Searched hist:274819 (Results 1 - 23 of 23) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/tws/ | ||
| H A D | tws_cam.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/glxiic/ | ||
| H A D | glxiic.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/virtio/scsi/ | ||
| H A D | virtio_scsi.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/aic/ | ||
| H A D | aic.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/trm/ | ||
| H A D | trm.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/advansys/ | ||
| H A D | adwcam.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| H A D | advansys.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/iir/ | ||
| H A D | iir.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/mvs/ | ||
| H A D | mvs.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/siis/ | ||
| H A D | siis.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/aha/ | ||
| H A D | aha.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/dpt/ | ||
| H A D | dpt_scsi.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/ahb/ | ||
| H A D | ahb.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/buslogic/ | ||
| H A D | bt.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/mrsas/ | ||
| H A D | mrsas_cam.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/arcmsr/ | ||
| H A D | arcmsr.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/mpt/ | ||
| H A D | mpt.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| H A D | mpt.h | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| H A D | mpt_cam.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/sym/ | ||
| H A D | sym_hipd.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/firewire/ | ||
| H A D | sbp.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/dev/ciss/ | ||
| H A D | ciss.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/cam/ | ||
| H A D | cam_xpt.c | diff 274819 Fri Nov 21 19:07:19 MST 2014 smh Prevent overflow issues in timeout processing Previously, any timeout value for which (timeout * hz) will overflow the signed integer, will give weird results, since callout(9) routines will convert negative values of ticks to '1'. For unsigned integer overflow we will get sufficiently smaller timeout values than expected. Switch from callout_reset, which requires conversion to int based ticks to callout_reset_sbt to avoid this. Also correct isci to correctly resolve ccb timeout. This was based on the original work done by Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> back in 5 Aug 2011 which used a macro to help avoid the overlow. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1157 Reviewed by: mav, davide MFC after: 1 month Sponsored by: Multiplay |
Completed in 564 milliseconds