1                                  _   _ ____  _
2                              ___| | | |  _ \| |
3                             / __| | | | |_) | |
4                            | (__| |_| |  _ <| |___
5                             \___|\___/|_| \_\_____|
6
7                        When Contributing Source Code
8
9 This document is intended to offer guidelines that can be useful to keep in
10 mind when you decide to contribute to the project. This concerns new features
11 as well as corrections to existing flaws or bugs.
12
13 1. Learning cURL
14 1.1 Join the Community
15 1.2 License
16 1.3 What To Read
17
18 2. cURL Coding Standards
19 2.1 Naming
20 2.2 Indenting
21 2.3 Commenting
22 2.4 Line Lengths
23 2.5 General Style
24 2.6 Non-clobbering All Over
25 2.7 Platform Dependent Code
26 2.8 Write Separate Patches
27 2.9 Patch Against Recent Sources
28 2.10 Document
29 2.11 Test Cases
30
31 3. Pushing Out Your Changes
32 3.1 Write Access to git Repository
33 3.2 How To Make a Patch with git
34 3.3 How To Make a Patch without git
35 3.4 How to get your changes into the main sources
36 3.5 Write good commit messages
37 3.6 Please don't send pull requests
38
39==============================================================================
40
411. Learning cURL
42
431.1 Join the Community
44
45 Skip over to http://curl.haxx.se/mail/ and join the appropriate mailing
46 list(s).  Read up on details before you post questions. Read this file before
47 you start sending patches! We prefer patches and discussions being held on
48 the mailing list(s), not sent to individuals.
49
50 Before posting to one of the curl mailing lists, please read up on the mailing
51 list etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
52
53 We also hang out on IRC in #curl on irc.freenode.net
54
551.2. License
56
57 When contributing with code, you agree to put your changes and new code under
58 the same license curl and libcurl is already using unless stated and agreed
59 otherwise.
60
61 If you add a larger piece of code, you can opt to make that file or set of
62 files to use a different license as long as they don't enforce any changes to
63 the rest of the package and they make sense. Such "separate parts" can not be
64 GPL licensed (as we don't want copyleft to affect users of libcurl) but they
65 must use "GPL compatible" licenses (as we want to allow users to use libcurl
66 properly in GPL licensed environments).
67
68 When changing existing source code, you do not alter the copyright of the
69 original file(s). The copyright will still be owned by the original
70 creator(s) or those who have been assigned copyright by the original
71 author(s).
72
73 By submitting a patch to the curl project, you are assumed to have the right
74 to the code and to be allowed by your employer or whatever to hand over that
75 patch/code to us. We will credit you for your changes as far as possible, to
76 give credit but also to keep a trace back to who made what changes. Please
77 always provide us with your full real name when contributing!
78
791.3 What To Read
80
81 Source code, the man pages, the INTERNALS document, TODO, KNOWN_BUGS, the
82 most recent CHANGES. Just lurking on the curl-library mailing list is gonna
83 give you a lot of insights on what's going on right now. Asking there is a
84 good idea too.
85
862. cURL Coding Standards
87
882.1 Naming
89
90 Try using a non-confusing naming scheme for your new functions and variable
91 names. It doesn't necessarily have to mean that you should use the same as in
92 other places of the code, just that the names should be logical,
93 understandable and be named according to what they're used for. File-local
94 functions should be made static. We like lower case names.
95
96 See the INTERNALS document on how we name non-exported library-global
97 symbols.
98
992.2 Indenting
100
101 Use the same indenting levels and bracing method as all the other code
102 already does. It makes the source code easier to follow if all of it is
103 written using the same style. We don't ask you to like it, we just ask you to
104 follow the tradition! ;-) This mainly means: 2-level indents, using spaces
105 only (no tabs) and having the opening brace ({) on the same line as the if()
106 or while().
107
108 Also note that we use if() and while() with no space before the parenthesis.
109
1102.3 Commenting
111
112 Comment your source code extensively using C comments (/* comment */), DO NOT
113 use C++ comments (// this style). Commented code is quality code and enables
114 future modifications much more. Uncommented code risk having to be completely
115 replaced when someone wants to extend things, since other persons' source
116 code can get quite hard to read.
117
1182.4 Line Lengths
119
120 We write source lines shorter than 80 columns.
121
1222.5 General Style
123
124 Keep your functions small. If they're small you avoid a lot of mistakes and
125 you don't accidentally mix up variables etc.
126
1272.6 Non-clobbering All Over
128
129 When you write new functionality or fix bugs, it is important that you don't
130 fiddle all over the source files and functions. Remember that it is likely
131 that other people have done changes in the same source files as you have and
132 possibly even in the same functions. If you bring completely new
133 functionality, try writing it in a new source file. If you fix bugs, try to
134 fix one bug at a time and send them as separate patches.
135
1362.7 Platform Dependent Code
137
138 Use #ifdef HAVE_FEATURE to do conditional code. We avoid checking for
139 particular operating systems or hardware in the #ifdef lines. The
140 HAVE_FEATURE shall be generated by the configure script for unix-like systems
141 and they are hard-coded in the config-[system].h files for the others.
142
1432.8 Write Separate Patches
144
145 It is annoying when you get a huge patch from someone that is said to fix 511
146 odd problems, but discussions and opinions don't agree with 510 of them - or
147 509 of them were already fixed in a different way. Then the patcher needs to
148 extract the single interesting patch from somewhere within the huge pile of
149 source, and that gives a lot of extra work. Preferably, all fixes that
150 correct different problems should be in their own patch with an attached
151 description exactly what they correct so that all patches can be selectively
152 applied by the maintainer or other interested parties.
153
154 Also, separate patches enable bisecting much better when we track problems in
155 the future.
156
1572.9 Patch Against Recent Sources
158
159 Please try to get the latest available sources to make your patches
160 against. It makes the life of the developers so much easier. The very best is
161 if you get the most up-to-date sources from the git repository, but the
162 latest release archive is quite OK as well!
163
1642.10 Document
165
166 Writing docs is dead boring and one of the big problems with many open source
167 projects. Someone's gotta do it. It makes it a lot easier if you submit a
168 small description of your fix or your new features with every contribution so
169 that it can be swiftly added to the package documentation.
170
171 The documentation is always made in man pages (nroff formatted) or plain
172 ASCII files. All HTML files on the web site and in the release archives are
173 generated from the nroff/ASCII versions.
174
1752.11 Test Cases
176
177 Since the introduction of the test suite, we can quickly verify that the main
178 features are working as they're supposed to. To maintain this situation and
179 improve it, all new features and functions that are added need to be tested
180 in the test suite. Every feature that is added should get at least one valid
181 test case that verifies that it works as documented. If every submitter also
182 posts a few test cases, it won't end up as a heavy burden on a single person!
183
184 If you don't have test cases or perhaps you have done something that is very
185 hard to write tests for, do explain exactly how you have otherwise tested and
186 verified your changes.
187
1883. Pushing Out Your Changes
189
1903.1 Write Access to git Repository
191
192 If you are a frequent contributor, or have another good reason, you can of
193 course get write access to the git repository and then you'll be able to push
194 your changes straight into the git repo instead of sending changes by mail as
195 patches. Just ask if this is what you'd want. You will be required to have
196 posted a few quality patches first, before you can be granted push access.
197
1983.2 How To Make a Patch with git
199
200 You need to first checkout the repository:
201
202     git clone git://github.com/bagder/curl.git
203
204 You then proceed and edit all the files you like and you commit them to your
205 local repository:
206
207     git commit [file]
208
209 As usual, group your commits so that you commit all changes that at once that
210 constitutes a logical change. See also section "3.5 Write good commit
211 messages".
212
213 Once you have done all your commits and you're happy with what you see, you
214 can make patches out of your changes that are suitable for mailing:
215
216     git format-patch remotes/origin/master
217
218 This creates files in your local directory named NNNN-[name].patch for each
219 commit.
220
221 Now send those patches off to the curl-library list. You can of course opt to
222 do that with the 'git send-email' command.
223
2243.3 How To Make a Patch without git
225
226 Keep a copy of the unmodified curl sources. Make your changes in a separate
227 source tree. When you think you have something that you want to offer the
228 curl community, use GNU diff to generate patches.
229
230 If you have modified a single file, try something like:
231
232     diff -u unmodified-file.c my-changed-one.c > my-fixes.diff
233
234 If you have modified several files, possibly in different directories, you
235 can use diff recursively:
236
237     diff -ur curl-original-dir curl-modified-sources-dir > my-fixes.diff
238
239 The GNU diff and GNU patch tools exist for virtually all platforms, including
240 all kinds of Unixes and Windows:
241
242 For unix-like operating systems:
243
244     http://www.gnu.org/software/patch/patch.html
245     http://www.gnu.org/directory/diffutils.html
246
247 For Windows:
248
249     http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/patch.htm
250     http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htm
251
2523.4 How to get your changes into the main sources
253
254 Submit your patch to the curl-library mailing list.
255
256 Make the patch against as recent sources as possible.
257
258 Make sure your patch adheres to the source indent and coding style of already
259 existing source code. Failing to do so just adds more work for me.
260
261 Respond to replies on the list about the patch and answer questions and/or
262 fix nits/flaws. This is very important. I will take lack of replies as a sign
263 that you're not very anxious to get your patch accepted and I tend to simply
264 drop such patches from my TODO list.
265
266 If you've followed the above paragraphs and your patch still hasn't been
267 incorporated after some weeks, consider resubmitting it to the list.
268
2693.5 Write good commit messages
270
271 A short guide to how to do fine commit messages in the curl project.
272
273      ---- start ----
274      [area]: [short line describing the main effect]
275
276      [separate the above single line from the rest with an empty line]
277
278      [full description, no wider than 72 columns that describe as much as
279      possible as to why this change is made, and possibly what things
280      it fixes and everything else that is related]
281      ---- stop ----
282
283 Don't forget to use commit --author="" if you commit someone else's work,
284 and make sure that you have your own user and email setup correctly in git
285 before you commit
286
2873.6 Please don't send pull requests
288
289 With git (and especially github) it is easy and tempting to send a pull
290 request to one or more people in the curl project to have changes merged this
291 way instead of mailing patches to the curl-library mailing list.
292
293 We don't like that. We want them mailed for these reasons:
294
295 - Peer review. Anyone and everyone on the list can review, comment and
296   improve on the patch. Pull requests limit this ability.
297
298 - Anyone can merge the patch into their own trees for testing and those who
299   have push rights can push it to the main repo. It doesn't have to be anyone
300   the patch author knows beforehand.
301
302 - Commit messages can be tweaked and changed if merged locally instead of
303   using github. Merges directly on github requires the changes to be perfect
304   already, which they seldom are.
305
306 - Merges on github prevents rebases and even enforces --no-ff which is a git
307   style we don't otherwise use in the project
308
309 However: once patches have been reviewed and deemed fine on list they are
310 perfectly OK to be pulled from a published git tree.
311