Searched hist:124534 (Results 1 - 15 of 15) sorted by relevance

/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/dev/ata/
H A Data-card.cdiff 124534 Wed Jan 14 19:26:35 MST 2004 sos Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage.
This gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it.
A few percent more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but
we then need to clear fields all over the place to be safe, and
that was deemed not worth the trouble (and it makes life dangerous).
H A Data-cbus.cdiff 124534 Wed Jan 14 19:26:35 MST 2004 sos Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage.
This gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it.
A few percent more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but
we then need to clear fields all over the place to be safe, and
that was deemed not worth the trouble (and it makes life dangerous).
H A Data-isa.cdiff 124534 Wed Jan 14 19:26:35 MST 2004 sos Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage.
This gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it.
A few percent more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but
we then need to clear fields all over the place to be safe, and
that was deemed not worth the trouble (and it makes life dangerous).
H A Data-lowlevel.cdiff 124534 Wed Jan 14 19:26:35 MST 2004 sos Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage.
This gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it.
A few percent more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but
we then need to clear fields all over the place to be safe, and
that was deemed not worth the trouble (and it makes life dangerous).
H A Data-queue.cdiff 124534 Wed Jan 14 19:26:35 MST 2004 sos Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage.
This gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it.
A few percent more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but
we then need to clear fields all over the place to be safe, and
that was deemed not worth the trouble (and it makes life dangerous).
H A Data-raid.cdiff 124534 Wed Jan 14 19:26:35 MST 2004 sos Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage.
This gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it.
A few percent more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but
we then need to clear fields all over the place to be safe, and
that was deemed not worth the trouble (and it makes life dangerous).
H A Datapi-cam.cdiff 124534 Wed Jan 14 19:26:35 MST 2004 sos Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage.
This gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it.
A few percent more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but
we then need to clear fields all over the place to be safe, and
that was deemed not worth the trouble (and it makes life dangerous).
H A Data-pci.cdiff 124534 Wed Jan 14 19:26:35 MST 2004 sos Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage.
This gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it.
A few percent more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but
we then need to clear fields all over the place to be safe, and
that was deemed not worth the trouble (and it makes life dangerous).
H A Datapi-fd.cdiff 124534 Wed Jan 14 19:26:35 MST 2004 sos Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage.
This gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it.
A few percent more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but
we then need to clear fields all over the place to be safe, and
that was deemed not worth the trouble (and it makes life dangerous).
H A Datapi-tape.cdiff 124534 Wed Jan 14 19:26:35 MST 2004 sos Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage.
This gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it.
A few percent more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but
we then need to clear fields all over the place to be safe, and
that was deemed not worth the trouble (and it makes life dangerous).
H A Data-all.hdiff 124534 Wed Jan 14 19:26:35 MST 2004 sos Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage.
This gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it.
A few percent more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but
we then need to clear fields all over the place to be safe, and
that was deemed not worth the trouble (and it makes life dangerous).
H A Data-dma.cdiff 124534 Wed Jan 14 19:26:35 MST 2004 sos Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage.
This gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it.
A few percent more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but
we then need to clear fields all over the place to be safe, and
that was deemed not worth the trouble (and it makes life dangerous).
H A Datapi-cd.cdiff 124534 Wed Jan 14 19:26:35 MST 2004 sos Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage.
This gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it.
A few percent more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but
we then need to clear fields all over the place to be safe, and
that was deemed not worth the trouble (and it makes life dangerous).
H A Data-all.cdiff 124534 Wed Jan 14 19:26:35 MST 2004 sos Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage.
This gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it.
A few percent more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but
we then need to clear fields all over the place to be safe, and
that was deemed not worth the trouble (and it makes life dangerous).
H A Data-disk.cdiff 124534 Wed Jan 14 19:26:35 MST 2004 sos Use UMA instead of plain malloc for getting ATA request storage.
This gives +10% performance on simple tests, so definitly worth it.
A few percent more could be had by not using M_ZERO'd alloc's, but
we then need to clear fields all over the place to be safe, and
that was deemed not worth the trouble (and it makes life dangerous).

Completed in 401 milliseconds