History log of /freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.c
Revision Date Author Comments
(<<< Hide modified files)
(Show modified files >>>)
# 267654 19-Jun-2014 gjb

Copy stable/9 to releng/9.3 as part of the 9.3-RELEASE cycle.

Approved by: re (implicit)
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation

# 235527 16-May-2012 jfv

MFC of the e1000 drivers: revisions include
227309,228281,228386,228387,228393,228405,
228415,228788,228803,229606,229767,229939,
230023,230024,230742,231796,232238,233708,
234154,234665,235256


# 225736 22-Sep-2011 kensmith

Copy head to stable/9 as part of 9.0-RELEASE release cycle.

Approved by: re (implicit)


# 218588 11-Feb-2011 jfv

Fix the shared code to be consistent with Intel-internal,
and now build.


# 205869 29-Mar-2010 jfv

Update to igb and em:

em revision 7.0.0:
- Using driver devclass, seperate legacy (pre-pcie) code
into a seperate source file. This will at least help
protect against regression issues. It compiles along
with em, and is transparent to end use, devices in each
appear to be 'emX'. When using em in a modular form this
also allows the legacy stuff to be defined out.
- Add tx and rx rings as in igb, in the 82574 this becomes
actual multiqueue for the first time (2 queues) while in
other PCIE adapters its just make code cleaner.
- Add RX mbuf handling logic that matches igb, this will
eliminate packet drops due to temporary mbuf shortage.

igb revision 1.9.3:
- Following the ixgbe code, use a new approach in what
was called 'get_buf', the routine now has been made
independent of rxeof, it now does the update to the
engine TDT register, this design allows temporary
mbuf resources to become non-critical, not requiring
a packet to be discarded, instead it just returns and
does not increment the tail pointer.
- With the above change it was also unnecessary to keep
'spare' maps around, since we do not have the discard
issue.
- Performance tweaks and improvements to the code also.

MFC in a week


# 203049 26-Jan-2010 jfv

Update the 1G drivers, shared code sync with Intel,
igb now has a queue notion that has a single interrupt
with an RX/TX pair, this will reduce the total interrupts
seen on a system. Both em and igb have a new watchdog
method. igb has fixes from Pyun Yong-Hyeon that have
improved stability, thank you :)

I wish to MFC this for 7.3 asap, please test if able.


# 200243 07-Dec-2009 jfv

Resync with Intel versions of both the em and igb
drivers. These add new hardware support, most importantly
the pch (i5 chipset) in the em driver. Also, both drivers
now have the simplified (and I hope improved) watchdog
code. The igb driver uses the new RX cleanup that I
first implemented in ixgbe.

em - version 6.9.24
igb - version 1.8.4


# 190872 09-Apr-2009 jfv

This delta syncs the em and igb drivers with Intel,
adds header split and SCTP support into the igb driver.
Various small improvements and fixes.

MFC after: 2 weeks


# 185353 26-Nov-2008 jfv

This delta is primarily a fix for es2lan devices that
will sometimes fail to initialize problem due to a lock
contention with management hardware. However, in order to
deliver that fix it was necessary to take a shared code
update as a whole, and this required scattered changes in
the core code to be compatible.

The em driver now has VLAN HW support added as the igb
driver had previously.

MFC after: ASAP - in time for 7.1 RELEASE


# 181027 30-Jul-2008 jfv

Merge of the source for igb and em into dev/e1000, this
proved to be necessary to make the static drivers work
in EITHER/OR or BOTH configurations. Modules will still
build in sys/modules/igb or em as before.

This also updates the igb driver for support for the 82576
adapter, adds shared code fixes, and etc....

MFC after: ASAP


# 177867 02-Apr-2008 jfv

This update primarily addresses the ability to have both the em
and the igb driver static in the kernel. But it also reflects
some other bug fixes in my development stream at Intel.
PR 122373 is also fixed in this code.


# 176667 29-Feb-2008 jfv

This change introduces a split to the Intel E1000 driver, now rather than
just em, there is an igb driver (this follows behavior with our Linux drivers).
All adapters up to the 82575 are supported in em, and new client/desktop support
will continue to be in that adapter.

The igb driver is for new server NICs like the 82575 and its followons.
Advanced features for virtualization and performance will be in this driver.

Also, both drivers now have shared code that is up to the latest we have
released. Some stylistic changes as well.

Enjoy :)


# 173788 20-Nov-2007 jfv

Driver version 6.7.3
- Bring HEAD up to the latest shared code
- Fix TSO problem using limited MSS and forwarding
- Dual lock implementation
- New device support
- For my ease, this code can compile in either 6.x or later
- brings this driver in sync with the 6.3


# 169589 15-May-2007 jfv

This delta adds two bug fixes: one that makes HW Offload logic in
legacy codepath match the 82575, without this we were seeing bridging
fail on 82546 adapters. Secondly, I have limited TSO to PCI Express
adapters, I meant to do this and it got dropped in the earlier delta.
Next, I am dropping in the latest shared code from our development
team, consensus was that this should be done frequently, so I am :)

Approved by: pdeuskar


# 169248 04-May-2007 rwatson

$FreeBSD$ tags are not compilable C code; wrap in either __FBSDID() or
in comments for .c and .h files respectively. Jack may want to clean up
style or other aspects once he's up and about again, but this gets the
kernel compiling.


# 169240 03-May-2007 jfv

Merge in the new driver (6.5.0) of Intel. This has a new
shared code infrastructure that is family specific and
modular. There is also support for our latest gigabit
nic, the 82575 that is MSI/X and multiqueue capable.

The new shared code changes some interfaces to the core
code but testing at Intel has been going on for months,
it is fairly stable.

I have attempted to be careful in retaining any fixes that
CURRENT had and we did not, I apologize in advance if any
thing gets clobbered, I'm sure I'll hear about it :)

Approved by pdeuskar