1# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
2
3# Copyright 2004, 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
4
5# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
6# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
7# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
8# (at your option) any later version.
9#
10# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
11# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
12# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
13# GNU General Public License for more details.
14#
15# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
16# along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
17
18# Test "return", "finish", and "call" of functions that a scalar (int,
19# float, enum) and/or take a single scalar parameter.
20
21if $tracelevel then {
22	strace $tracelevel
23}
24
25set prms_id 0
26set bug_id 0
27
28# Some targets can't call functions, so don't even bother with this
29# test.
30
31if [target_info exists gdb,cannot_call_functions] {
32    setup_xfail "*-*-*"
33    fail "This target can not call functions"
34    continue
35}
36
37set testfile "call-sc"
38set srcfile ${testfile}.c
39set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
40
41# Create and source the file that provides information about the
42# compiler used to compile the test case.
43
44if [get_compiler_info ${binfile}] {
45    return -1;
46}
47
48# Use the file name, compiler and tuples to set up any needed KFAILs.
49
50proc setup_kfails { file tuples bug } {
51    global testfile
52    if [string match $file $testfile] {
53	foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
54    }
55}
56
57proc setup_compiler_kfails { file compiler format tuples bug } {
58    global testfile
59    if {[string match $file $testfile] && [test_compiler_info $compiler]  && [test_debug_format $format]} {
60	foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
61    }
62}
63
64# Compile a variant of scalars.c using TYPE to specify the type of the
65# parameter and return-type.  Run the compiled program up to "main".
66# Also updates the global "testfile" to reflect the most recent build.
67
68proc start_scalars_test { type } {
69    global testfile
70    global srcfile
71    global binfile
72    global objdir
73    global subdir
74    global srcdir
75    global gdb_prompt
76    global expect_out
77
78    # Create the additional flags
79    set flags "debug additional_flags=-DT=${type}"
80    set testfile "call-sc-${type}"
81
82    set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
83    if  { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags}"] != "" } {
84	# built the second test case since we can't use prototypes
85	warning "Prototypes not supported, rebuilding with -DNO_PROTOTYPES"
86	if  { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags} additional_flags=-DNO_PROTOTYPES"] != "" } {
87	    untested call-sc.exp
88	    return -1
89	}
90    }
91
92    # Start with a fresh gdb.
93    gdb_exit
94    gdb_start
95    gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
96    gdb_load ${binfile}
97
98    # Make certain that the output is consistent
99    gdb_test "set print sevenbit-strings" "" \
100	    "set print sevenbit-strings; ${testfile}"
101    gdb_test "set print address off" "" \
102	    "set print address off; ${testfile}"
103    gdb_test "set width 0" "" \
104	    "set width 0; ${testfile}"
105
106    # Advance to main
107    if { ![runto_main] } then {
108	gdb_suppress_tests;
109    }
110
111    # Get the debug format
112    get_debug_format
113
114    # check that type matches what was passed in
115    set test "ptype; ${testfile}"
116    set foo_t "xxx"
117    gdb_test_multiple "ptype ${type}" "${test}" {
118	-re "type = (\[^\r\n\]*)\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
119	    set foo_t "$expect_out(1,string)"
120	    pass "$test (${foo_t})"
121	}
122    }
123    gdb_test "ptype foo" "type = ${foo_t}" "ptype foo; ${testfile} $expect_out(1,string)"
124}
125
126
127# Given N (0..25), return the corresponding alphabetic letter in lower
128# or upper case.  This is ment to be i18n proof.
129
130proc i2a { n } {
131    return [string range "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" $n $n]
132}
133
134proc I2A { n } {
135    return [string toupper [i2a $n]]
136}
137
138
139# Use the file name, compiler and tuples to set up any needed KFAILs.
140
141proc setup_kfails { file tuples bug } {
142    global testfile
143    if [string match $file $testfile] {
144	foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
145    }
146}
147
148proc setup_compiler_kfails { file compiler format tuples bug } {
149    global testfile
150    if {[string match $file $testfile] && [test_compiler_info $compiler]  && [test_debug_format $format]} {
151	foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
152    }
153}
154
155# Test GDB's ability to make inferior function calls to functions
156# returning (or passing) in a single scalar.
157
158# start_scalars_test() will have previously built a program with a
159# specified scalar type.  To ensure robustness of the output, "p/c" is
160# used.
161
162# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?" and
163# "extract return-value from registers" called by "infcall.c".
164
165proc test_scalar_calls { } {
166    global testfile
167    global gdb_prompt
168
169    # Check that GDB can always extract a scalar-return value from an
170    # inferior function call.  Since GDB always knows the location of
171    # an inferior function call's return value these should never fail
172
173    # Implemented by calling the parameterless function "fun" and then
174    # examining the return value printed by GDB.
175
176    set tests "call ${testfile}"
177
178    # Call fun, checking the printed return-value.
179    gdb_test "p/c fun()" "= 49 '1'" "p/c fun(); ${tests}"
180
181    # Check that GDB can always pass a structure to an inferior function.
182    # This test can never fail.
183
184    # Implemented by calling the one parameter function "Fun" which
185    # stores its parameter in the global variable "L".  GDB then
186    # examining that global to confirm that the value is as expected.
187
188    gdb_test "call Fun(foo)" "" "call Fun(foo); ${tests}"
189    gdb_test "p/c L" " = 49 '1'" "p/c L; ${tests}"
190}
191
192# Test GDB's ability to both return a function (with "return" or
193# "finish") and correctly extract/store any corresponding
194# return-value.
195
196# Check that GDB can consistently extract/store structure return
197# values.  There are two cases - returned in registers and returned in
198# memory.  For the latter case, the return value can't be found and a
199# failure is "expected".  However GDB must still both return the
200# function and display the final source and line information.
201
202# N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
203# for the test case.  FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
204# this test.
205
206# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?", "extract
207# return-value from registers", and "store return-value in registers".
208# Unlike "test struct calls", this test is expected to "fail" when the
209# return-value is in memory (GDB can't find the location).  The test
210# is in three parts: test "return"; test "finish"; check that the two
211# are consistent.  GDB can sometimes work for one command and not the
212# other.
213
214proc test_scalar_returns { } {
215    global gdb_prompt
216    global testfile
217
218    set tests "return ${testfile}"
219
220
221    # Check that "return" works.
222
223    # GDB must always force the return of a function that has
224    # a struct result.  Dependant on the ABI, it may, or may not be
225    # possible to store the return value in a register.
226
227    # The relevant code looks like "L{n} = fun{n}()".  The test forces
228    # "fun{n}" to "return" with an explicit value.  Since that code
229    # snippet will store the the returned value in "L{n}" the return
230    # is tested by examining "L{n}".  This assumes that the
231    # compiler implemented this as fun{n}(&L{n}) and hence that when
232    # the value isn't stored "L{n}" remains unchanged.  Also check for
233    # consistency between this and the "finish" case.
234
235    # Get into a call of fun
236    gdb_test "advance fun" \
237	    "fun .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo.*" \
238	    "advance to fun for return; ${tests}"
239
240    # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
241    gdb_test "p/c L" " = 90 'Z'" "zed L for return; ${tests}"
242
243    # Force the "return".  This checks that the return is always
244    # performed, and that GDB correctly reported this to the user.
245    # GDB 6.0 and earlier, when the return-value's location wasn't
246    # known, both failed to print a final "source and line" and misplaced
247    # the frame ("No frame").
248
249    # The test is writen so that it only reports one FAIL/PASS for the
250    # entire operation.  The value returned is checked further down.
251    # "return_value_unknown", if non-empty, records why GDB realised
252    # that it didn't know where the return value was.
253
254    set test "return foo; ${tests}"
255    set return_value_unknown 0
256    set return_value_unimplemented 0
257    gdb_test_multiple "return foo" "${test}" {
258	-re "The location" {
259	    # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
260	    set return_value_unknown 1
261	    exp_continue
262	}
263	-re "A structure or union" {
264	    # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
265	    set return_value_unknown 1
266	    # Double ulgh.  Architecture doesn't use return_value and
267	    # hence hasn't implemented small structure return.
268	    set return_value_unimplemented 1
269	    exp_continue
270	}
271	-re "Make fun return now.*y or n. $" {
272	    gdb_test_multiple "y" "${test}" {
273		-re "L *= fun.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
274		    # Need to step off the function call
275		    gdb_test "next" "zed.*" "${test}"
276		}
277		-re "zed \\(\\);.*$gdb_prompt $" {
278		    pass "${test}"
279		}
280	    }
281	}
282    }
283
284    # If the previous test did not work, the program counter might
285    # still be inside foo() rather than main().  Make sure the program
286    # counter is is main().
287    #
288    # This happens on ppc64 GNU/Linux with gcc 3.4.1 and a buggy GDB
289
290    set test "return foo; synchronize pc to main()"
291    for {set loop_count 0} {$loop_count < 2} {incr loop_count} {
292      gdb_test_multiple "backtrace 1" $test {
293        -re "#0.*main \\(\\).*${gdb_prompt} $" {
294          pass $test
295          set loop_count 2
296        }
297        -re "#0.*fun \\(\\).*${gdb_prompt} $" {
298          if {$loop_count < 1} {
299            gdb_test "finish" ".*" ""
300          } else {
301            fail $test
302            set loop_count 2
303          }
304        }
305      }
306    }
307
308    # Check that the return-value is as expected.  At this stage we're
309    # just checking that GDB has returned a value consistent with
310    # "return_value_unknown" set above.
311
312    set test "value foo returned; ${tests}"
313    gdb_test_multiple "p/c L" "${test}" {
314	-re " = 49 '1'.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
315	    if $return_value_unknown {
316		# This contradicts the above claim that GDB didn't
317		# know the location of the return-value.
318		fail "${test}"
319	    } else {
320		pass "${test}"
321	    }
322	}
323	-re " = 90 .*${gdb_prompt} $" {
324	    if $return_value_unknown {
325		# The struct return case.  Since any modification
326		# would be by reference, and that can't happen, the
327		# value should be unmodified and hence Z is expected.
328		# Is this a reasonable assumption?
329		pass "${test}"
330	    } else {
331		# This contradicts the above claim that GDB knew
332		# the location of the return-value.
333		fail "${test}"
334	    }
335	}
336	-re ".*${gdb_prompt} $" {
337	    if $return_value_unimplemented {
338		# What a suprize.  The architecture hasn't implemented
339		# return_value, and hence has to fail.
340		kfail "$test" gdb/1444
341	    } else {
342		fail "$test"
343	    }
344	}
345    }
346
347    # Check that a "finish" works.
348
349    # This is almost but not quite the same as "call struct funcs".
350    # Architectures can have subtle differences in the two code paths.
351
352    # The relevant code snippet is "L{n} = fun{n}()".  The program is
353    # advanced into a call to  "fun{n}" and then that function is
354    # finished.  The returned value that GDB prints, reformatted using
355    # "p/c", is checked.
356
357    # Get into "fun()".
358    gdb_test "advance fun" \
359	    "fun .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo.*" \
360	    "advance to fun for finish; ${tests}"
361
362    # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
363    gdb_test "p/c L" " = 90 'Z'" "zed L for finish; ${tests}"
364
365    # Finish the function, set 'finish_value_unknown" to non-empty if the
366    # return-value was not found.
367    set test "finish foo; ${tests}"
368    set finish_value_unknown 0
369    gdb_test_multiple "finish" "${test}" {
370	-re "Value returned is .*${gdb_prompt} $" {
371	    pass "${test}"
372	}
373	-re "Cannot determine contents.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
374	    # Expected bad value.  For the moment this is ok.
375	    set finish_value_unknown 1
376	    pass "${test}"
377	}
378    }
379
380    # Re-print the last (return-value) using the more robust
381    # "p/c".  If no return value was found, the 'Z' from the previous
382    # check that the variable was cleared, is printed.
383    set test "value foo finished; ${tests}"
384    gdb_test_multiple "p/c" "${test}" {
385	-re " = 49 '1'\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
386	    if $finish_value_unknown {
387		# This contradicts the above claim that GDB didn't
388		# know the location of the return-value.
389		fail "${test}"
390	    } else {
391		pass "${test}"
392	    }
393	}
394	-re " = 90 'Z'\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
395	    # The value didn't get found.  This is "expected".
396	    if $finish_value_unknown {
397		pass "${test}"
398	    } else {
399		# This contradicts the above claim that GDB did
400		# know the location of the return-value.
401		fail "${test}"
402	    }
403	}
404    }
405
406    # Finally, check that "return" and finish" have consistent
407    # behavior.
408
409    # Since both "return" and "finish" use equivalent "which
410    # return-value convention" logic, both commands should have
411    # identical can/can-not find return-value messages.
412
413    # Note that since "call" and "finish" use common code paths, a
414    # failure here is a strong indicator of problems with "store
415    # return-value" code paths.  Suggest looking at "return_value"
416    # when investigating a fix.
417
418    set test "return and finish use same convention; ${tests}"
419    if {$finish_value_unknown == $return_value_unknown} {
420	pass "${test}"
421    } else {
422	kfail gdb/1444 "${test}"
423    }
424}
425
426# ABIs pass anything >8 or >16 bytes in memory but below that things
427# randomly use register and/and structure conventions.  Check all
428# possible sized char scalars in that range.  But only a restricted
429# range of the other types.
430
431# NetBSD/PPC returns "unnatural" (3, 5, 6, 7) sized scalars in memory.
432
433# d10v is weird. 5/6 byte scalars go in memory.  2 or more char
434# scalars go in memory.  Everything else is in a register!
435
436# Test every single char struct from 1..17 in size.  This is what the
437# original "scalars" test was doing.
438
439start_scalars_test tc
440test_scalar_calls
441test_scalar_returns
442
443
444# Let the fun begin.
445
446# Assuming that any integer struct larger than 8 bytes goes in memory,
447# come up with many and varied combinations of a return struct.  For
448# "struct calls" test just beyond that 8 byte boundary, for "struct
449# returns" test up to that boundary.
450
451# For floats, assumed that up to two struct elements can be stored in
452# floating point registers, regardless of their size.
453
454# The approx size of each structure it is computed assumed that tc=1,
455# ts=2, ti=4, tl=4, tll=8, tf=4, td=8, tld=16, and that all fields are
456# naturally aligned.  Padding being added where needed.  Note that
457# these numbers are just approx, the d10v has ti=2, a 64-bit has has
458# tl=8.
459
460# Approx size: 2, 4, ...
461start_scalars_test ts
462test_scalar_calls
463test_scalar_returns
464
465# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
466start_scalars_test ti
467test_scalar_calls
468test_scalar_returns
469
470# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
471start_scalars_test tl
472test_scalar_calls
473test_scalar_returns
474
475# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
476start_scalars_test tll
477test_scalar_calls
478test_scalar_returns
479
480# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
481start_scalars_test tf
482test_scalar_calls
483test_scalar_returns
484
485# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
486start_scalars_test td
487test_scalar_calls
488test_scalar_returns
489
490# Approx size: 16, 32, ...
491start_scalars_test tld
492test_scalar_calls
493test_scalar_returns
494
495# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
496start_scalars_test te
497test_scalar_calls
498test_scalar_returns
499
500return 0
501