| #
bbcf0f55 |
|
28-Aug-2022 |
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> |
bpf, mips: No need to use min() to get MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT
MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT is 33, so min(MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, 0xffff) is always
MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, it is better to use MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT directly.
At the same time, add BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT > 0xffff) with a
comment on why the assertion is there.
Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Suggested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1661742309-2320-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
|
| #
ebf7f6f0 |
|
04-Nov-2021 |
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> |
bpf: Change value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT from 32 to 33
In the current code, the actual max tail call count is 33 which is greater
than MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT (defined as 32). The actual limit is not consistent
with the meaning of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT and thus confusing at first glance.
We can see the historical evolution from commit 04fd61ab36ec ("bpf: allow
bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs") and commit f9dabe016b63
("bpf: Undo off-by-one in interpreter tail call count limit"). In order
to avoid changing existing behavior, the actual limit is 33 now, this is
reasonable.
After commit 874be05f525e ("bpf, tests: Add tail call test suite"), we can
see there exists failed testcase.
On all archs when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set:
# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf
# dmesg | grep -w FAIL
Tail call error path, max count reached jited:0 ret 34 != 33 FAIL
On some archs:
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf
# dmesg | grep -w FAIL
Tail call error path, max count reached jited:1 ret 34 != 33 FAIL
Although the above failed testcase has been fixed in commit 18935a72eb25
("bpf/tests: Fix error in tail call limit tests"), it would still be good
to change the value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT from 32 to 33 to make the code
more readable.
The 32-bit x86 JIT was using a limit of 32, just fix the wrong comments and
limit to 33 tail calls as the constant MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT updated. For the
mips64 JIT, use "ori" instead of "addiu" as suggested by Johan Almbladh.
For the riscv JIT, use RV_REG_TCC directly to save one register move as
suggested by Björn Töpel. For the other implementations, no function changes,
it does not change the current limit 33, the new value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT
can reflect the actual max tail call count, the related tail call testcases
in test_bpf module and selftests can work well for the interpreter and the
JIT.
Here are the test results on x86_64:
# uname -m
x86_64
# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls
# dmesg | tail -1
test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/8 JIT'ed]
# rmmod test_bpf
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls
# dmesg | tail -1
test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [8/8 JIT'ed]
# rmmod test_bpf
# ./test_progs -t tailcalls
#142 tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/11 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636075800-3264-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
|
| #
eb63cfcd |
|
05-Oct-2021 |
Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> |
mips, bpf: Add eBPF JIT for 32-bit MIPS
This is an implementation of an eBPF JIT for 32-bit MIPS I-V and MIPS32.
The implementation supports all 32-bit and 64-bit ALU and JMP operations,
including the recently-added atomics. 64-bit div/mod and 64-bit atomics
are implemented using function calls to math64 and atomic64 functions,
respectively. All 32-bit operations are implemented natively by the JIT,
except if the CPU lacks ll/sc instructions.
Register mapping
================
All 64-bit eBPF registers are mapped to native 32-bit MIPS register pairs,
and does not use any stack scratch space for register swapping. This means
that all eBPF register data is kept in CPU registers all the time, and
this simplifies the register management a lot. It also reduces the JIT's
pressure on temporary registers since we do not have to move data around.
Native register pairs are ordered according to CPU endiannes, following
the O32 calling convention for passing 64-bit arguments and return values.
The eBPF return value, arguments and callee-saved registers are mapped to
their native MIPS equivalents.
Since the 32 highest bits in the eBPF FP (frame pointer) register are
always zero, only one general-purpose register is actually needed for the
mapping. The MIPS fp register is used for this purpose. The high bits are
mapped to MIPS register r0. This saves us one CPU register, which is much
needed for temporaries, while still allowing us to treat the R10 (FP)
register just like any other eBPF register in the JIT.
The MIPS gp (global pointer) and at (assembler temporary) registers are
used as internal temporary registers for constant blinding. CPU registers
t6-t9 are used internally by the JIT when constructing more complex 64-bit
operations. This is precisely what is needed - two registers to store an
operand value, and two more as scratch registers when performing the
operation.
The register mapping is shown below.
R0 - $v1, $v0 return value
R1 - $a1, $a0 argument 1, passed in registers
R2 - $a3, $a2 argument 2, passed in registers
R3 - $t1, $t0 argument 3, passed on stack
R4 - $t3, $t2 argument 4, passed on stack
R5 - $t4, $t3 argument 5, passed on stack
R6 - $s1, $s0 callee-saved
R7 - $s3, $s2 callee-saved
R8 - $s5, $s4 callee-saved
R9 - $s7, $s6 callee-saved
FP - $r0, $fp 32-bit frame pointer
AX - $gp, $at constant-blinding
$t6 - $t9 unallocated, JIT temporaries
Jump offsets
============
The JIT tries to map all conditional JMP operations to MIPS conditional
PC-relative branches. The MIPS branch offset field is 18 bits, in bytes,
which is equivalent to the eBPF 16-bit instruction offset. However, since
the JIT may emit more than one CPU instruction per eBPF instruction, the
field width may overflow. If that happens, the JIT converts the long
conditional jump to a short PC-relative branch with the condition
inverted, jumping over a long unconditional absolute jmp (j).
This conversion will change the instruction offset mapping used for jumps,
and may in turn result in more branch offset overflows. The JIT therefore
dry-runs the translation until no more branches are converted and the
offsets do not change anymore. There is an upper bound on this of course,
and if the JIT hits that limit, the last two iterations are run with all
branches being converted.
Tail call count
===============
The current tail call count is stored in the 16-byte area of the caller's
stack frame that is reserved for the callee in the o32 ABI. The value is
initialized in the prologue, and propagated to the tail-callee by skipping
the initialization instructions when emitting the tail call.
Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211005165408.2305108-4-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
|