Searched refs:RIP (Results 1 - 14 of 14) sorted by relevance
| /macosx-10.9.5/llvmCore-3425.0.33/lib/Target/X86/MCTargetDesc/ |
| H A D | X86MCTargetDesc.cpp | 366 ? X86::RIP // Should have dwarf #16.
406 MachineLocation CSSrc(is64Bit ? X86::RIP : X86::EIP);
|
| H A D | X86AsmBackend.cpp | 239 // Check if it has an expression and is not RIP relative.
247 if (Op.isReg() && Op.getReg() == X86::RIP)
|
| H A D | X86MCCodeEmitter.cpp | 309 if (BaseReg == X86::RIP) { // [disp32+RIP] in X86-64 mode
337 // If no BaseReg, issue a RIP relative instruction only if the MCE can
348 // byte to emit an addr that is just 'disp32' (the non-RIP relative form).
|
| /macosx-10.9.5/llvmCore-3425.0.33/lib/Target/X86/ |
| H A D | X86RegisterInfo.cpp | 60 ? X86::RIP : X86::EIP,
311 Reserved.set(X86::RIP);
312 for (MCSubRegIterator I(X86::RIP, this); I.isValid(); ++I)
|
| H A D | X86CodeEmitter.cpp | 429 // But it's probably not beneficial. If the MCE supports using RIP directly
484 if (BaseReg == X86::RIP ||
485 (Is64BitMode && DispForReloc)) { // [disp32+RIP] in X86-64 mode
495 // while others, unless explicit asked to use RIP, use absolute references.
499 // If no BaseReg, issue a RIP relative instruction only if the MCE can
503 if (BaseReg != 0 && BaseReg != X86::RIP)
513 // byte to emit an addr that is just 'disp32' (the non-RIP relative form).
516 BaseReg == X86::RIP) { // [disp32+RIP] in X86-64 mode
|
| H A D | X86FastISel.cpp | 502 // RIP-relative addresses can't have additional register operands, so if
526 AM.Base.Reg = X86::RIP;
555 StubAM.Base.Reg = X86::RIP;
635 // RIP-relative addresses can't have additional register operands.
658 AM.Base.Reg = X86::RIP;
2119 PICBase = X86::RIP;
|
| H A D | X86AsmPrinter.cpp | 319 BaseReg.getReg() == X86::RIP)
|
| H A D | X86MCInstLower.cpp | 588 LEA.addOperand(MCOperand::CreateReg(X86::RIP)); // base
|
| H A D | X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp | 88 /// isRIPRelative - Return true if this addressing mode is already RIP
94 return RegNode->getReg() == X86::RIP;
239 // These are 32-bit even in 64-bit mode since RIP relative offset
635 // folding because RIP is preferable to non-RIP accesses.
679 AM.setBaseReg(CurDAG->getRegister(X86::RIP, MVT::i64));
685 // mode, this only applies to a non-RIP-relative computation.
689 "RIP-relative addressing already handled");
744 AM.Base_Reg = CurDAG->getRegister(X86::RIP, MVT::i64);
969 // RIP relativ
[all...] |
| H A D | X86InstrInfo.cpp | 1568 if (BaseReg == 0 || BaseReg == X86::RIP)
3931 PICBase = X86::RIP;
4484 "X86-64 PIC uses RIP relative addressing");
4682 "X86-64 PIC uses RIP relative addressing");
|
| H A D | X86ISelLowering.cpp | 1419 // X86-64 uses RIP relative addressing based on the jump table label.
7568 // Most TLS accesses are not RIP relative, even on x86-64. One exception is
13220 .addReg(X86::RIP)
16819 // RIP in the class. Do they matter any more here than they do
|
| /macosx-10.9.5/llvmCore-3425.0.33/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/ |
| H A D | X86DisassemblerDecoder.h | 291 ENTRY(RIP)
|
| H A D | X86Disassembler.cpp | 567 baseReg = MCOperand::CreateReg(X86::RIP); // Section 2.2.1.6
|
| /macosx-10.9.5/llvmCore-3425.0.33/lib/Transforms/Scalar/ |
| H A D | ObjCARC.cpp | 3262 Instruction *RIP = *RI; local
3263 if (ReleasesToMove.ReverseInsertPts.insert(RIP))
3264 NewDelta -= BBStates[RIP->getParent()].GetAllPathCount();
3314 Instruction *RIP = *RI; local
3315 if (RetainsToMove.ReverseInsertPts.insert(RIP)) {
3316 PathCount = BBStates[RIP->getParent()].GetAllPathCount();
|
Completed in 309 milliseconds