Searched hist:220132 (Results 1 - 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
/freebsd-11.0-release/sys/dev/ath/ | ||
H A D | if_athioctl.h | diff 220132 Tue Mar 29 16:03:57 MDT 2011 adrian According to ath9k recv.c, one shouldn't be doing self-linked descriptors in the RX path when doing 11n and block-ack'ed frames. Apparently, the MAC will loop over that self-linked descriptor and treat it as "good enough" for (incorrectly!) ACKing the frames in the block-ack. Until I figure out how to work around this issue in the future, this counter will tell me if packet RX processing ever gets to the point where it's touching the self-linked descriptor. If there's ever enough packets to get to that point, BA's will be invalid and likely very unhappy. |
H A D | if_ath_sysctl.c | diff 220132 Tue Mar 29 16:03:57 MDT 2011 adrian According to ath9k recv.c, one shouldn't be doing self-linked descriptors in the RX path when doing 11n and block-ack'ed frames. Apparently, the MAC will loop over that self-linked descriptor and treat it as "good enough" for (incorrectly!) ACKing the frames in the block-ack. Until I figure out how to work around this issue in the future, this counter will tell me if packet RX processing ever gets to the point where it's touching the self-linked descriptor. If there's ever enough packets to get to that point, BA's will be invalid and likely very unhappy. |
H A D | if_ath.c | diff 220132 Tue Mar 29 16:03:57 MDT 2011 adrian According to ath9k recv.c, one shouldn't be doing self-linked descriptors in the RX path when doing 11n and block-ack'ed frames. Apparently, the MAC will loop over that self-linked descriptor and treat it as "good enough" for (incorrectly!) ACKing the frames in the block-ack. Until I figure out how to work around this issue in the future, this counter will tell me if packet RX processing ever gets to the point where it's touching the self-linked descriptor. If there's ever enough packets to get to that point, BA's will be invalid and likely very unhappy. |
Completed in 168 milliseconds