drm/i915/pxp/mtl: Update pxp-firmware response timeout

Update the max GSC-fw response time to match updated internal
fw specs. Because this response time is an SLA on the firmware,
not inclusive of i915->GuC->HW handoff latency, when submitting
requests to the GSC fw via intel_gsc_uc_heci_cmd_submit helpers,
start the count after the request hits the GSC command streamer.
Also, move GSC_REPLY_LATENCY_MS definition from pxp header to
intel_gsc_uc_heci_cmd_submit.h since its for any GSC HECI packet.

Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vivaik Balasubrawmanian <vivaik.balasubrawmanian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230917211933.1407559-2-alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com

drm/i915/gsc: Fix error code in intel_gsc_uc_heci_cmd_submit_nonpriv()

This should return negative -EAGAIN instead of positive EAGAIN.

Fixes: e5e1e6d28ebc ("drm/i915/pxp: Add MTL helpers to submit Heci-Cmd-Packet to GSC")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ZH7sr+Vs4zOQoouU@moroto

drm/i915/mtl/huc: auth HuC via GSC

The full authentication via the GSC requires an heci packet submission
to the GSC FW via the GSC CS. The GSC has new PXP command for this
(literally called NEW_HUC_AUTH).
The intel_huc_auth function is also updated to handle both authentication
types.

v2: check that the GuC auth for clear media has completed before
proceding with the full auth

v3: use a define for the object size (Alan)

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230531235415.1467475-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

drm/i915/pxp: Add MTL helpers to submit Heci-Cmd-Packet to GSC

Add helper functions into a new file for heci-packet-submission.
The helpers will handle generating the MTL GSC-CS Memory-Header
and submission of the Heci-Cmd-Packet instructions to the engine.

NOTE1: These common functions for heci-packet-submission will be used
by different i915 callers:
1- GSC-SW-Proxy: This is pending upstream publication awaiting
a few remaining opens
2- MTL-HDCP: An equivalent patch has also been published at:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/111876/. (Patch 1)
3- PXP: This series.

NOTE2: A difference in this patch vs what is appearing is in bullet 2
above is that HDCP (and SW-Proxy) will be using priveleged submission
(GGTT and common gsc-uc-context) while PXP will be using non-priveleged
PPGTT, context and batch buffer. Therefore this patch will only slightly
overlap with the MTL-HDCP patches despite have very similar function
names (emit_foo vs emit_nonpriv_foo). This is because HECI_CMD_PKT
instructions require different flows and hw-specific code when done
via PPGTT based submission (not different from other engines). MTL-HDCP
contains the same intel_gsc_mtl_header_t structures as this but the
helpers there are different. Both add the same new file names.

NOTE3: Additional clarity about the heci-cmd-pkt layout and where the
common helpers come in:
- On MTL, when an i915 subsystem needs to send a command request
to the security firmware, it will send that via the GSC-
engine-command-streamer.
- However those commands, (lets call them "gsc_specific_fw_api"
calls), are not understood by the GSC command streamer hw.
- The GSC CS only looks at the GSC_HECI_CMD_PKT instruction and
passes it along to the GSC firmware.
- The GSC FW on the other hand needs additional metadata to know
which usage service is being called (PXP, HDCP, proxy, etc) along
with session specific info. Thus an extra header called GSC-CS
HECI Memory Header, (C) in below diagram is prepended before
the FW specific API, (D).
- Thus, the structural layout of the request submitted would
need to look like the diagram below (for non-priv PXP).
- In the diagram, the common helper for HDCP, (GSC-Sw-Proxy) and
PXP (i.e. new function intel_gsc_uc_heci_cmd_emit_mtl_header)
will populate blob (C) while additional helpers, different for
PPGGTT (this patch) vs GGTT (HDCP series) will populate
blobs (A) and (B) below.
___________________________________________________________
(A) | MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START (ppgtt, batchbuff-addr, ...) |
| | |
| _|________________________________________________ |
| (B)| GSC_HECI_CMD_PKT (pkt-addr-in, pkt-size-in, | |
| | pkt-addr-out, pkt-size-out) |--------
| | MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END | | |
| |________________________________________________| | |
| | |
|_________________________________________________________| |
|
---------------------------------------------------------
|
\|/
______V___________________________________________
| _________________________________________ |
|(C)| | |
| | struct intel_gsc_mtl_header { | |
| | validity marker | |
| | heci_clent_id | |
| | ... | |
| | } | |
| |_______________________________________| |
|(D)| | |
| | struct gsc_fw_specific_api_foobar { | |
| | ... | |
| | For an example, see | |
| | 'struct pxp43_create_arb_in' at | |
| | intel_pxp_cmd_interface_43.h | |
| | | |
| | } | |
| | Struture depends on command type | |
| | struct gsc_fw_specific_api_foobar { | |
| |_______________________________________| |
|________________________________________________|

That said, this patch provides basic helpers but leaves the
PXP subsystem (i.e. the caller) to handle (D) and everything
else such as input/output size verification or handling the
responses from security firmware (for example, requiring a retry).

Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230511231738.1077674-4-alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com

drm/i915/mtl: Add function to send command to GSC CS

Add function that takes care of sending command to gsc cs. We start
of with allocation of memory for our command intel_hdcp_gsc_message that
contains gsc cs memory header as directed in specs followed by the
actual payload hdcp message that we want to send.
Spec states that we need to poll pending bit of response header around
20 times each try being 50ms apart hence adding that to current
gsc_msg_send function
Also we use the same function to take care of both sending and receiving
hence no separate function to get the response.

--v4
-Create common function to fill in gsc_mtl_header [Alan]
-define host session bitmask [Alan]

--v5
-use i915 directly instead of gt->i915 [Alan]
-No need to make fields NULL as we are already
using kzalloc [Alan]

--v8
-change mechanism to reuse the same memory for one hdcp session[Alan]
-fix header ordering
-add comments to explain flags and host session mask [Alan]

--v9
-remove gem obj from hdcp message as we can use
i915_vma_unpin_and_release [Alan]
-move hdcp message allocation and deallocation from hdcp2_enable and
hdcp2_disable to init and teardown of HDCP [Alan]

--v10
-remove unnecessary i915_vma_unpin [Alan]

--v11
-fix comment style [Uma]

Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Alan Pervin Teres <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230316092927.668980-6-suraj.kandpal@intel.com

drm/i915/gsc: Create GSC request submission mechanism

HDCP and PXP will require a common function to allow it to
submit commands to the gsc cs. Also adding the gsc mtl header
that needs to be added on to the existing payloads of HDCP
and PXP.

--v4
-Seprate gsc load and heci cmd submission into different
functions in different files for better scalability [Alan]
-Rename gsc address field [Alan]

--v5
-remove extra line is intel_gsc_fw.h [Uma]

Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal<suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230316092927.668980-2-suraj.kandpal@intel.com