Searched hist:150306 (Results 1 - 24 of 24) sorted by relevance
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/cm/ | ||
H A D | if_cm_isa.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/sio/ | ||
H A D | sio_pccard.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/xe/ | ||
H A D | if_xe_pccard.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/en/ | ||
H A D | if_en_pci.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/fe/ | ||
H A D | if_fe_pccard.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/cp/ | ||
H A D | if_cp.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/ixgb/ | ||
H A D | if_ixgb.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/nve/ | ||
H A D | if_nve.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/sn/ | ||
H A D | if_sn.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/cs/ | ||
H A D | if_cs.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/ipw/ | ||
H A D | if_ipw.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/lge/ | ||
H A D | if_lge.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/txp/ | ||
H A D | if_txp.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/wl/ | ||
H A D | if_wl.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/an/ | ||
H A D | if_an.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/iwi/ | ||
H A D | if_iwi.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/vge/ | ||
H A D | if_vge.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/ep/ | ||
H A D | if_ep.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/nge/ | ||
H A D | if_nge.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/e1000/ | ||
H A D | if_em.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/ed/ | ||
H A D | if_ed.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/if_ndis/ | ||
H A D | if_ndis.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/re/ | ||
H A D | if_re.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/wi/ | ||
H A D | if_wi.c | diff 150306 Mon Sep 19 01:10:21 MDT 2005 imp Make sure that we call if_free(ifp) after bus_teardown_intr. Since we could get an interrupt after we free the ifp, and the interrupt handler depended on the ifp being still alive, this could, in theory, cause a crash. Eliminate this possibility by moving the if_free to after the bus_teardown_intr() call. |
Completed in 642 milliseconds