1
2
3NETWORK WORKING GROUP                                        N. Williams
4Internet-Draft                                                       Sun
5Expires: December 30, 2004                                     July 2004
6
7
8     Namespace Considerations and Registries for GSS-API Extensions
9              draft-williams-gssapi-extensions-iana-00.txt
10
11Status of this Memo
12
13   By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable
14   patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed,
15   and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with
16   RFC 3668.
17
18   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
19   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
20   other groups may also distribute working documents as
21   Internet-Drafts.
22
23   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
24   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
25   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
26   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
27
28   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
29   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
30
31   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
32   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
33
34   This Internet-Draft will expire on December 30, 2004.
35
36Copyright Notice
37
38   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).  All Rights Reserved.
39
40Abstract
41
42   This document describes the ways in which the GSS-API may be extended
43   and directs the creation of IANA registries for GSS-API namespaces
44   that may be affected by any extensions.
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55Williams               Expires December 30, 2004                [Page 1]
56
57Internet-Draft      GSS-API Namespace Considerations           July 2004
58
59
60Table of Contents
61
62   1. Conventions used in this document  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
63   2. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
64   3. Extensions to the GSS-API  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
65   4. Generic GSS-API Namespaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
66   5. Language Binding-Specific GSS-API Namespaces . . . . . . . . .   7
67   6. Extension-Specific GSS-API Namespaces  . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
68   7. IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
69   8. Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
70   9. Normative  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
71      Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
72      Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . .  11
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111Williams               Expires December 30, 2004                [Page 2]
112
113Internet-Draft      GSS-API Namespace Considerations           July 2004
114
115
1161.  Conventions used in this document
117
118   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
119   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
120   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167Williams               Expires December 30, 2004                [Page 3]
168
169Internet-Draft      GSS-API Namespace Considerations           July 2004
170
171
1722.  Introduction
173
174   There is a need for generic and mechanism-specific extensions to the
175   Generic Security Services Application Programming Interface
176   (GSS-API).  As such extensions are designed and standardized, both at
177   the IETF and elsewhere, there is a non-trivial risk of namespace
178   pollution and conflicts.  To avoid this we set out guidelines for
179   extending the GSS-API and create IANA registries of GSS-API
180   namespaces.
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223Williams               Expires December 30, 2004                [Page 4]
224
225Internet-Draft      GSS-API Namespace Considerations           July 2004
226
227
2283.  Extensions to the GSS-API
229
230   Extensions to the GSS-API can be categorized as follows:
231   o  Generic
232   o  Implementation-specific
233   o  Mechanism-specific
234   o  Language binding-specific
235   o  Any combination of two or all three of the last three
236
237   Extensions to the GSS-API may be purely semantic, without effect on
238   the GSS-API's namespaces.  Or they may introduce new functions,
239   constants, types, etc...; these clearly affect the GSS-API
240   namespaces.
241
242   Extensions that affect the GSS-API namespaces should be registered
243   with the IANA< along with their specific effects on the GSS-API
244   namespaces.
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279Williams               Expires December 30, 2004                [Page 5]
280
281Internet-Draft      GSS-API Namespace Considerations           July 2004
282
283
2844.  Generic GSS-API Namespaces
285
286   All the function, constant and type names, as well as all the
287   constant values specified in the base GSS-API specification for the
288   basic generic GSS-API namespace.
289
290   The generic GSS-API namespaces are:
291   o  Type names
292   o  Function names
293   o  Constant names for each type
294   o  Constant values for each type
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335Williams               Expires December 30, 2004                [Page 6]
336
337Internet-Draft      GSS-API Namespace Considerations           July 2004
338
339
3405.  Language Binding-Specific GSS-API Namespaces
341
342   <Add text; discuss header, module, library, class namespaces and
343   whatever else comes up that is language-specific and appropriate for
344   registration with the IANA.>
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391Williams               Expires December 30, 2004                [Page 7]
392
393Internet-Draft      GSS-API Namespace Considerations           July 2004
394
395
3966.  Extension-Specific GSS-API Namespaces
397
398   Extensions to the GSS-API may create additional namespaces.  IANA
399   registries SHOULD be created for any such new namespaces.
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447Williams               Expires December 30, 2004                [Page 8]
448
449Internet-Draft      GSS-API Namespace Considerations           July 2004
450
451
4527.  IANA Considerations
453
454   The following registries should be established upon publication of
455   this document as an RFC:
456   o  GSS-API Type Name Registry
457   o  GSS-API Function Name Registry
458   o  GSS-API Constant Name Registry
459   o  GSS-API Constant Value Registry
460   o  GSS-API Class/Header/Library/Module Name Registry
461
462   Entries in these registries should consist of:
463   o  Namespace name
464   o  Symbol name or prefix, OR value or value range.
465   o  [optional] Reference to normative reference for the registration.
466   o  [optional] Programming language
467   o  [optional] Entry sub-type (e.g., "header name")
468   o  [optional] Mechanism OID(s) and/or OID prefix(es) associated with
469      the entry
470   o  [optional] Magic
471   o  [optional] Expert Review (body or people who reviewed the
472      registration)
473   o  [optional] Description (in English)
474
475   <Add text on guidelines for IANA consideration of registration
476   applications, particularly with respect to entries w/o normative
477   references, "magic" entries (e.g., special values of 'time' types
478   which indicate something other than absolute or relative time, such
479   as GSS_C_INDEFINITE), expert review requirements for registrations w/
480   o normative references, etc....>
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503Williams               Expires December 30, 2004                [Page 9]
504
505Internet-Draft      GSS-API Namespace Considerations           July 2004
506
507
5088.  Security Considerations
509
510   This document has no security considerations.
511
5129  Normative
513
514   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
515              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
516
517   [RFC2743]  Linn, J., "Generic Security Service Application Program
518              Interface Version 2, Update 1", RFC 2743, January 2000.
519
520   [RFC2744]  Wray, J., "Generic Security Service API Version 2 :
521              C-bindings", RFC 2744, January 2000.
522
523
524Author's Address
525
526   Nicolas Williams
527   Sun Microsystems
528   5300 Riata Trace Ct
529   Austin, TX  78727
530   US
531
532   EMail: Nicolas.Williams@sun.com
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559Williams               Expires December 30, 2004               [Page 10]
560
561Internet-Draft      GSS-API Namespace Considerations           July 2004
562
563
564Intellectual Property Statement
565
566   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
567   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
568   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
569   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
570   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
571   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
572   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
573   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
574
575   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
576   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
577   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
578   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
579   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
580   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
581
582   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
583   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
584   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
585   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
586   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
587
588
589Disclaimer of Validity
590
591   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
592   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
593   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
594   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
595   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
596   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
597   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
598
599
600Copyright Statement
601
602   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).  This document is subject
603   to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
604   except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
605
606
607Acknowledgment
608
609   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
610   Internet Society.
611
612
613
614
615Williams               Expires December 30, 2004               [Page 11]
616
617
618