Searched hist:42104 (Results 1 - 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /linux-master/include/linux/ | ||
| H A D | jbd2.h | diff 169f1a2a Wed Jun 12 21:04:04 MDT 2013 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> jbd2: use a single printk for jbd_debug() Since the jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk() calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like the following (see lines marked with "*"): [ 290.339362] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 203): kjournald2: kjournald2 wakes [ 290.339365] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 155): kjournald2: commit_sequence=42103, commit_request=42104 [ 290.339369] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 158): kjournald2: OK, requests differ [* 290.339376] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: [* 290.339379] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 [* 290.339382] JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 [ 290.339410] (fs/jbd2/revoke.c, 566): jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records: Wrote 0 revoke records [ 290.376555] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 1088): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: commit 42104 complete, head 42079 i.e. the debug output from log_wait_commit and journal_commit_transaction have become interleaved. The output should have been: (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 It is expected that this is not easy to replicate -- I was only able to cause it on preempt-rt kernels, and even then only under heavy I/O load. Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Suggested-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> diff 169f1a2a Wed Jun 12 21:04:04 MDT 2013 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> jbd2: use a single printk for jbd_debug() Since the jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk() calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like the following (see lines marked with "*"): [ 290.339362] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 203): kjournald2: kjournald2 wakes [ 290.339365] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 155): kjournald2: commit_sequence=42103, commit_request=42104 [ 290.339369] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 158): kjournald2: OK, requests differ [* 290.339376] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: [* 290.339379] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 [* 290.339382] JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 [ 290.339410] (fs/jbd2/revoke.c, 566): jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records: Wrote 0 revoke records [ 290.376555] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 1088): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: commit 42104 complete, head 42079 i.e. the debug output from log_wait_commit and journal_commit_transaction have become interleaved. The output should have been: (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 It is expected that this is not easy to replicate -- I was only able to cause it on preempt-rt kernels, and even then only under heavy I/O load. Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Suggested-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> diff 169f1a2a Wed Jun 12 21:04:04 MDT 2013 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> jbd2: use a single printk for jbd_debug() Since the jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk() calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like the following (see lines marked with "*"): [ 290.339362] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 203): kjournald2: kjournald2 wakes [ 290.339365] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 155): kjournald2: commit_sequence=42103, commit_request=42104 [ 290.339369] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 158): kjournald2: OK, requests differ [* 290.339376] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: [* 290.339379] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 [* 290.339382] JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 [ 290.339410] (fs/jbd2/revoke.c, 566): jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records: Wrote 0 revoke records [ 290.376555] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 1088): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: commit 42104 complete, head 42079 i.e. the debug output from log_wait_commit and journal_commit_transaction have become interleaved. The output should have been: (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 It is expected that this is not easy to replicate -- I was only able to cause it on preempt-rt kernels, and even then only under heavy I/O load. Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Suggested-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> diff 169f1a2a Wed Jun 12 21:04:04 MDT 2013 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> jbd2: use a single printk for jbd_debug() Since the jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk() calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like the following (see lines marked with "*"): [ 290.339362] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 203): kjournald2: kjournald2 wakes [ 290.339365] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 155): kjournald2: commit_sequence=42103, commit_request=42104 [ 290.339369] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 158): kjournald2: OK, requests differ [* 290.339376] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: [* 290.339379] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 [* 290.339382] JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 [ 290.339410] (fs/jbd2/revoke.c, 566): jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records: Wrote 0 revoke records [ 290.376555] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 1088): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: commit 42104 complete, head 42079 i.e. the debug output from log_wait_commit and journal_commit_transaction have become interleaved. The output should have been: (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 It is expected that this is not easy to replicate -- I was only able to cause it on preempt-rt kernels, and even then only under heavy I/O load. Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Suggested-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> diff 169f1a2a Wed Jun 12 21:04:04 MDT 2013 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> jbd2: use a single printk for jbd_debug() Since the jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk() calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like the following (see lines marked with "*"): [ 290.339362] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 203): kjournald2: kjournald2 wakes [ 290.339365] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 155): kjournald2: commit_sequence=42103, commit_request=42104 [ 290.339369] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 158): kjournald2: OK, requests differ [* 290.339376] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: [* 290.339379] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 [* 290.339382] JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 [ 290.339410] (fs/jbd2/revoke.c, 566): jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records: Wrote 0 revoke records [ 290.376555] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 1088): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: commit 42104 complete, head 42079 i.e. the debug output from log_wait_commit and journal_commit_transaction have become interleaved. The output should have been: (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 It is expected that this is not easy to replicate -- I was only able to cause it on preempt-rt kernels, and even then only under heavy I/O load. Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Suggested-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> diff 169f1a2a Wed Jun 12 21:04:04 MDT 2013 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> jbd2: use a single printk for jbd_debug() Since the jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk() calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like the following (see lines marked with "*"): [ 290.339362] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 203): kjournald2: kjournald2 wakes [ 290.339365] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 155): kjournald2: commit_sequence=42103, commit_request=42104 [ 290.339369] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 158): kjournald2: OK, requests differ [* 290.339376] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: [* 290.339379] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 [* 290.339382] JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 [ 290.339410] (fs/jbd2/revoke.c, 566): jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records: Wrote 0 revoke records [ 290.376555] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 1088): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: commit 42104 complete, head 42079 i.e. the debug output from log_wait_commit and journal_commit_transaction have become interleaved. The output should have been: (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 It is expected that this is not easy to replicate -- I was only able to cause it on preempt-rt kernels, and even then only under heavy I/O load. Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Suggested-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> |
| /linux-master/fs/jbd2/ | ||
| H A D | journal.c | diff 169f1a2a Wed Jun 12 21:04:04 MDT 2013 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> jbd2: use a single printk for jbd_debug() Since the jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk() calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like the following (see lines marked with "*"): [ 290.339362] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 203): kjournald2: kjournald2 wakes [ 290.339365] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 155): kjournald2: commit_sequence=42103, commit_request=42104 [ 290.339369] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 158): kjournald2: OK, requests differ [* 290.339376] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: [* 290.339379] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 [* 290.339382] JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 [ 290.339410] (fs/jbd2/revoke.c, 566): jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records: Wrote 0 revoke records [ 290.376555] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 1088): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: commit 42104 complete, head 42079 i.e. the debug output from log_wait_commit and journal_commit_transaction have become interleaved. The output should have been: (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 It is expected that this is not easy to replicate -- I was only able to cause it on preempt-rt kernels, and even then only under heavy I/O load. Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Suggested-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> diff 169f1a2a Wed Jun 12 21:04:04 MDT 2013 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> jbd2: use a single printk for jbd_debug() Since the jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk() calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like the following (see lines marked with "*"): [ 290.339362] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 203): kjournald2: kjournald2 wakes [ 290.339365] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 155): kjournald2: commit_sequence=42103, commit_request=42104 [ 290.339369] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 158): kjournald2: OK, requests differ [* 290.339376] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: [* 290.339379] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 [* 290.339382] JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 [ 290.339410] (fs/jbd2/revoke.c, 566): jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records: Wrote 0 revoke records [ 290.376555] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 1088): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: commit 42104 complete, head 42079 i.e. the debug output from log_wait_commit and journal_commit_transaction have become interleaved. The output should have been: (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 It is expected that this is not easy to replicate -- I was only able to cause it on preempt-rt kernels, and even then only under heavy I/O load. Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Suggested-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> diff 169f1a2a Wed Jun 12 21:04:04 MDT 2013 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> jbd2: use a single printk for jbd_debug() Since the jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk() calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like the following (see lines marked with "*"): [ 290.339362] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 203): kjournald2: kjournald2 wakes [ 290.339365] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 155): kjournald2: commit_sequence=42103, commit_request=42104 [ 290.339369] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 158): kjournald2: OK, requests differ [* 290.339376] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: [* 290.339379] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 [* 290.339382] JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 [ 290.339410] (fs/jbd2/revoke.c, 566): jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records: Wrote 0 revoke records [ 290.376555] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 1088): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: commit 42104 complete, head 42079 i.e. the debug output from log_wait_commit and journal_commit_transaction have become interleaved. The output should have been: (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 It is expected that this is not easy to replicate -- I was only able to cause it on preempt-rt kernels, and even then only under heavy I/O load. Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Suggested-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> diff 169f1a2a Wed Jun 12 21:04:04 MDT 2013 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> jbd2: use a single printk for jbd_debug() Since the jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk() calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like the following (see lines marked with "*"): [ 290.339362] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 203): kjournald2: kjournald2 wakes [ 290.339365] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 155): kjournald2: commit_sequence=42103, commit_request=42104 [ 290.339369] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 158): kjournald2: OK, requests differ [* 290.339376] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: [* 290.339379] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 [* 290.339382] JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 [ 290.339410] (fs/jbd2/revoke.c, 566): jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records: Wrote 0 revoke records [ 290.376555] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 1088): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: commit 42104 complete, head 42079 i.e. the debug output from log_wait_commit and journal_commit_transaction have become interleaved. The output should have been: (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 It is expected that this is not easy to replicate -- I was only able to cause it on preempt-rt kernels, and even then only under heavy I/O load. Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Suggested-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> diff 169f1a2a Wed Jun 12 21:04:04 MDT 2013 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> jbd2: use a single printk for jbd_debug() Since the jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk() calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like the following (see lines marked with "*"): [ 290.339362] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 203): kjournald2: kjournald2 wakes [ 290.339365] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 155): kjournald2: commit_sequence=42103, commit_request=42104 [ 290.339369] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 158): kjournald2: OK, requests differ [* 290.339376] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: [* 290.339379] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 [* 290.339382] JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 [ 290.339410] (fs/jbd2/revoke.c, 566): jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records: Wrote 0 revoke records [ 290.376555] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 1088): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: commit 42104 complete, head 42079 i.e. the debug output from log_wait_commit and journal_commit_transaction have become interleaved. The output should have been: (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 It is expected that this is not easy to replicate -- I was only able to cause it on preempt-rt kernels, and even then only under heavy I/O load. Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Suggested-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> diff 169f1a2a Wed Jun 12 21:04:04 MDT 2013 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> jbd2: use a single printk for jbd_debug() Since the jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk() calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like the following (see lines marked with "*"): [ 290.339362] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 203): kjournald2: kjournald2 wakes [ 290.339365] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 155): kjournald2: commit_sequence=42103, commit_request=42104 [ 290.339369] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 158): kjournald2: OK, requests differ [* 290.339376] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: [* 290.339379] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 [* 290.339382] JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 [ 290.339410] (fs/jbd2/revoke.c, 566): jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records: Wrote 0 revoke records [ 290.376555] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 1088): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: commit 42104 complete, head 42079 i.e. the debug output from log_wait_commit and journal_commit_transaction have become interleaved. The output should have been: (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103 (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104 It is expected that this is not easy to replicate -- I was only able to cause it on preempt-rt kernels, and even then only under heavy I/O load. Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Suggested-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> |
| /linux-master/tools/perf/ | ||
| H A D | builtin-top.c | diff b269876c Tue Nov 17 13:38:02 MST 2009 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> perf top: Don't allocate the source parsing members upfront Defer to parse_source() time allocating it. Now we use about this much memory: 1724 root 20 0 42104 10m 940 S 0.0 0.4 0:00.23 perf Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> LKML-Reference: <1258490282-1821-3-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> |
Completed in 306 milliseconds