Searched hist:8870 (Results 1 - 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /linux-master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/ | ||
| H A D | qcom,sm6375-tlmm.yaml | diff 8870dce5 Mon Oct 17 16:59:49 MDT 2022 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,sm6375-tlmm: drop ref to pinctrl.yaml The binding references common Qualcomm TLMM pin controller schema, which references pinctrl.yaml. Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221017230012.47878-11-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> |
| /linux-master/net/netfilter/ipvs/ | ||
| H A D | ip_vs_core.c | diff 8870f842 Thu Aug 26 14:21:26 MDT 2010 Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> IPVS: ICMPv6 checksum calculation Cc: Xiaoyu Du <tingsrain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
| /linux-master/scripts/ | ||
| H A D | checkpatch.pl | diff 6ad724e2 Tue Aug 21 22:58:08 MDT 2018 Michal Zylowski <michal.zylowski@intel.com> checkpatch: check for space after "else" keyword Current checkpatch implementation permits notation like } else{ in kernel code. It looks like oversight and inconsistency in checkpatch rules (e.g. instruction like 'do' is tested). Add regex for checking space after 'else' keyword and trigger error if space is not present. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1533545753-8870-1-git-send-email-michal.zylowski@intel.com Signed-off-by: Michal Zylowski <michal.zylowski@intel.com> Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
| /linux-master/kernel/sched/ | ||
| H A D | fair.c | diff d8fcb81f Thu Oct 22 07:15:50 MDT 2020 Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> sched/fair: Check for idle core in wake_affine In the case of a thread wakeup, wake_affine determines whether a core will be chosen for the thread on the socket where the thread ran previously or on the socket of the waker. This is done primarily by comparing the load of the core where th thread ran previously (prev) and the load of the waker (this). commit 11f10e5420f6 ("sched/fair: Use load instead of runnable load in wakeup path") changed the load computation from the runnable load to the load average, where the latter includes the load of threads that have already blocked on the core. When a short-running daemon processes happens to run on prev, this change raised the situation that prev could appear to have a greater load than this, even when prev is actually idle. When prev and this are on the same socket, the idle prev is detected later, in select_idle_sibling. But if that does not hold, prev is completely ignored, causing the waking thread to move to the socket of the waker. In the case of N mostly active threads on N cores, this triggers other migrations and hurts performance. In contrast, before commit 11f10e5420f6, the load on an idle core was 0, and in the case of a non-idle waker core, the effect of wake_affine was to select prev as the target for searching for a core for the waking thread. To avoid unnecessary migrations, extend wake_affine_idle to check whether the core where the thread previously ran is currently idle, and if so simply return that core as the target. [1] commit 11f10e5420f6ce ("sched/fair: Use load instead of runnable load in wakeup path") This particularly has an impact when using the ondemand power manager, where kworkers run every 0.004 seconds on all cores, increasing the likelihood that an idle core will be considered to have a load. The following numbers were obtained with the benchmarking tool hyperfine (https://github.com/sharkdp/hyperfine) on the NAS parallel benchmarks (https://www.nas.nasa.gov/publications/npb.html). The tests were run on an 80-core Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8870 v4 @ 2.10GHz. Active (intel_pstate) and passive (intel_cpufreq) power management were used. Times are in seconds. All experiments use all 160 hardware threads. v5.9/intel-pstate v5.9+patch/intel-pstate bt.C.c 24.725724+-0.962340 23.349608+-1.607214 lu.C.x 29.105952+-4.804203 25.249052+-5.561617 sp.C.x 31.220696+-1.831335 30.227760+-2.429792 ua.C.x 26.606118+-1.767384 25.778367+-1.263850 v5.9/ondemand v5.9+patch/ondemand bt.C.c 25.330360+-1.028316 23.544036+-1.020189 lu.C.x 35.872659+-4.872090 23.719295+-3.883848 sp.C.x 32.141310+-2.289541 29.125363+-0.872300 ua.C.x 29.024597+-1.667049 25.728888+-1.539772 On the smaller data sets (A and B) and on the other NAS benchmarks there is no impact on performance. This also has a major impact on the splash2x.volrend benchmark of the parsec benchmark suite that goes from 1m25 without this patch to 0m45, in active (intel_pstate) mode. Fixes: 11f10e5420f6 ("sched/fair: Use load instead of runnable load in wakeup path") Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1603372550-14680-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr diff d8fcb81f Thu Oct 22 07:15:50 MDT 2020 Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> sched/fair: Check for idle core in wake_affine In the case of a thread wakeup, wake_affine determines whether a core will be chosen for the thread on the socket where the thread ran previously or on the socket of the waker. This is done primarily by comparing the load of the core where th thread ran previously (prev) and the load of the waker (this). commit 11f10e5420f6 ("sched/fair: Use load instead of runnable load in wakeup path") changed the load computation from the runnable load to the load average, where the latter includes the load of threads that have already blocked on the core. When a short-running daemon processes happens to run on prev, this change raised the situation that prev could appear to have a greater load than this, even when prev is actually idle. When prev and this are on the same socket, the idle prev is detected later, in select_idle_sibling. But if that does not hold, prev is completely ignored, causing the waking thread to move to the socket of the waker. In the case of N mostly active threads on N cores, this triggers other migrations and hurts performance. In contrast, before commit 11f10e5420f6, the load on an idle core was 0, and in the case of a non-idle waker core, the effect of wake_affine was to select prev as the target for searching for a core for the waking thread. To avoid unnecessary migrations, extend wake_affine_idle to check whether the core where the thread previously ran is currently idle, and if so simply return that core as the target. [1] commit 11f10e5420f6ce ("sched/fair: Use load instead of runnable load in wakeup path") This particularly has an impact when using the ondemand power manager, where kworkers run every 0.004 seconds on all cores, increasing the likelihood that an idle core will be considered to have a load. The following numbers were obtained with the benchmarking tool hyperfine (https://github.com/sharkdp/hyperfine) on the NAS parallel benchmarks (https://www.nas.nasa.gov/publications/npb.html). The tests were run on an 80-core Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8870 v4 @ 2.10GHz. Active (intel_pstate) and passive (intel_cpufreq) power management were used. Times are in seconds. All experiments use all 160 hardware threads. v5.9/intel-pstate v5.9+patch/intel-pstate bt.C.c 24.725724+-0.962340 23.349608+-1.607214 lu.C.x 29.105952+-4.804203 25.249052+-5.561617 sp.C.x 31.220696+-1.831335 30.227760+-2.429792 ua.C.x 26.606118+-1.767384 25.778367+-1.263850 v5.9/ondemand v5.9+patch/ondemand bt.C.c 25.330360+-1.028316 23.544036+-1.020189 lu.C.x 35.872659+-4.872090 23.719295+-3.883848 sp.C.x 32.141310+-2.289541 29.125363+-0.872300 ua.C.x 29.024597+-1.667049 25.728888+-1.539772 On the smaller data sets (A and B) and on the other NAS benchmarks there is no impact on performance. This also has a major impact on the splash2x.volrend benchmark of the parsec benchmark suite that goes from 1m25 without this patch to 0m45, in active (intel_pstate) mode. Fixes: 11f10e5420f6 ("sched/fair: Use load instead of runnable load in wakeup path") Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1603372550-14680-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr |
Completed in 1005 milliseconds