• Home
  • History
  • Annotate
  • only in this directory
NameDateSize

..21-Feb-201250

abts.cH A D16-Oct-200910.1 KiB

abts.hH A D28-May-20083.5 KiB

abts_tests.hH A D20-Jul-20071.7 KiB

data/H21-Feb-20124

echod.cH A D18-Aug-20063.8 KiB

globalmutexchild.cH A D03-Aug-20061.8 KiB

internal/H21-Feb-20126

Makefile.inH A D21-May-20085.6 KiB

Makefile.winH A D26-Dec-20078.2 KiB

mod_test.cH A D03-Aug-20061.1 KiB

nw_misc.cH A D17-Mar-2011417

NWGNUaprtestH A D17-Apr-20115.5 KiB

NWGNUechodH A D17-Mar-20114.3 KiB

NWGNUglobalmutexchildH A D17-Apr-20114.3 KiB

NWGNUmakefileH A D17-Mar-20111.1 KiB

NWGNUmod_testH A D17-Apr-20114.3 KiB

NWGNUproc_childH A D17-Apr-20114.3 KiB

NWGNUreadchildH A D17-Apr-20114.3 KiB

NWGNUsockchildH A D17-Apr-20114.3 KiB

NWGNUsockperfH A D17-Mar-20114.3 KiB

NWGNUtestatmcH A D17-Apr-20114.3 KiB

NWGNUtryreadH A D17-Apr-20114.3 KiB

occhild.cH A D24-Nov-2004453

proc_child.cH A D14-Oct-2007380

readchild.cH A D03-Aug-20061.4 KiB

READMEH A D03-Oct-200811.9 KiB

sendfile.cH A D07-Mar-201022.4 KiB

sockchild.cH A D16-Oct-20092.3 KiB

sockperf.cH A D17-Jun-20086.5 KiB

testall.dswH A D17-Oct-20072.4 KiB

testapp.cH A D24-Nov-2004185

testargs.cH A D03-Aug-20066.1 KiB

testatomic.cH A D17-Nov-200713.4 KiB

testcond.cH A D17-Nov-200715.5 KiB

testdir.cH A D07-Mar-20108.1 KiB

testdll.dspH A D17-Oct-20079.6 KiB

testdso.cH A D03-Jan-20107.3 KiB

testdup.cH A D07-Mar-20106.1 KiB

testenv.cH A D06-Nov-20064.5 KiB

testfile.cH A D07-Mar-201030.7 KiB

testfilecopy.cH A D24-Jul-20084.4 KiB

testfileinfo.cH A D07-Mar-20109.4 KiB

testflock.cH A D07-Mar-20103.2 KiB

testflock.hH A D03-Aug-2006966

testfmt.cH A D17-Nov-20074.5 KiB

testfnmatch.cH A D19-May-20119.1 KiB

testglobalmutex.cH A D06-Oct-20074.2 KiB

testglobalmutex.hH A D03-Aug-20061 KiB

testhash.cH A D01-Nov-200714.1 KiB

testipsub.cH A D17-Nov-20077.2 KiB

testlfs.cH A D18-Jun-200810.9 KiB

testlib.dspH A D17-Oct-20079.5 KiB

testlock.cH A D01-Mar-20079.4 KiB

testlockperf.cH A D16-Oct-20078.1 KiB

testmmap.cH A D07-Mar-20104.2 KiB

testmutexscope.cH A D13-Oct-20075.8 KiB

testnames.cH A D03-May-201110.6 KiB

testoc.cH A D30-Jul-20093.5 KiB

testpath.cH A D03-Aug-20064.1 KiB

testpipe.cH A D03-Aug-20096.2 KiB

testpoll.cH A D29-Apr-201126.7 KiB

testpools.cH A D17-Nov-20074.3 KiB

testproc.cH A D07-Mar-20105.3 KiB

testprocmutex.cH A D03-Aug-20065.9 KiB

testrand.cH A D21-Mar-20119.9 KiB

testshm.cH A D21-Mar-20118.6 KiB

testshm.hH A D03-Aug-20061.1 KiB

testshmconsumer.cH A D03-Aug-20062.4 KiB

testshmproducer.cH A D03-Aug-20062.3 KiB

testsleep.cH A D03-Aug-20061.6 KiB

testsock.cH A D13-Mar-201113.8 KiB

testsock.hH A D03-Aug-20061.4 KiB

testsockets.cH A D15-Oct-20076.7 KiB

testsockopt.cH A D03-Aug-20064 KiB

teststr.cH A D17-Nov-200711.6 KiB

teststrnatcmp.cH A D03-Aug-20062.4 KiB

testtable.cH A D17-Nov-20075.5 KiB

testtemp.cH A D03-Aug-20061.7 KiB

testthread.cH A D03-Aug-20063.4 KiB

testtime.cH A D03-Aug-20068.7 KiB

testud.cH A D17-Nov-20072.4 KiB

testuser.cH A D29-Jun-20075 KiB

testutil.cH A D03-Aug-20061.4 KiB

testutil.hH A D07-Oct-20073.5 KiB

testvsn.cH A D03-Aug-20061.6 KiB

tryread.cH A D07-Mar-20101.5 KiB

README

1Writing APR tests
2
3All APR tests should be executable in 2 ways, as an individual program, or
4as a part of the full test suite.  The full test suite is controlled with
5the testall program.  At the beginning of the testall.c file, there is an
6array of functions called tests.  The testall program loops through this 
7array calling each function.  Each function returns a CuSuite variable, which
8is then added to the SuiteList.  Once all Suites have been added, the SuiteList
9is executed, and the output is printed to the screen.  All functions in the
10array should follow the same basic format:
11
12The Full Suite
13--------------
14
15/* The driver function.  This must return a CuSuite variable, which will
16 * then be used to actually run the tests.  Essentially, all Suites are a
17 * collection of tests.  The driver will take each Suite, and put it in a
18 * SuiteList, which is a collection of Suites.
19 */
20CuSuite *testtime(void)
21{
22    /* The actual suite, this must be created for each test program.  Please
23     * give it a useful name, that will inform the user of the feature being
24     * tested.
25     */
26    CuSuite *suite = CuSuiteNew("Test Time");
27
28    /* Each function must be added to the suite.  Each function represents
29     * a single test.  It is possible to test multiple features in a single
30     * function, although no tests currently do that.
31     */
32    SUITE_ADD_TEST(suite, test_now);
33    SUITE_ADD_TEST(suite, test_gmtstr);
34    SUITE_ADD_TEST(suite, test_localstr);
35    SUITE_ADD_TEST(suite, test_exp_get_gmt);
36    SUITE_ADD_TEST(suite, test_exp_get_lt);
37    SUITE_ADD_TEST(suite, test_imp_gmt);
38    SUITE_ADD_TEST(suite, test_rfcstr);
39    SUITE_ADD_TEST(suite, test_ctime);
40    SUITE_ADD_TEST(suite, test_strftime);
41    SUITE_ADD_TEST(suite, test_strftimesmall);
42    SUITE_ADD_TEST(suite, test_exp_tz);
43    SUITE_ADD_TEST(suite, test_strftimeoffset);
44
45    /* You must return the suite so that the driver knows which suites to
46     * run.
47     */
48    return suite;
49}
50
51Building the full driver
52------------------------
53
54All you need to do to build the full driver is run:
55
56    make
57
58To run it, run:
59
60    ./testall
61
62Running individual tests
63------------------------
64
65It is not possible to build individual tests, however it is possible to
66run individual tests.  When running the test suite, specify the name of the
67tests that you want to run on the command line.  For example:
68
69	./testall teststr testrand
70
71Will run the Strings and Random generator tests.
72
73Reading the test suite output
74-----------------------------
75
76Once you run the test suite, you will get output like:
77
78All APR Tests:
79    Test Strings:       ....
80    Test Time:  ............
81
8216 tests run:  16 passed, 0 failed, 0 not implemented.
83
84Known test failures are documented in ../STATUS.
85
86There are a couple of things to look at with this.  First, if you look at the
87first function in this document, you should notice that the string passed to
88the CuSuiteNew function is in the output.  That is why the string should
89explain the feature you are testing.
90
91Second, this test passed completely.  This is obvious in two ways.  First, and
92most obvious, the summary line tells you that 16 tests were run and 16 tests
93passed.  However, the results can also be found in the lines above.  Every
94'.' in the output represents a passed test.
95
96If a test fails, the output will look like:
97
98All APR Tests:
99    Test Strings:       ....
100    Test Time:  ..F.........
101
10216 tests run:  15 passed, 1 failed, 0 not implemented.
103
104This is not very useful, because you don't know which test failed.  However,
105once you know that a test failed, you can run the suite again, with the
106-v option.  If you do this, you will get something like:
107
108All APR Tests:
109    Test Strings:       ....
110    Test Time:  ..F.........
111
11216 tests run:  15 passed, 1 failed, 0 not implemented.
113Failed tests:
1141) test_localstr: assert failed
115
116In this case, we know the test_localstr function failed, and there is an
117Assert in this that failed (I modified the test to fail for this document).
118Now, you can look at what that test does, and why it would have failed.
119
120There is one other possible output for the test suite (run with -v):
121
122All APR Tests:
123    Test Strings:       ....
124    Test Time:  ..N.........
125
12616 tests run:  15 passed, 0 failed, 1 not implemented.
127
128Not Implemented tests:
129
130Not Implemented tests:
1311) test_localstr: apr_time_exp_lt not implemented on this platform
132
133The 'N' means that a function has returned APR_ENOTIMPL.  This should be 
134treated as an error, and the function should be implemented as soon as
135possible.
136
137Adding New test Suites to the full driver
138-------------------------------------------
139
140To add a new Suite to the full driver, you must make a couple of modifications.
141
1421)  Edit test_apr.h, and add the prototype for the function.
1432)  Edit testall.c, and add the function and name to the tests array.
1443)  Edit Makefile.in, and add the .lo file to the testall target.
145
146Once those four things are done, your tests will automatically be added
147to the suite.
148
149Writting an ABTS unit test
150--------------------------
151
152The aim of this quick and dirty Howto is to give a short introduction
153to APR (Apache Portable Runtime) unit tests, and how to write
154one. During my Google's Summer of Code 2005 project, I discovered a
155small bug in the APR-Util's date parsing routines, and I needed to
156write a unit test for the fixed code. I decided to write this
157documentation because I did not find any. Thanks to Garrett Rooney for
158his help on writing the unit test !
159
160The APR and APR-Util libraries provide a platform independent API for
161software developers. They contain a lot of modules, including network
162programming, threads, string and memory management, etc. All these
163functions need to be heavily tested so that developers can be sure the
164library is reliable.
165
166The ABTS give APR developers the ability to build a complete test
167suite for the bunch of tests they wrote, which can then be ran under
168various platforms. In this Howto, I will try teach you how to write an
169ABTS unit test.
170
171As you may probably know, a unit test is a simple routine which tests
172a very specific feature of the tested software or library. To build a
173unit test, you need three different things :
174
175 * the to-be-tested function,
176 * the input data that will be given to the function,
177 * the expected output data.
178
179The principle of a unit test is very simple : for each entry in your
180set of input data, we pass it to our function, fetch what the function
181returned and compare it to the corresponding expected output data. Of
182course, the more edge cases you can test, the better your input data
183set is.
184
185The ABTS aims to quicken the write of unit test, and make them
186available to the whole test suite by providing a set of preprocessor
187macros. Adding a unit test to a test suite can be easily done by the
188following piece of code :
189
190abts_suite *testdaterfc(abts_suite *suite)
191{
192    suite = ADD_SUITE(suite);
193    abts_run_test(suite, test_date_rfc, NULL);
194
195    return suite;
196}
197
198Where test_date_rfc is the name of the function performing the
199test. Writing such a function is, in the light of the explanation I
200just gave, pretty much easy too. As I said, we need to check every
201entry of our input data set. That gives us a loop. For each loop
202iteration, we call our to-be-tested function, grab its result and
203compare the returned value with the expected one.
204
205Test functions must have the following prototype :
206
207static void my_test_function(abts_case *tc, void *data);
208
209The comparison step is performed by the ABTS, thus giving the
210whole test suite the correct behavior if your unit test fails. Here
211comes a list of the available test methods :
212
213ABTS_INT_EQUAL(tc, a, b)
214ABTS_INT_NEQUAL(tc, a, b)
215ABTS_STR_EQUAL(tc, a, b)
216ABTS_STR_NEQUAL(tc, a, b, c)
217ABTS_PTR_NOTNULL(tc, b)
218ABTS_PTR_EQUAL(tc, a, b)
219ABTS_TRUE(tc, b)
220ABTS_FAIL(tc, b)
221ABTS_NOT_IMPL(tc, b)
222ABTS_ASSERT(tc, a, b)
223
224The first argument, tc is a reference to the unit test currently
225processed by the test suite (passed to your test function). The other
226parameters are the data to be tested. For example, the following line
227will never make your unit test fail :
228
229ABTS_INT_EQUAL(tc, 1, 1);
230
231See, it's easy ! Let's take a look at the complete example :
232testdaterfc. We want to test our date string parser. For this, we will
233use some chosen date strings (from mail headers for example) written
234in various formats but that should all be handled by our function, and
235their equivalents in correct RFC822 format.
236
237The function we want to test returns an apr_time_t}, which will be
238directly given as input to the apr_rfc822_date() function, thus
239producing the corresponding RFC822 date string. All we need to do
240after this is to call the correct test method from the ABTS macros !
241
242You can take a look at the apr-util/test/testdaterfc.c file for the
243complete source code of this unit test.
244
245Although this Howto is very small and mostly dedicated to the
246testdaterfc unit test, I hope you'll find it useful. Good luck !
247
248Writing tests for CuTest (no longer used)
249-----------------------------------------
250
251There are a couple of rules for writing good tests for the test suite.
252
2531)  All tests can determine for themselves if it passed or not.  This means
254that there is no reason for the person running the test suite to interpret
255the results of the tests.
2562)  Never use printf to add to the output of the test suite.  The suite
257library should be able to print all of the information required to debug
258a problem.
2593)  Functions should be tested with both positive and negative tests.  This
260means that you should test things that should both succeed and fail.
2614)  Just checking the return code does _NOT_ make a useful test.  You must
262check to determine that the test actually did what you expected it to do.
263
264An example test
265---------------
266
267Finally, we will look at a quick test:
268
269/* All tests are passed a CuTest variable.  This is how the suite determines
270 * if the test succeeded or failed.
271 */
272static void test_localstr(CuTest *tc)
273{
274    apr_status_t rv;
275    apr_time_exp_t xt;
276    time_t os_now;
277
278    rv = apr_time_exp_lt(&xt, now);
279    os_now = now / APR_USEC_PER_SEC;
280   
281    /* If the function can return APR_ENOTIMPL, then you should check for it.
282     * This allows platform implementors to know if they have to implement
283     * the function.
284     */
285    if (rv == APR_ENOTIMPL) {
286        CuNotImpl(tc, "apr_time_exp_lt");
287    }
288
289    /* It often helps to ensure that the return code was APR_SUCESS.  If it
290     * wasn't, then we know the test failed.
291     */
292    CuAssertTrue(tc, rv == APR_SUCCESS);
293
294    /* Now that we know APR thinks it worked properly, we need to check the
295     * output to ensure that we got what we expected.
296     */
297    CuAssertStrEquals(tc, "2002-08-14 12:05:36.186711 -25200 [257 Sat] DST",
298                      print_time(p, &xt));
299}
300
301Notice, the same test can fail for any of a number of reasons.  The first 
302test to fail ends the test.
303
304CuTest
305------
306
307CuTest is an open source test suite written by Asim Jalis.  It has been 
308released under the zlib/libpng license.  That license can be found in the
309CuTest.c and CuTest.h files.
310
311The version of CuTest that is included in the APR test suite has been modified
312from the original distribution in the following ways:
313
3141)  The original distribution does not have a -v flag, the details are always
315printed.
3162)  The NotImplemented result does not exist.
3173)  SuiteLists do not exist.  In the original distribution, you can add suites
318to suites, but it just adds the tests in the first suite to the list of tests
319in the original suite.  The output wasn't as detailed as I wanted, so I created
320SuiteLists.
321
322The first two modifications have been sent to the original author of CuTest,
323but they have not been integrated into the base distribution.  The SuiteList
324changes will be sent to the original author soon.
325
326The modified version of CuTest is not currently in any CVS or Subversion
327server.  In time, it will be hosted at rkbloom.net.
328
329There are currently no docs for how to write tests, but the teststr and 
330testtime programs should give an idea of how it is done.  In time, a document
331should be written to define how tests are written.
332
333