomes necessary to unmount the first update on /opt, /usr, /etc and then propagate the new update. But this means, there's an interval where the old base system is accessible. This has to be avoided to protect against downgrade attacks. The vfs already exposes a mechanism to userspace whereby mounts can be mounted beneath an existing mount. Such mounts are internally referred to as "tucked". The patch series exposes the ability to mount beneath a top mount through the new MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH flag for the move_mount() system call. This allows userspace to seamlessly upgrade mounts. After this series the only thing that will have changed is that mounting beneath an existing mount can be done explicitly instead of just implicitly. Today, there are two scenarios where a mount can be mounted beneath an existing mount instead of on top of it: (1) When a service or container is started in a new mount namespace and pivot_root()s into its new rootfs. The way this is done is by mounting the new rootfs beneath the old rootfs: fd_newroot = open("/var/lib/machines/fedora", ...); fd_oldroot = open("/", ...); fchdir(fd_newroot); pivot_root(".", "."); After the pivot_root(".", ".") call the new rootfs is mounted beneath the old rootfs which can then be unmounted to reveal the underlying mount: fchdir(fd_oldroot); umount2(".", MNT_DETACH); Since pivot_root() moves the caller into a new rootfs no mounts must be propagated out of the new rootfs as a consequence of the pivot_root() call. Thus, the mounts cannot be shared. (2) When a mount is propagated to a mount that already has another mount mounted on the same dentry. The easiest example for this is to create a new mount namespace. The following commands will create a mount namespace where the rootfs mount / will be a slave to the peer group of the host rootfs / mount's peer group. IOW, it will receive propagation from the host: mount --make-shared / unshare --mount --propagation=slave Now a new mount on the /mnt dentry in that mount namespace is created. (As it can be confusing it should be spelled out that the tmpfs mount on the /mnt dentry that was just created doesn't propagate back to the host because the rootfs mount / of the mount namespace isn't a peer of the host rootfs.): mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /mnt TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION └─/mnt tmpfs tmpfs Now another terminal in the host mount namespace can observe that the mount indeed hasn't propagated back to into the host mount namespace. A new mount can now be created on top of the /mnt dentry with the rootfs mount / as its parent: mount --bind /opt /mnt TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION └─/mnt /dev/sda2[/opt] ext4 shared:1 The mount namespace that was created earlier can now observe that the bind mount created on the host has propagated into it: TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION └─/mnt /dev/sda2[/opt] ext4 master:1 └─/mnt tmpfs tmpfs But instead of having been mounted on top of the tmpfs mount at the /mnt dentry the /opt mount has been mounted on top of the rootfs mount at the /mnt dentry. And the tmpfs mount has been remounted on top of the propagated /opt mount at the /opt dentry. So in other words, the propagated mount has been mounted beneath the preexisting mount in that mount namespace. Mount namespaces make this easy to illustrate but it's also easy to mount beneath an existing mount in the same mount namespace (The following example assumes a shared rootfs mount / with peer group id 1): mount --bind /opt /opt TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE MNT_ID PARENT_ID PROPAGATION └─/opt /dev/sda2[/opt] ext4 188 29 shared:1 If another mount is mounted on top of the /opt mount at the /opt dentry: mount --bind /tmp /opt The following clunky mount tree will result: TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE MNT_ID PARENT_ID PROPAGATION └─/opt /dev/sda2[/tmp] ext4 405 29 shared:1 └─/opt /dev/sda2[/opt] ext4 188 405 shared:1 └─/opt /dev/sda2[/tmp] ext4 404 188 shared:1 The /tmp mount is mounted beneath the /opt mount and another copy is mounted on top of the /opt mount. This happens because the rootfs / and the /opt mount are shared mounts in the same peer group. When the new /tmp mount is supposed to be mounted at the /opt dentry then the /tmp mount first propagates to the root mount at the /opt dentry. But there already is the /opt mount mounted at the /opt dentry. So the old /opt mount at the /opt dentry will be mounted on top of the new /tmp mount at the /tmp dentry, i.e. @opt->mnt_parent is @tmp and @opt->mnt_mountpoint is /tmp (Note that @opt->mnt_root is /opt which is what shows up as /opt under SOURCE). So again, a mount will be mounted beneath a preexisting mount. (Fwiw, a few iterations of mount --bind /opt /opt in a loop on a shared rootfs is a good example of what could be referred to as mount explosion.) The main point is that such mounts allows userspace to umount a top mount and reveal an underlying mount. So for example, umounting the tmpfs mount on /mnt that was created in example (1) using mount namespaces reveals the /opt mount which was mounted beneath it. In (2) where a mount was mounted beneath the top mount in the same mount namespace unmounting the top mount would unmount both the top mount and the mount beneath. In the process the original mount would be remounted on top of the rootfs mount / at the /opt dentry again. This again, is a result of mount propagation only this time it's umount propagation. However, this can be avoided by simply making the parent mount / of the @opt mount a private or slave mount. Then the top mount and the original mount can be unmounted to reveal the mount beneath. These two examples are fairly arcane and are merely added to make it clear how mount propagation has effects on current and future features. More common use-cases will just be things like: mount -t btrfs /dev/sdA /mnt mount -t xfs /dev/sdB --beneath /mnt umount /mnt after which we'll have updated from a btrfs filesystem to a xfs filesystem without ever revealing the underlying mountpoint. The crux is that the proposed mechanism already exists and that it is so powerful as to cover cases where mounts are supposed to be updated with new versions. Crucially, it offers an important flexibility. Namely that updates to a system may either be forced or can be delayed and the umount of the top mount be left to a service if it is a cooperative one. This adds a new flag to move_mount() that allows to explicitly move a beneath the top mount adhering to the following semantics: * Mounts cannot be mounted beneath the rootfs. This restriction encompasses the rootfs but also chroots via chroot() and pivot_root(). To mount a mount beneath the rootfs or a chroot, pivot_root() can be used as illustrated above. * The source mount must be a private mount to force the kernel to allocate a new, unused peer group id. This isn't a required restriction but a voluntary one. It avoids repeating a semantical quirk that already exists today. If bind mounts which already have a peer group id are inserted into mount trees that have the same peer group id this can cause a lot of mount propagation events to be generated (For example, consider running mount --bind /opt /opt in a loop where the parent mount is a shared mount.). * Avoid getting rid of the top mount in the kernel. Cooperative services need to be able to unmount the top mount themselves. This also avoids a good deal of additional complexity. The umount would have to be propagated which would be another rather expensive operation. So namespace_lock() and lock_mount_hash() would potentially have to be held for a long time for both a mount and umount propagation. That should be avoided. * The path to mount beneath must be mounted and attached. * The top mount and its parent must be in the caller's mount namespace and the caller must be able to mount in that mount namespace. * The caller must be able to unmount the top mount to prove that they could reveal the underlying mount. * The propagation tree is calculated based on the destination mount's parent mount and the destination mount's mountpoint on the parent mount. Of course, if the parent of the destination mount and the destination mount are shared mounts in the same peer group and the mountpoint of the new mount to be mounted is a subdir of their ->mnt_root then both will receive a mount of /opt. That's probably easier to understand with an example. Assuming a standard shared rootfs /: mount --bind /opt /opt mount --bind /tmp /opt will cause the same mount tree as: mount --bind /opt /opt mount --beneath /tmp /opt because both / and /opt are shared mounts/peers in the same peer group and the /opt dentry is a subdirectory of both the parent's and the child's ->mnt_root. If a mount tree like that is created it almost always is an accident or abuse of mount propagation. Realistically what most people probably mean in this scenarios is: mount --bind /opt /opt mount --make-private /opt mount --make-shared /opt This forces the allocation of a new separate peer group for the /opt mount. Aferwards a mount --bind or mount --beneath actually makes sense as the / and /opt mount belong to different peer groups. Before that it's likely just confusion about what the user wanted to achieve. * Refuse MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH if: (1) the @mnt_from has been overmounted in between path resolution and acquiring @namespace_sem when locking @mnt_to. This avoids the proliferation of shadow mounts. (2) if @to_mnt is moved to a different mountpoint while acquiring @namespace_sem to lock @to_mnt. (3) if @to_mnt is unmounted while acquiring @namespace_sem to lock @to_mnt. (4) if the parent of the target mount propagates to the target mount at the same mountpoint. This would mean mounting @mnt_from on @mnt_to->mnt_parent and then propagating a copy @c of @mnt_from onto @mnt_to. This defeats the whole purpose of mounting @mnt_from beneath @mnt_to. (5) if the parent mount @mnt_to->mnt_parent propagates to @mnt_from at the same mountpoint. If @mnt_to->mnt_parent propagates to @mnt_from this would mean propagating a copy @c of @mnt_from on top of @mnt_from. Afterwards @mnt_from would be mounted on top of @mnt_to->mnt_parent and @mnt_to would be unmounted from @mnt->mnt_parent and remounted on @mnt_from. But since @c is already mounted on @mnt_from, @mnt_to would ultimately be remounted on top of @c. Afterwards, @mnt_from would be covered by a copy @c of @mnt_from and @c would be covered by @mnt_from itself. This defeats the whole purpose of mounting @mnt_from beneath @mnt_to. Cases (1) to (3) are required as they deal with races that would cause bugs or unexpected behavior for users. Cases (4) and (5) refuse semantical quirks that would not be a bug but would cause weird mount trees to be created. While they can already be created via other means (mount --bind /opt /opt x n) there's no reason to repeat past mistakes in new features. Link: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/systemd-sysext.8.html [1] Link: https://brauner.io/2023/02/28/mounting-into-mount-namespaces.html [2] Link: https://github.com/flatcar/sysext-bakery Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unified_Kernel_Support_Phase_1 Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unified_Kernel_Support_Phase_2 Link: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/26013 Reviewed-by: Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) <sforshee@kernel.org> Message-Id: <20230202-fs-move-mount-replace-v4-4-98f3d80d7eaa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> diff 64f44b27 Wed May 03 05:18:41 MDT 2023 Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> fs: use a for loop when locking a mount Currently, lock_mount() uses a goto to retry the lookup until it succeeded in acquiring the namespace_lock() preventing the top mount from being overmounted. While that's perfectly fine we want to lookup the mountpoint on the parent of the top mount in later patches. So adapt the code to make this easier to implement. Also, the for loop is arguably a little cleaner and makes the code easier to follow. No functional changes intended. Reviewed-by: Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) <sforshee@kernel.org> Message-Id: <20230202-fs-move-mount-replace-v4-3-98f3d80d7eaa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> diff 104026c2 Wed May 03 05:18:40 MDT 2023 Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> fs: properly document __lookup_mnt() The comment on top of __lookup_mnt() states that it finds the first mount implying that there could be multiple mounts mounted at the same dentry with the same parent. On older kernels "shadow mounts" could be created during mount propagation. So if a mount @m in the destination propagation tree already had a child mount @p mounted at @mp then any mount @n we propagated to @m at the same @mp would be appended after the preexisting mount @p in @mount_hashtable. This was a completely direct way of creating shadow mounts. That direct way is gone but there are still subtle ways to create shadow mounts. For example, when attaching a source mnt @mnt to a shared mount. The root of the source mnt @mnt might be overmounted by a mount @o after we finished path lookup but before we acquired the namespace semaphore to copy the source mount tree @mnt. After we acquired the namespace lock @mnt is copied including @o covering it. After we attach @mnt to a shared mount @dest_mnt we end up propagation it to all it's peer and slaves @d. If @d already has a mount @n mounted on top of it we tuck @mnt beneath @n. This means, we mount @mnt at @d and mount @n on @mnt. Now we have both @o and @n mounted on the same mountpoint at @mnt. Explain this in the documentation as this is pretty subtle. Reviewed-by: Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) <sforshee@kernel.org> Message-Id: <20230202-fs-move-mount-replace-v4-2-98f3d80d7eaa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> diff 78aa08a8 Wed May 03 05:18:39 MDT 2023 Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> fs: add path_mounted() Add a small helper to check whether a path refers to the root of the mount instead of open-coding this everywhere. Reviewed-by: Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) <sforshee@kernel.org> Message-Id: <20230202-fs-move-mount-replace-v4-1-98f3d80d7eaa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
/linux-master/include/net/ | ||
H A D | net_namespace.h | diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
/linux-master/net/core/ | ||
H A D | net_namespace.c | diff 98f6c533 Mon Feb 12 14:26:02 MST 2018 Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> net: Assign net to net_namespace_list in setup_net() This patch merges two repeating pieces of code in one, and they will live in setup_net() now. The only change is that assignment: init_net_initialized = true; becomes reordered with: list_add_tail_rcu(&net->list, &net_namespace_list); The order does not have visible effect, and it is a simple cleanup because of: init_net_initialized is used in !CONFIG_NET_NS case to order proc_net_ns_ops registration occuring at boot time: start_kernel()->proc_root_init()->proc_net_init(), with net_ns_init()->setup_net(&init_net, &init_user_ns) also occuring in boot time from the same init_task. When there are no another tasks to race with them, for the single task it does not matter, which order two sequential independent loads should be made. So we make them reordered. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> diff 98f842e6 Wed Jun 15 11:21:48 MDT 2011 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Usable inode numbers for the namespace file descriptors. Assign a unique proc inode to each namespace, and use that inode number to ensure we only allocate at most one proc inode for every namespace in proc. A single proc inode per namespace allows userspace to test to see if two processes are in the same namespace. This has been a long requested feature and only blocked because a naive implementation would put the id in a global space and would ultimately require having a namespace for the names of namespaces, making migration and certain virtualization tricks impossible. We still don't have per superblock inode numbers for proc, which appears necessary for application unaware checkpoint/restart and migrations (if the application is using namespace file descriptors) but that is now allowd by the design if it becomes important. I have preallocated the ipc and uts initial proc inode numbers so their structures can be statically initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
Completed in 994 milliseconds