Searched hist:148385 (Results 1 - 25 of 30) sorted by relevance
/freebsd-10.3-release/sys/netinet6/ | ||
H A D | scope6_var.h | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | in6_cksum.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | route6.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | in6.h | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | in6_var.h | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | ip6_forward.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | scope6.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | ip6_mroute.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | ip6_var.h | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | in6_ifattach.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | in6_proto.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | in6_src.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | mld6.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | nd6_nbr.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | nd6_rtr.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | raw_ip6.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | icmp6.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | in6_pcb.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | ip6_input.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | ip6_output.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | nd6.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
/freebsd-10.3-release/sys/netinet/ | ||
H A D | icmp6.h | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | ip_carp.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
/freebsd-10.3-release/sys/net/ | ||
H A D | if_spppsubr.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
H A D | if_gif.c | diff 148385 Mon Jul 25 12:31:43 MDT 2005 ume scope cleanup. with this change - most of the kernel code will not care about the actual encoding of scope zone IDs and won't touch "s6_addr16[1]" directly. - similarly, most of the kernel code will not care about link-local scoped addresses as a special case. - scope boundary check will be stricter. For example, the current *BSD code allows a packet with src=::1 and dst=(some global IPv6 address) to be sent outside of the node, if the application do: s = socket(AF_INET6); bind(s, "::1"); sendto(s, some_global_IPv6_addr); This is clearly wrong, since ::1 is only meaningful within a single node, but the current implementation of the *BSD kernel cannot reject this attempt. Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei__at__isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Obtained from: KAME |
Completed in 750 milliseconds