#
331722 |
|
29-Mar-2018 |
eadler |
Revert r330897:
This was intended to be a non-functional change. It wasn't. The commit message was thus wrong. In addition it broke arm, and merged crypto related code.
Revert with prejudice.
This revert skips files touched in r316370 since that commit was since MFCed. This revert also skips files that require $FreeBSD$ property changes.
Thank you to those who helped me get out of this mess including but not limited to gonzo, kevans, rgrimes.
Requested by: gjb (re)
|
#
281562 |
|
15-Apr-2015 |
rmacklem |
File systems that do not use the buffer cache (such as ZFS) must use VOP_FSYNC() to perform the NFS server's Commit operation. This patch adds a mnt_kern_flag called MNTK_USES_BCACHE which is set by file systems that use the buffer cache. If this flag is not set, the NFS server always does a VOP_FSYNC(). This should be ok for old file system modules that do not set MNTK_USES_BCACHE, since calling VOP_FSYNC() is correct, although it might not be optimal for file systems that use the buffer cache.
Reviewed by: kib MFC after: 2 weeks
|
#
273377 |
|
21-Oct-2014 |
hselasky |
Fix multiple incorrect SYSCTL arguments in the kernel:
- Wrong integer type was specified.
- Wrong or missing "access" specifier. The "access" specifier sometimes included the SYSCTL type, which it should not, except for procedural SYSCTL nodes.
- Logical OR where binary OR was expected.
- Properly assert the "access" argument passed to all SYSCTL macros, using the CTASSERT macro. This applies to both static- and dynamically created SYSCTLs.
- Properly assert the the data type for both static and dynamic SYSCTLs. In the case of static SYSCTLs we only assert that the data pointed to by the SYSCTL data pointer has the correct size, hence there is no easy way to assert types in the C language outside a C-function.
- Rewrote some code which doesn't pass a constant "access" specifier when creating dynamic SYSCTL nodes, which is now a requirement.
- Updated "EXAMPLES" section in SYSCTL manual page.
MFC after: 3 days Sponsored by: Mellanox Technologies
|
#
255219 |
|
04-Sep-2013 |
pjd |
Change the cap_rights_t type from uint64_t to a structure that we can extend in the future in a backward compatible (API and ABI) way.
The cap_rights_t represents capability rights. We used to use one bit to represent one right, but we are running out of spare bits. Currently the new structure provides place for 114 rights (so 50 more than the previous cap_rights_t), but it is possible to grow the structure to hold at least 285 rights, although we can make it even larger if 285 rights won't be enough.
The structure definition looks like this:
struct cap_rights { uint64_t cr_rights[CAP_RIGHTS_VERSION + 2]; };
The initial CAP_RIGHTS_VERSION is 0.
The top two bits in the first element of the cr_rights[] array contain total number of elements in the array - 2. This means if those two bits are equal to 0, we have 2 array elements.
The top two bits in all remaining array elements should be 0. The next five bits in all array elements contain array index. Only one bit is used and bit position in this five-bits range defines array index. This means there can be at most five array elements in the future.
To define new right the CAPRIGHT() macro must be used. The macro takes two arguments - an array index and a bit to set, eg.
#define CAP_PDKILL CAPRIGHT(1, 0x0000000000000800ULL)
We still support aliases that combine few rights, but the rights have to belong to the same array element, eg:
#define CAP_LOOKUP CAPRIGHT(0, 0x0000000000000400ULL) #define CAP_FCHMOD CAPRIGHT(0, 0x0000000000002000ULL)
#define CAP_FCHMODAT (CAP_FCHMOD | CAP_LOOKUP)
There is new API to manage the new cap_rights_t structure:
cap_rights_t *cap_rights_init(cap_rights_t *rights, ...); void cap_rights_set(cap_rights_t *rights, ...); void cap_rights_clear(cap_rights_t *rights, ...); bool cap_rights_is_set(const cap_rights_t *rights, ...);
bool cap_rights_is_valid(const cap_rights_t *rights); void cap_rights_merge(cap_rights_t *dst, const cap_rights_t *src); void cap_rights_remove(cap_rights_t *dst, const cap_rights_t *src); bool cap_rights_contains(const cap_rights_t *big, const cap_rights_t *little);
Capability rights to the cap_rights_init(), cap_rights_set(), cap_rights_clear() and cap_rights_is_set() functions are provided by separating them with commas, eg:
cap_rights_t rights;
cap_rights_init(&rights, CAP_READ, CAP_WRITE, CAP_FSTAT);
There is no need to terminate the list of rights, as those functions are actually macros that take care of the termination, eg:
#define cap_rights_set(rights, ...) \ __cap_rights_set((rights), __VA_ARGS__, 0ULL) void __cap_rights_set(cap_rights_t *rights, ...);
Thanks to using one bit as an array index we can assert in those functions that there are no two rights belonging to different array elements provided together. For example this is illegal and will be detected, because CAP_LOOKUP belongs to element 0 and CAP_PDKILL to element 1:
cap_rights_init(&rights, CAP_LOOKUP | CAP_PDKILL);
Providing several rights that belongs to the same array's element this way is correct, but is not advised. It should only be used for aliases definition.
This commit also breaks compatibility with some existing Capsicum system calls, but I see no other way to do that. This should be fine as Capsicum is still experimental and this change is not going to 9.x.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
|
#
241519 |
|
13-Oct-2012 |
attilio |
Import a FreeBSD port of the FUSE Linux module. This has been developed during 2 summer of code mandates and being revived by gnn recently. The functionality in this commit mirrors entirely content of fusefs-kmod port, which doesn't need to be installed anymore for -CURRENT setups.
In order to get some sparse technical notes, please refer to: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2012-March/013876.html
or to the project branch: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/projects/fuse/
which also contains granular history of changes happened during port refinements. This commit does not came from the branch reintegration itself because it seems svn is not behaving properly for this functionaly at the moment.
Partly Sponsored by: Google, Summer of Code program 2005, 2011 Originally submitted by: ilya, Csaba Henk <csaba-ml AT creo DOT hu > In collabouration with: pho Tested by: flo, gnn, Gustau Perez, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman AT gmail DOT com> MFC after: 2 months
|