Searched hist:222531 (Results 1 - 15 of 15) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/kern/ | ||
| H A D | subr_pcpu.c | diff 222531 Tue May 31 15:19:44 MDT 2011 nwhitehorn On multi-core, multi-threaded PPC systems, it is important that the threads be brought up in the order they are enumerated in the device tree (in particular, that thread 0 on each core be brought up first). The SLIST through which we loop to start the CPUs has all of its entries added with SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(), which means it is in reverse order of enumeration and so AP startup would always fail in such situations (causing a machine check or RTAS failure). Fix this by changing the SLIST into an STAILQ, and inserting new CPUs at the end. Reviewed by: jhb |
| H A D | kern_idle.c | diff 222531 Tue May 31 15:19:44 MDT 2011 nwhitehorn On multi-core, multi-threaded PPC systems, it is important that the threads be brought up in the order they are enumerated in the device tree (in particular, that thread 0 on each core be brought up first). The SLIST through which we loop to start the CPUs has all of its entries added with SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(), which means it is in reverse order of enumeration and so AP startup would always fail in such situations (causing a machine check or RTAS failure). Fix this by changing the SLIST into an STAILQ, and inserting new CPUs at the end. Reviewed by: jhb |
| H A D | subr_kdb.c | diff 222531 Tue May 31 15:19:44 MDT 2011 nwhitehorn On multi-core, multi-threaded PPC systems, it is important that the threads be brought up in the order they are enumerated in the device tree (in particular, that thread 0 on each core be brought up first). The SLIST through which we loop to start the CPUs has all of its entries added with SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(), which means it is in reverse order of enumeration and so AP startup would always fail in such situations (causing a machine check or RTAS failure). Fix this by changing the SLIST into an STAILQ, and inserting new CPUs at the end. Reviewed by: jhb |
| H A D | sched_4bsd.c | diff 222531 Tue May 31 15:19:44 MDT 2011 nwhitehorn On multi-core, multi-threaded PPC systems, it is important that the threads be brought up in the order they are enumerated in the device tree (in particular, that thread 0 on each core be brought up first). The SLIST through which we loop to start the CPUs has all of its entries added with SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(), which means it is in reverse order of enumeration and so AP startup would always fail in such situations (causing a machine check or RTAS failure). Fix this by changing the SLIST into an STAILQ, and inserting new CPUs at the end. Reviewed by: jhb |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/mips/mips/ | ||
| H A D | mp_machdep.c | diff 222531 Tue May 31 15:19:44 MDT 2011 nwhitehorn On multi-core, multi-threaded PPC systems, it is important that the threads be brought up in the order they are enumerated in the device tree (in particular, that thread 0 on each core be brought up first). The SLIST through which we loop to start the CPUs has all of its entries added with SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(), which means it is in reverse order of enumeration and so AP startup would always fail in such situations (causing a machine check or RTAS failure). Fix this by changing the SLIST into an STAILQ, and inserting new CPUs at the end. Reviewed by: jhb |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/net/ | ||
| H A D | netisr.c | diff 222531 Tue May 31 15:19:44 MDT 2011 nwhitehorn On multi-core, multi-threaded PPC systems, it is important that the threads be brought up in the order they are enumerated in the device tree (in particular, that thread 0 on each core be brought up first). The SLIST through which we loop to start the CPUs has all of its entries added with SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(), which means it is in reverse order of enumeration and so AP startup would always fail in such situations (causing a machine check or RTAS failure). Fix this by changing the SLIST into an STAILQ, and inserting new CPUs at the end. Reviewed by: jhb |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/powerpc/powerpc/ | ||
| H A D | mp_machdep.c | diff 222531 Tue May 31 15:19:44 MDT 2011 nwhitehorn On multi-core, multi-threaded PPC systems, it is important that the threads be brought up in the order they are enumerated in the device tree (in particular, that thread 0 on each core be brought up first). The SLIST through which we loop to start the CPUs has all of its entries added with SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(), which means it is in reverse order of enumeration and so AP startup would always fail in such situations (causing a machine check or RTAS failure). Fix this by changing the SLIST into an STAILQ, and inserting new CPUs at the end. Reviewed by: jhb |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/sys/ | ||
| H A D | pcpu.h | diff 222531 Tue May 31 15:19:44 MDT 2011 nwhitehorn On multi-core, multi-threaded PPC systems, it is important that the threads be brought up in the order they are enumerated in the device tree (in particular, that thread 0 on each core be brought up first). The SLIST through which we loop to start the CPUs has all of its entries added with SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(), which means it is in reverse order of enumeration and so AP startup would always fail in such situations (causing a machine check or RTAS failure). Fix this by changing the SLIST into an STAILQ, and inserting new CPUs at the end. Reviewed by: jhb |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/powerpc/booke/ | ||
| H A D | pmap.c | diff 222531 Tue May 31 15:19:44 MDT 2011 nwhitehorn On multi-core, multi-threaded PPC systems, it is important that the threads be brought up in the order they are enumerated in the device tree (in particular, that thread 0 on each core be brought up first). The SLIST through which we loop to start the CPUs has all of its entries added with SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(), which means it is in reverse order of enumeration and so AP startup would always fail in such situations (causing a machine check or RTAS failure). Fix this by changing the SLIST into an STAILQ, and inserting new CPUs at the end. Reviewed by: jhb |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/sparc64/sparc64/ | ||
| H A D | mp_machdep.c | diff 222531 Tue May 31 15:19:44 MDT 2011 nwhitehorn On multi-core, multi-threaded PPC systems, it is important that the threads be brought up in the order they are enumerated in the device tree (in particular, that thread 0 on each core be brought up first). The SLIST through which we loop to start the CPUs has all of its entries added with SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(), which means it is in reverse order of enumeration and so AP startup would always fail in such situations (causing a machine check or RTAS failure). Fix this by changing the SLIST into an STAILQ, and inserting new CPUs at the end. Reviewed by: jhb |
| H A D | pmap.c | diff 222531 Tue May 31 15:19:44 MDT 2011 nwhitehorn On multi-core, multi-threaded PPC systems, it is important that the threads be brought up in the order they are enumerated in the device tree (in particular, that thread 0 on each core be brought up first). The SLIST through which we loop to start the CPUs has all of its entries added with SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(), which means it is in reverse order of enumeration and so AP startup would always fail in such situations (causing a machine check or RTAS failure). Fix this by changing the SLIST into an STAILQ, and inserting new CPUs at the end. Reviewed by: jhb |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/i386/pci/ | ||
| H A D | pci_cfgreg.c | diff 222531 Tue May 31 15:19:44 MDT 2011 nwhitehorn On multi-core, multi-threaded PPC systems, it is important that the threads be brought up in the order they are enumerated in the device tree (in particular, that thread 0 on each core be brought up first). The SLIST through which we loop to start the CPUs has all of its entries added with SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(), which means it is in reverse order of enumeration and so AP startup would always fail in such situations (causing a machine check or RTAS failure). Fix this by changing the SLIST into an STAILQ, and inserting new CPUs at the end. Reviewed by: jhb |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/ia64/ia64/ | ||
| H A D | mp_machdep.c | diff 222531 Tue May 31 15:19:44 MDT 2011 nwhitehorn On multi-core, multi-threaded PPC systems, it is important that the threads be brought up in the order they are enumerated in the device tree (in particular, that thread 0 on each core be brought up first). The SLIST through which we loop to start the CPUs has all of its entries added with SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(), which means it is in reverse order of enumeration and so AP startup would always fail in such situations (causing a machine check or RTAS failure). Fix this by changing the SLIST into an STAILQ, and inserting new CPUs at the end. Reviewed by: jhb |
| H A D | pmap.c | diff 222531 Tue May 31 15:19:44 MDT 2011 nwhitehorn On multi-core, multi-threaded PPC systems, it is important that the threads be brought up in the order they are enumerated in the device tree (in particular, that thread 0 on each core be brought up first). The SLIST through which we loop to start the CPUs has all of its entries added with SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(), which means it is in reverse order of enumeration and so AP startup would always fail in such situations (causing a machine check or RTAS failure). Fix this by changing the SLIST into an STAILQ, and inserting new CPUs at the end. Reviewed by: jhb |
| H A D | machdep.c | diff 222531 Tue May 31 15:19:44 MDT 2011 nwhitehorn On multi-core, multi-threaded PPC systems, it is important that the threads be brought up in the order they are enumerated in the device tree (in particular, that thread 0 on each core be brought up first). The SLIST through which we loop to start the CPUs has all of its entries added with SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(), which means it is in reverse order of enumeration and so AP startup would always fail in such situations (causing a machine check or RTAS failure). Fix this by changing the SLIST into an STAILQ, and inserting new CPUs at the end. Reviewed by: jhb |
Completed in 489 milliseconds