Searched hist:15329 (Results 1 - 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /linux-master/arch/x86/boot/ | ||
| H A D | video.c | diff f1f6baf8 Wed Feb 17 19:32:06 MST 2010 H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> x86, setup: When restoring the screen, update boot_params.screen_info When we restore the screen content after a mode change, we return the cursor to its former position. However, we need to also update boot_params.screen_info accordingly, so that the decompression code knows where on the screen the cursor is. Just in case the video BIOS does something extra screwy, read the cursor position back from the BIOS instead of relying on it doing the right thing. While we're at it, make sure we cap the cursor position to the new screen coordinates. Reported-by: Wim Osterholt <wim@djo.tudelft.nl> Bugzilla-Reference: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15329 Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> |
| /linux-master/arch/powerpc/mm/ | ||
| H A D | numa.c | diff 2fabf084 Thu Jul 17 17:15:12 MDT 2014 Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> powerpc: reorder per-cpu NUMA information's initialization There is an issue currently where NUMA information is used on powerpc (and possibly ia64) before it has been read from the device-tree, which leads to large slab consumption with CONFIG_SLUB and memoryless nodes. NUMA powerpc non-boot CPU's cpu_to_node/cpu_to_mem is only accurate after start_secondary(), similar to ia64, which is invoked via smp_init(). Commit 6ee0578b4daae ("workqueue: mark init_workqueues() as early_initcall()") made init_workqueues() be invoked via do_pre_smp_initcalls(), which is obviously before the secondary processors are online. Additionally, the following commits changed init_workqueues() to use cpu_to_node to determine the node to use for kthread_create_on_node: bce903809ab3f ("workqueue: add wq_numa_tbl_len and wq_numa_possible_cpumask[]") f3f90ad469342 ("workqueue: determine NUMA node of workers accourding to the allowed cpumask") Therefore, when init_workqueues() runs, it sees all CPUs as being on Node 0. On LPARs or KVM guests where Node 0 is memoryless, this leads to a high number of slab deactivations (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg67489.html). Fix this by initializing the powerpc-specific CPU<->node/local memory node mapping as early as possible, which on powerpc is do_init_bootmem(). Currently that function initializes the mapping for the boot CPU, but we extend it to setup the mapping for all possible CPUs. Then, in smp_prepare_cpus(), we can correspondingly set the per-cpu values for all possible CPUs. That ensures that before the early_initcalls run (and really as early as possible), the per-cpu NUMA mapping is accurate. While testing memoryless nodes on PowerKVM guests with a fix to the workqueue logic to use cpu_to_mem() instead of cpu_to_node(), with a guest topology of: available: 2 nodes (0-1) node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 node 0 size: 0 MB node 0 free: 0 MB node 1 cpus: 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 node 1 size: 16336 MB node 1 free: 15329 MB node distances: node 0 1 0: 10 40 1: 40 10 the slab consumption decreases from Slab: 932416 kB SUnreclaim: 902336 kB to Slab: 395264 kB SUnreclaim: 359424 kB And we a corresponding increase in the slab efficiency from slab mem objs slabs used active active ------------------------------------------------------------ kmalloc-16384 337 MB 11.28% 100.00% task_struct 288 MB 9.93% 100.00% to slab mem objs slabs used active active ------------------------------------------------------------ kmalloc-16384 37 MB 100.00% 100.00% task_struct 31 MB 100.00% 100.00% Powerpc didn't support memoryless nodes until recently (64bb80d87f01 "powerpc/numa: Enable CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES" and 8c272261194d "powerpc/numa: Enable USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID"). Those commits also helped improve memory consumption with these kind of environments. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> |
| /linux-master/arch/powerpc/kernel/ | ||
| H A D | smp.c | diff 2fabf084 Thu Jul 17 17:15:12 MDT 2014 Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> powerpc: reorder per-cpu NUMA information's initialization There is an issue currently where NUMA information is used on powerpc (and possibly ia64) before it has been read from the device-tree, which leads to large slab consumption with CONFIG_SLUB and memoryless nodes. NUMA powerpc non-boot CPU's cpu_to_node/cpu_to_mem is only accurate after start_secondary(), similar to ia64, which is invoked via smp_init(). Commit 6ee0578b4daae ("workqueue: mark init_workqueues() as early_initcall()") made init_workqueues() be invoked via do_pre_smp_initcalls(), which is obviously before the secondary processors are online. Additionally, the following commits changed init_workqueues() to use cpu_to_node to determine the node to use for kthread_create_on_node: bce903809ab3f ("workqueue: add wq_numa_tbl_len and wq_numa_possible_cpumask[]") f3f90ad469342 ("workqueue: determine NUMA node of workers accourding to the allowed cpumask") Therefore, when init_workqueues() runs, it sees all CPUs as being on Node 0. On LPARs or KVM guests where Node 0 is memoryless, this leads to a high number of slab deactivations (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg67489.html). Fix this by initializing the powerpc-specific CPU<->node/local memory node mapping as early as possible, which on powerpc is do_init_bootmem(). Currently that function initializes the mapping for the boot CPU, but we extend it to setup the mapping for all possible CPUs. Then, in smp_prepare_cpus(), we can correspondingly set the per-cpu values for all possible CPUs. That ensures that before the early_initcalls run (and really as early as possible), the per-cpu NUMA mapping is accurate. While testing memoryless nodes on PowerKVM guests with a fix to the workqueue logic to use cpu_to_mem() instead of cpu_to_node(), with a guest topology of: available: 2 nodes (0-1) node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 node 0 size: 0 MB node 0 free: 0 MB node 1 cpus: 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 node 1 size: 16336 MB node 1 free: 15329 MB node distances: node 0 1 0: 10 40 1: 40 10 the slab consumption decreases from Slab: 932416 kB SUnreclaim: 902336 kB to Slab: 395264 kB SUnreclaim: 359424 kB And we a corresponding increase in the slab efficiency from slab mem objs slabs used active active ------------------------------------------------------------ kmalloc-16384 337 MB 11.28% 100.00% task_struct 288 MB 9.93% 100.00% to slab mem objs slabs used active active ------------------------------------------------------------ kmalloc-16384 37 MB 100.00% 100.00% task_struct 31 MB 100.00% 100.00% Powerpc didn't support memoryless nodes until recently (64bb80d87f01 "powerpc/numa: Enable CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES" and 8c272261194d "powerpc/numa: Enable USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID"). Those commits also helped improve memory consumption with these kind of environments. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> |
| /linux-master/kernel/sched/ | ||
| H A D | fair.c | diff d4335581 Wed Mar 09 07:59:08 MST 2016 Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> sched/fair: Add comments to explain select_idle_sibling() It's not entirely obvious how the main loop in select_idle_sibling() works on first glance. Sprinkle a few comments to explain the design and intention behind the loop based on some conversations with Mike and Peter. Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1457535548-15329-1-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> diff d4335581 Wed Mar 09 07:59:08 MST 2016 Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> sched/fair: Add comments to explain select_idle_sibling() It's not entirely obvious how the main loop in select_idle_sibling() works on first glance. Sprinkle a few comments to explain the design and intention behind the loop based on some conversations with Mike and Peter. Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1457535548-15329-1-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
Completed in 1027 milliseconds