History log of /linux-master/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c
Revision Date Author Comments
# 0f350231 08-Feb-2022 Song Liu <song@kernel.org>

bpf: Fix leftover header->pages in sparc and powerpc code.

Replace header->pages * PAGE_SIZE with new header->size.

Fixes: ed2d9e1a26cc ("bpf: Use size instead of pages in bpf_binary_header")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220208220509.4180389-2-song@kernel.org


# 06edc59c 19-Nov-2021 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

bpf, docs: Prune all references to "internal BPF"

The eBPF name has completely taken over from eBPF in general usage for
the actual eBPF representation, or BPF for any general in-kernel use.
Prune all remaining references to "internal BPF".

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211119163215.971383-4-hch@lst.de


# ebf7f6f0 04-Nov-2021 Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>

bpf: Change value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT from 32 to 33

In the current code, the actual max tail call count is 33 which is greater
than MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT (defined as 32). The actual limit is not consistent
with the meaning of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT and thus confusing at first glance.
We can see the historical evolution from commit 04fd61ab36ec ("bpf: allow
bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs") and commit f9dabe016b63
("bpf: Undo off-by-one in interpreter tail call count limit"). In order
to avoid changing existing behavior, the actual limit is 33 now, this is
reasonable.

After commit 874be05f525e ("bpf, tests: Add tail call test suite"), we can
see there exists failed testcase.

On all archs when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set:
# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf
# dmesg | grep -w FAIL
Tail call error path, max count reached jited:0 ret 34 != 33 FAIL

On some archs:
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf
# dmesg | grep -w FAIL
Tail call error path, max count reached jited:1 ret 34 != 33 FAIL

Although the above failed testcase has been fixed in commit 18935a72eb25
("bpf/tests: Fix error in tail call limit tests"), it would still be good
to change the value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT from 32 to 33 to make the code
more readable.

The 32-bit x86 JIT was using a limit of 32, just fix the wrong comments and
limit to 33 tail calls as the constant MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT updated. For the
mips64 JIT, use "ori" instead of "addiu" as suggested by Johan Almbladh.
For the riscv JIT, use RV_REG_TCC directly to save one register move as
suggested by Björn Töpel. For the other implementations, no function changes,
it does not change the current limit 33, the new value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT
can reflect the actual max tail call count, the related tail call testcases
in test_bpf module and selftests can work well for the interpreter and the
JIT.

Here are the test results on x86_64:

# uname -m
x86_64
# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls
# dmesg | tail -1
test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/8 JIT'ed]
# rmmod test_bpf
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls
# dmesg | tail -1
test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [8/8 JIT'ed]
# rmmod test_bpf
# ./test_progs -t tailcalls
#142 tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/11 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636075800-3264-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn


# f5e81d11 13-Jul-2021 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

bpf: Introduce BPF nospec instruction for mitigating Spectre v4

In case of JITs, each of the JIT backends compiles the BPF nospec instruction
/either/ to a machine instruction which emits a speculation barrier /or/ to
/no/ machine instruction in case the underlying architecture is not affected
by Speculative Store Bypass or has different mitigations in place already.

This covers both x86 and (implicitly) arm64: In case of x86, we use 'lfence'
instruction for mitigation. In case of arm64, we rely on the firmware mitigation
as controlled via the ssbd kernel parameter. Whenever the mitigation is enabled,
it works for all of the kernel code with no need to provide any additional
instructions here (hence only comment in arm64 JIT). Other archs can follow
as needed. The BPF nospec instruction is specifically targeting Spectre v4
since i) we don't use a serialization barrier for the Spectre v1 case, and
ii) mitigation instructions for v1 and v4 might be different on some archs.

The BPF nospec is required for a future commit, where the BPF verifier does
annotate intermediate BPF programs with speculation barriers.

Co-developed-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>


# 91c960b0 14-Jan-2021 Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>

bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .imm

A subsequent patch will add additional atomic operations. These new
operations will use the same opcode field as the existing XADD, with
the immediate discriminating different operations.

In preparation, rename the instruction mode BPF_ATOMIC and start
calling the zero immediate BPF_ADD.

This is possible (doesn't break existing valid BPF progs) because the
immediate field is currently reserved MBZ and BPF_ADD is zero.

All uses are removed from the tree but the BPF_XADD definition is
kept around to avoid breaking builds for people including kernel
headers.

Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-5-jackmanb@google.com


# 3e2a33cf 24-May-2019 Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>

sparc: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>


# 9df95e8e 19-Dec-2018 Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>

bpf: sparc64: Enable sparc64 jit to provide bpf_line_info

This patch enables sparc64's bpf_int_jit_compile() to provide
bpf_line_info by calling bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo().

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>


# 2b9034b5 26-Nov-2018 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

sparc: Adjust bpf JIT prologue for PSEUDO calls.

Move all arguments into output registers from input registers.

This path is exercised by test_verifier.c's "calls: two calls with
args" test. Adjust BPF_TAILCALL_PROLOGUE_SKIP as needed.

Let's also make the prologue length a constant size regardless of
the combination of ->saw_frame_pointer and ->saw_tail_call
settings.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>


# e2ac579a 26-Nov-2018 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

sparc: Correct ctx->saw_frame_pointer logic.

We need to initialize the frame pointer register not just if it is
seen as a source operand, but also if it is seen as the destination
operand of a store or an atomic instruction (which effectively is a
source operand).

This is exercised by test_verifier's "non-invalid fp arithmetic"

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>


# c44768a3 26-Nov-2018 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

sparc: Fix JIT fused branch convergance.

On T4 and later sparc64 cpus we can use the fused compare and branch
instruction.

However, it can only be used if the branch destination is in the range
of a signed 10-bit immediate offset. This amounts to 1024
instructions forwards or backwards.

After the commit referenced in the Fixes: tag, the largest possible
size program seen by the JIT explodes by a significant factor.

As a result of this convergance takes many more passes since the
expanded "BPF_LDX | BPF_MSH | BPF_B" code sequence, for example,
contains several embedded branch on condition instructions.

On each pass, as suddenly new fused compare and branch instances
become valid, this makes thousands more in range for the next pass.
And so on and so forth.

This is most greatly exemplified by "BPF_MAXINSNS: exec all MSH" which
takes 35 passes to converge, and shrinks the image by about 64K.

To decrease the cost of this number of convergance passes, do the
convergance pass before we have the program image allocated, just like
other JITs (such as x86) do.

Fixes: e0cea7ce988c ("bpf: implement ld_abs/ld_ind in native bpf")
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>


# 631b1e3b 14-May-2018 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

bpf, sparc: remove unused variable

Since fe83963b7c38 ("bpf, sparc64: remove ld_abs/ld_ind") it's not
used anymore therefore remove it.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>


# fe83963b 03-May-2018 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

bpf, sparc64: remove ld_abs/ld_ind

Since LD_ABS/LD_IND instructions are now removed from the core and
reimplemented through a combination of inlined BPF instructions and
a slow-path helper, we can get rid of the complexity from sparc64 JIT.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>


# 740d52c6 26-Jan-2018 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

bpf, sparc64: remove obsolete exception handling from div/mod

Since we've changed div/mod exception handling for src_reg in
eBPF verifier itself, remove the leftovers from sparc64 JIT.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>


# fa9dd599 19-Jan-2018 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

bpf: get rid of pure_initcall dependency to enable jits

Having a pure_initcall() callback just to permanently enable BPF
JITs under CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is unnecessary and could leave
a small race window in future where JIT is still disabled on boot.
Since we know about the setting at compilation time anyway, just
initialize it properly there. Also consolidate all the individual
bpf_jit_enable variables into a single one and move them under one
location. Moreover, don't allow for setting unspecified garbage
values on them.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>


# 5f5a6411 22-Dec-2017 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

bpf: sparc64: Add JIT support for multi-function programs.

Modelled strongly upon the arm64 implementation.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>


# 60b58afc 14-Dec-2017 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

bpf: fix net.core.bpf_jit_enable race

global bpf_jit_enable variable is tested multiple times in JITs,
blinding and verifier core. The malicious root can try to toggle
it while loading the programs. This race condition was accounted
for and there should be no issues, but it's safer to avoid
this race condition.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>


# 07aee943 14-Dec-2017 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

bpf, sparc: fix usage of wrong reg for load_skb_regs after call

When LD_ABS/IND is used in the program, and we have a BPF helper
call that changes packet data (bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() returns
true), then in case of sparc JIT, we try to reload cached skb data
from bpf2sparc[BPF_REG_6]. However, there is no such guarantee or
assumption that skb sits in R6 at this point, all helpers changing
skb data only have a guarantee that skb sits in R1. Therefore,
store BPF R1 in L7 temporarily and after procedure call use L7 to
reload cached skb data. skb sitting in R6 is only true at the time
when LD_ABS/IND is executed.

Fixes: 7a12b5031c6b ("sparc64: Add eBPF JIT.")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>


# b2441318 01-Nov-2017 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.

By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.

Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.

This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.

How this work was done:

Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,

Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.

The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.

The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).

All documentation files were explicitly excluded.

The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.

- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.

For non */uapi/* files that summary was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139

and resulted in the first patch in this series.

If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930

and resulted in the second patch in this series.

- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1

and that resulted in the third patch in this series.

- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).

- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.

- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).

- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.

In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.

Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.

In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.

Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct

This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.

These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.

Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>


# 18423550 09-Aug-2017 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

bpf, sparc64: implement jiting of BPF_J{LT, LE, SLT, SLE}

This work implements jiting of BPF_J{LT,LE,SLT,SLE} instructions
with BPF_X/BPF_K variants for the sparc64 eBPF JIT.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# 783d28dd1 05-Jun-2017 Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>

bpf: Add jited_len to struct bpf_prog

Add jited_len to struct bpf_prog. It will be
useful for the struct bpf_prog_info which will
be added in the later patch.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# a5e2ee5d 31-May-2017 David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

bpf: Take advantage of stack_depth tracking in sparc64 JIT

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# 71189fa9 30-May-2017 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

bpf: free up BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL | BPF_X opcode

free up BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL | BPF_X opcode to be used by actual
indirect call by register and use kernel internal opcode to
mark call instruction into bpf_tail_call() helper.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# e3bf4c61 01-May-2017 David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

sparc64: Fix BPF JIT wrt. branches and ldimm64 instructions.

Like other JITs, sparc64 maintains an array of instruction offsets but
stores the entries off by one. This is done because jumps to the
exit block are indexed to one past the last BPF instruction.

So if we size the array by the program length, we need to record
the previous instruction in order to stay within the array bounds.

This is explained in ARM JIT commit 8eee539ddea0 ("arm64: bpf: fix
out-of-bounds read in bpf2a64_offset()").

But this scheme requires a little bit of careful handling when
the instruction before the branch destination is a 64-bit load
immediate. It takes up 2 BPF instruction slots.

Therefore, we have to fill in the array entry for the second
half of the 64-bit load immediate instruction rather than for
the one for the beginning of that instruction.

Fixes: 7a12b5031c6b ("sparc64: Add eBPF JIT.")
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# 14933dc8 24-Apr-2017 David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

sparc64: Improve 64-bit constant loading in eBPF JIT.

Doing a full 64-bit decomposition is really stupid especially for
simple values like 0 and -1.

But if we are going to optimize this, go all the way and try for all 2
and 3 instruction sequences not requiring a temporary register as
well.

First we do the easy cases where it's a zero or sign extended 32-bit
number (sethi+or, sethi+xor, respectively).

Then we try to find a range of set bits we can load simply then shift
up into place, in various ways.

Then we try negating the constant and see if we can do a simple
sequence using that with a xor at the end. (f.e. the range of set
bits can't be loaded simply, but for the negated value it can)

The final optimized strategy involves 4 instructions sequences not
needing a temporary register.

Otherwise we sadly fully decompose using a temp..

Example, from ALU64_XOR_K: 0x0000ffffffff0000 ^ 0x0 = 0x0000ffffffff0000:

0000000000000000 <foo>:
0: 9d e3 bf 50 save %sp, -176, %sp
4: 01 00 00 00 nop
8: 90 10 00 18 mov %i0, %o0
c: 13 3f ff ff sethi %hi(0xfffffc00), %o1
10: 92 12 63 ff or %o1, 0x3ff, %o1 ! ffffffff <foo+0xffffffff>
14: 93 2a 70 10 sllx %o1, 0x10, %o1
18: 15 3f ff ff sethi %hi(0xfffffc00), %o2
1c: 94 12 a3 ff or %o2, 0x3ff, %o2 ! ffffffff <foo+0xffffffff>
20: 95 2a b0 10 sllx %o2, 0x10, %o2
24: 92 1a 60 00 xor %o1, 0, %o1
28: 12 e2 40 8a cxbe %o1, %o2, 38 <foo+0x38>
2c: 9a 10 20 02 mov 2, %o5
30: 10 60 00 03 b,pn %xcc, 3c <foo+0x3c>
34: 01 00 00 00 nop
38: 9a 10 20 01 mov 1, %o5 ! 1 <foo+0x1>
3c: 81 c7 e0 08 ret
40: 91 eb 40 00 restore %o5, %g0, %o0

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# e3a724ed 24-Apr-2017 David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

sparc64: Support cbcond instructions in eBPF JIT.

cbcond combines a compare with a branch into a single instruction.

The limitations are:

1) Only newer chips support it

2) For immediate compares we are limited to 5-bit signed immediate
values

3) The branch displacement is limited to 10-bit signed

4) We cannot use it for JSET

Also, cbcond (unlike all other sparc control transfers) lacks a delay
slot.

Currently we don't have a useful instruction we can push into the
delay slot of normal branches. So using cbcond pretty much always
increases code density, and is therefore a win.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# 7a12b503 17-Apr-2017 David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

sparc64: Add eBPF JIT.

This is an eBPF JIT for sparc64. All major features are supported.

All tests under tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ pass.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# 6b3d4eec 17-Apr-2017 David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

sparc: Split BPF JIT into 32-bit and 64-bit.

This is in preparation for adding the 64-bit eBPF JIT.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>