1.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 2 3=================================================== 4The Kernel Test Anything Protocol (KTAP), version 1 5=================================================== 6 7TAP, or the Test Anything Protocol is a format for specifying test results used 8by a number of projects. It's website and specification are found at this `link 9<https://testanything.org/>`_. The Linux Kernel largely uses TAP output for test 10results. However, Kernel testing frameworks have special needs for test results 11which don't align with the original TAP specification. Thus, a "Kernel TAP" 12(KTAP) format is specified to extend and alter TAP to support these use-cases. 13This specification describes the generally accepted format of KTAP as it is 14currently used in the kernel. 15 16KTAP test results describe a series of tests (which may be nested: i.e., test 17can have subtests), each of which can contain both diagnostic data -- e.g., log 18lines -- and a final result. The test structure and results are 19machine-readable, whereas the diagnostic data is unstructured and is there to 20aid human debugging. 21 22KTAP output is built from four different types of lines: 23- Version lines 24- Plan lines 25- Test case result lines 26- Diagnostic lines 27 28In general, valid KTAP output should also form valid TAP output, but some 29information, in particular nested test results, may be lost. Also note that 30there is a stagnant draft specification for TAP14, KTAP diverges from this in 31a couple of places (notably the "Subtest" header), which are described where 32relevant later in this document. 33 34Version lines 35------------- 36 37All KTAP-formatted results begin with a "version line" which specifies which 38version of the (K)TAP standard the result is compliant with. 39 40For example: 41- "KTAP version 1" 42- "TAP version 13" 43- "TAP version 14" 44 45Note that, in KTAP, subtests also begin with a version line, which denotes the 46start of the nested test results. This differs from TAP14, which uses a 47separate "Subtest" line. 48 49While, going forward, "KTAP version 1" should be used by compliant tests, it 50is expected that most parsers and other tooling will accept the other versions 51listed here for compatibility with existing tests and frameworks. 52 53Plan lines 54---------- 55 56A test plan provides the number of tests (or subtests) in the KTAP output. 57 58Plan lines must follow the format of "1..N" where N is the number of tests or subtests. 59Plan lines follow version lines to indicate the number of nested tests. 60 61While there are cases where the number of tests is not known in advance -- in 62which case the test plan may be omitted -- it is strongly recommended one is 63present where possible. 64 65Test case result lines 66---------------------- 67 68Test case result lines indicate the final status of a test. 69They are required and must have the format: 70 71.. code-block:: none 72 73 <result> <number> [<description>][ # [<directive>] [<diagnostic data>]] 74 75The result can be either "ok", which indicates the test case passed, 76or "not ok", which indicates that the test case failed. 77 78<number> represents the number of the test being performed. The first test must 79have the number 1 and the number then must increase by 1 for each additional 80subtest within the same test at the same nesting level. 81 82The description is a description of the test, generally the name of 83the test, and can be any string of characters other than # or a 84newline. The description is optional, but recommended. 85 86The directive and any diagnostic data is optional. If either are present, they 87must follow a hash sign, "#". 88 89A directive is a keyword that indicates a different outcome for a test other 90than passed and failed. The directive is optional, and consists of a single 91keyword preceding the diagnostic data. In the event that a parser encounters 92a directive it doesn't support, it should fall back to the "ok" / "not ok" 93result. 94 95Currently accepted directives are: 96 97- "SKIP", which indicates a test was skipped (note the result of the test case 98 result line can be either "ok" or "not ok" if the SKIP directive is used) 99- "TODO", which indicates that a test is not expected to pass at the moment, 100 e.g. because the feature it is testing is known to be broken. While this 101 directive is inherited from TAP, its use in the kernel is discouraged. 102- "XFAIL", which indicates that a test is expected to fail. This is similar 103 to "TODO", above, and is used by some kselftest tests. 104- ���TIMEOUT���, which indicates a test has timed out (note the result of the test 105 case result line should be ���not ok��� if the TIMEOUT directive is used) 106- ���ERROR���, which indicates that the execution of a test has failed due to a 107 specific error that is included in the diagnostic data. (note the result of 108 the test case result line should be ���not ok��� if the ERROR directive is used) 109 110The diagnostic data is a plain-text field which contains any additional details 111about why this result was produced. This is typically an error message for ERROR 112or failed tests, or a description of missing dependencies for a SKIP result. 113 114The diagnostic data field is optional, and results which have neither a 115directive nor any diagnostic data do not need to include the "#" field 116separator. 117 118Example result lines include:: 119 120 ok 1 test_case_name 121 122The test "test_case_name" passed. 123 124:: 125 126 not ok 1 test_case_name 127 128The test "test_case_name" failed. 129 130:: 131 132 ok 1 test # SKIP necessary dependency unavailable 133 134The test "test" was SKIPPED with the diagnostic message "necessary dependency 135unavailable". 136 137:: 138 139 not ok 1 test # TIMEOUT 30 seconds 140 141The test "test" timed out, with diagnostic data "30 seconds". 142 143:: 144 145 ok 5 check return code # rcode=0 146 147The test "check return code" passed, with additional diagnostic data ���rcode=0��� 148 149 150Diagnostic lines 151---------------- 152 153If tests wish to output any further information, they should do so using 154"diagnostic lines". Diagnostic lines are optional, freeform text, and are 155often used to describe what is being tested and any intermediate results in 156more detail than the final result and diagnostic data line provides. 157 158Diagnostic lines are formatted as "# <diagnostic_description>", where the 159description can be any string. Diagnostic lines can be anywhere in the test 160output. As a rule, diagnostic lines regarding a test are directly before the 161test result line for that test. 162 163Note that most tools will treat unknown lines (see below) as diagnostic lines, 164even if they do not start with a "#": this is to capture any other useful 165kernel output which may help debug the test. It is nevertheless recommended 166that tests always prefix any diagnostic output they have with a "#" character. 167 168Unknown lines 169------------- 170 171There may be lines within KTAP output that do not follow the format of one of 172the four formats for lines described above. This is allowed, however, they will 173not influence the status of the tests. 174 175This is an important difference from TAP. Kernel tests may print messages 176to the system console or a log file. Both of these destinations may contain 177messages either from unrelated kernel or userspace activity, or kernel 178messages from non-test code that is invoked by the test. The kernel code 179invoked by the test likely is not aware that a test is in progress and 180thus can not print the message as a diagnostic message. 181 182Nested tests 183------------ 184 185In KTAP, tests can be nested. This is done by having a test include within its 186output an entire set of KTAP-formatted results. This can be used to categorize 187and group related tests, or to split out different results from the same test. 188 189The "parent" test's result should consist of all of its subtests' results, 190starting with another KTAP version line and test plan, and end with the overall 191result. If one of the subtests fail, for example, the parent test should also 192fail. 193 194Additionally, all lines in a subtest should be indented. One level of 195indentation is two spaces: " ". The indentation should begin at the version 196line and should end before the parent test's result line. 197 198"Unknown lines" are not considered to be lines in a subtest and thus are 199allowed to be either indented or not indented. 200 201An example of a test with two nested subtests: 202 203:: 204 205 KTAP version 1 206 1..1 207 KTAP version 1 208 1..2 209 ok 1 test_1 210 not ok 2 test_2 211 # example failed 212 not ok 1 example 213 214An example format with multiple levels of nested testing: 215 216:: 217 218 KTAP version 1 219 1..2 220 KTAP version 1 221 1..2 222 KTAP version 1 223 1..2 224 not ok 1 test_1 225 ok 2 test_2 226 not ok 1 test_3 227 ok 2 test_4 # SKIP 228 not ok 1 example_test_1 229 ok 2 example_test_2 230 231 232Major differences between TAP and KTAP 233-------------------------------------- 234 235================================================== ========= =============== 236Feature TAP KTAP 237================================================== ========= =============== 238yaml and json in diagnosic message ok not recommended 239TODO directive ok not recognized 240allows an arbitrary number of tests to be nested no yes 241"Unknown lines" are in category of "Anything else" yes no 242"Unknown lines" are incorrect allowed 243================================================== ========= =============== 244 245The TAP14 specification does permit nested tests, but instead of using another 246nested version line, uses a line of the form 247"Subtest: <name>" where <name> is the name of the parent test. 248 249Example KTAP output 250-------------------- 251:: 252 253 KTAP version 1 254 1..1 255 KTAP version 1 256 1..3 257 KTAP version 1 258 1..1 259 # test_1: initializing test_1 260 ok 1 test_1 261 ok 1 example_test_1 262 KTAP version 1 263 1..2 264 ok 1 test_1 # SKIP test_1 skipped 265 ok 2 test_2 266 ok 2 example_test_2 267 KTAP version 1 268 1..3 269 ok 1 test_1 270 # test_2: FAIL 271 not ok 2 test_2 272 ok 3 test_3 # SKIP test_3 skipped 273 not ok 3 example_test_3 274 not ok 1 main_test 275 276This output defines the following hierarchy: 277 278A single test called "main_test", which fails, and has three subtests: 279- "example_test_1", which passes, and has one subtest: 280 281 - "test_1", which passes, and outputs the diagnostic message "test_1: initializing test_1" 282 283- "example_test_2", which passes, and has two subtests: 284 285 - "test_1", which is skipped, with the explanation "test_1 skipped" 286 - "test_2", which passes 287 288- "example_test_3", which fails, and has three subtests 289 290 - "test_1", which passes 291 - "test_2", which outputs the diagnostic line "test_2: FAIL", and fails. 292 - "test_3", which is skipped with the explanation "test_3 skipped" 293 294Note that the individual subtests with the same names do not conflict, as they 295are found in different parent tests. This output also exhibits some sensible 296rules for "bubbling up" test results: a test fails if any of its subtests fail. 297Skipped tests do not affect the result of the parent test (though it often 298makes sense for a test to be marked skipped if _all_ of its subtests have been 299skipped). 300 301See also: 302--------- 303 304- The TAP specification: 305 https://testanything.org/tap-version-13-specification.html 306- The (stagnant) TAP version 14 specification: 307 https://github.com/TestAnything/Specification/blob/tap-14-specification/specification.md 308- The kselftest documentation: 309 Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst 310- The KUnit documentation: 311 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst 312