Searched refs:loss (Results 1 - 9 of 9) sorted by relevance

/freebsd-11-stable/sbin/ipfw/
H A Ddummynet.c526 double loss; local
530 loss = p->loss_level;
531 loss /= p->samples_no;
532 printf("\t profile: name \"%s\" loss %f samples %d\n",
533 p->name, loss, p->samples_no);
697 * L +-- loss-level x
725 * loss-level L
727 * (0.0 <= L <= 1.0, default 1.0 i.e. no loss);
751 loss-level 0.86
768 #define ED_TOK_LOSS "loss
876 double loss = -1.0; local
[all...]
/freebsd-11-stable/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/
H A Dlibzfs_pool.c1506 int64_t loss = -1; local
1520 (void) nvlist_lookup_int64(nv, ZPOOL_CONFIG_REWIND_TIME, &loss);
1534 if (loss > 120) {
1538 (loss + 30) / 60);
1541 } else if (loss > 0) {
1544 dryrun ? "Would discard" : "Discarded", loss);
1556 int64_t loss = -1; local
1576 (void) nvlist_lookup_int64(nv, ZPOOL_CONFIG_REWIND_TIME, &loss);
1581 "Recovery is possible, but will result in some data loss.\n"));
1595 if (loss > 12
[all...]
/freebsd-11-stable/contrib/traceroute/
H A Dtraceroute.c1068 int loss; local
1071 for (probe = 0, loss = 0; probe < nprobes; ++probe) {
1238 loss++;
1244 Printf(" (%d%% loss)", (loss * 100) / nprobes);
/freebsd-11-stable/sys/conf/
H A Dkern.mk93 # it is probably an overall loss as it makes the code bigger (less efficient
/freebsd-11-stable/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/
H A Dspa.c2169 int64_t loss = 0; local
2175 loss = spa->spa_last_ubsync_txg_ts - spa->spa_load_txg_ts;
2179 ZPOOL_CONFIG_REWIND_TIME, loss) == 0);
/freebsd-11-stable/sys/contrib/ngatm/netnatm/msg/
H A Duni_ie.c2808 MKT(UNI_AAL1_ECM_LOSS, loss),
/freebsd-11-stable/contrib/gcc/doc/include/
H A Dtexinfo.tex6130 % is a loss. Therefore, we give the text of the node name again, so it
/freebsd-11-stable/contrib/groff/doc/
H A Dtexinfo.tex6004 % is a loss. Therefore, we give the text of the node name again, so it
/freebsd-11-stable/contrib/amd/doc/
H A Dtexinfo.tex7998 % this is a loss. Therefore, we give the text of the node name

Completed in 310 milliseconds