1#!./perl
2
3#
4# test the conversion operators
5#
6# Notations:
7#
8# "N p i N vs N N":  Apply op-N, then op-p, then op-i, then reporter-N
9# Compare with application of op-N, then reporter-N
10# Right below are descriptions of different ops and reporters.
11
12# We do not use these subroutines any more, sub overhead makes a "switch"
13# solution better:
14
15# obviously, 0, 1 and 2, 3 are destructive.  (XXXX 64-bit? 4 destructive too)
16
17# *0 = sub {--$_[0]};		# -
18# *1 = sub {++$_[0]};		# +
19
20# # Converters
21# *2 = sub { $_[0] = $max_uv & $_[0]}; # U
22# *3 = sub { use integer; $_[0] += $zero}; # I
23# *4 = sub { $_[0] += $zero};	# N
24# *5 = sub { $_[0] = "$_[0]" };	# P
25
26# # Side effects
27# *6 = sub { $max_uv & $_[0]};	# u
28# *7 = sub { use integer; $_[0] + $zero};	# i
29# *8 = sub { $_[0] + $zero};	# n
30# *9 = sub { $_[0] . "" };	# p
31
32# # Reporters
33# sub a2 { sprintf "%u", $_[0] }	# U
34# sub a3 { sprintf "%d", $_[0] }	# I
35# sub a4 { sprintf "%g", $_[0] }	# N
36# sub a5 { "$_[0]" }		# P
37
38BEGIN {
39    chdir 't' if -d 't';
40    @INC = '../lib';
41}
42
43use strict 'vars';
44
45my $max_chain = $ENV{PERL_TEST_NUMCONVERTS} || 2;
46
47# Bulk out if unsigned type is hopelessly wrong:
48my $max_uv1 = ~0;
49my $max_uv2 = sprintf "%u", $max_uv1 ** 6; # 6 is an arbitrary number here
50my $big_iv = do {use integer; $max_uv1 * 16}; # 16 is an arbitrary number here
51my $max_uv_less3 = $max_uv1 - 3;
52
53print "# max_uv1 = $max_uv1, max_uv2 = $max_uv2, big_iv = $big_iv\n";
54print "# max_uv_less3 = $max_uv_less3\n";
55if ($max_uv1 ne $max_uv2 or $big_iv > $max_uv1 or $max_uv1 == $max_uv_less3) {
56  print "1..0 # skipped: unsigned perl arithmetic is not sane";
57  eval { require Config; import Config };
58  use vars qw(%Config);
59  if ($Config{d_quad} eq 'define') {
60      print " (common in 64-bit platforms)";
61  }
62  print "\n";
63  exit 0;
64}
65if ($max_uv_less3 =~ tr/0-9//c) {
66  print "1..0 # skipped: this perl stringifies large unsigned integers using E notation\n";
67  exit 0;
68}
69
70my $st_t = 4*4;			# We try 4 initializers and 4 reporters
71
72my $num = 0;
73$num += 10**$_ - 4**$_ for 1.. $max_chain;
74$num *= $st_t;
75print "1..$num\n";		# In fact 15 times more subsubtests...
76
77my $max_uv = ~0;
78my $max_iv = int($max_uv/2);
79my $zero = 0;
80
81my $l_uv = length $max_uv;
82my $l_iv = length $max_iv;
83
84# Hope: the first digits are good
85my $larger_than_uv = substr 97 x 100, 0, $l_uv;
86my $smaller_than_iv = substr 12 x 100, 0, $l_iv;
87my $yet_smaller_than_iv = substr 97 x 100, 0, ($l_iv - 1);
88
89my @list = (1, $yet_smaller_than_iv, $smaller_than_iv, $max_iv, $max_iv + 1,
90	    $max_uv, $max_uv + 1);
91unshift @list, (reverse map -$_, @list), 0; # 15 elts
92@list = map "$_", @list; # Normalize
93
94print "# @list\n";
95
96# need to special case ++ for max_uv, as ++ "magic" on a string gives
97# another string, whereas ++ magic on a string used as a number gives
98# a number. Not a problem when NV preserves UV, but if it doesn't then
99# stringification of the latter gives something in e notation.
100
101my $max_uv_pp = "$max_uv"; $max_uv_pp++;
102my $max_uv_p1 = "$max_uv"; $max_uv_p1+=0; $max_uv_p1++;
103
104# Also need to cope with %g notation for max_uv_p1 that actually gives an
105# integer less than max_uv because of correct rounding for the limited
106# precisision. This bites for 12 byte long doubles and 8 byte UVs
107
108my $temp = $max_uv_p1;
109my $max_uv_p1_as_iv;
110{use integer; $max_uv_p1_as_iv = 0 + sprintf "%s", $temp}
111my $max_uv_p1_as_uv = 0 | sprintf "%s", $temp;
112
113my @opnames = split //, "-+UINPuinp";
114
115# @list = map { 2->($_), 3->($_), 4->($_), 5->($_),  } @list; # Prepare input
116
117#print "@list\n";
118#print "'@ops'\n";
119
120my $test = 1;
121my $nok;
122for my $num_chain (1..$max_chain) {
123  my @ops = map [split //], grep /[4-9]/,
124    map { sprintf "%0${num_chain}d", $_ }  0 .. 10**$num_chain - 1;
125
126  #@ops = ([]) unless $num_chain;
127  #@ops = ([6, 4]);
128
129  # print "'@ops'\n";
130  for my $op (@ops) {
131    for my $first (2..5) {
132      for my $last (2..5) {
133	$nok = 0;
134	my @otherops = grep $_ <= 3, @$op;
135	my @curops = ($op,\@otherops);
136
137	for my $num (@list) {
138	  my $inpt;
139	  my @ans;
140
141	  for my $short (0, 1) {
142	    # undef $inpt;	# Forget all we had - some bugs were masked
143
144	    $inpt = $num;	# Try to not contaminate $num...
145	    $inpt = "$inpt";
146	    if ($first == 2) {
147	      $inpt = $max_uv & $inpt; # U 2
148	    } elsif ($first == 3) {
149	      use integer; $inpt += $zero; # I 3
150	    } elsif ($first == 4) {
151	      $inpt += $zero;	# N 4
152	    } else {
153	      $inpt = "$inpt";	# P 5
154	    }
155
156	    # Saves 20% of time - not with this logic:
157	    #my $tmp = $inpt;
158	    #my $tmp1 = $num;
159	    #next if $num_chain > 1
160	    #  and "$tmp" ne "$tmp1"; # Already the coercion gives problems...
161
162	    for my $curop (@{$curops[$short]}) {
163	      if ($curop < 5) {
164		if ($curop < 3) {
165		  if ($curop == 0) {
166		    --$inpt;	# - 0
167		  } elsif ($curop == 1) {
168		    ++$inpt;	# + 1
169		  } else {
170		    $inpt = $max_uv & $inpt; # U 2
171		  }
172		} elsif ($curop == 3) {
173		  use integer; $inpt += $zero;
174		} else {
175		  $inpt += $zero; # N 4
176		}
177	      } elsif ($curop < 8) {
178		if ($curop == 5) {
179		  $inpt = "$inpt"; # P 5
180		} elsif ($curop == 6) {
181		  $max_uv & $inpt; # u 6
182		} else {
183		  use integer; $inpt + $zero;
184		}
185	      } elsif ($curop == 8) {
186		$inpt + $zero;	# n 8
187	      } else {
188		$inpt . "";	# p 9
189	      }
190	    }
191
192	    if ($last == 2) {
193	      $inpt = sprintf "%u", $inpt; # U 2
194	    } elsif ($last == 3) {
195	      $inpt = sprintf "%d", $inpt; # I 3
196	    } elsif ($last == 4) {
197	      $inpt = sprintf "%g", $inpt; # N 4
198	    } else {
199	      $inpt = "$inpt";	# P 5
200	    }
201	    push @ans, $inpt;
202	  }
203	  if ($ans[0] ne $ans[1]) {
204	    print "# '$ans[0]' ne '$ans[1]',\t$num\t=> @opnames[$first,@{$curops[0]},$last] vs @opnames[$first,@{$curops[1]},$last]\n";
205	    # XXX ought to check that "+" was in the list of opnames
206	    if ((($ans[0] eq $max_uv_pp) and ($ans[1] eq $max_uv_p1))
207		or (($ans[1] eq $max_uv_pp) and ($ans[0] eq $max_uv_p1))) {
208	      # string ++ versus numeric ++. Tolerate this little
209	      # bit of insanity
210	      print "# ok, as string ++ of max_uv is \"$max_uv_pp\", numeric is $max_uv_p1\n"
211	    } elsif ($opnames[$last] eq 'I' and $ans[1] eq "-1"
212		     and $ans[0] eq $max_uv_p1_as_iv) {
213              # Max UV plus 1 is NV. This NV may stringify in E notation.
214              # And the number of decimal digits shown in E notation will depend
215              # on the binary digits in the mantissa. And it may be that
216              # (say)  18446744073709551616 in E notation is truncated to
217              # (say) 1.8446744073709551e+19 (say) which gets converted back
218              # as    1.8446744073709551000e+19
219              # ie    18446744073709551000
220              # which isn't the integer we first had.
221              # But each step of conversion is correct. So it's not an error.
222              # (Only shows up for 64 bit UVs and NVs with 64 bit mantissas,
223              #  and on Crays (64 bit integers, 48 bit mantissas) IIRC)
224	      print "# ok, \"$max_uv_p1\" correctly converts to IV \"$max_uv_p1_as_iv\"\n";
225	    } elsif ($opnames[$last] eq 'U' and $ans[1] eq ~0
226		     and $ans[0] eq $max_uv_p1_as_uv) {
227              # as aboce
228	      print "# ok, \"$max_uv_p1\" correctly converts to UV \"$max_uv_p1_as_uv\"\n";
229	    } elsif (grep {/^N$/} @opnames[@{$curops[0]}]
230		     and $ans[0] == $ans[1] and $ans[0] <= ~0
231                     # First must be in E notation (ie not just digits) and
232                     # second must still be an integer.
233		     # eg 1.84467440737095516e+19
234		     # 1.84467440737095516e+19 for 64 bit mantissa is in the
235		     # integer range, so 1.84467440737095516e+19 + 0 is treated
236		     # as integer addition. [should it be?]
237		     # and 18446744073709551600 + 0 is 18446744073709551600
238		     # Which isn't the string you first thought of.
239                     # I can't remember why there isn't symmetry in this
240                     # exception, ie why only the first ops are tested for 'N'
241                     and $ans[0] != /^-?\d+$/ and $ans[1] !~ /^-?\d+$/) {
242	      print "# ok, numerically equal - notation changed due to adding zero\n";
243	    } else {
244	      $nok++,
245	    }
246	  }
247	}
248        if ($nok) {
249          print "not ok $test\n";
250        } else {
251          print "ok $test\n";
252        }
253	#print $txt if $nok;
254	$test++;
255      }
256    }
257  }
258}
259