1\input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2@setfilename gprof.info
3@c Copyright (C) 1988-2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
4@settitle GNU gprof
5@setchapternewpage odd
6
7@c man begin INCLUDE
8@include bfdver.texi
9@c man end
10
11@ifnottex
12@c This is a dir.info fragment to support semi-automated addition of
13@c manuals to an info tree.  zoo@cygnus.com is developing this facility.
14@dircategory Software development
15@direntry
16* gprof: (gprof).                Profiling your program's execution
17@end direntry
18@end ifnottex
19
20@copying
21This file documents the gprof profiler of the GNU system.
22
23@c man begin COPYRIGHT
24Copyright @copyright{} 1988-2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
25
26Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
27under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3
28or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
29with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no
30Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license is included in the
31section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''.
32
33@c man end
34@end copying
35
36@finalout
37@smallbook
38
39@titlepage
40@title GNU gprof
41@subtitle The @sc{gnu} Profiler
42@ifset VERSION_PACKAGE
43@subtitle @value{VERSION_PACKAGE}
44@end ifset
45@subtitle Version @value{VERSION}
46@author Jay Fenlason and Richard Stallman
47
48@page
49
50This manual describes the @sc{gnu} profiler, @code{gprof}, and how you
51can use it to determine which parts of a program are taking most of the
52execution time.  We assume that you know how to write, compile, and
53execute programs.  @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} was written by Jay Fenlason.
54Eric S. Raymond made some minor corrections and additions in 2003.
55
56@vskip 0pt plus 1filll
57Copyright @copyright{} 1988-2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
58
59      Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
60      under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3
61      or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
62      with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no
63      Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license is included in the
64      section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''.
65
66@end titlepage
67@contents
68
69@ifnottex
70@node Top
71@top Profiling a Program: Where Does It Spend Its Time?
72
73This manual describes the @sc{gnu} profiler, @code{gprof}, and how you
74can use it to determine which parts of a program are taking most of the
75execution time.  We assume that you know how to write, compile, and
76execute programs.  @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} was written by Jay Fenlason.
77
78This manual is for @code{gprof}
79@ifset VERSION_PACKAGE
80@value{VERSION_PACKAGE}
81@end ifset
82version @value{VERSION}.
83
84This document is distributed under the terms of the GNU Free
85Documentation License version 1.3.  A copy of the license is included
86in the section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''.
87
88@menu
89* Introduction::        What profiling means, and why it is useful.
90
91* Compiling::           How to compile your program for profiling.
92* Executing::           Executing your program to generate profile data
93* Invoking::            How to run @code{gprof}, and its options
94
95* Output::              Interpreting @code{gprof}'s output
96
97* Inaccuracy::          Potential problems you should be aware of
98* How do I?::           Answers to common questions
99* Incompatibilities::   (between @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} and Unix @code{gprof}.)
100* Details::             Details of how profiling is done
101* GNU Free Documentation License::  GNU Free Documentation License
102@end menu
103@end ifnottex
104
105@node Introduction
106@chapter Introduction to Profiling
107
108@ifset man
109@c man title gprof display call graph profile data
110
111@smallexample
112@c man begin SYNOPSIS
113gprof [ -[abcDhilLrsTvwxyz] ] [ -[ABCeEfFJnNOpPqQRStZ][@var{name}] ]
114 [ -I @var{dirs} ] [ -d[@var{num}] ] [ -k @var{from/to} ]
115 [ -m @var{min-count} ] [ -R @var{map_file} ] [ -t @var{table-length} ]
116 [ --[no-]annotated-source[=@var{name}] ]
117 [ --[no-]exec-counts[=@var{name}] ]
118 [ --[no-]flat-profile[=@var{name}] ] [ --[no-]graph[=@var{name}] ]
119 [ --[no-]time=@var{name}] [ --all-lines ] [ --brief ]
120 [ --debug[=@var{level}] ] [ --function-ordering ]
121 [ --file-ordering @var{map_file} ] [ --directory-path=@var{dirs} ]
122 [ --display-unused-functions ] [ --file-format=@var{name} ]
123 [ --file-info ] [ --help ] [ --line ] [ --inline-file-names ]
124 [ --min-count=@var{n} ] [ --no-static ] [ --print-path ]
125 [ --separate-files ] [ --static-call-graph ] [ --sum ]
126 [ --table-length=@var{len} ] [ --traditional ] [ --version ]
127 [ --width=@var{n} ] [ --ignore-non-functions ]
128 [ --demangle[=@var{STYLE}] ] [ --no-demangle ]
129 [--external-symbol-table=name]
130 [ @var{image-file} ] [ @var{profile-file} @dots{} ]
131@c man end
132@end smallexample
133
134@c man begin DESCRIPTION
135@code{gprof} produces an execution profile of C, Pascal, or Fortran77
136programs.  The effect of called routines is incorporated in the profile
137of each caller.  The profile data is taken from the call graph profile file
138(@file{gmon.out} default) which is created by programs
139that are compiled with the @samp{-pg} option of
140@code{cc}, @code{pc}, and @code{f77}.
141The @samp{-pg} option also links in versions of the library routines
142that are compiled for profiling.  @code{Gprof} reads the given object
143file (the default is @code{a.out}) and establishes the relation between
144its symbol table and the call graph profile from @file{gmon.out}.
145If more than one profile file is specified, the @code{gprof}
146output shows the sum of the profile information in the given profile files.
147
148@code{Gprof} calculates the amount of time spent in each routine.
149Next, these times are propagated along the edges of the call graph.
150Cycles are discovered, and calls into a cycle are made to share the time
151of the cycle.
152
153@c man end
154
155@c man begin BUGS
156The granularity of the sampling is shown, but remains
157statistical at best.
158We assume that the time for each execution of a function
159can be expressed by the total time for the function divided
160by the number of times the function is called.
161Thus the time propagated along the call graph arcs to the function's
162parents is directly proportional to the number of times that
163arc is traversed.
164
165Parents that are not themselves profiled will have the time of
166their profiled children propagated to them, but they will appear
167to be spontaneously invoked in the call graph listing, and will
168not have their time propagated further.
169Similarly, signal catchers, even though profiled, will appear
170to be spontaneous (although for more obscure reasons).
171Any profiled children of signal catchers should have their times
172propagated properly, unless the signal catcher was invoked during
173the execution of the profiling routine, in which case all is lost.
174
175The profiled program must call @code{exit}(2)
176or return normally for the profiling information to be saved
177in the @file{gmon.out} file.
178@c man end
179
180@c man begin FILES
181@table @code
182@item @file{a.out}
183the namelist and text space.
184@item @file{gmon.out}
185dynamic call graph and profile.
186@item @file{gmon.sum}
187summarized dynamic call graph and profile.
188@end table
189@c man end
190
191@c man begin SEEALSO
192monitor(3), profil(2), cc(1), prof(1), and the Info entry for @file{gprof}.
193
194``An Execution Profiler for Modular Programs'',
195by S. Graham, P. Kessler, M. McKusick;
196Software - Practice and Experience,
197Vol. 13, pp. 671-685, 1983.
198
199``gprof: A Call Graph Execution Profiler'',
200by S. Graham, P. Kessler, M. McKusick;
201Proceedings of the SIGPLAN '82 Symposium on Compiler Construction,
202SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 17, No  6, pp. 120-126, June 1982.
203@c man end
204@end ifset
205
206Profiling allows you to learn where your program spent its time and which
207functions called which other functions while it was executing.  This
208information can show you which pieces of your program are slower than you
209expected, and might be candidates for rewriting to make your program
210execute faster.  It can also tell you which functions are being called more
211or less often than you expected.  This may help you spot bugs that had
212otherwise been unnoticed.
213
214Since the profiler uses information collected during the actual execution
215of your program, it can be used on programs that are too large or too
216complex to analyze by reading the source.  However, how your program is run
217will affect the information that shows up in the profile data.  If you
218don't use some feature of your program while it is being profiled, no
219profile information will be generated for that feature.
220
221Profiling has several steps:
222
223@itemize @bullet
224@item
225You must compile and link your program with profiling enabled.
226@xref{Compiling, ,Compiling a Program for Profiling}.
227
228@item
229You must execute your program to generate a profile data file.
230@xref{Executing, ,Executing the Program}.
231
232@item
233You must run @code{gprof} to analyze the profile data.
234@xref{Invoking, ,@code{gprof} Command Summary}.
235@end itemize
236
237The next three chapters explain these steps in greater detail.
238
239@c man begin DESCRIPTION
240
241Several forms of output are available from the analysis.
242
243The @dfn{flat profile} shows how much time your program spent in each function,
244and how many times that function was called.  If you simply want to know
245which functions burn most of the cycles, it is stated concisely here.
246@xref{Flat Profile, ,The Flat Profile}.
247
248The @dfn{call graph} shows, for each function, which functions called it, which
249other functions it called, and how many times.  There is also an estimate
250of how much time was spent in the subroutines of each function.  This can
251suggest places where you might try to eliminate function calls that use a
252lot of time.  @xref{Call Graph, ,The Call Graph}.
253
254The @dfn{annotated source} listing is a copy of the program's
255source code, labeled with the number of times each line of the
256program was executed.  @xref{Annotated Source, ,The Annotated Source
257Listing}.
258@c man end
259
260To better understand how profiling works, you may wish to read
261a description of its implementation.
262@xref{Implementation, ,Implementation of Profiling}.
263
264@node Compiling
265@chapter Compiling a Program for Profiling
266
267The first step in generating profile information for your program is
268to compile and link it with profiling enabled.
269
270To compile a source file for profiling, specify the @samp{-pg} option when
271you run the compiler.  (This is in addition to the options you normally
272use.)
273
274To link the program for profiling, if you use a compiler such as @code{cc}
275to do the linking, simply specify @samp{-pg} in addition to your usual
276options.  The same option, @samp{-pg}, alters either compilation or linking
277to do what is necessary for profiling.  Here are examples:
278
279@example
280cc -g -c myprog.c utils.c -pg
281cc -o myprog myprog.o utils.o -pg
282@end example
283
284The @samp{-pg} option also works with a command that both compiles and links:
285
286@example
287cc -o myprog myprog.c utils.c -g -pg
288@end example
289
290Note: The @samp{-pg} option must be part of your compilation options
291as well as your link options.  If it is not then no call-graph data
292will be gathered and when you run @code{gprof} you will get an error
293message like this:
294
295@example
296gprof: gmon.out file is missing call-graph data
297@end example
298
299If you add the @samp{-Q} switch to suppress the printing of the call
300graph data you will still be able to see the time samples:
301
302@example
303Flat profile:
304
305Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
306  %   cumulative   self              self     total
307 time   seconds   seconds    calls  Ts/call  Ts/call  name
308 44.12      0.07     0.07                             zazLoop
309 35.29      0.14     0.06                             main
310 20.59      0.17     0.04                             bazMillion
311@end example
312
313If you run the linker @code{ld} directly instead of through a compiler
314such as @code{cc}, you may have to specify a profiling startup file
315@file{gcrt0.o} as the first input file instead of the usual startup
316file @file{crt0.o}.  In addition, you would probably want to
317specify the profiling C library, @file{libc_p.a}, by writing
318@samp{-lc_p} instead of the usual @samp{-lc}.  This is not absolutely
319necessary, but doing this gives you number-of-calls information for
320standard library functions such as @code{read} and @code{open}.  For
321example:
322
323@example
324ld -o myprog /lib/gcrt0.o myprog.o utils.o -lc_p
325@end example
326
327If you are running the program on a system which supports shared
328libraries you may run into problems with the profiling support code in
329a shared library being called before that library has been fully
330initialised.  This is usually detected by the program encountering a
331segmentation fault as soon as it is run.  The solution is to link
332against a static version of the library containing the profiling
333support code, which for @code{gcc} users can be done via the
334@samp{-static} or @samp{-static-libgcc} command-line option.  For
335example:
336
337@example
338gcc -g -pg -static-libgcc myprog.c utils.c -o myprog
339@end example
340
341If you compile only some of the modules of the program with @samp{-pg}, you
342can still profile the program, but you won't get complete information about
343the modules that were compiled without @samp{-pg}.  The only information
344you get for the functions in those modules is the total time spent in them;
345there is no record of how many times they were called, or from where.  This
346will not affect the flat profile (except that the @code{calls} field for
347the functions will be blank), but will greatly reduce the usefulness of the
348call graph.
349
350If you wish to perform line-by-line profiling you should use the
351@code{gcov} tool instead of @code{gprof}.  See that tool's manual or
352info pages for more details of how to do this.
353
354Note, older versions of @code{gcc} produce line-by-line profiling
355information that works with @code{gprof} rather than @code{gcov} so
356there is still support for displaying this kind of information in
357@code{gprof}. @xref{Line-by-line, ,Line-by-line Profiling}.
358
359It also worth noting that @code{gcc} implements a
360@samp{-finstrument-functions} command-line option which will insert
361calls to special user supplied instrumentation routines at the entry
362and exit of every function in their program.  This can be used to
363implement an alternative profiling scheme.
364
365@node Executing
366@chapter Executing the Program
367
368Once the program is compiled for profiling, you must run it in order to
369generate the information that @code{gprof} needs.  Simply run the program
370as usual, using the normal arguments, file names, etc.  The program should
371run normally, producing the same output as usual.  It will, however, run
372somewhat slower than normal because of the time spent collecting and
373writing the profile data.
374
375The way you run the program---the arguments and input that you give
376it---may have a dramatic effect on what the profile information shows.  The
377profile data will describe the parts of the program that were activated for
378the particular input you use.  For example, if the first command you give
379to your program is to quit, the profile data will show the time used in
380initialization and in cleanup, but not much else.
381
382Your program will write the profile data into a file called @file{gmon.out}
383just before exiting.  If there is already a file called @file{gmon.out},
384its contents are overwritten.  You can rename the file afterwards if you
385are concerned that it may be overwritten.  If your system libc allows you
386may be able to write the profile data under a different name.  Set the
387GMON_OUT_PREFIX environment variable; this name will be appended with
388the PID of the running program.
389
390In order to write the @file{gmon.out} file properly, your program must exit
391normally: by returning from @code{main} or by calling @code{exit}.  Calling
392the low-level function @code{_exit} does not write the profile data, and
393neither does abnormal termination due to an unhandled signal.
394
395The @file{gmon.out} file is written in the program's @emph{current working
396directory} at the time it exits.  This means that if your program calls
397@code{chdir}, the @file{gmon.out} file will be left in the last directory
398your program @code{chdir}'d to.  If you don't have permission to write in
399this directory, the file is not written, and you will get an error message.
400
401Older versions of the @sc{gnu} profiling library may also write a file
402called @file{bb.out}.  This file, if present, contains an human-readable
403listing of the basic-block execution counts.  Unfortunately, the
404appearance of a human-readable @file{bb.out} means the basic-block
405counts didn't get written into @file{gmon.out}.
406The Perl script @code{bbconv.pl}, included with the @code{gprof}
407source distribution, will convert a @file{bb.out} file into
408a format readable by @code{gprof}.  Invoke it like this:
409
410@smallexample
411bbconv.pl < bb.out > @var{bh-data}
412@end smallexample
413
414This translates the information in @file{bb.out} into a form that
415@code{gprof} can understand.  But you still need to tell @code{gprof}
416about the existence of this translated information.  To do that, include
417@var{bb-data} on the @code{gprof} command line, @emph{along with
418@file{gmon.out}}, like this:
419
420@smallexample
421gprof @var{options} @var{executable-file} gmon.out @var{bb-data} [@var{yet-more-profile-data-files}@dots{}] [> @var{outfile}]
422@end smallexample
423
424@node Invoking
425@chapter @code{gprof} Command Summary
426
427After you have a profile data file @file{gmon.out}, you can run @code{gprof}
428to interpret the information in it.  The @code{gprof} program prints a
429flat profile and a call graph on standard output.  Typically you would
430redirect the output of @code{gprof} into a file with @samp{>}.
431
432You run @code{gprof} like this:
433
434@smallexample
435gprof @var{options} [@var{executable-file} [@var{profile-data-files}@dots{}]] [> @var{outfile}]
436@end smallexample
437
438@noindent
439Here square-brackets indicate optional arguments.
440
441If you omit the executable file name, the file @file{a.out} is used.  If
442you give no profile data file name, the file @file{gmon.out} is used.  If
443any file is not in the proper format, or if the profile data file does not
444appear to belong to the executable file, an error message is printed.
445
446You can give more than one profile data file by entering all their names
447after the executable file name; then the statistics in all the data files
448are summed together.
449
450The order of these options does not matter.
451
452@menu
453* Output Options::      Controlling @code{gprof}'s output style
454* Analysis Options::    Controlling how @code{gprof} analyzes its data
455* Miscellaneous Options::
456* Deprecated Options::  Options you no longer need to use, but which
457                            have been retained for compatibility
458* Symspecs::            Specifying functions to include or exclude
459@end menu
460
461@node Output Options
462@section Output Options
463
464@c man begin OPTIONS
465These options specify which of several output formats
466@code{gprof} should produce.
467
468Many of these options take an optional @dfn{symspec} to specify
469functions to be included or excluded.  These options can be
470specified multiple times, with different symspecs, to include
471or exclude sets of symbols.  @xref{Symspecs, ,Symspecs}.
472
473Specifying any of these options overrides the default (@samp{-p -q}),
474which prints a flat profile and call graph analysis
475for all functions.
476
477@table @code
478
479@item -A[@var{symspec}]
480@itemx --annotated-source[=@var{symspec}]
481The @samp{-A} option causes @code{gprof} to print annotated source code.
482If @var{symspec} is specified, print output only for matching symbols.
483@xref{Annotated Source, ,The Annotated Source Listing}.
484
485@item -b
486@itemx --brief
487If the @samp{-b} option is given, @code{gprof} doesn't print the
488verbose blurbs that try to explain the meaning of all of the fields in
489the tables.  This is useful if you intend to print out the output, or
490are tired of seeing the blurbs.
491
492@item -B
493The @samp{-B} option causes @code{gprof} to print the call graph analysis.
494
495@item -C[@var{symspec}]
496@itemx --exec-counts[=@var{symspec}]
497The @samp{-C} option causes @code{gprof} to
498print a tally of functions and the number of times each was called.
499If @var{symspec} is specified, print tally only for matching symbols.
500
501If the profile data file contains basic-block count records, specifying
502the @samp{-l} option, along with @samp{-C}, will cause basic-block
503execution counts to be tallied and displayed.
504
505@item -i
506@itemx --file-info
507The @samp{-i} option causes @code{gprof} to display summary information
508about the profile data file(s) and then exit.  The number of histogram,
509call graph, and basic-block count records is displayed.
510
511@item -I @var{dirs}
512@itemx --directory-path=@var{dirs}
513The @samp{-I} option specifies a list of search directories in
514which to find source files.  Environment variable @var{GPROF_PATH}
515can also be used to convey this information.
516Used mostly for annotated source output.
517
518@item -J[@var{symspec}]
519@itemx --no-annotated-source[=@var{symspec}]
520The @samp{-J} option causes @code{gprof} not to
521print annotated source code.
522If @var{symspec} is specified, @code{gprof} prints annotated source,
523but excludes matching symbols.
524
525@item -L
526@itemx --print-path
527Normally, source filenames are printed with the path
528component suppressed.  The @samp{-L} option causes @code{gprof}
529to print the full pathname of
530source filenames, which is determined
531from symbolic debugging information in the image file
532and is relative to the directory in which the compiler
533was invoked.
534
535@item -p[@var{symspec}]
536@itemx --flat-profile[=@var{symspec}]
537The @samp{-p} option causes @code{gprof} to print a flat profile.
538If @var{symspec} is specified, print flat profile only for matching symbols.
539@xref{Flat Profile, ,The Flat Profile}.
540
541@item -P[@var{symspec}]
542@itemx --no-flat-profile[=@var{symspec}]
543The @samp{-P} option causes @code{gprof} to suppress printing a flat profile.
544If @var{symspec} is specified, @code{gprof} prints a flat profile,
545but excludes matching symbols.
546
547@item -q[@var{symspec}]
548@itemx --graph[=@var{symspec}]
549The @samp{-q} option causes @code{gprof} to print the call graph analysis.
550If @var{symspec} is specified, print call graph only for matching symbols
551and their children.
552@xref{Call Graph, ,The Call Graph}.
553
554@item -Q[@var{symspec}]
555@itemx --no-graph[=@var{symspec}]
556The @samp{-Q} option causes @code{gprof} to suppress printing the
557call graph.
558If @var{symspec} is specified, @code{gprof} prints a call graph,
559but excludes matching symbols.
560
561@item -t
562@itemx --table-length=@var{num}
563The @samp{-t} option causes the @var{num} most active source lines in
564each source file to be listed when source annotation is enabled.  The
565default is 10.
566
567@item -y
568@itemx --separate-files
569This option affects annotated source output only.
570Normally, @code{gprof} prints annotated source files
571to standard-output.  If this option is specified,
572annotated source for a file named @file{path/@var{filename}}
573is generated in the file @file{@var{filename}-ann}.  If the underlying
574file system would truncate @file{@var{filename}-ann} so that it
575overwrites the original @file{@var{filename}}, @code{gprof} generates
576annotated source in the file @file{@var{filename}.ann} instead (if the
577original file name has an extension, that extension is @emph{replaced}
578with @file{.ann}).
579
580@item -Z[@var{symspec}]
581@itemx --no-exec-counts[=@var{symspec}]
582The @samp{-Z} option causes @code{gprof} not to
583print a tally of functions and the number of times each was called.
584If @var{symspec} is specified, print tally, but exclude matching symbols.
585
586@item -r
587@itemx --function-ordering
588The @samp{--function-ordering} option causes @code{gprof} to print a
589suggested function ordering for the program based on profiling data.
590This option suggests an ordering which may improve paging, tlb and
591cache behavior for the program on systems which support arbitrary
592ordering of functions in an executable.
593
594The exact details of how to force the linker to place functions
595in a particular order is system dependent and out of the scope of this
596manual.
597
598@item -R @var{map_file}
599@itemx --file-ordering @var{map_file}
600The @samp{--file-ordering} option causes @code{gprof} to print a
601suggested .o link line ordering for the program based on profiling data.
602This option suggests an ordering which may improve paging, tlb and
603cache behavior for the program on systems which do not support arbitrary
604ordering of functions in an executable.
605
606Use of the @samp{-a} argument is highly recommended with this option.
607
608The @var{map_file} argument is a pathname to a file which provides
609function name to object file mappings.  The format of the file is similar to
610the output of the program @code{nm}.
611
612@smallexample
613@group
614c-parse.o:00000000 T yyparse
615c-parse.o:00000004 C yyerrflag
616c-lang.o:00000000 T maybe_objc_method_name
617c-lang.o:00000000 T print_lang_statistics
618c-lang.o:00000000 T recognize_objc_keyword
619c-decl.o:00000000 T print_lang_identifier
620c-decl.o:00000000 T print_lang_type
621@dots{}
622
623@end group
624@end smallexample
625
626To create a @var{map_file} with @sc{gnu} @code{nm}, type a command like
627@kbd{nm --extern-only --defined-only -v --print-file-name program-name}.
628
629@item -T
630@itemx --traditional
631The @samp{-T} option causes @code{gprof} to print its output in
632``traditional'' BSD style.
633
634@item -w @var{width}
635@itemx --width=@var{width}
636Sets width of output lines to @var{width}.
637Currently only used when printing the function index at the bottom
638of the call graph.
639
640@item -x
641@itemx --all-lines
642This option affects annotated source output only.
643By default, only the lines at the beginning of a basic-block
644are annotated.  If this option is specified, every line in
645a basic-block is annotated by repeating the annotation for the
646first line.  This behavior is similar to @code{tcov}'s @samp{-a}.
647
648@item --demangle[=@var{style}]
649@itemx --no-demangle
650These options control whether C++ symbol names should be demangled when
651printing output.  The default is to demangle symbols.  The
652@code{--no-demangle} option may be used to turn off demangling. Different
653compilers have different mangling styles.  The optional demangling style
654argument can be used to choose an appropriate demangling style for your
655compiler.
656@end table
657
658@node Analysis Options
659@section Analysis Options
660
661@table @code
662
663@item -a
664@itemx --no-static
665The @samp{-a} option causes @code{gprof} to suppress the printing of
666statically declared (private) functions.  (These are functions whose
667names are not listed as global, and which are not visible outside the
668file/function/block where they were defined.)  Time spent in these
669functions, calls to/from them, etc., will all be attributed to the
670function that was loaded directly before it in the executable file.
671@c This is compatible with Unix @code{gprof}, but a bad idea.
672This option affects both the flat profile and the call graph.
673
674@item -c
675@itemx --static-call-graph
676The @samp{-c} option causes the call graph of the program to be
677augmented by a heuristic which examines the text space of the object
678file and identifies function calls in the binary machine code.
679Since normal call graph records are only generated when functions are
680entered, this option identifies children that could have been called,
681but never were.  Calls to functions that were not compiled with
682profiling enabled are also identified, but only if symbol table
683entries are present for them.
684Calls to dynamic library routines are typically @emph{not} found
685by this option.
686Parents or children identified via this heuristic
687are indicated in the call graph with call counts of @samp{0}.
688
689@item -D
690@itemx --ignore-non-functions
691The @samp{-D} option causes @code{gprof} to ignore symbols which
692are not known to be functions.  This option will give more accurate
693profile data on systems where it is supported (Solaris and HPUX for
694example).
695
696@item -k @var{from}/@var{to}
697The @samp{-k} option allows you to delete from the call graph any arcs from
698symbols matching symspec @var{from} to those matching symspec @var{to}.
699
700@item -l
701@itemx --line
702The @samp{-l} option enables line-by-line profiling, which causes
703histogram hits to be charged to individual source code lines,
704instead of functions.  This feature only works with programs compiled
705by older versions of the @code{gcc} compiler.  Newer versions of
706@code{gcc} are designed to work with the @code{gcov} tool instead.
707
708If the program was compiled with basic-block counting enabled,
709this option will also identify how many times each line of
710code was executed.
711While line-by-line profiling can help isolate where in a large function
712a program is spending its time, it also significantly increases
713the running time of @code{gprof}, and magnifies statistical
714inaccuracies.
715@xref{Sampling Error, ,Statistical Sampling Error}.
716
717@item --inline-file-names
718This option causes @code{gprof} to print the source file after each
719symbol in both the flat profile and the call graph. The full path to the
720file is printed if used with the @samp{-L} option.
721
722@item -m @var{num}
723@itemx --min-count=@var{num}
724This option affects execution count output only.
725Symbols that are executed less than @var{num} times are suppressed.
726
727@item -n@var{symspec}
728@itemx --time=@var{symspec}
729The @samp{-n} option causes @code{gprof}, in its call graph analysis,
730to only propagate times for symbols matching @var{symspec}.
731
732@item -N@var{symspec}
733@itemx --no-time=@var{symspec}
734The @samp{-n} option causes @code{gprof}, in its call graph analysis,
735not to propagate times for symbols matching @var{symspec}.
736
737@item -S@var{filename}
738@itemx --external-symbol-table=@var{filename}
739The @samp{-S} option causes @code{gprof} to read an external symbol table
740file, such as @file{/proc/kallsyms}, rather than read the symbol table
741from the given object file (the default is @code{a.out}). This is useful
742for profiling kernel modules.
743
744@item -z
745@itemx --display-unused-functions
746If you give the @samp{-z} option, @code{gprof} will mention all
747functions in the flat profile, even those that were never called, and
748that had no time spent in them.  This is useful in conjunction with the
749@samp{-c} option for discovering which routines were never called.
750
751@end table
752
753@node Miscellaneous Options
754@section Miscellaneous Options
755
756@table @code
757
758@item -d[@var{num}]
759@itemx --debug[=@var{num}]
760The @samp{-d @var{num}} option specifies debugging options.
761If @var{num} is not specified, enable all debugging.
762@xref{Debugging, ,Debugging @code{gprof}}.
763
764@item -h
765@itemx --help
766The @samp{-h} option prints command line usage.
767
768@item -O@var{name}
769@itemx --file-format=@var{name}
770Selects the format of the profile data files.  Recognized formats are
771@samp{auto} (the default), @samp{bsd}, @samp{4.4bsd}, @samp{magic}, and
772@samp{prof} (not yet supported).
773
774@item -s
775@itemx --sum
776The @samp{-s} option causes @code{gprof} to summarize the information
777in the profile data files it read in, and write out a profile data
778file called @file{gmon.sum}, which contains all the information from
779the profile data files that @code{gprof} read in.  The file @file{gmon.sum}
780may be one of the specified input files; the effect of this is to
781merge the data in the other input files into @file{gmon.sum}.
782
783Eventually you can run @code{gprof} again without @samp{-s} to analyze the
784cumulative data in the file @file{gmon.sum}.
785
786@item -v
787@itemx --version
788The @samp{-v} flag causes @code{gprof} to print the current version
789number, and then exit.
790
791@end table
792
793@node Deprecated Options
794@section Deprecated Options
795
796These options have been replaced with newer versions that use symspecs.
797
798@table @code
799
800@item -e @var{function_name}
801The @samp{-e @var{function}} option tells @code{gprof} to not print
802information about the function @var{function_name} (and its
803children@dots{}) in the call graph.  The function will still be listed
804as a child of any functions that call it, but its index number will be
805shown as @samp{[not printed]}.  More than one @samp{-e} option may be
806given; only one @var{function_name} may be indicated with each @samp{-e}
807option.
808
809@item -E @var{function_name}
810The @code{-E @var{function}} option works like the @code{-e} option, but
811time spent in the function (and children who were not called from
812anywhere else), will not be used to compute the percentages-of-time for
813the call graph.  More than one @samp{-E} option may be given; only one
814@var{function_name} may be indicated with each @samp{-E} option.
815
816@item -f @var{function_name}
817The @samp{-f @var{function}} option causes @code{gprof} to limit the
818call graph to the function @var{function_name} and its children (and
819their children@dots{}).  More than one @samp{-f} option may be given;
820only one @var{function_name} may be indicated with each @samp{-f}
821option.
822
823@item -F @var{function_name}
824The @samp{-F @var{function}} option works like the @code{-f} option, but
825only time spent in the function and its children (and their
826children@dots{}) will be used to determine total-time and
827percentages-of-time for the call graph.  More than one @samp{-F} option
828may be given; only one @var{function_name} may be indicated with each
829@samp{-F} option.  The @samp{-F} option overrides the @samp{-E} option.
830
831@end table
832
833@c man end
834
835Note that only one function can be specified with each @code{-e},
836@code{-E}, @code{-f} or @code{-F} option.  To specify more than one
837function, use multiple options.  For example, this command:
838
839@example
840gprof -e boring -f foo -f bar myprogram > gprof.output
841@end example
842
843@noindent
844lists in the call graph all functions that were reached from either
845@code{foo} or @code{bar} and were not reachable from @code{boring}.
846
847@node Symspecs
848@section Symspecs
849
850Many of the output options allow functions to be included or excluded
851using @dfn{symspecs} (symbol specifications), which observe the
852following syntax:
853
854@example
855  filename_containing_a_dot
856| funcname_not_containing_a_dot
857| linenumber
858| ( [ any_filename ] `:' ( any_funcname | linenumber ) )
859@end example
860
861Here are some sample symspecs:
862
863@table @samp
864@item main.c
865Selects everything in file @file{main.c}---the
866dot in the string tells @code{gprof} to interpret
867the string as a filename, rather than as
868a function name.  To select a file whose
869name does not contain a dot, a trailing colon
870should be specified.  For example, @samp{odd:} is
871interpreted as the file named @file{odd}.
872
873@item main
874Selects all functions named @samp{main}.
875
876Note that there may be multiple instances of the same function name
877because some of the definitions may be local (i.e., static).  Unless a
878function name is unique in a program, you must use the colon notation
879explained below to specify a function from a specific source file.
880
881Sometimes, function names contain dots.  In such cases, it is necessary
882to add a leading colon to the name.  For example, @samp{:.mul} selects
883function @samp{.mul}.
884
885In some object file formats, symbols have a leading underscore.
886@code{gprof} will normally not print these underscores.  When you name a
887symbol in a symspec, you should type it exactly as @code{gprof} prints
888it in its output.  For example, if the compiler produces a symbol
889@samp{_main} from your @code{main} function, @code{gprof} still prints
890it as @samp{main} in its output, so you should use @samp{main} in
891symspecs.
892
893@item main.c:main
894Selects function @samp{main} in file @file{main.c}.
895
896@item main.c:134
897Selects line 134 in file @file{main.c}.
898@end table
899
900@node Output
901@chapter Interpreting @code{gprof}'s Output
902
903@code{gprof} can produce several different output styles, the
904most important of which are described below.  The simplest output
905styles (file information, execution count, and function and file ordering)
906are not described here, but are documented with the respective options
907that trigger them.
908@xref{Output Options, ,Output Options}.
909
910@menu
911* Flat Profile::        The flat profile shows how much time was spent
912                            executing directly in each function.
913* Call Graph::          The call graph shows which functions called which
914                            others, and how much time each function used
915                            when its subroutine calls are included.
916* Line-by-line::        @code{gprof} can analyze individual source code lines
917* Annotated Source::    The annotated source listing displays source code
918                            labeled with execution counts
919@end menu
920
921
922@node Flat Profile
923@section The Flat Profile
924@cindex flat profile
925
926The @dfn{flat profile} shows the total amount of time your program
927spent executing each function.  Unless the @samp{-z} option is given,
928functions with no apparent time spent in them, and no apparent calls
929to them, are not mentioned.  Note that if a function was not compiled
930for profiling, and didn't run long enough to show up on the program
931counter histogram, it will be indistinguishable from a function that
932was never called.
933
934This is part of a flat profile for a small program:
935
936@smallexample
937@group
938Flat profile:
939
940Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
941  %   cumulative   self              self     total
942 time   seconds   seconds    calls  ms/call  ms/call  name
943 33.34      0.02     0.02     7208     0.00     0.00  open
944 16.67      0.03     0.01      244     0.04     0.12  offtime
945 16.67      0.04     0.01        8     1.25     1.25  memccpy
946 16.67      0.05     0.01        7     1.43     1.43  write
947 16.67      0.06     0.01                             mcount
948  0.00      0.06     0.00      236     0.00     0.00  tzset
949  0.00      0.06     0.00      192     0.00     0.00  tolower
950  0.00      0.06     0.00       47     0.00     0.00  strlen
951  0.00      0.06     0.00       45     0.00     0.00  strchr
952  0.00      0.06     0.00        1     0.00    50.00  main
953  0.00      0.06     0.00        1     0.00     0.00  memcpy
954  0.00      0.06     0.00        1     0.00    10.11  print
955  0.00      0.06     0.00        1     0.00     0.00  profil
956  0.00      0.06     0.00        1     0.00    50.00  report
957@dots{}
958@end group
959@end smallexample
960
961@noindent
962The functions are sorted first by decreasing run-time spent in them,
963then by decreasing number of calls, then alphabetically by name.  The
964functions @samp{mcount} and @samp{profil} are part of the profiling
965apparatus and appear in every flat profile; their time gives a measure of
966the amount of overhead due to profiling.
967
968Just before the column headers, a statement appears indicating
969how much time each sample counted as.
970This @dfn{sampling period} estimates the margin of error in each of the time
971figures.  A time figure that is not much larger than this is not
972reliable.  In this example, each sample counted as 0.01 seconds,
973suggesting a 100 Hz sampling rate.
974The program's total execution time was 0.06
975seconds, as indicated by the @samp{cumulative seconds} field.  Since
976each sample counted for 0.01 seconds, this means only six samples
977were taken during the run.  Two of the samples occurred while the
978program was in the @samp{open} function, as indicated by the
979@samp{self seconds} field.  Each of the other four samples
980occurred one each in @samp{offtime}, @samp{memccpy}, @samp{write},
981and @samp{mcount}.
982Since only six samples were taken, none of these values can
983be regarded as particularly reliable.
984In another run,
985the @samp{self seconds} field for
986@samp{mcount} might well be @samp{0.00} or @samp{0.02}.
987@xref{Sampling Error, ,Statistical Sampling Error},
988for a complete discussion.
989
990The remaining functions in the listing (those whose
991@samp{self seconds} field is @samp{0.00}) didn't appear
992in the histogram samples at all.  However, the call graph
993indicated that they were called, so therefore they are listed,
994sorted in decreasing order by the @samp{calls} field.
995Clearly some time was spent executing these functions,
996but the paucity of histogram samples prevents any
997determination of how much time each took.
998
999Here is what the fields in each line mean:
1000
1001@table @code
1002@item % time
1003This is the percentage of the total execution time your program spent
1004in this function.  These should all add up to 100%.
1005
1006@item cumulative seconds
1007This is the cumulative total number of seconds the computer spent
1008executing this functions, plus the time spent in all the functions
1009above this one in this table.
1010
1011@item self seconds
1012This is the number of seconds accounted for by this function alone.
1013The flat profile listing is sorted first by this number.
1014
1015@item calls
1016This is the total number of times the function was called.  If the
1017function was never called, or the number of times it was called cannot
1018be determined (probably because the function was not compiled with
1019profiling enabled), the @dfn{calls} field is blank.
1020
1021@item self ms/call
1022This represents the average number of milliseconds spent in this
1023function per call, if this function is profiled.  Otherwise, this field
1024is blank for this function.
1025
1026@item total ms/call
1027This represents the average number of milliseconds spent in this
1028function and its descendants per call, if this function is profiled.
1029Otherwise, this field is blank for this function.
1030This is the only field in the flat profile that uses call graph analysis.
1031
1032@item name
1033This is the name of the function.   The flat profile is sorted by this
1034field alphabetically after the @dfn{self seconds} and @dfn{calls}
1035fields are sorted.
1036@end table
1037
1038@node Call Graph
1039@section The Call Graph
1040@cindex call graph
1041
1042The @dfn{call graph} shows how much time was spent in each function
1043and its children.  From this information, you can find functions that,
1044while they themselves may not have used much time, called other
1045functions that did use unusual amounts of time.
1046
1047Here is a sample call from a small program.  This call came from the
1048same @code{gprof} run as the flat profile example in the previous
1049section.
1050
1051@smallexample
1052@group
1053granularity: each sample hit covers 2 byte(s) for 20.00% of 0.05 seconds
1054
1055index % time    self  children    called     name
1056                                                 <spontaneous>
1057[1]    100.0    0.00    0.05                 start [1]
1058                0.00    0.05       1/1           main [2]
1059                0.00    0.00       1/2           on_exit [28]
1060                0.00    0.00       1/1           exit [59]
1061-----------------------------------------------
1062                0.00    0.05       1/1           start [1]
1063[2]    100.0    0.00    0.05       1         main [2]
1064                0.00    0.05       1/1           report [3]
1065-----------------------------------------------
1066                0.00    0.05       1/1           main [2]
1067[3]    100.0    0.00    0.05       1         report [3]
1068                0.00    0.03       8/8           timelocal [6]
1069                0.00    0.01       1/1           print [9]
1070                0.00    0.01       9/9           fgets [12]
1071                0.00    0.00      12/34          strncmp <cycle 1> [40]
1072                0.00    0.00       8/8           lookup [20]
1073                0.00    0.00       1/1           fopen [21]
1074                0.00    0.00       8/8           chewtime [24]
1075                0.00    0.00       8/16          skipspace [44]
1076-----------------------------------------------
1077[4]     59.8    0.01        0.02       8+472     <cycle 2 as a whole> [4]
1078                0.01        0.02     244+260         offtime <cycle 2> [7]
1079                0.00        0.00     236+1           tzset <cycle 2> [26]
1080-----------------------------------------------
1081@end group
1082@end smallexample
1083
1084The lines full of dashes divide this table into @dfn{entries}, one for each
1085function.  Each entry has one or more lines.
1086
1087In each entry, the primary line is the one that starts with an index number
1088in square brackets.  The end of this line says which function the entry is
1089for.  The preceding lines in the entry describe the callers of this
1090function and the following lines describe its subroutines (also called
1091@dfn{children} when we speak of the call graph).
1092
1093The entries are sorted by time spent in the function and its subroutines.
1094
1095The internal profiling function @code{mcount} (@pxref{Flat Profile, ,The
1096Flat Profile}) is never mentioned in the call graph.
1097
1098@menu
1099* Primary::       Details of the primary line's contents.
1100* Callers::       Details of caller-lines' contents.
1101* Subroutines::   Details of subroutine-lines' contents.
1102* Cycles::        When there are cycles of recursion,
1103                   such as @code{a} calls @code{b} calls @code{a}@dots{}
1104@end menu
1105
1106@node Primary
1107@subsection The Primary Line
1108
1109The @dfn{primary line} in a call graph entry is the line that
1110describes the function which the entry is about and gives the overall
1111statistics for this function.
1112
1113For reference, we repeat the primary line from the entry for function
1114@code{report} in our main example, together with the heading line that
1115shows the names of the fields:
1116
1117@smallexample
1118@group
1119index  % time    self  children called     name
1120@dots{}
1121[3]    100.0    0.00    0.05       1         report [3]
1122@end group
1123@end smallexample
1124
1125Here is what the fields in the primary line mean:
1126
1127@table @code
1128@item index
1129Entries are numbered with consecutive integers.  Each function
1130therefore has an index number, which appears at the beginning of its
1131primary line.
1132
1133Each cross-reference to a function, as a caller or subroutine of
1134another, gives its index number as well as its name.  The index number
1135guides you if you wish to look for the entry for that function.
1136
1137@item % time
1138This is the percentage of the total time that was spent in this
1139function, including time spent in subroutines called from this
1140function.
1141
1142The time spent in this function is counted again for the callers of
1143this function.  Therefore, adding up these percentages is meaningless.
1144
1145@item self
1146This is the total amount of time spent in this function.  This
1147should be identical to the number printed in the @code{seconds} field
1148for this function in the flat profile.
1149
1150@item children
1151This is the total amount of time spent in the subroutine calls made by
1152this function.  This should be equal to the sum of all the @code{self}
1153and @code{children} entries of the children listed directly below this
1154function.
1155
1156@item called
1157This is the number of times the function was called.
1158
1159If the function called itself recursively, there are two numbers,
1160separated by a @samp{+}.  The first number counts non-recursive calls,
1161and the second counts recursive calls.
1162
1163In the example above, the function @code{report} was called once from
1164@code{main}.
1165
1166@item name
1167This is the name of the current function.  The index number is
1168repeated after it.
1169
1170If the function is part of a cycle of recursion, the cycle number is
1171printed between the function's name and the index number
1172(@pxref{Cycles, ,How Mutually Recursive Functions Are Described}).
1173For example, if function @code{gnurr} is part of
1174cycle number one, and has index number twelve, its primary line would
1175be end like this:
1176
1177@example
1178gnurr <cycle 1> [12]
1179@end example
1180@end table
1181
1182@node Callers
1183@subsection Lines for a Function's Callers
1184
1185A function's entry has a line for each function it was called by.
1186These lines' fields correspond to the fields of the primary line, but
1187their meanings are different because of the difference in context.
1188
1189For reference, we repeat two lines from the entry for the function
1190@code{report}, the primary line and one caller-line preceding it, together
1191with the heading line that shows the names of the fields:
1192
1193@smallexample
1194index  % time    self  children called     name
1195@dots{}
1196                0.00    0.05       1/1           main [2]
1197[3]    100.0    0.00    0.05       1         report [3]
1198@end smallexample
1199
1200Here are the meanings of the fields in the caller-line for @code{report}
1201called from @code{main}:
1202
1203@table @code
1204@item self
1205An estimate of the amount of time spent in @code{report} itself when it was
1206called from @code{main}.
1207
1208@item children
1209An estimate of the amount of time spent in subroutines of @code{report}
1210when @code{report} was called from @code{main}.
1211
1212The sum of the @code{self} and @code{children} fields is an estimate
1213of the amount of time spent within calls to @code{report} from @code{main}.
1214
1215@item called
1216Two numbers: the number of times @code{report} was called from @code{main},
1217followed by the total number of non-recursive calls to @code{report} from
1218all its callers.
1219
1220@item name and index number
1221The name of the caller of @code{report} to which this line applies,
1222followed by the caller's index number.
1223
1224Not all functions have entries in the call graph; some
1225options to @code{gprof} request the omission of certain functions.
1226When a caller has no entry of its own, it still has caller-lines
1227in the entries of the functions it calls.
1228
1229If the caller is part of a recursion cycle, the cycle number is
1230printed between the name and the index number.
1231@end table
1232
1233If the identity of the callers of a function cannot be determined, a
1234dummy caller-line is printed which has @samp{<spontaneous>} as the
1235``caller's name'' and all other fields blank.  This can happen for
1236signal handlers.
1237@c What if some calls have determinable callers' names but not all?
1238@c FIXME - still relevant?
1239
1240@node Subroutines
1241@subsection Lines for a Function's Subroutines
1242
1243A function's entry has a line for each of its subroutines---in other
1244words, a line for each other function that it called.  These lines'
1245fields correspond to the fields of the primary line, but their meanings
1246are different because of the difference in context.
1247
1248For reference, we repeat two lines from the entry for the function
1249@code{main}, the primary line and a line for a subroutine, together
1250with the heading line that shows the names of the fields:
1251
1252@smallexample
1253index  % time    self  children called     name
1254@dots{}
1255[2]    100.0    0.00    0.05       1         main [2]
1256                0.00    0.05       1/1           report [3]
1257@end smallexample
1258
1259Here are the meanings of the fields in the subroutine-line for @code{main}
1260calling @code{report}:
1261
1262@table @code
1263@item self
1264An estimate of the amount of time spent directly within @code{report}
1265when @code{report} was called from @code{main}.
1266
1267@item children
1268An estimate of the amount of time spent in subroutines of @code{report}
1269when @code{report} was called from @code{main}.
1270
1271The sum of the @code{self} and @code{children} fields is an estimate
1272of the total time spent in calls to @code{report} from @code{main}.
1273
1274@item called
1275Two numbers, the number of calls to @code{report} from @code{main}
1276followed by the total number of non-recursive calls to @code{report}.
1277This ratio is used to determine how much of @code{report}'s @code{self}
1278and @code{children} time gets credited to @code{main}.
1279@xref{Assumptions, ,Estimating @code{children} Times}.
1280
1281@item name
1282The name of the subroutine of @code{main} to which this line applies,
1283followed by the subroutine's index number.
1284
1285If the caller is part of a recursion cycle, the cycle number is
1286printed between the name and the index number.
1287@end table
1288
1289@node Cycles
1290@subsection How Mutually Recursive Functions Are Described
1291@cindex cycle
1292@cindex recursion cycle
1293
1294The graph may be complicated by the presence of @dfn{cycles of
1295recursion} in the call graph.  A cycle exists if a function calls
1296another function that (directly or indirectly) calls (or appears to
1297call) the original function.  For example: if @code{a} calls @code{b},
1298and @code{b} calls @code{a}, then @code{a} and @code{b} form a cycle.
1299
1300Whenever there are call paths both ways between a pair of functions, they
1301belong to the same cycle.  If @code{a} and @code{b} call each other and
1302@code{b} and @code{c} call each other, all three make one cycle.  Note that
1303even if @code{b} only calls @code{a} if it was not called from @code{a},
1304@code{gprof} cannot determine this, so @code{a} and @code{b} are still
1305considered a cycle.
1306
1307The cycles are numbered with consecutive integers.  When a function
1308belongs to a cycle, each time the function name appears in the call graph
1309it is followed by @samp{<cycle @var{number}>}.
1310
1311The reason cycles matter is that they make the time values in the call
1312graph paradoxical.  The ``time spent in children'' of @code{a} should
1313include the time spent in its subroutine @code{b} and in @code{b}'s
1314subroutines---but one of @code{b}'s subroutines is @code{a}!  How much of
1315@code{a}'s time should be included in the children of @code{a}, when
1316@code{a} is indirectly recursive?
1317
1318The way @code{gprof} resolves this paradox is by creating a single entry
1319for the cycle as a whole.  The primary line of this entry describes the
1320total time spent directly in the functions of the cycle.  The
1321``subroutines'' of the cycle are the individual functions of the cycle, and
1322all other functions that were called directly by them.  The ``callers'' of
1323the cycle are the functions, outside the cycle, that called functions in
1324the cycle.
1325
1326Here is an example portion of a call graph which shows a cycle containing
1327functions @code{a} and @code{b}.  The cycle was entered by a call to
1328@code{a} from @code{main}; both @code{a} and @code{b} called @code{c}.
1329
1330@smallexample
1331index  % time    self  children called     name
1332----------------------------------------
1333                 1.77        0    1/1        main [2]
1334[3]     91.71    1.77        0    1+5    <cycle 1 as a whole> [3]
1335                 1.02        0    3          b <cycle 1> [4]
1336                 0.75        0    2          a <cycle 1> [5]
1337----------------------------------------
1338                                  3          a <cycle 1> [5]
1339[4]     52.85    1.02        0    0      b <cycle 1> [4]
1340                                  2          a <cycle 1> [5]
1341                    0        0    3/6        c [6]
1342----------------------------------------
1343                 1.77        0    1/1        main [2]
1344                                  2          b <cycle 1> [4]
1345[5]     38.86    0.75        0    1      a <cycle 1> [5]
1346                                  3          b <cycle 1> [4]
1347                    0        0    3/6        c [6]
1348----------------------------------------
1349@end smallexample
1350
1351@noindent
1352(The entire call graph for this program contains in addition an entry for
1353@code{main}, which calls @code{a}, and an entry for @code{c}, with callers
1354@code{a} and @code{b}.)
1355
1356@smallexample
1357index  % time    self  children called     name
1358                                             <spontaneous>
1359[1]    100.00       0     1.93    0      start [1]
1360                 0.16     1.77    1/1        main [2]
1361----------------------------------------
1362                 0.16     1.77    1/1        start [1]
1363[2]    100.00    0.16     1.77    1      main [2]
1364                 1.77        0    1/1        a <cycle 1> [5]
1365----------------------------------------
1366                 1.77        0    1/1        main [2]
1367[3]     91.71    1.77        0    1+5    <cycle 1 as a whole> [3]
1368                 1.02        0    3          b <cycle 1> [4]
1369                 0.75        0    2          a <cycle 1> [5]
1370                    0        0    6/6        c [6]
1371----------------------------------------
1372                                  3          a <cycle 1> [5]
1373[4]     52.85    1.02        0    0      b <cycle 1> [4]
1374                                  2          a <cycle 1> [5]
1375                    0        0    3/6        c [6]
1376----------------------------------------
1377                 1.77        0    1/1        main [2]
1378                                  2          b <cycle 1> [4]
1379[5]     38.86    0.75        0    1      a <cycle 1> [5]
1380                                  3          b <cycle 1> [4]
1381                    0        0    3/6        c [6]
1382----------------------------------------
1383                    0        0    3/6        b <cycle 1> [4]
1384                    0        0    3/6        a <cycle 1> [5]
1385[6]      0.00       0        0    6      c [6]
1386----------------------------------------
1387@end smallexample
1388
1389The @code{self} field of the cycle's primary line is the total time
1390spent in all the functions of the cycle.  It equals the sum of the
1391@code{self} fields for the individual functions in the cycle, found
1392in the entry in the subroutine lines for these functions.
1393
1394The @code{children} fields of the cycle's primary line and subroutine lines
1395count only subroutines outside the cycle.  Even though @code{a} calls
1396@code{b}, the time spent in those calls to @code{b} is not counted in
1397@code{a}'s @code{children} time.  Thus, we do not encounter the problem of
1398what to do when the time in those calls to @code{b} includes indirect
1399recursive calls back to @code{a}.
1400
1401The @code{children} field of a caller-line in the cycle's entry estimates
1402the amount of time spent @emph{in the whole cycle}, and its other
1403subroutines, on the times when that caller called a function in the cycle.
1404
1405The @code{called} field in the primary line for the cycle has two numbers:
1406first, the number of times functions in the cycle were called by functions
1407outside the cycle; second, the number of times they were called by
1408functions in the cycle (including times when a function in the cycle calls
1409itself).  This is a generalization of the usual split into non-recursive and
1410recursive calls.
1411
1412The @code{called} field of a subroutine-line for a cycle member in the
1413cycle's entry says how many time that function was called from functions in
1414the cycle.  The total of all these is the second number in the primary line's
1415@code{called} field.
1416
1417In the individual entry for a function in a cycle, the other functions in
1418the same cycle can appear as subroutines and as callers.  These lines show
1419how many times each function in the cycle called or was called from each other
1420function in the cycle.  The @code{self} and @code{children} fields in these
1421lines are blank because of the difficulty of defining meanings for them
1422when recursion is going on.
1423
1424@node Line-by-line
1425@section Line-by-line Profiling
1426
1427@code{gprof}'s @samp{-l} option causes the program to perform
1428@dfn{line-by-line} profiling.  In this mode, histogram
1429samples are assigned not to functions, but to individual
1430lines of source code.  This only works with programs compiled with
1431older versions of the @code{gcc} compiler.  Newer versions of @code{gcc}
1432use a different program - @code{gcov} - to display line-by-line
1433profiling information.
1434
1435With the older versions of @code{gcc} the program usually has to be
1436compiled with a @samp{-g} option, in addition to @samp{-pg}, in order
1437to generate debugging symbols for tracking source code lines.
1438Note, in much older versions of @code{gcc} the program had to be
1439compiled with the @samp{-a} command-line option as well.
1440
1441The flat profile is the most useful output table
1442in line-by-line mode.
1443The call graph isn't as useful as normal, since
1444the current version of @code{gprof} does not propagate
1445call graph arcs from source code lines to the enclosing function.
1446The call graph does, however, show each line of code
1447that called each function, along with a count.
1448
1449Here is a section of @code{gprof}'s output, without line-by-line profiling.
1450Note that @code{ct_init} accounted for four histogram hits, and
145113327 calls to @code{init_block}.
1452
1453@smallexample
1454Flat profile:
1455
1456Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
1457  %   cumulative   self              self     total
1458 time   seconds   seconds    calls  us/call  us/call  name
1459 30.77      0.13     0.04     6335     6.31     6.31  ct_init
1460
1461
1462		     Call graph (explanation follows)
1463
1464
1465granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 7.69% of 0.13 seconds
1466
1467index % time    self  children    called     name
1468
1469                0.00    0.00       1/13496       name_too_long
1470                0.00    0.00      40/13496       deflate
1471                0.00    0.00     128/13496       deflate_fast
1472                0.00    0.00   13327/13496       ct_init
1473[7]      0.0    0.00    0.00   13496         init_block
1474
1475@end smallexample
1476
1477Now let's look at some of @code{gprof}'s output from the same program run,
1478this time with line-by-line profiling enabled.  Note that @code{ct_init}'s
1479four histogram hits are broken down into four lines of source code---one hit
1480occurred on each of lines 349, 351, 382 and 385.  In the call graph,
1481note how
1482@code{ct_init}'s 13327 calls to @code{init_block} are broken down
1483into one call from line 396, 3071 calls from line 384, 3730 calls
1484from line 385, and 6525 calls from 387.
1485
1486@smallexample
1487Flat profile:
1488
1489Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
1490  %   cumulative   self
1491 time   seconds   seconds    calls  name
1492  7.69      0.10     0.01           ct_init (trees.c:349)
1493  7.69      0.11     0.01           ct_init (trees.c:351)
1494  7.69      0.12     0.01           ct_init (trees.c:382)
1495  7.69      0.13     0.01           ct_init (trees.c:385)
1496
1497
1498		     Call graph (explanation follows)
1499
1500
1501granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 7.69% of 0.13 seconds
1502
1503  % time    self  children    called     name
1504
1505            0.00    0.00       1/13496       name_too_long (gzip.c:1440)
1506            0.00    0.00       1/13496       deflate (deflate.c:763)
1507            0.00    0.00       1/13496       ct_init (trees.c:396)
1508            0.00    0.00       2/13496       deflate (deflate.c:727)
1509            0.00    0.00       4/13496       deflate (deflate.c:686)
1510            0.00    0.00       5/13496       deflate (deflate.c:675)
1511            0.00    0.00      12/13496       deflate (deflate.c:679)
1512            0.00    0.00      16/13496       deflate (deflate.c:730)
1513            0.00    0.00     128/13496       deflate_fast (deflate.c:654)
1514            0.00    0.00    3071/13496       ct_init (trees.c:384)
1515            0.00    0.00    3730/13496       ct_init (trees.c:385)
1516            0.00    0.00    6525/13496       ct_init (trees.c:387)
1517[6]  0.0    0.00    0.00   13496         init_block (trees.c:408)
1518
1519@end smallexample
1520
1521
1522@node Annotated Source
1523@section The Annotated Source Listing
1524
1525@code{gprof}'s @samp{-A} option triggers an annotated source listing,
1526which lists the program's source code, each function labeled with the
1527number of times it was called.  You may also need to specify the
1528@samp{-I} option, if @code{gprof} can't find the source code files.
1529
1530With older versions of @code{gcc} compiling with @samp{gcc @dots{} -g
1531-pg -a} augments your program with basic-block counting code, in
1532addition to function counting code.  This enables @code{gprof} to
1533determine how many times each line of code was executed.  With newer
1534versions of @code{gcc} support for displaying basic-block counts is
1535provided by the @code{gcov} program.
1536
1537For example, consider the following function, taken from gzip,
1538with line numbers added:
1539
1540@smallexample
1541 1 ulg updcrc(s, n)
1542 2     uch *s;
1543 3     unsigned n;
1544 4 @{
1545 5     register ulg c;
1546 6
1547 7     static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL;
1548 8
1549 9     if (s == NULL) @{
155010         c = 0xffffffffL;
155111     @} else @{
155212         c = crc;
155313         if (n) do @{
155414             c = crc_32_tab[...];
155515         @} while (--n);
155616     @}
155717     crc = c;
155818     return c ^ 0xffffffffL;
155919 @}
1560
1561@end smallexample
1562
1563@code{updcrc} has at least five basic-blocks.
1564One is the function itself.  The
1565@code{if} statement on line 9 generates two more basic-blocks, one
1566for each branch of the @code{if}.  A fourth basic-block results from
1567the @code{if} on line 13, and the contents of the @code{do} loop form
1568the fifth basic-block.  The compiler may also generate additional
1569basic-blocks to handle various special cases.
1570
1571A program augmented for basic-block counting can be analyzed with
1572@samp{gprof -l -A}.
1573The @samp{-x} option is also helpful,
1574to ensure that each line of code is labeled at least once.
1575Here is @code{updcrc}'s
1576annotated source listing for a sample @code{gzip} run:
1577
1578@smallexample
1579                ulg updcrc(s, n)
1580                    uch *s;
1581                    unsigned n;
1582            2 ->@{
1583                    register ulg c;
1584
1585                    static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL;
1586
1587            2 ->    if (s == NULL) @{
1588            1 ->        c = 0xffffffffL;
1589            1 ->    @} else @{
1590            1 ->        c = crc;
1591            1 ->        if (n) do @{
1592        26312 ->            c = crc_32_tab[...];
159326312,1,26311 ->        @} while (--n);
1594                    @}
1595            2 ->    crc = c;
1596            2 ->    return c ^ 0xffffffffL;
1597            2 ->@}
1598@end smallexample
1599
1600In this example, the function was called twice, passing once through
1601each branch of the @code{if} statement.  The body of the @code{do}
1602loop was executed a total of 26312 times.  Note how the @code{while}
1603statement is annotated.  It began execution 26312 times, once for
1604each iteration through the loop.  One of those times (the last time)
1605it exited, while it branched back to the beginning of the loop 26311 times.
1606
1607@node Inaccuracy
1608@chapter Inaccuracy of @code{gprof} Output
1609
1610@menu
1611* Sampling Error::      Statistical margins of error
1612* Assumptions::         Estimating children times
1613@end menu
1614
1615@node Sampling Error
1616@section Statistical Sampling Error
1617
1618The run-time figures that @code{gprof} gives you are based on a sampling
1619process, so they are subject to statistical inaccuracy.  If a function runs
1620only a small amount of time, so that on the average the sampling process
1621ought to catch that function in the act only once, there is a pretty good
1622chance it will actually find that function zero times, or twice.
1623
1624By contrast, the number-of-calls and basic-block figures are derived
1625by counting, not sampling.  They are completely accurate and will not
1626vary from run to run if your program is deterministic and single
1627threaded.  In multi-threaded applications, or single threaded
1628applications that link with multi-threaded libraries, the counts are
1629only deterministic if the counting function is thread-safe.  (Note:
1630beware that the mcount counting function in glibc is @emph{not}
1631thread-safe).  @xref{Implementation, ,Implementation of Profiling}.
1632
1633The @dfn{sampling period} that is printed at the beginning of the flat
1634profile says how often samples are taken.  The rule of thumb is that a
1635run-time figure is accurate if it is considerably bigger than the sampling
1636period.
1637
1638The actual amount of error can be predicted.
1639For @var{n} samples, the @emph{expected} error
1640is the square-root of @var{n}.  For example,
1641if the sampling period is 0.01 seconds and @code{foo}'s run-time is 1 second,
1642@var{n} is 100 samples (1 second/0.01 seconds), sqrt(@var{n}) is 10 samples, so
1643the expected error in @code{foo}'s run-time is 0.1 seconds (10*0.01 seconds),
1644or ten percent of the observed value.
1645Again, if the sampling period is 0.01 seconds and @code{bar}'s run-time is
1646100 seconds, @var{n} is 10000 samples, sqrt(@var{n}) is 100 samples, so
1647the expected error in @code{bar}'s run-time is 1 second,
1648or one percent of the observed value.
1649It is likely to
1650vary this much @emph{on the average} from one profiling run to the next.
1651(@emph{Sometimes} it will vary more.)
1652
1653This does not mean that a small run-time figure is devoid of information.
1654If the program's @emph{total} run-time is large, a small run-time for one
1655function does tell you that that function used an insignificant fraction of
1656the whole program's time.  Usually this means it is not worth optimizing.
1657
1658One way to get more accuracy is to give your program more (but similar)
1659input data so it will take longer.  Another way is to combine the data from
1660several runs, using the @samp{-s} option of @code{gprof}.  Here is how:
1661
1662@enumerate
1663@item
1664Run your program once.
1665
1666@item
1667Issue the command @samp{mv gmon.out gmon.sum}.
1668
1669@item
1670Run your program again, the same as before.
1671
1672@item
1673Merge the new data in @file{gmon.out} into @file{gmon.sum} with this command:
1674
1675@example
1676gprof -s @var{executable-file} gmon.out gmon.sum
1677@end example
1678
1679@item
1680Repeat the last two steps as often as you wish.
1681
1682@item
1683Analyze the cumulative data using this command:
1684
1685@example
1686gprof @var{executable-file} gmon.sum > @var{output-file}
1687@end example
1688@end enumerate
1689
1690@node Assumptions
1691@section Estimating @code{children} Times
1692
1693Some of the figures in the call graph are estimates---for example, the
1694@code{children} time values and all the time figures in caller and
1695subroutine lines.
1696
1697There is no direct information about these measurements in the profile
1698data itself.  Instead, @code{gprof} estimates them by making an assumption
1699about your program that might or might not be true.
1700
1701The assumption made is that the average time spent in each call to any
1702function @code{foo} is not correlated with who called @code{foo}.  If
1703@code{foo} used 5 seconds in all, and 2/5 of the calls to @code{foo} came
1704from @code{a}, then @code{foo} contributes 2 seconds to @code{a}'s
1705@code{children} time, by assumption.
1706
1707This assumption is usually true enough, but for some programs it is far
1708from true.  Suppose that @code{foo} returns very quickly when its argument
1709is zero; suppose that @code{a} always passes zero as an argument, while
1710other callers of @code{foo} pass other arguments.  In this program, all the
1711time spent in @code{foo} is in the calls from callers other than @code{a}.
1712But @code{gprof} has no way of knowing this; it will blindly and
1713incorrectly charge 2 seconds of time in @code{foo} to the children of
1714@code{a}.
1715
1716@c FIXME - has this been fixed?
1717We hope some day to put more complete data into @file{gmon.out}, so that
1718this assumption is no longer needed, if we can figure out how.  For the
1719novice, the estimated figures are usually more useful than misleading.
1720
1721@node How do I?
1722@chapter Answers to Common Questions
1723
1724@table @asis
1725@item How can I get more exact information about hot spots in my program?
1726
1727Looking at the per-line call counts only tells part of the story.
1728Because @code{gprof} can only report call times and counts by function,
1729the best way to get finer-grained information on where the program
1730is spending its time is to re-factor large functions into sequences
1731of calls to smaller ones.  Beware however that this can introduce
1732artificial hot spots since compiling with @samp{-pg} adds a significant
1733overhead to function calls.  An alternative solution is to use a
1734non-intrusive profiler, e.g.@: oprofile.
1735
1736@item How do I find which lines in my program were executed the most times?
1737
1738Use the @code{gcov} program.
1739
1740@item How do I find which lines in my program called a particular function?
1741
1742Use @samp{gprof -l} and lookup the function in the call graph.
1743The callers will be broken down by function and line number.
1744
1745@item How do I analyze a program that runs for less than a second?
1746
1747Try using a shell script like this one:
1748
1749@example
1750for i in `seq 1 100`; do
1751  fastprog
1752  mv gmon.out gmon.out.$i
1753done
1754
1755gprof -s fastprog gmon.out.*
1756
1757gprof fastprog gmon.sum
1758@end example
1759
1760If your program is completely deterministic, all the call counts
1761will be simple multiples of 100 (i.e., a function called once in
1762each run will appear with a call count of 100).
1763
1764@end table
1765
1766@node Incompatibilities
1767@chapter Incompatibilities with Unix @code{gprof}
1768
1769@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} and Berkeley Unix @code{gprof} use the same data
1770file @file{gmon.out}, and provide essentially the same information.  But
1771there are a few differences.
1772
1773@itemize @bullet
1774@item
1775@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} uses a new, generalized file format with support
1776for basic-block execution counts and non-realtime histograms.  A magic
1777cookie and version number allows @code{gprof} to easily identify
1778new style files.  Old BSD-style files can still be read.
1779@xref{File Format, ,Profiling Data File Format}.
1780
1781@item
1782For a recursive function, Unix @code{gprof} lists the function as a
1783parent and as a child, with a @code{calls} field that lists the number
1784of recursive calls.  @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} omits these lines and puts
1785the number of recursive calls in the primary line.
1786
1787@item
1788When a function is suppressed from the call graph with @samp{-e}, @sc{gnu}
1789@code{gprof} still lists it as a subroutine of functions that call it.
1790
1791@item
1792@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} accepts the @samp{-k} with its argument
1793in the form @samp{from/to}, instead of @samp{from to}.
1794
1795@item
1796In the annotated source listing,
1797if there are multiple basic blocks on the same line,
1798@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} prints all of their counts, separated by commas.
1799
1800@ignore - it does this now
1801@item
1802The function names printed in @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} output do not include
1803the leading underscores that are added internally to the front of all
1804C identifiers on many operating systems.
1805@end ignore
1806
1807@item
1808The blurbs, field widths, and output formats are different.  @sc{gnu}
1809@code{gprof} prints blurbs after the tables, so that you can see the
1810tables without skipping the blurbs.
1811@end itemize
1812
1813@node Details
1814@chapter Details of Profiling
1815
1816@menu
1817* Implementation::      How a program collects profiling information
1818* File Format::         Format of @samp{gmon.out} files
1819* Internals::           @code{gprof}'s internal operation
1820* Debugging::           Using @code{gprof}'s @samp{-d} option
1821@end menu
1822
1823@node Implementation
1824@section Implementation of Profiling
1825
1826Profiling works by changing how every function in your program is compiled
1827so that when it is called, it will stash away some information about where
1828it was called from.  From this, the profiler can figure out what function
1829called it, and can count how many times it was called.  This change is made
1830by the compiler when your program is compiled with the @samp{-pg} option,
1831which causes every function to call @code{mcount}
1832(or @code{_mcount}, or @code{__mcount}, depending on the OS and compiler)
1833as one of its first operations.
1834
1835The @code{mcount} routine, included in the profiling library,
1836is responsible for recording in an in-memory call graph table
1837both its parent routine (the child) and its parent's parent.  This is
1838typically done by examining the stack frame to find both
1839the address of the child, and the return address in the original parent.
1840Since this is a very machine-dependent operation, @code{mcount}
1841itself is typically a short assembly-language stub routine
1842that extracts the required
1843information, and then calls @code{__mcount_internal}
1844(a normal C function) with two arguments---@code{frompc} and @code{selfpc}.
1845@code{__mcount_internal} is responsible for maintaining
1846the in-memory call graph, which records @code{frompc}, @code{selfpc},
1847and the number of times each of these call arcs was traversed.
1848
1849GCC Version 2 provides a magical function (@code{__builtin_return_address}),
1850which allows a generic @code{mcount} function to extract the
1851required information from the stack frame.  However, on some
1852architectures, most notably the SPARC, using this builtin can be
1853very computationally expensive, and an assembly language version
1854of @code{mcount} is used for performance reasons.
1855
1856Number-of-calls information for library routines is collected by using a
1857special version of the C library.  The programs in it are the same as in
1858the usual C library, but they were compiled with @samp{-pg}.  If you
1859link your program with @samp{gcc @dots{} -pg}, it automatically uses the
1860profiling version of the library.
1861
1862Profiling also involves watching your program as it runs, and keeping a
1863histogram of where the program counter happens to be every now and then.
1864Typically the program counter is looked at around 100 times per second of
1865run time, but the exact frequency may vary from system to system.
1866
1867This is done is one of two ways.  Most UNIX-like operating systems
1868provide a @code{profil()} system call, which registers a memory
1869array with the kernel, along with a scale
1870factor that determines how the program's address space maps
1871into the array.
1872Typical scaling values cause every 2 to 8 bytes of address space
1873to map into a single array slot.
1874On every tick of the system clock
1875(assuming the profiled program is running), the value of the
1876program counter is examined and the corresponding slot in
1877the memory array is incremented.  Since this is done in the kernel,
1878which had to interrupt the process anyway to handle the clock
1879interrupt, very little additional system overhead is required.
1880
1881However, some operating systems, most notably Linux 2.0 (and earlier),
1882do not provide a @code{profil()} system call.  On such a system,
1883arrangements are made for the kernel to periodically deliver
1884a signal to the process (typically via @code{setitimer()}),
1885which then performs the same operation of examining the
1886program counter and incrementing a slot in the memory array.
1887Since this method requires a signal to be delivered to
1888user space every time a sample is taken, it uses considerably
1889more overhead than kernel-based profiling.  Also, due to the
1890added delay required to deliver the signal, this method is
1891less accurate as well.
1892
1893A special startup routine allocates memory for the histogram and
1894either calls @code{profil()} or sets up
1895a clock signal handler.
1896This routine (@code{monstartup}) can be invoked in several ways.
1897On Linux systems, a special profiling startup file @code{gcrt0.o},
1898which invokes @code{monstartup} before @code{main},
1899is used instead of the default @code{crt0.o}.
1900Use of this special startup file is one of the effects
1901of using @samp{gcc @dots{} -pg} to link.
1902On SPARC systems, no special startup files are used.
1903Rather, the @code{mcount} routine, when it is invoked for
1904the first time (typically when @code{main} is called),
1905calls @code{monstartup}.
1906
1907If the compiler's @samp{-a} option was used, basic-block counting
1908is also enabled.  Each object file is then compiled with a static array
1909of counts, initially zero.
1910In the executable code, every time a new basic-block begins
1911(i.e., when an @code{if} statement appears), an extra instruction
1912is inserted to increment the corresponding count in the array.
1913At compile time, a paired array was constructed that recorded
1914the starting address of each basic-block.  Taken together,
1915the two arrays record the starting address of every basic-block,
1916along with the number of times it was executed.
1917
1918The profiling library also includes a function (@code{mcleanup}) which is
1919typically registered using @code{atexit()} to be called as the
1920program exits, and is responsible for writing the file @file{gmon.out}.
1921Profiling is turned off, various headers are output, and the histogram
1922is written, followed by the call-graph arcs and the basic-block counts.
1923
1924The output from @code{gprof} gives no indication of parts of your program that
1925are limited by I/O or swapping bandwidth.  This is because samples of the
1926program counter are taken at fixed intervals of the program's run time.
1927Therefore, the
1928time measurements in @code{gprof} output say nothing about time that your
1929program was not running.  For example, a part of the program that creates
1930so much data that it cannot all fit in physical memory at once may run very
1931slowly due to thrashing, but @code{gprof} will say it uses little time.  On
1932the other hand, sampling by run time has the advantage that the amount of
1933load due to other users won't directly affect the output you get.
1934
1935@node File Format
1936@section Profiling Data File Format
1937
1938The old BSD-derived file format used for profile data does not contain a
1939magic cookie that allows one to check whether a data file really is a
1940@code{gprof} file.  Furthermore, it does not provide a version number, thus
1941rendering changes to the file format almost impossible.  @sc{gnu} @code{gprof}
1942uses a new file format that provides these features.  For backward
1943compatibility, @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} continues to support the old BSD-derived
1944format, but not all features are supported with it.  For example,
1945basic-block execution counts cannot be accommodated by the old file
1946format.
1947
1948The new file format is defined in header file @file{gmon_out.h}.  It
1949consists of a header containing the magic cookie and a version number,
1950as well as some spare bytes available for future extensions.  All data
1951in a profile data file is in the native format of the target for which
1952the profile was collected.  @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} adapts automatically
1953to the byte-order in use.
1954
1955In the new file format, the header is followed by a sequence of
1956records.  Currently, there are three different record types: histogram
1957records, call-graph arc records, and basic-block execution count
1958records.  Each file can contain any number of each record type.  When
1959reading a file, @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} will ensure records of the same type are
1960compatible with each other and compute the union of all records.  For
1961example, for basic-block execution counts, the union is simply the sum
1962of all execution counts for each basic-block.
1963
1964@subsection Histogram Records
1965
1966Histogram records consist of a header that is followed by an array of
1967bins.  The header contains the text-segment range that the histogram
1968spans, the size of the histogram in bytes (unlike in the old BSD
1969format, this does not include the size of the header), the rate of the
1970profiling clock, and the physical dimension that the bin counts
1971represent after being scaled by the profiling clock rate.  The
1972physical dimension is specified in two parts: a long name of up to 15
1973characters and a single character abbreviation.  For example, a
1974histogram representing real-time would specify the long name as
1975``seconds'' and the abbreviation as ``s''.  This feature is useful for
1976architectures that support performance monitor hardware (which,
1977fortunately, is becoming increasingly common).  For example, under DEC
1978OSF/1, the ``uprofile'' command can be used to produce a histogram of,
1979say, instruction cache misses.  In this case, the dimension in the
1980histogram header could be set to ``i-cache misses'' and the abbreviation
1981could be set to ``1'' (because it is simply a count, not a physical
1982dimension).  Also, the profiling rate would have to be set to 1 in
1983this case.
1984
1985Histogram bins are 16-bit numbers and each bin represent an equal
1986amount of text-space.  For example, if the text-segment is one
1987thousand bytes long and if there are ten bins in the histogram, each
1988bin represents one hundred bytes.
1989
1990
1991@subsection Call-Graph Records
1992
1993Call-graph records have a format that is identical to the one used in
1994the BSD-derived file format.  It consists of an arc in the call graph
1995and a count indicating the number of times the arc was traversed
1996during program execution.  Arcs are specified by a pair of addresses:
1997the first must be within caller's function and the second must be
1998within the callee's function.  When performing profiling at the
1999function level, these addresses can point anywhere within the
2000respective function.  However, when profiling at the line-level, it is
2001better if the addresses are as close to the call-site/entry-point as
2002possible.  This will ensure that the line-level call-graph is able to
2003identify exactly which line of source code performed calls to a
2004function.
2005
2006@subsection Basic-Block Execution Count Records
2007
2008Basic-block execution count records consist of a header followed by a
2009sequence of address/count pairs.  The header simply specifies the
2010length of the sequence.  In an address/count pair, the address
2011identifies a basic-block and the count specifies the number of times
2012that basic-block was executed.  Any address within the basic-address can
2013be used.
2014
2015@node Internals
2016@section @code{gprof}'s Internal Operation
2017
2018Like most programs, @code{gprof} begins by processing its options.
2019During this stage, it may building its symspec list
2020(@code{sym_ids.c:@-sym_id_add}), if
2021options are specified which use symspecs.
2022@code{gprof} maintains a single linked list of symspecs,
2023which will eventually get turned into 12 symbol tables,
2024organized into six include/exclude pairs---one
2025pair each for the flat profile (INCL_FLAT/EXCL_FLAT),
2026the call graph arcs (INCL_ARCS/EXCL_ARCS),
2027printing in the call graph (INCL_GRAPH/EXCL_GRAPH),
2028timing propagation in the call graph (INCL_TIME/EXCL_TIME),
2029the annotated source listing (INCL_ANNO/EXCL_ANNO),
2030and the execution count listing (INCL_EXEC/EXCL_EXEC).
2031
2032After option processing, @code{gprof} finishes
2033building the symspec list by adding all the symspecs in
2034@code{default_excluded_list} to the exclude lists
2035EXCL_TIME and EXCL_GRAPH, and if line-by-line profiling is specified,
2036EXCL_FLAT as well.
2037These default excludes are not added to EXCL_ANNO, EXCL_ARCS, and EXCL_EXEC.
2038
2039Next, the BFD library is called to open the object file,
2040verify that it is an object file,
2041and read its symbol table (@code{core.c:@-core_init}),
2042using @code{bfd_canonicalize_symtab} after mallocing
2043an appropriately sized array of symbols.  At this point,
2044function mappings are read (if the @samp{--file-ordering} option
2045has been specified), and the core text space is read into
2046memory (if the @samp{-c} option was given).
2047
2048@code{gprof}'s own symbol table, an array of Sym structures,
2049is now built.
2050This is done in one of two ways, by one of two routines, depending
2051on whether line-by-line profiling (@samp{-l} option) has been
2052enabled.
2053For normal profiling, the BFD canonical symbol table is scanned.
2054For line-by-line profiling, every
2055text space address is examined, and a new symbol table entry
2056gets created every time the line number changes.
2057In either case, two passes are made through the symbol
2058table---one to count the size of the symbol table required,
2059and the other to actually read the symbols.  In between the
2060two passes, a single array of type @code{Sym} is created of
2061the appropriate length.
2062Finally, @code{symtab.c:@-symtab_finalize}
2063is called to sort the symbol table and remove duplicate entries
2064(entries with the same memory address).
2065
2066The symbol table must be a contiguous array for two reasons.
2067First, the @code{qsort} library function (which sorts an array)
2068will be used to sort the symbol table.
2069Also, the symbol lookup routine (@code{symtab.c:@-sym_lookup}),
2070which finds symbols
2071based on memory address, uses a binary search algorithm
2072which requires the symbol table to be a sorted array.
2073Function symbols are indicated with an @code{is_func} flag.
2074Line number symbols have no special flags set.
2075Additionally, a symbol can have an @code{is_static} flag
2076to indicate that it is a local symbol.
2077
2078With the symbol table read, the symspecs can now be translated
2079into Syms (@code{sym_ids.c:@-sym_id_parse}).  Remember that a single
2080symspec can match multiple symbols.
2081An array of symbol tables
2082(@code{syms}) is created, each entry of which is a symbol table
2083of Syms to be included or excluded from a particular listing.
2084The master symbol table and the symspecs are examined by nested
2085loops, and every symbol that matches a symspec is inserted
2086into the appropriate syms table.  This is done twice, once to
2087count the size of each required symbol table, and again to build
2088the tables, which have been malloced between passes.
2089From now on, to determine whether a symbol is on an include
2090or exclude symspec list, @code{gprof} simply uses its
2091standard symbol lookup routine on the appropriate table
2092in the @code{syms} array.
2093
2094Now the profile data file(s) themselves are read
2095(@code{gmon_io.c:@-gmon_out_read}),
2096first by checking for a new-style @samp{gmon.out} header,
2097then assuming this is an old-style BSD @samp{gmon.out}
2098if the magic number test failed.
2099
2100New-style histogram records are read by @code{hist.c:@-hist_read_rec}.
2101For the first histogram record, allocate a memory array to hold
2102all the bins, and read them in.
2103When multiple profile data files (or files with multiple histogram
2104records) are read, the memory ranges of each pair of histogram records
2105must be either equal, or non-overlapping.  For each pair of histogram
2106records, the resolution (memory region size divided by the number of
2107bins) must be the same.  The time unit must be the same for all
2108histogram records. If the above containts are met, all histograms
2109for the same memory range are merged.
2110
2111As each call graph record is read (@code{call_graph.c:@-cg_read_rec}),
2112the parent and child addresses
2113are matched to symbol table entries, and a call graph arc is
2114created by @code{cg_arcs.c:@-arc_add}, unless the arc fails a symspec
2115check against INCL_ARCS/EXCL_ARCS.  As each arc is added,
2116a linked list is maintained of the parent's child arcs, and of the child's
2117parent arcs.
2118Both the child's call count and the arc's call count are
2119incremented by the record's call count.
2120
2121Basic-block records are read (@code{basic_blocks.c:@-bb_read_rec}),
2122but only if line-by-line profiling has been selected.
2123Each basic-block address is matched to a corresponding line
2124symbol in the symbol table, and an entry made in the symbol's
2125bb_addr and bb_calls arrays.  Again, if multiple basic-block
2126records are present for the same address, the call counts
2127are cumulative.
2128
2129A gmon.sum file is dumped, if requested (@code{gmon_io.c:@-gmon_out_write}).
2130
2131If histograms were present in the data files, assign them to symbols
2132(@code{hist.c:@-hist_assign_samples}) by iterating over all the sample
2133bins and assigning them to symbols.  Since the symbol table
2134is sorted in order of ascending memory addresses, we can
2135simple follow along in the symbol table as we make our pass
2136over the sample bins.
2137This step includes a symspec check against INCL_FLAT/EXCL_FLAT.
2138Depending on the histogram
2139scale factor, a sample bin may span multiple symbols,
2140in which case a fraction of the sample count is allocated
2141to each symbol, proportional to the degree of overlap.
2142This effect is rare for normal profiling, but overlaps
2143are more common during line-by-line profiling, and can
2144cause each of two adjacent lines to be credited with half
2145a hit, for example.
2146
2147If call graph data is present, @code{cg_arcs.c:@-cg_assemble} is called.
2148First, if @samp{-c} was specified, a machine-dependent
2149routine (@code{find_call}) scans through each symbol's machine code,
2150looking for subroutine call instructions, and adding them
2151to the call graph with a zero call count.
2152A topological sort is performed by depth-first numbering
2153all the symbols (@code{cg_dfn.c:@-cg_dfn}), so that
2154children are always numbered less than their parents,
2155then making a array of pointers into the symbol table and sorting it into
2156numerical order, which is reverse topological
2157order (children appear before parents).
2158Cycles are also detected at this point, all members
2159of which are assigned the same topological number.
2160Two passes are now made through this sorted array of symbol pointers.
2161The first pass, from end to beginning (parents to children),
2162computes the fraction of child time to propagate to each parent
2163and a print flag.
2164The print flag reflects symspec handling of INCL_GRAPH/EXCL_GRAPH,
2165with a parent's include or exclude (print or no print) property
2166being propagated to its children, unless they themselves explicitly appear
2167in INCL_GRAPH or EXCL_GRAPH.
2168A second pass, from beginning to end (children to parents) actually
2169propagates the timings along the call graph, subject
2170to a check against INCL_TIME/EXCL_TIME.
2171With the print flag, fractions, and timings now stored in the symbol
2172structures, the topological sort array is now discarded, and a
2173new array of pointers is assembled, this time sorted by propagated time.
2174
2175Finally, print the various outputs the user requested, which is now fairly
2176straightforward.  The call graph (@code{cg_print.c:@-cg_print}) and
2177flat profile (@code{hist.c:@-hist_print}) are regurgitations of values
2178already computed.  The annotated source listing
2179(@code{basic_blocks.c:@-print_annotated_source}) uses basic-block
2180information, if present, to label each line of code with call counts,
2181otherwise only the function call counts are presented.
2182
2183The function ordering code is marginally well documented
2184in the source code itself (@code{cg_print.c}).  Basically,
2185the functions with the most use and the most parents are
2186placed first, followed by other functions with the most use,
2187followed by lower use functions, followed by unused functions
2188at the end.
2189
2190@node Debugging
2191@section Debugging @code{gprof}
2192
2193If @code{gprof} was compiled with debugging enabled,
2194the @samp{-d} option triggers debugging output
2195(to stdout) which can be helpful in understanding its operation.
2196The debugging number specified is interpreted as a sum of the following
2197options:
2198
2199@table @asis
2200@item 2 - Topological sort
2201Monitor depth-first numbering of symbols during call graph analysis
2202@item 4 - Cycles
2203Shows symbols as they are identified as cycle heads
2204@item 16 - Tallying
2205As the call graph arcs are read, show each arc and how
2206the total calls to each function are tallied
2207@item 32 - Call graph arc sorting
2208Details sorting individual parents/children within each call graph entry
2209@item 64 - Reading histogram and call graph records
2210Shows address ranges of histograms as they are read, and each
2211call graph arc
2212@item 128 - Symbol table
2213Reading, classifying, and sorting the symbol table from the object file.
2214For line-by-line profiling (@samp{-l} option), also shows line numbers
2215being assigned to memory addresses.
2216@item 256 - Static call graph
2217Trace operation of @samp{-c} option
2218@item 512 - Symbol table and arc table lookups
2219Detail operation of lookup routines
2220@item 1024 - Call graph propagation
2221Shows how function times are propagated along the call graph
2222@item 2048 - Basic-blocks
2223Shows basic-block records as they are read from profile data
2224(only meaningful with @samp{-l} option)
2225@item 4096 - Symspecs
2226Shows symspec-to-symbol pattern matching operation
2227@item 8192 - Annotate source
2228Tracks operation of @samp{-A} option
2229@end table
2230
2231@node GNU Free Documentation License
2232@appendix GNU Free Documentation License
2233@include fdl.texi
2234
2235@bye
2236
2237NEEDS AN INDEX
2238
2239-T - "traditional BSD style": How is it different?  Should the
2240differences be documented?
2241
2242example flat file adds up to 100.01%...
2243
2244note: time estimates now only go out to one decimal place (0.0), where
2245they used to extend two (78.67).
2246