Searched hist:57146 (Results 1 - 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
/linux-master/include/linux/ | ||
H A D | oom.h | diff 9066e5cf Tue Aug 11 19:31:22 MDT 2020 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> mm, oom: make the calculation of oom badness more accurate Recently we found an issue on our production environment that when memcg oom is triggered the oom killer doesn't chose the process with largest resident memory but chose the first scanned process. Note that all processes in this memcg have the same oom_score_adj, so the oom killer should chose the process with largest resident memory. Bellow is part of the oom info, which is enough to analyze this issue. [7516987.983223] memory: usage 16777216kB, limit 16777216kB, failcnt 52843037 [7516987.983224] memory+swap: usage 16777216kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0 [7516987.983225] kmem: usage 301464kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0 [...] [7516987.983293] [ pid ] uid tgid total_vm rss pgtables_bytes swapents oom_score_adj name [7516987.983510] [ 5740] 0 5740 257 1 32768 0 -998 pause [7516987.983574] [58804] 0 58804 4594 771 81920 0 -998 entry_point.bas [7516987.983577] [58908] 0 58908 7089 689 98304 0 -998 cron [7516987.983580] [58910] 0 58910 16235 5576 163840 0 -998 supervisord [7516987.983590] [59620] 0 59620 18074 1395 188416 0 -998 sshd [7516987.983594] [59622] 0 59622 18680 6679 188416 0 -998 python [7516987.983598] [59624] 0 59624 1859266 5161 548864 0 -998 odin-agent [7516987.983600] [59625] 0 59625 707223 9248 983040 0 -998 filebeat [7516987.983604] [59627] 0 59627 416433 64239 774144 0 -998 odin-log-agent [7516987.983607] [59631] 0 59631 180671 15012 385024 0 -998 python3 [7516987.983612] [61396] 0 61396 791287 3189 352256 0 -998 client [7516987.983615] [61641] 0 61641 1844642 29089 946176 0 -998 client [7516987.983765] [ 9236] 0 9236 2642 467 53248 0 -998 php_scanner [7516987.983911] [42898] 0 42898 15543 838 167936 0 -998 su [7516987.983915] [42900] 1000 42900 3673 867 77824 0 -998 exec_script_vr2 [7516987.983918] [42925] 1000 42925 36475 19033 335872 0 -998 python [7516987.983921] [57146] 1000 57146 3673 848 73728 0 -998 exec_script_J2p [7516987.983925] [57195] 1000 57195 186359 22958 491520 0 -998 python2 [7516987.983928] [58376] 1000 58376 275764 14402 290816 0 -998 rosmaster [7516987.983931] [58395] 1000 58395 155166 4449 245760 0 -998 rosout [7516987.983935] [58406] 1000 58406 18285584 3967322 37101568 0 -998 data_sim [7516987.984221] oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_MEMCG,nodemask=(null),cpuset=3aa16c9482ae3a6f6b78bda68a55d32c87c99b985e0f11331cddf05af6c4d753,mems_allowed=0-1,oom_memcg=/kubepods/podf1c273d3-9b36-11ea-b3df-246e9693c184,task_memcg=/kubepods/podf1c273d3-9b36-11ea-b3df-246e9693c184/1f246a3eeea8f70bf91141eeaf1805346a666e225f823906485ea0b6c37dfc3d,task=pause,pid=5740,uid=0 [7516987.984254] Memory cgroup out of memory: Killed process 5740 (pause) total-vm:1028kB, anon-rss:4kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB [7516988.092344] oom_reaper: reaped process 5740 (pause), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB We can find that the first scanned process 5740 (pause) was killed, but its rss is only one page. That is because, when we calculate the oom badness in oom_badness(), we always ignore the negtive point and convert all of these negtive points to 1. Now as oom_score_adj of all the processes in this targeted memcg have the same value -998, the points of these processes are all negtive value. As a result, the first scanned process will be killed. The oom_socre_adj (-998) in this memcg is set by kubelet, because it is a a Guaranteed pod, which has higher priority to prevent from being killed by system oom. To fix this issue, we should make the calculation of oom point more accurate. We can achieve it by convert the chosen_point from 'unsigned long' to 'long'. [cai@lca.pw: reported a issue in the previous version] [mhocko@suse.com: fixed the issue reported by Cai] [mhocko@suse.com: add the comment in proc_oom_score()] [laoar.shao@gmail.com: v3] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594396651-9931-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594309987-9919-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> diff 9066e5cf Tue Aug 11 19:31:22 MDT 2020 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> mm, oom: make the calculation of oom badness more accurate Recently we found an issue on our production environment that when memcg oom is triggered the oom killer doesn't chose the process with largest resident memory but chose the first scanned process. Note that all processes in this memcg have the same oom_score_adj, so the oom killer should chose the process with largest resident memory. Bellow is part of the oom info, which is enough to analyze this issue. [7516987.983223] memory: usage 16777216kB, limit 16777216kB, failcnt 52843037 [7516987.983224] memory+swap: usage 16777216kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0 [7516987.983225] kmem: usage 301464kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0 [...] [7516987.983293] [ pid ] uid tgid total_vm rss pgtables_bytes swapents oom_score_adj name [7516987.983510] [ 5740] 0 5740 257 1 32768 0 -998 pause [7516987.983574] [58804] 0 58804 4594 771 81920 0 -998 entry_point.bas [7516987.983577] [58908] 0 58908 7089 689 98304 0 -998 cron [7516987.983580] [58910] 0 58910 16235 5576 163840 0 -998 supervisord [7516987.983590] [59620] 0 59620 18074 1395 188416 0 -998 sshd [7516987.983594] [59622] 0 59622 18680 6679 188416 0 -998 python [7516987.983598] [59624] 0 59624 1859266 5161 548864 0 -998 odin-agent [7516987.983600] [59625] 0 59625 707223 9248 983040 0 -998 filebeat [7516987.983604] [59627] 0 59627 416433 64239 774144 0 -998 odin-log-agent [7516987.983607] [59631] 0 59631 180671 15012 385024 0 -998 python3 [7516987.983612] [61396] 0 61396 791287 3189 352256 0 -998 client [7516987.983615] [61641] 0 61641 1844642 29089 946176 0 -998 client [7516987.983765] [ 9236] 0 9236 2642 467 53248 0 -998 php_scanner [7516987.983911] [42898] 0 42898 15543 838 167936 0 -998 su [7516987.983915] [42900] 1000 42900 3673 867 77824 0 -998 exec_script_vr2 [7516987.983918] [42925] 1000 42925 36475 19033 335872 0 -998 python [7516987.983921] [57146] 1000 57146 3673 848 73728 0 -998 exec_script_J2p [7516987.983925] [57195] 1000 57195 186359 22958 491520 0 -998 python2 [7516987.983928] [58376] 1000 58376 275764 14402 290816 0 -998 rosmaster [7516987.983931] [58395] 1000 58395 155166 4449 245760 0 -998 rosout [7516987.983935] [58406] 1000 58406 18285584 3967322 37101568 0 -998 data_sim [7516987.984221] oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_MEMCG,nodemask=(null),cpuset=3aa16c9482ae3a6f6b78bda68a55d32c87c99b985e0f11331cddf05af6c4d753,mems_allowed=0-1,oom_memcg=/kubepods/podf1c273d3-9b36-11ea-b3df-246e9693c184,task_memcg=/kubepods/podf1c273d3-9b36-11ea-b3df-246e9693c184/1f246a3eeea8f70bf91141eeaf1805346a666e225f823906485ea0b6c37dfc3d,task=pause,pid=5740,uid=0 [7516987.984254] Memory cgroup out of memory: Killed process 5740 (pause) total-vm:1028kB, anon-rss:4kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB [7516988.092344] oom_reaper: reaped process 5740 (pause), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB We can find that the first scanned process 5740 (pause) was killed, but its rss is only one page. That is because, when we calculate the oom badness in oom_badness(), we always ignore the negtive point and convert all of these negtive points to 1. Now as oom_score_adj of all the processes in this targeted memcg have the same value -998, the points of these processes are all negtive value. As a result, the first scanned process will be killed. The oom_socre_adj (-998) in this memcg is set by kubelet, because it is a a Guaranteed pod, which has higher priority to prevent from being killed by system oom. To fix this issue, we should make the calculation of oom point more accurate. We can achieve it by convert the chosen_point from 'unsigned long' to 'long'. [cai@lca.pw: reported a issue in the previous version] [mhocko@suse.com: fixed the issue reported by Cai] [mhocko@suse.com: add the comment in proc_oom_score()] [laoar.shao@gmail.com: v3] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594396651-9931-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594309987-9919-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
/linux-master/mm/ | ||
H A D | oom_kill.c | diff 9066e5cf Tue Aug 11 19:31:22 MDT 2020 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> mm, oom: make the calculation of oom badness more accurate Recently we found an issue on our production environment that when memcg oom is triggered the oom killer doesn't chose the process with largest resident memory but chose the first scanned process. Note that all processes in this memcg have the same oom_score_adj, so the oom killer should chose the process with largest resident memory. Bellow is part of the oom info, which is enough to analyze this issue. [7516987.983223] memory: usage 16777216kB, limit 16777216kB, failcnt 52843037 [7516987.983224] memory+swap: usage 16777216kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0 [7516987.983225] kmem: usage 301464kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0 [...] [7516987.983293] [ pid ] uid tgid total_vm rss pgtables_bytes swapents oom_score_adj name [7516987.983510] [ 5740] 0 5740 257 1 32768 0 -998 pause [7516987.983574] [58804] 0 58804 4594 771 81920 0 -998 entry_point.bas [7516987.983577] [58908] 0 58908 7089 689 98304 0 -998 cron [7516987.983580] [58910] 0 58910 16235 5576 163840 0 -998 supervisord [7516987.983590] [59620] 0 59620 18074 1395 188416 0 -998 sshd [7516987.983594] [59622] 0 59622 18680 6679 188416 0 -998 python [7516987.983598] [59624] 0 59624 1859266 5161 548864 0 -998 odin-agent [7516987.983600] [59625] 0 59625 707223 9248 983040 0 -998 filebeat [7516987.983604] [59627] 0 59627 416433 64239 774144 0 -998 odin-log-agent [7516987.983607] [59631] 0 59631 180671 15012 385024 0 -998 python3 [7516987.983612] [61396] 0 61396 791287 3189 352256 0 -998 client [7516987.983615] [61641] 0 61641 1844642 29089 946176 0 -998 client [7516987.983765] [ 9236] 0 9236 2642 467 53248 0 -998 php_scanner [7516987.983911] [42898] 0 42898 15543 838 167936 0 -998 su [7516987.983915] [42900] 1000 42900 3673 867 77824 0 -998 exec_script_vr2 [7516987.983918] [42925] 1000 42925 36475 19033 335872 0 -998 python [7516987.983921] [57146] 1000 57146 3673 848 73728 0 -998 exec_script_J2p [7516987.983925] [57195] 1000 57195 186359 22958 491520 0 -998 python2 [7516987.983928] [58376] 1000 58376 275764 14402 290816 0 -998 rosmaster [7516987.983931] [58395] 1000 58395 155166 4449 245760 0 -998 rosout [7516987.983935] [58406] 1000 58406 18285584 3967322 37101568 0 -998 data_sim [7516987.984221] oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_MEMCG,nodemask=(null),cpuset=3aa16c9482ae3a6f6b78bda68a55d32c87c99b985e0f11331cddf05af6c4d753,mems_allowed=0-1,oom_memcg=/kubepods/podf1c273d3-9b36-11ea-b3df-246e9693c184,task_memcg=/kubepods/podf1c273d3-9b36-11ea-b3df-246e9693c184/1f246a3eeea8f70bf91141eeaf1805346a666e225f823906485ea0b6c37dfc3d,task=pause,pid=5740,uid=0 [7516987.984254] Memory cgroup out of memory: Killed process 5740 (pause) total-vm:1028kB, anon-rss:4kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB [7516988.092344] oom_reaper: reaped process 5740 (pause), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB We can find that the first scanned process 5740 (pause) was killed, but its rss is only one page. That is because, when we calculate the oom badness in oom_badness(), we always ignore the negtive point and convert all of these negtive points to 1. Now as oom_score_adj of all the processes in this targeted memcg have the same value -998, the points of these processes are all negtive value. As a result, the first scanned process will be killed. The oom_socre_adj (-998) in this memcg is set by kubelet, because it is a a Guaranteed pod, which has higher priority to prevent from being killed by system oom. To fix this issue, we should make the calculation of oom point more accurate. We can achieve it by convert the chosen_point from 'unsigned long' to 'long'. [cai@lca.pw: reported a issue in the previous version] [mhocko@suse.com: fixed the issue reported by Cai] [mhocko@suse.com: add the comment in proc_oom_score()] [laoar.shao@gmail.com: v3] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594396651-9931-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594309987-9919-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> diff 9066e5cf Tue Aug 11 19:31:22 MDT 2020 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> mm, oom: make the calculation of oom badness more accurate Recently we found an issue on our production environment that when memcg oom is triggered the oom killer doesn't chose the process with largest resident memory but chose the first scanned process. Note that all processes in this memcg have the same oom_score_adj, so the oom killer should chose the process with largest resident memory. Bellow is part of the oom info, which is enough to analyze this issue. [7516987.983223] memory: usage 16777216kB, limit 16777216kB, failcnt 52843037 [7516987.983224] memory+swap: usage 16777216kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0 [7516987.983225] kmem: usage 301464kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0 [...] [7516987.983293] [ pid ] uid tgid total_vm rss pgtables_bytes swapents oom_score_adj name [7516987.983510] [ 5740] 0 5740 257 1 32768 0 -998 pause [7516987.983574] [58804] 0 58804 4594 771 81920 0 -998 entry_point.bas [7516987.983577] [58908] 0 58908 7089 689 98304 0 -998 cron [7516987.983580] [58910] 0 58910 16235 5576 163840 0 -998 supervisord [7516987.983590] [59620] 0 59620 18074 1395 188416 0 -998 sshd [7516987.983594] [59622] 0 59622 18680 6679 188416 0 -998 python [7516987.983598] [59624] 0 59624 1859266 5161 548864 0 -998 odin-agent [7516987.983600] [59625] 0 59625 707223 9248 983040 0 -998 filebeat [7516987.983604] [59627] 0 59627 416433 64239 774144 0 -998 odin-log-agent [7516987.983607] [59631] 0 59631 180671 15012 385024 0 -998 python3 [7516987.983612] [61396] 0 61396 791287 3189 352256 0 -998 client [7516987.983615] [61641] 0 61641 1844642 29089 946176 0 -998 client [7516987.983765] [ 9236] 0 9236 2642 467 53248 0 -998 php_scanner [7516987.983911] [42898] 0 42898 15543 838 167936 0 -998 su [7516987.983915] [42900] 1000 42900 3673 867 77824 0 -998 exec_script_vr2 [7516987.983918] [42925] 1000 42925 36475 19033 335872 0 -998 python [7516987.983921] [57146] 1000 57146 3673 848 73728 0 -998 exec_script_J2p [7516987.983925] [57195] 1000 57195 186359 22958 491520 0 -998 python2 [7516987.983928] [58376] 1000 58376 275764 14402 290816 0 -998 rosmaster [7516987.983931] [58395] 1000 58395 155166 4449 245760 0 -998 rosout [7516987.983935] [58406] 1000 58406 18285584 3967322 37101568 0 -998 data_sim [7516987.984221] oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_MEMCG,nodemask=(null),cpuset=3aa16c9482ae3a6f6b78bda68a55d32c87c99b985e0f11331cddf05af6c4d753,mems_allowed=0-1,oom_memcg=/kubepods/podf1c273d3-9b36-11ea-b3df-246e9693c184,task_memcg=/kubepods/podf1c273d3-9b36-11ea-b3df-246e9693c184/1f246a3eeea8f70bf91141eeaf1805346a666e225f823906485ea0b6c37dfc3d,task=pause,pid=5740,uid=0 [7516987.984254] Memory cgroup out of memory: Killed process 5740 (pause) total-vm:1028kB, anon-rss:4kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB [7516988.092344] oom_reaper: reaped process 5740 (pause), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB We can find that the first scanned process 5740 (pause) was killed, but its rss is only one page. That is because, when we calculate the oom badness in oom_badness(), we always ignore the negtive point and convert all of these negtive points to 1. Now as oom_score_adj of all the processes in this targeted memcg have the same value -998, the points of these processes are all negtive value. As a result, the first scanned process will be killed. The oom_socre_adj (-998) in this memcg is set by kubelet, because it is a a Guaranteed pod, which has higher priority to prevent from being killed by system oom. To fix this issue, we should make the calculation of oom point more accurate. We can achieve it by convert the chosen_point from 'unsigned long' to 'long'. [cai@lca.pw: reported a issue in the previous version] [mhocko@suse.com: fixed the issue reported by Cai] [mhocko@suse.com: add the comment in proc_oom_score()] [laoar.shao@gmail.com: v3] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594396651-9931-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594309987-9919-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
/linux-master/fs/proc/ | ||
H A D | base.c | diff 9066e5cf Tue Aug 11 19:31:22 MDT 2020 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> mm, oom: make the calculation of oom badness more accurate Recently we found an issue on our production environment that when memcg oom is triggered the oom killer doesn't chose the process with largest resident memory but chose the first scanned process. Note that all processes in this memcg have the same oom_score_adj, so the oom killer should chose the process with largest resident memory. Bellow is part of the oom info, which is enough to analyze this issue. [7516987.983223] memory: usage 16777216kB, limit 16777216kB, failcnt 52843037 [7516987.983224] memory+swap: usage 16777216kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0 [7516987.983225] kmem: usage 301464kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0 [...] [7516987.983293] [ pid ] uid tgid total_vm rss pgtables_bytes swapents oom_score_adj name [7516987.983510] [ 5740] 0 5740 257 1 32768 0 -998 pause [7516987.983574] [58804] 0 58804 4594 771 81920 0 -998 entry_point.bas [7516987.983577] [58908] 0 58908 7089 689 98304 0 -998 cron [7516987.983580] [58910] 0 58910 16235 5576 163840 0 -998 supervisord [7516987.983590] [59620] 0 59620 18074 1395 188416 0 -998 sshd [7516987.983594] [59622] 0 59622 18680 6679 188416 0 -998 python [7516987.983598] [59624] 0 59624 1859266 5161 548864 0 -998 odin-agent [7516987.983600] [59625] 0 59625 707223 9248 983040 0 -998 filebeat [7516987.983604] [59627] 0 59627 416433 64239 774144 0 -998 odin-log-agent [7516987.983607] [59631] 0 59631 180671 15012 385024 0 -998 python3 [7516987.983612] [61396] 0 61396 791287 3189 352256 0 -998 client [7516987.983615] [61641] 0 61641 1844642 29089 946176 0 -998 client [7516987.983765] [ 9236] 0 9236 2642 467 53248 0 -998 php_scanner [7516987.983911] [42898] 0 42898 15543 838 167936 0 -998 su [7516987.983915] [42900] 1000 42900 3673 867 77824 0 -998 exec_script_vr2 [7516987.983918] [42925] 1000 42925 36475 19033 335872 0 -998 python [7516987.983921] [57146] 1000 57146 3673 848 73728 0 -998 exec_script_J2p [7516987.983925] [57195] 1000 57195 186359 22958 491520 0 -998 python2 [7516987.983928] [58376] 1000 58376 275764 14402 290816 0 -998 rosmaster [7516987.983931] [58395] 1000 58395 155166 4449 245760 0 -998 rosout [7516987.983935] [58406] 1000 58406 18285584 3967322 37101568 0 -998 data_sim [7516987.984221] oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_MEMCG,nodemask=(null),cpuset=3aa16c9482ae3a6f6b78bda68a55d32c87c99b985e0f11331cddf05af6c4d753,mems_allowed=0-1,oom_memcg=/kubepods/podf1c273d3-9b36-11ea-b3df-246e9693c184,task_memcg=/kubepods/podf1c273d3-9b36-11ea-b3df-246e9693c184/1f246a3eeea8f70bf91141eeaf1805346a666e225f823906485ea0b6c37dfc3d,task=pause,pid=5740,uid=0 [7516987.984254] Memory cgroup out of memory: Killed process 5740 (pause) total-vm:1028kB, anon-rss:4kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB [7516988.092344] oom_reaper: reaped process 5740 (pause), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB We can find that the first scanned process 5740 (pause) was killed, but its rss is only one page. That is because, when we calculate the oom badness in oom_badness(), we always ignore the negtive point and convert all of these negtive points to 1. Now as oom_score_adj of all the processes in this targeted memcg have the same value -998, the points of these processes are all negtive value. As a result, the first scanned process will be killed. The oom_socre_adj (-998) in this memcg is set by kubelet, because it is a a Guaranteed pod, which has higher priority to prevent from being killed by system oom. To fix this issue, we should make the calculation of oom point more accurate. We can achieve it by convert the chosen_point from 'unsigned long' to 'long'. [cai@lca.pw: reported a issue in the previous version] [mhocko@suse.com: fixed the issue reported by Cai] [mhocko@suse.com: add the comment in proc_oom_score()] [laoar.shao@gmail.com: v3] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594396651-9931-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594309987-9919-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> diff 9066e5cf Tue Aug 11 19:31:22 MDT 2020 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> mm, oom: make the calculation of oom badness more accurate Recently we found an issue on our production environment that when memcg oom is triggered the oom killer doesn't chose the process with largest resident memory but chose the first scanned process. Note that all processes in this memcg have the same oom_score_adj, so the oom killer should chose the process with largest resident memory. Bellow is part of the oom info, which is enough to analyze this issue. [7516987.983223] memory: usage 16777216kB, limit 16777216kB, failcnt 52843037 [7516987.983224] memory+swap: usage 16777216kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0 [7516987.983225] kmem: usage 301464kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0 [...] [7516987.983293] [ pid ] uid tgid total_vm rss pgtables_bytes swapents oom_score_adj name [7516987.983510] [ 5740] 0 5740 257 1 32768 0 -998 pause [7516987.983574] [58804] 0 58804 4594 771 81920 0 -998 entry_point.bas [7516987.983577] [58908] 0 58908 7089 689 98304 0 -998 cron [7516987.983580] [58910] 0 58910 16235 5576 163840 0 -998 supervisord [7516987.983590] [59620] 0 59620 18074 1395 188416 0 -998 sshd [7516987.983594] [59622] 0 59622 18680 6679 188416 0 -998 python [7516987.983598] [59624] 0 59624 1859266 5161 548864 0 -998 odin-agent [7516987.983600] [59625] 0 59625 707223 9248 983040 0 -998 filebeat [7516987.983604] [59627] 0 59627 416433 64239 774144 0 -998 odin-log-agent [7516987.983607] [59631] 0 59631 180671 15012 385024 0 -998 python3 [7516987.983612] [61396] 0 61396 791287 3189 352256 0 -998 client [7516987.983615] [61641] 0 61641 1844642 29089 946176 0 -998 client [7516987.983765] [ 9236] 0 9236 2642 467 53248 0 -998 php_scanner [7516987.983911] [42898] 0 42898 15543 838 167936 0 -998 su [7516987.983915] [42900] 1000 42900 3673 867 77824 0 -998 exec_script_vr2 [7516987.983918] [42925] 1000 42925 36475 19033 335872 0 -998 python [7516987.983921] [57146] 1000 57146 3673 848 73728 0 -998 exec_script_J2p [7516987.983925] [57195] 1000 57195 186359 22958 491520 0 -998 python2 [7516987.983928] [58376] 1000 58376 275764 14402 290816 0 -998 rosmaster [7516987.983931] [58395] 1000 58395 155166 4449 245760 0 -998 rosout [7516987.983935] [58406] 1000 58406 18285584 3967322 37101568 0 -998 data_sim [7516987.984221] oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_MEMCG,nodemask=(null),cpuset=3aa16c9482ae3a6f6b78bda68a55d32c87c99b985e0f11331cddf05af6c4d753,mems_allowed=0-1,oom_memcg=/kubepods/podf1c273d3-9b36-11ea-b3df-246e9693c184,task_memcg=/kubepods/podf1c273d3-9b36-11ea-b3df-246e9693c184/1f246a3eeea8f70bf91141eeaf1805346a666e225f823906485ea0b6c37dfc3d,task=pause,pid=5740,uid=0 [7516987.984254] Memory cgroup out of memory: Killed process 5740 (pause) total-vm:1028kB, anon-rss:4kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB [7516988.092344] oom_reaper: reaped process 5740 (pause), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB We can find that the first scanned process 5740 (pause) was killed, but its rss is only one page. That is because, when we calculate the oom badness in oom_badness(), we always ignore the negtive point and convert all of these negtive points to 1. Now as oom_score_adj of all the processes in this targeted memcg have the same value -998, the points of these processes are all negtive value. As a result, the first scanned process will be killed. The oom_socre_adj (-998) in this memcg is set by kubelet, because it is a a Guaranteed pod, which has higher priority to prevent from being killed by system oom. To fix this issue, we should make the calculation of oom point more accurate. We can achieve it by convert the chosen_point from 'unsigned long' to 'long'. [cai@lca.pw: reported a issue in the previous version] [mhocko@suse.com: fixed the issue reported by Cai] [mhocko@suse.com: add the comment in proc_oom_score()] [laoar.shao@gmail.com: v3] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594396651-9931-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594309987-9919-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
/linux-master/kernel/sched/ | ||
H A D | fair.c | diff 05cbdf4f Fri Sep 21 11:48:59 MDT 2018 Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> sched/numa: Limit the conditions where scan period is reset migrate_task_rq_fair() resets the scan rate for NUMA balancing on every cross-node migration. In the event of excessive load balancing due to saturation, this may result in the scan rate being pegged at maximum and further overloading the machine. This patch only resets the scan if NUMA balancing is active, a preferred node has been selected and the task is being migrated from the preferred node as these are the most harmful. For example, a migration to the preferred node does not justify a faster scan rate. Similarly, a migration between two nodes that are not preferred is probably bouncing due to over-saturation of the machine. In that case, scanning faster and trapping more NUMA faults will further overload the machine. Specjbb2005 results (8 warehouses) Higher bops are better 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 203370 205332 0.964744 1 328431 319785 -2.63252 2 Socket - 4 Node Power8 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 1 206070 206585 0.249915 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 188386 189162 0.41192 1 201566 213760 6.04963 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM JVMS Prev Current %Change 8 59157.4 58736.8 -0.710985 1 105495 105419 -0.0720413 Some events stats before and after applying the patch. perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 13,825,492 14,285,708 migrations 1,152,509 1,180,621 faults 371,948 339,114 cache-misses 55,654,206,041 55,205,631,894 sched:sched_move_numa 1,856 843 sched:sched_stick_numa 4 6 sched:sched_swap_numa 428 219 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 898 365 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 57146 26907 numa_hint_faults_local 51612 24279 numa_hit 238164 239771 numa_huge_pte_updates 16 0 numa_interleave 63 68 numa_local 238085 239688 numa_other 79 83 numa_pages_migrated 883 363 numa_pte_updates 67540 27415 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 3,288,525 3,202,779 migrations 38,652 37,186 faults 111,678 106,076 cache-misses 12,111,197,376 12,024,873,744 sched:sched_move_numa 900 931 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 5 1 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 714 637 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 18572 17409 numa_hint_faults_local 14850 14367 numa_hit 73197 73953 numa_huge_pte_updates 11 20 numa_interleave 25 25 numa_local 73138 73892 numa_other 59 61 numa_pages_migrated 712 668 numa_pte_updates 24021 27276 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 8,451,543 8,474,013 migrations 202,804 254,934 faults 310,024 320,506 cache-misses 253,522,507 110,580,458 sched:sched_move_numa 213 725 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 2 7 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 88 145 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 11830 22797 numa_hint_faults_local 11301 21539 numa_hit 90038 89308 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 855 865 numa_local 89796 88955 numa_other 242 353 numa_pages_migrated 88 149 numa_pte_updates 12039 22930 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 2,049,153 2,195,628 migrations 11,405 11,179 faults 162,309 149,656 cache-misses 7,203,343 8,117,515 sched:sched_move_numa 22 49 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 0 0 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1 5 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 1693 3577 numa_hint_faults_local 1669 3476 numa_hit 25177 26142 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 194 358 numa_local 24993 26042 numa_other 184 100 numa_pages_migrated 1 5 numa_pte_updates 1577 3587 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 94,515,937 100,602,296 migrations 4,203,554 4,135,630 faults 832,697 789,256 cache-misses 226,248,698,331 226,160,621,058 sched:sched_move_numa 1,730 1,366 sched:sched_stick_numa 14 16 sched:sched_swap_numa 432 374 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1,398 1,350 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 80079 47857 numa_hint_faults_local 68620 39768 numa_hit 241187 240165 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 241186 240165 numa_other 1 0 numa_pages_migrated 1347 1224 numa_pte_updates 80729 48354 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 63,704,961 58,515,496 migrations 573,404 564,845 faults 230,878 245,807 cache-misses 76,568,222,781 73,603,757,976 sched:sched_move_numa 509 996 sched:sched_stick_numa 31 10 sched:sched_swap_numa 182 193 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 541 646 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 8501 13422 numa_hint_faults_local 2960 5619 numa_hit 35526 36118 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 35526 36116 numa_other 0 2 numa_pages_migrated 539 616 numa_pte_updates 8433 13374 Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537552141-27815-5-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> diff 3f9672ba Fri Sep 21 11:48:58 MDT 2018 Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> sched/numa: Reset scan rate whenever task moves across nodes Currently task scan rate is reset when NUMA balancer migrates the task to a different node. If NUMA balancer initiates a swap, reset is only applicable to the task that initiates the swap. Similarly no scan rate reset is done if the task is migrated across nodes by traditional load balancer. Instead move the scan reset to the migrate_task_rq. This ensures the task moved out of its preferred node, either gets back to its preferred node quickly or finds a new preferred node. Doing so, would be fair to all tasks migrating across nodes. Specjbb2005 results (8 warehouses) Higher bops are better 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 200668 203370 1.3465 1 321791 328431 2.06345 2 Socket - 4 Node Power8 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 1 204848 206070 0.59654 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 188098 188386 0.153112 1 200351 201566 0.606436 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM JVMS Prev Current %Change 8 58145.9 59157.4 1.73959 1 103798 105495 1.63491 Some events stats before and after applying the patch. perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 13,912,183 13,825,492 migrations 1,155,931 1,152,509 faults 367,139 371,948 cache-misses 54,240,196,814 55,654,206,041 sched:sched_move_numa 1,571 1,856 sched:sched_stick_numa 9 4 sched:sched_swap_numa 463 428 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 703 898 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 50155 57146 numa_hint_faults_local 45264 51612 numa_hit 239652 238164 numa_huge_pte_updates 36 16 numa_interleave 68 63 numa_local 239576 238085 numa_other 76 79 numa_pages_migrated 680 883 numa_pte_updates 71146 67540 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 3,156,720 3,288,525 migrations 30,354 38,652 faults 97,261 111,678 cache-misses 12,400,026,826 12,111,197,376 sched:sched_move_numa 4 900 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 1 5 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 20 714 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 272 18572 numa_hint_faults_local 186 14850 numa_hit 71362 73197 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 11 numa_interleave 23 25 numa_local 71299 73138 numa_other 63 59 numa_pages_migrated 2 712 numa_pte_updates 0 24021 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 8,606,824 8,451,543 migrations 155,352 202,804 faults 301,409 310,024 cache-misses 157,759,224 253,522,507 sched:sched_move_numa 168 213 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 3 2 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 125 88 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 4650 11830 numa_hint_faults_local 3946 11301 numa_hit 90489 90038 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 892 855 numa_local 90034 89796 numa_other 455 242 numa_pages_migrated 124 88 numa_pte_updates 4818 12039 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 2,113,167 2,049,153 migrations 10,533 11,405 faults 142,727 162,309 cache-misses 5,594,192 7,203,343 sched:sched_move_numa 10 22 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 0 0 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 6 1 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 744 1693 numa_hint_faults_local 584 1669 numa_hit 25551 25177 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 263 194 numa_local 25302 24993 numa_other 249 184 numa_pages_migrated 6 1 numa_pte_updates 744 1577 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 101,227,352 94,515,937 migrations 4,151,829 4,203,554 faults 745,233 832,697 cache-misses 224,669,561,766 226,248,698,331 sched:sched_move_numa 617 1,730 sched:sched_stick_numa 2 14 sched:sched_swap_numa 187 432 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 316 1,398 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 24195 80079 numa_hint_faults_local 21639 68620 numa_hit 238331 241187 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 238331 241186 numa_other 0 1 numa_pages_migrated 204 1347 numa_pte_updates 24561 80729 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 62,738,978 63,704,961 migrations 562,702 573,404 faults 228,465 230,878 cache-misses 75,778,067,952 76,568,222,781 sched:sched_move_numa 648 509 sched:sched_stick_numa 13 31 sched:sched_swap_numa 137 182 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 733 541 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 10281 8501 numa_hint_faults_local 3242 2960 numa_hit 36338 35526 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 36338 35526 numa_other 0 0 numa_pages_migrated 706 539 numa_pte_updates 10176 8433 Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537552141-27815-4-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> diff 05cbdf4f Fri Sep 21 11:48:59 MDT 2018 Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> sched/numa: Limit the conditions where scan period is reset migrate_task_rq_fair() resets the scan rate for NUMA balancing on every cross-node migration. In the event of excessive load balancing due to saturation, this may result in the scan rate being pegged at maximum and further overloading the machine. This patch only resets the scan if NUMA balancing is active, a preferred node has been selected and the task is being migrated from the preferred node as these are the most harmful. For example, a migration to the preferred node does not justify a faster scan rate. Similarly, a migration between two nodes that are not preferred is probably bouncing due to over-saturation of the machine. In that case, scanning faster and trapping more NUMA faults will further overload the machine. Specjbb2005 results (8 warehouses) Higher bops are better 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 203370 205332 0.964744 1 328431 319785 -2.63252 2 Socket - 4 Node Power8 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 1 206070 206585 0.249915 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 188386 189162 0.41192 1 201566 213760 6.04963 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM JVMS Prev Current %Change 8 59157.4 58736.8 -0.710985 1 105495 105419 -0.0720413 Some events stats before and after applying the patch. perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 13,825,492 14,285,708 migrations 1,152,509 1,180,621 faults 371,948 339,114 cache-misses 55,654,206,041 55,205,631,894 sched:sched_move_numa 1,856 843 sched:sched_stick_numa 4 6 sched:sched_swap_numa 428 219 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 898 365 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 57146 26907 numa_hint_faults_local 51612 24279 numa_hit 238164 239771 numa_huge_pte_updates 16 0 numa_interleave 63 68 numa_local 238085 239688 numa_other 79 83 numa_pages_migrated 883 363 numa_pte_updates 67540 27415 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 3,288,525 3,202,779 migrations 38,652 37,186 faults 111,678 106,076 cache-misses 12,111,197,376 12,024,873,744 sched:sched_move_numa 900 931 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 5 1 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 714 637 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 18572 17409 numa_hint_faults_local 14850 14367 numa_hit 73197 73953 numa_huge_pte_updates 11 20 numa_interleave 25 25 numa_local 73138 73892 numa_other 59 61 numa_pages_migrated 712 668 numa_pte_updates 24021 27276 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 8,451,543 8,474,013 migrations 202,804 254,934 faults 310,024 320,506 cache-misses 253,522,507 110,580,458 sched:sched_move_numa 213 725 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 2 7 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 88 145 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 11830 22797 numa_hint_faults_local 11301 21539 numa_hit 90038 89308 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 855 865 numa_local 89796 88955 numa_other 242 353 numa_pages_migrated 88 149 numa_pte_updates 12039 22930 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 2,049,153 2,195,628 migrations 11,405 11,179 faults 162,309 149,656 cache-misses 7,203,343 8,117,515 sched:sched_move_numa 22 49 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 0 0 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1 5 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 1693 3577 numa_hint_faults_local 1669 3476 numa_hit 25177 26142 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 194 358 numa_local 24993 26042 numa_other 184 100 numa_pages_migrated 1 5 numa_pte_updates 1577 3587 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 94,515,937 100,602,296 migrations 4,203,554 4,135,630 faults 832,697 789,256 cache-misses 226,248,698,331 226,160,621,058 sched:sched_move_numa 1,730 1,366 sched:sched_stick_numa 14 16 sched:sched_swap_numa 432 374 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1,398 1,350 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 80079 47857 numa_hint_faults_local 68620 39768 numa_hit 241187 240165 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 241186 240165 numa_other 1 0 numa_pages_migrated 1347 1224 numa_pte_updates 80729 48354 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 63,704,961 58,515,496 migrations 573,404 564,845 faults 230,878 245,807 cache-misses 76,568,222,781 73,603,757,976 sched:sched_move_numa 509 996 sched:sched_stick_numa 31 10 sched:sched_swap_numa 182 193 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 541 646 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 8501 13422 numa_hint_faults_local 2960 5619 numa_hit 35526 36118 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 35526 36116 numa_other 0 2 numa_pages_migrated 539 616 numa_pte_updates 8433 13374 Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537552141-27815-5-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> diff 3f9672ba Fri Sep 21 11:48:58 MDT 2018 Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> sched/numa: Reset scan rate whenever task moves across nodes Currently task scan rate is reset when NUMA balancer migrates the task to a different node. If NUMA balancer initiates a swap, reset is only applicable to the task that initiates the swap. Similarly no scan rate reset is done if the task is migrated across nodes by traditional load balancer. Instead move the scan reset to the migrate_task_rq. This ensures the task moved out of its preferred node, either gets back to its preferred node quickly or finds a new preferred node. Doing so, would be fair to all tasks migrating across nodes. Specjbb2005 results (8 warehouses) Higher bops are better 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 200668 203370 1.3465 1 321791 328431 2.06345 2 Socket - 4 Node Power8 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 1 204848 206070 0.59654 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 188098 188386 0.153112 1 200351 201566 0.606436 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM JVMS Prev Current %Change 8 58145.9 59157.4 1.73959 1 103798 105495 1.63491 Some events stats before and after applying the patch. perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 13,912,183 13,825,492 migrations 1,155,931 1,152,509 faults 367,139 371,948 cache-misses 54,240,196,814 55,654,206,041 sched:sched_move_numa 1,571 1,856 sched:sched_stick_numa 9 4 sched:sched_swap_numa 463 428 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 703 898 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 50155 57146 numa_hint_faults_local 45264 51612 numa_hit 239652 238164 numa_huge_pte_updates 36 16 numa_interleave 68 63 numa_local 239576 238085 numa_other 76 79 numa_pages_migrated 680 883 numa_pte_updates 71146 67540 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 3,156,720 3,288,525 migrations 30,354 38,652 faults 97,261 111,678 cache-misses 12,400,026,826 12,111,197,376 sched:sched_move_numa 4 900 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 1 5 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 20 714 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 272 18572 numa_hint_faults_local 186 14850 numa_hit 71362 73197 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 11 numa_interleave 23 25 numa_local 71299 73138 numa_other 63 59 numa_pages_migrated 2 712 numa_pte_updates 0 24021 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 8,606,824 8,451,543 migrations 155,352 202,804 faults 301,409 310,024 cache-misses 157,759,224 253,522,507 sched:sched_move_numa 168 213 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 3 2 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 125 88 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 4650 11830 numa_hint_faults_local 3946 11301 numa_hit 90489 90038 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 892 855 numa_local 90034 89796 numa_other 455 242 numa_pages_migrated 124 88 numa_pte_updates 4818 12039 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 2,113,167 2,049,153 migrations 10,533 11,405 faults 142,727 162,309 cache-misses 5,594,192 7,203,343 sched:sched_move_numa 10 22 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 0 0 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 6 1 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 744 1693 numa_hint_faults_local 584 1669 numa_hit 25551 25177 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 263 194 numa_local 25302 24993 numa_other 249 184 numa_pages_migrated 6 1 numa_pte_updates 744 1577 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 101,227,352 94,515,937 migrations 4,151,829 4,203,554 faults 745,233 832,697 cache-misses 224,669,561,766 226,248,698,331 sched:sched_move_numa 617 1,730 sched:sched_stick_numa 2 14 sched:sched_swap_numa 187 432 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 316 1,398 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 24195 80079 numa_hint_faults_local 21639 68620 numa_hit 238331 241187 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 238331 241186 numa_other 0 1 numa_pages_migrated 204 1347 numa_pte_updates 24561 80729 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 62,738,978 63,704,961 migrations 562,702 573,404 faults 228,465 230,878 cache-misses 75,778,067,952 76,568,222,781 sched:sched_move_numa 648 509 sched:sched_stick_numa 13 31 sched:sched_swap_numa 137 182 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 733 541 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 10281 8501 numa_hint_faults_local 3242 2960 numa_hit 36338 35526 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 36338 35526 numa_other 0 0 numa_pages_migrated 706 539 numa_pte_updates 10176 8433 Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537552141-27815-4-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
Completed in 1443 milliseconds