Searched hist:35388 (Results 1 - 9 of 9) sorted by last modified time
| /linux-master/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ | ||
| H A D | fec_main.c | diff 79f33912 Wed Jun 11 18:16:23 MDT 2014 Nimrod Andy <B38611@freescale.com> net: fec: Add software TSO support Add software TSO support for FEC. This feature allows to improve outbound throughput performance. Tested on imx6dl sabresd board, running iperf tcp tests shows: - 16.2% improvement comparing with FEC SG patch - 82% improvement comparing with NO SG & TSO patch $ ethtool -K eth0 tso on $ iperf -c 10.192.242.167 -t 3 & [ 3] local 10.192.242.108 port 35388 connected with 10.192.242.167 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0- 3.0 sec 181 MBytes 506 Mbits/sec During the testing, CPU loading is 30%. Since imx6dl FEC Bandwidth is limited to SOC system bus bandwidth, the performance with SW TSO is a milestone. CC: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> CC: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> CC: Li Frank <B20596@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Fugang Duan <B38611@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
| H A D | fec.h | diff 79f33912 Wed Jun 11 18:16:23 MDT 2014 Nimrod Andy <B38611@freescale.com> net: fec: Add software TSO support Add software TSO support for FEC. This feature allows to improve outbound throughput performance. Tested on imx6dl sabresd board, running iperf tcp tests shows: - 16.2% improvement comparing with FEC SG patch - 82% improvement comparing with NO SG & TSO patch $ ethtool -K eth0 tso on $ iperf -c 10.192.242.167 -t 3 & [ 3] local 10.192.242.108 port 35388 connected with 10.192.242.167 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0- 3.0 sec 181 MBytes 506 Mbits/sec During the testing, CPU loading is 30%. Since imx6dl FEC Bandwidth is limited to SOC system bus bandwidth, the performance with SW TSO is a milestone. CC: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> CC: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> CC: Li Frank <B20596@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Fugang Duan <B38611@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
| /linux-master/drivers/mtd/ubi/ | ||
| H A D | ubi.h | diff 90e0be56 Mon Aug 28 00:38:43 MDT 2023 Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> ubi: fastmap: Fix lapsed wear leveling for first 64 PEBs The anchor PEB must be picked from first 64 PEBs, these PEBs could have large erase counter greater than other PEBs especially when free space is nearly running out. The ubi_update_fastmap will be called as long as pool/wl_pool is empty, old anchor PEB is erased when updating fastmap. Given an UBI device with N PEBs, free PEBs is nearly running out and pool will be filled with 1 PEB every time ubi_update_fastmap invoked. So t=N/POOL_SIZE[1]/64 means that in worst case the erase counter of first 64 PEBs is t times greater than other PEBs in theory. After running fsstress for 24h, the erase counter statistics for two UBI devices shown as follow(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=128): Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 960 29224 29282 29362 100000 .. inf: 64 117897 117934 117940 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 29224 34822 117940 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8128 2253 2321 2387 10000 .. 99999: 64 35387 35387 35388 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2253 2579 35388 The key point is reducing fastmap updating frequency by enlarging POOL_SIZE, so let UBI reserve ubi->fm_pool.max_size PEBs during attaching. Then POOL_SIZE will become ubi->fm_pool.max_size/2 even in free space running out case. Given an UBI device with 8192 PEBs(16384\8192\4096 is common large-capacity flash), t=8192/128/64=1. The fastmap updating will happen in either wl_pool or pool is empty, so setting fm_pool_rsv_cnt as ubi->fm_pool.max_size can fill wl_pool in full state. After pool reservation, running fsstress for 24h: Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 1024 33801 33997 34056 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 33801 33997 34056 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8192 2205 2397 2460 10000 .. 99999: 0 0 0 0 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2205 2397 2460 The difference of erase counter between first 64 PEBs and others is under WL_FREE_MAX_DIFF(2*UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=2*128=256). Device A: 34056 - 33801 = 255 Device B: 2460 - 2205 = 255 Next patch will add a switch to control whether UBI needs to reserve PEBs for filling pool. Fixes: dbb7d2a88d2a ("UBI: Add fastmap core") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217787 Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> diff 90e0be56 Mon Aug 28 00:38:43 MDT 2023 Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> ubi: fastmap: Fix lapsed wear leveling for first 64 PEBs The anchor PEB must be picked from first 64 PEBs, these PEBs could have large erase counter greater than other PEBs especially when free space is nearly running out. The ubi_update_fastmap will be called as long as pool/wl_pool is empty, old anchor PEB is erased when updating fastmap. Given an UBI device with N PEBs, free PEBs is nearly running out and pool will be filled with 1 PEB every time ubi_update_fastmap invoked. So t=N/POOL_SIZE[1]/64 means that in worst case the erase counter of first 64 PEBs is t times greater than other PEBs in theory. After running fsstress for 24h, the erase counter statistics for two UBI devices shown as follow(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=128): Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 960 29224 29282 29362 100000 .. inf: 64 117897 117934 117940 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 29224 34822 117940 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8128 2253 2321 2387 10000 .. 99999: 64 35387 35387 35388 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2253 2579 35388 The key point is reducing fastmap updating frequency by enlarging POOL_SIZE, so let UBI reserve ubi->fm_pool.max_size PEBs during attaching. Then POOL_SIZE will become ubi->fm_pool.max_size/2 even in free space running out case. Given an UBI device with 8192 PEBs(16384\8192\4096 is common large-capacity flash), t=8192/128/64=1. The fastmap updating will happen in either wl_pool or pool is empty, so setting fm_pool_rsv_cnt as ubi->fm_pool.max_size can fill wl_pool in full state. After pool reservation, running fsstress for 24h: Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 1024 33801 33997 34056 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 33801 33997 34056 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8192 2205 2397 2460 10000 .. 99999: 0 0 0 0 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2205 2397 2460 The difference of erase counter between first 64 PEBs and others is under WL_FREE_MAX_DIFF(2*UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=2*128=256). Device A: 34056 - 33801 = 255 Device B: 2460 - 2205 = 255 Next patch will add a switch to control whether UBI needs to reserve PEBs for filling pool. Fixes: dbb7d2a88d2a ("UBI: Add fastmap core") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217787 Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
| H A D | build.c | diff 90e0be56 Mon Aug 28 00:38:43 MDT 2023 Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> ubi: fastmap: Fix lapsed wear leveling for first 64 PEBs The anchor PEB must be picked from first 64 PEBs, these PEBs could have large erase counter greater than other PEBs especially when free space is nearly running out. The ubi_update_fastmap will be called as long as pool/wl_pool is empty, old anchor PEB is erased when updating fastmap. Given an UBI device with N PEBs, free PEBs is nearly running out and pool will be filled with 1 PEB every time ubi_update_fastmap invoked. So t=N/POOL_SIZE[1]/64 means that in worst case the erase counter of first 64 PEBs is t times greater than other PEBs in theory. After running fsstress for 24h, the erase counter statistics for two UBI devices shown as follow(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=128): Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 960 29224 29282 29362 100000 .. inf: 64 117897 117934 117940 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 29224 34822 117940 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8128 2253 2321 2387 10000 .. 99999: 64 35387 35387 35388 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2253 2579 35388 The key point is reducing fastmap updating frequency by enlarging POOL_SIZE, so let UBI reserve ubi->fm_pool.max_size PEBs during attaching. Then POOL_SIZE will become ubi->fm_pool.max_size/2 even in free space running out case. Given an UBI device with 8192 PEBs(16384\8192\4096 is common large-capacity flash), t=8192/128/64=1. The fastmap updating will happen in either wl_pool or pool is empty, so setting fm_pool_rsv_cnt as ubi->fm_pool.max_size can fill wl_pool in full state. After pool reservation, running fsstress for 24h: Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 1024 33801 33997 34056 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 33801 33997 34056 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8192 2205 2397 2460 10000 .. 99999: 0 0 0 0 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2205 2397 2460 The difference of erase counter between first 64 PEBs and others is under WL_FREE_MAX_DIFF(2*UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=2*128=256). Device A: 34056 - 33801 = 255 Device B: 2460 - 2205 = 255 Next patch will add a switch to control whether UBI needs to reserve PEBs for filling pool. Fixes: dbb7d2a88d2a ("UBI: Add fastmap core") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217787 Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> diff 90e0be56 Mon Aug 28 00:38:43 MDT 2023 Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> ubi: fastmap: Fix lapsed wear leveling for first 64 PEBs The anchor PEB must be picked from first 64 PEBs, these PEBs could have large erase counter greater than other PEBs especially when free space is nearly running out. The ubi_update_fastmap will be called as long as pool/wl_pool is empty, old anchor PEB is erased when updating fastmap. Given an UBI device with N PEBs, free PEBs is nearly running out and pool will be filled with 1 PEB every time ubi_update_fastmap invoked. So t=N/POOL_SIZE[1]/64 means that in worst case the erase counter of first 64 PEBs is t times greater than other PEBs in theory. After running fsstress for 24h, the erase counter statistics for two UBI devices shown as follow(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=128): Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 960 29224 29282 29362 100000 .. inf: 64 117897 117934 117940 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 29224 34822 117940 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8128 2253 2321 2387 10000 .. 99999: 64 35387 35387 35388 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2253 2579 35388 The key point is reducing fastmap updating frequency by enlarging POOL_SIZE, so let UBI reserve ubi->fm_pool.max_size PEBs during attaching. Then POOL_SIZE will become ubi->fm_pool.max_size/2 even in free space running out case. Given an UBI device with 8192 PEBs(16384\8192\4096 is common large-capacity flash), t=8192/128/64=1. The fastmap updating will happen in either wl_pool or pool is empty, so setting fm_pool_rsv_cnt as ubi->fm_pool.max_size can fill wl_pool in full state. After pool reservation, running fsstress for 24h: Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 1024 33801 33997 34056 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 33801 33997 34056 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8192 2205 2397 2460 10000 .. 99999: 0 0 0 0 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2205 2397 2460 The difference of erase counter between first 64 PEBs and others is under WL_FREE_MAX_DIFF(2*UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=2*128=256). Device A: 34056 - 33801 = 255 Device B: 2460 - 2205 = 255 Next patch will add a switch to control whether UBI needs to reserve PEBs for filling pool. Fixes: dbb7d2a88d2a ("UBI: Add fastmap core") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217787 Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
| H A D | wl.h | diff 90e0be56 Mon Aug 28 00:38:43 MDT 2023 Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> ubi: fastmap: Fix lapsed wear leveling for first 64 PEBs The anchor PEB must be picked from first 64 PEBs, these PEBs could have large erase counter greater than other PEBs especially when free space is nearly running out. The ubi_update_fastmap will be called as long as pool/wl_pool is empty, old anchor PEB is erased when updating fastmap. Given an UBI device with N PEBs, free PEBs is nearly running out and pool will be filled with 1 PEB every time ubi_update_fastmap invoked. So t=N/POOL_SIZE[1]/64 means that in worst case the erase counter of first 64 PEBs is t times greater than other PEBs in theory. After running fsstress for 24h, the erase counter statistics for two UBI devices shown as follow(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=128): Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 960 29224 29282 29362 100000 .. inf: 64 117897 117934 117940 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 29224 34822 117940 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8128 2253 2321 2387 10000 .. 99999: 64 35387 35387 35388 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2253 2579 35388 The key point is reducing fastmap updating frequency by enlarging POOL_SIZE, so let UBI reserve ubi->fm_pool.max_size PEBs during attaching. Then POOL_SIZE will become ubi->fm_pool.max_size/2 even in free space running out case. Given an UBI device with 8192 PEBs(16384\8192\4096 is common large-capacity flash), t=8192/128/64=1. The fastmap updating will happen in either wl_pool or pool is empty, so setting fm_pool_rsv_cnt as ubi->fm_pool.max_size can fill wl_pool in full state. After pool reservation, running fsstress for 24h: Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 1024 33801 33997 34056 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 33801 33997 34056 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8192 2205 2397 2460 10000 .. 99999: 0 0 0 0 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2205 2397 2460 The difference of erase counter between first 64 PEBs and others is under WL_FREE_MAX_DIFF(2*UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=2*128=256). Device A: 34056 - 33801 = 255 Device B: 2460 - 2205 = 255 Next patch will add a switch to control whether UBI needs to reserve PEBs for filling pool. Fixes: dbb7d2a88d2a ("UBI: Add fastmap core") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217787 Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> diff 90e0be56 Mon Aug 28 00:38:43 MDT 2023 Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> ubi: fastmap: Fix lapsed wear leveling for first 64 PEBs The anchor PEB must be picked from first 64 PEBs, these PEBs could have large erase counter greater than other PEBs especially when free space is nearly running out. The ubi_update_fastmap will be called as long as pool/wl_pool is empty, old anchor PEB is erased when updating fastmap. Given an UBI device with N PEBs, free PEBs is nearly running out and pool will be filled with 1 PEB every time ubi_update_fastmap invoked. So t=N/POOL_SIZE[1]/64 means that in worst case the erase counter of first 64 PEBs is t times greater than other PEBs in theory. After running fsstress for 24h, the erase counter statistics for two UBI devices shown as follow(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=128): Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 960 29224 29282 29362 100000 .. inf: 64 117897 117934 117940 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 29224 34822 117940 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8128 2253 2321 2387 10000 .. 99999: 64 35387 35387 35388 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2253 2579 35388 The key point is reducing fastmap updating frequency by enlarging POOL_SIZE, so let UBI reserve ubi->fm_pool.max_size PEBs during attaching. Then POOL_SIZE will become ubi->fm_pool.max_size/2 even in free space running out case. Given an UBI device with 8192 PEBs(16384\8192\4096 is common large-capacity flash), t=8192/128/64=1. The fastmap updating will happen in either wl_pool or pool is empty, so setting fm_pool_rsv_cnt as ubi->fm_pool.max_size can fill wl_pool in full state. After pool reservation, running fsstress for 24h: Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 1024 33801 33997 34056 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 33801 33997 34056 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8192 2205 2397 2460 10000 .. 99999: 0 0 0 0 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2205 2397 2460 The difference of erase counter between first 64 PEBs and others is under WL_FREE_MAX_DIFF(2*UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=2*128=256). Device A: 34056 - 33801 = 255 Device B: 2460 - 2205 = 255 Next patch will add a switch to control whether UBI needs to reserve PEBs for filling pool. Fixes: dbb7d2a88d2a ("UBI: Add fastmap core") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217787 Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
| H A D | fastmap-wl.c | diff 90e0be56 Mon Aug 28 00:38:43 MDT 2023 Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> ubi: fastmap: Fix lapsed wear leveling for first 64 PEBs The anchor PEB must be picked from first 64 PEBs, these PEBs could have large erase counter greater than other PEBs especially when free space is nearly running out. The ubi_update_fastmap will be called as long as pool/wl_pool is empty, old anchor PEB is erased when updating fastmap. Given an UBI device with N PEBs, free PEBs is nearly running out and pool will be filled with 1 PEB every time ubi_update_fastmap invoked. So t=N/POOL_SIZE[1]/64 means that in worst case the erase counter of first 64 PEBs is t times greater than other PEBs in theory. After running fsstress for 24h, the erase counter statistics for two UBI devices shown as follow(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=128): Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 960 29224 29282 29362 100000 .. inf: 64 117897 117934 117940 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 29224 34822 117940 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8128 2253 2321 2387 10000 .. 99999: 64 35387 35387 35388 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2253 2579 35388 The key point is reducing fastmap updating frequency by enlarging POOL_SIZE, so let UBI reserve ubi->fm_pool.max_size PEBs during attaching. Then POOL_SIZE will become ubi->fm_pool.max_size/2 even in free space running out case. Given an UBI device with 8192 PEBs(16384\8192\4096 is common large-capacity flash), t=8192/128/64=1. The fastmap updating will happen in either wl_pool or pool is empty, so setting fm_pool_rsv_cnt as ubi->fm_pool.max_size can fill wl_pool in full state. After pool reservation, running fsstress for 24h: Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 1024 33801 33997 34056 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 33801 33997 34056 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8192 2205 2397 2460 10000 .. 99999: 0 0 0 0 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2205 2397 2460 The difference of erase counter between first 64 PEBs and others is under WL_FREE_MAX_DIFF(2*UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=2*128=256). Device A: 34056 - 33801 = 255 Device B: 2460 - 2205 = 255 Next patch will add a switch to control whether UBI needs to reserve PEBs for filling pool. Fixes: dbb7d2a88d2a ("UBI: Add fastmap core") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217787 Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> diff 90e0be56 Mon Aug 28 00:38:43 MDT 2023 Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> ubi: fastmap: Fix lapsed wear leveling for first 64 PEBs The anchor PEB must be picked from first 64 PEBs, these PEBs could have large erase counter greater than other PEBs especially when free space is nearly running out. The ubi_update_fastmap will be called as long as pool/wl_pool is empty, old anchor PEB is erased when updating fastmap. Given an UBI device with N PEBs, free PEBs is nearly running out and pool will be filled with 1 PEB every time ubi_update_fastmap invoked. So t=N/POOL_SIZE[1]/64 means that in worst case the erase counter of first 64 PEBs is t times greater than other PEBs in theory. After running fsstress for 24h, the erase counter statistics for two UBI devices shown as follow(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=128): Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 960 29224 29282 29362 100000 .. inf: 64 117897 117934 117940 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 29224 34822 117940 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8128 2253 2321 2387 10000 .. 99999: 64 35387 35387 35388 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2253 2579 35388 The key point is reducing fastmap updating frequency by enlarging POOL_SIZE, so let UBI reserve ubi->fm_pool.max_size PEBs during attaching. Then POOL_SIZE will become ubi->fm_pool.max_size/2 even in free space running out case. Given an UBI device with 8192 PEBs(16384\8192\4096 is common large-capacity flash), t=8192/128/64=1. The fastmap updating will happen in either wl_pool or pool is empty, so setting fm_pool_rsv_cnt as ubi->fm_pool.max_size can fill wl_pool in full state. After pool reservation, running fsstress for 24h: Device A(1024 PEBs, pool=50, wl_pool=25): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 0 0 0 0 10000 .. 99999: 1024 33801 33997 34056 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 1024 33801 33997 34056 Device B(8192 PEBs, pool=256, wl_pool=128): ========================================================= from to count min avg max --------------------------------------------------------- 0 .. 9: 0 0 0 0 10 .. 99: 0 0 0 0 100 .. 999: 0 0 0 0 1000 .. 9999: 8192 2205 2397 2460 10000 .. 99999: 0 0 0 0 100000 .. inf: 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------- Total : 8192 2205 2397 2460 The difference of erase counter between first 64 PEBs and others is under WL_FREE_MAX_DIFF(2*UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=2*128=256). Device A: 34056 - 33801 = 255 Device B: 2460 - 2205 = 255 Next patch will add a switch to control whether UBI needs to reserve PEBs for filling pool. Fixes: dbb7d2a88d2a ("UBI: Add fastmap core") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217787 Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
| /linux-master/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ | ||
| H A D | ethtool.c | diff d9317aea Thu Jan 23 07:35:48 MST 2014 Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> sfc: Use the correct maximum TX DMA ring size for SFC9100 As part of a workaround for a hardware erratum in the SFC9100 family (SF bug 35388), the TX_DESC_UPD_DWORD register address is also used for communicating with the event block, and only descriptor pointer values < 2048 are valid. If the TX DMA ring size is increased to 4096 descriptors (which the firmware still allows) then we may write a descriptor pointer value >= 2048, which has entirely different and undesirable effects! Limit the TX DMA ring size correctly when this workaround is in effect. Fixes: 8127d661e77f ('sfc: Add support for Solarflare SFC9100 family') Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: Shradha Shah <sshah@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
| H A D | efx.h | diff d9317aea Thu Jan 23 07:35:48 MST 2014 Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> sfc: Use the correct maximum TX DMA ring size for SFC9100 As part of a workaround for a hardware erratum in the SFC9100 family (SF bug 35388), the TX_DESC_UPD_DWORD register address is also used for communicating with the event block, and only descriptor pointer values < 2048 are valid. If the TX DMA ring size is increased to 4096 descriptors (which the firmware still allows) then we may write a descriptor pointer value >= 2048, which has entirely different and undesirable effects! Limit the TX DMA ring size correctly when this workaround is in effect. Fixes: 8127d661e77f ('sfc: Add support for Solarflare SFC9100 family') Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: Shradha Shah <sshah@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
| /linux-master/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/ | ||
| H A D | mirror_vlan.sh | 35388a6a Thu May 24 08:27:48 MDT 2018 Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> selftests: forwarding: Test mirror-to-vlan Test for "tc action mirred egress mirror" that mirrors to a vlan device. - test_vlan() tests that the packets get mirrored - test_tagged_vlan() tests that the mirrored packets have correct inner VLAN tag. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
Completed in 505 milliseconds