Searched +hist:3 +hist:e020389 (Results 1 - 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /linux-master/Documentation/filesystems/ | ||
| H A D | f2fs.rst | diff 71644dff Thu Dec 01 18:37:15 MST 2022 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: add block_age-based extent cache This patch introduces a runtime hot/cold data separation method for f2fs, in order to improve the accuracy for data temperature classification, reduce the garbage collection overhead after long-term data updates. Enhanced hot/cold data separation can record data block update frequency as "age" of the extent per inode, and take use of the age info to indicate better temperature type for data block allocation: - It records total data blocks allocated since mount; - When file extent has been updated, it calculate the count of data blocks allocated since last update as the age of the extent; - Before the data block allocated, it searches for the age info and chooses the suitable segment for allocation. Test and result: - Prepare: create about 30000 files * 3% for cold files (with cold file extension like .apk, from 3M to 10M) * 50% for warm files (with random file extension like .FcDxq, from 1K to 4M) * 47% for hot files (with hot file extension like .db, from 1K to 256K) - create(5%)/random update(90%)/delete(5%) the files * total write amount is about 70G * fsync will be called for .db files, and buffered write will be used for other files The storage of test device is large enough(128G) so that it will not switch to SSR mode during the test. Benefit: dirty segment count increment reduce about 14% - before: Dirty +21110 - after: Dirty +18286 Signed-off-by: qixiaoyu1 <qixiaoyu1@xiaomi.com> Signed-off-by: xiongping1 <xiongping1@xiaomi.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 71644dff Thu Dec 01 18:37:15 MST 2022 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: add block_age-based extent cache This patch introduces a runtime hot/cold data separation method for f2fs, in order to improve the accuracy for data temperature classification, reduce the garbage collection overhead after long-term data updates. Enhanced hot/cold data separation can record data block update frequency as "age" of the extent per inode, and take use of the age info to indicate better temperature type for data block allocation: - It records total data blocks allocated since mount; - When file extent has been updated, it calculate the count of data blocks allocated since last update as the age of the extent; - Before the data block allocated, it searches for the age info and chooses the suitable segment for allocation. Test and result: - Prepare: create about 30000 files * 3% for cold files (with cold file extension like .apk, from 3M to 10M) * 50% for warm files (with random file extension like .FcDxq, from 1K to 4M) * 47% for hot files (with hot file extension like .db, from 1K to 256K) - create(5%)/random update(90%)/delete(5%) the files * total write amount is about 70G * fsync will be called for .db files, and buffered write will be used for other files The storage of test device is large enough(128G) so that it will not switch to SSR mode during the test. Benefit: dirty segment count increment reduce about 14% - before: Dirty +21110 - after: Dirty +18286 Signed-off-by: qixiaoyu1 <qixiaoyu1@xiaomi.com> Signed-off-by: xiongping1 <xiongping1@xiaomi.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 3e020389 Sun Dec 12 02:17:51 MST 2021 Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> f2fs: support fault injection to f2fs_trylock_op() f2fs: support fault injection for f2fs_trylock_op() This patch supports to inject fault into f2fs_trylock_op(). Usage: a) echo 65536 > /sys/fs/f2fs/<dev>/inject_type or b) mount -o fault_type=65536 <dev> <mountpoint> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 3e020389 Sun Dec 12 02:17:51 MST 2021 Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> f2fs: support fault injection to f2fs_trylock_op() f2fs: support fault injection for f2fs_trylock_op() This patch supports to inject fault into f2fs_trylock_op(). Usage: a) echo 65536 > /sys/fs/f2fs/<dev>/inject_type or b) mount -o fault_type=65536 <dev> <mountpoint> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 4f993264 Mon Aug 02 18:15:43 MDT 2021 Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> f2fs: introduce discard_unit mount option As James Z reported in bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213877 [1.] One-line summary of the problem: Mount multiple SMR block devices exceed certain number cause system non-response [2.] Full description of the problem/report: Created some F2FS on SMR devices (mkfs.f2fs -m), then mounted in sequence. Each device is the same Model: HGST HSH721414AL (Size 14TB). Empirically, found that when the amount of SMR device * 1.5Gb > System RAM, the system ran out of memory and hung. No dmesg output. For example, 24 SMR Disk need 24*1.5GB = 36GB. A system with 32G RAM can only mount 21 devices, the 22nd device will be a reproducible cause of system hang. The number of SMR devices with other FS mounted on this system does not interfere with the result above. [3.] Keywords (i.e., modules, networking, kernel): F2FS, SMR, Memory [4.] Kernel information [4.1.] Kernel version (uname -a): Linux 5.13.4-200.fc34.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jul 20 20:27:29 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [4.2.] Kernel .config file: Default Fedora 34 with f2fs-tools-1.14.0-2.fc34.x86_64 [5.] Most recent kernel version which did not have the bug: None [6.] Output of Oops.. message (if applicable) with symbolic information resolved (see Documentation/admin-guide/oops-tracing.rst) None [7.] A small shell script or example program which triggers the problem (if possible) mount /dev/sdX /mnt/0X [8.] Memory consumption With 24 * 14T SMR Block device with F2FS free -g total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 46 36 0 0 10 10 Swap: 0 0 0 With 3 * 14T SMR Block device with F2FS free -g total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 7 5 0 0 1 1 Swap: 7 0 7 The root cause is, there are three bitmaps: - cur_valid_map - ckpt_valid_map - discard_map and each of them will cost ~500MB memory, {cur, ckpt}_valid_map are necessary, but discard_map is optional, since this bitmap will only be useful in mountpoint that small discard is enabled. For a blkzoned device such as SMR or ZNS devices, f2fs will only issue discard for a section(zone) when all blocks of that section are invalid, so, for such device, we don't need small discard functionality at all. This patch introduces a new mountoption "discard_unit=block|segment| section" to support issuing discard with different basic unit which is aligned to block, segment or section, so that user can specify "discard_unit=segment" or "discard_unit=section" to disable small discard functionality. Note that this mount option can not be changed by remount() due to related metadata need to be initialized during mount(). In order to save memory, let's use "discard_unit=section" for blkzoned device by default. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 4f993264 Mon Aug 02 18:15:43 MDT 2021 Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> f2fs: introduce discard_unit mount option As James Z reported in bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213877 [1.] One-line summary of the problem: Mount multiple SMR block devices exceed certain number cause system non-response [2.] Full description of the problem/report: Created some F2FS on SMR devices (mkfs.f2fs -m), then mounted in sequence. Each device is the same Model: HGST HSH721414AL (Size 14TB). Empirically, found that when the amount of SMR device * 1.5Gb > System RAM, the system ran out of memory and hung. No dmesg output. For example, 24 SMR Disk need 24*1.5GB = 36GB. A system with 32G RAM can only mount 21 devices, the 22nd device will be a reproducible cause of system hang. The number of SMR devices with other FS mounted on this system does not interfere with the result above. [3.] Keywords (i.e., modules, networking, kernel): F2FS, SMR, Memory [4.] Kernel information [4.1.] Kernel version (uname -a): Linux 5.13.4-200.fc34.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jul 20 20:27:29 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [4.2.] Kernel .config file: Default Fedora 34 with f2fs-tools-1.14.0-2.fc34.x86_64 [5.] Most recent kernel version which did not have the bug: None [6.] Output of Oops.. message (if applicable) with symbolic information resolved (see Documentation/admin-guide/oops-tracing.rst) None [7.] A small shell script or example program which triggers the problem (if possible) mount /dev/sdX /mnt/0X [8.] Memory consumption With 24 * 14T SMR Block device with F2FS free -g total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 46 36 0 0 10 10 Swap: 0 0 0 With 3 * 14T SMR Block device with F2FS free -g total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 7 5 0 0 1 1 Swap: 7 0 7 The root cause is, there are three bitmaps: - cur_valid_map - ckpt_valid_map - discard_map and each of them will cost ~500MB memory, {cur, ckpt}_valid_map are necessary, but discard_map is optional, since this bitmap will only be useful in mountpoint that small discard is enabled. For a blkzoned device such as SMR or ZNS devices, f2fs will only issue discard for a section(zone) when all blocks of that section are invalid, so, for such device, we don't need small discard functionality at all. This patch introduces a new mountoption "discard_unit=block|segment| section" to support issuing discard with different basic unit which is aligned to block, segment or section, so that user can specify "discard_unit=segment" or "discard_unit=section" to disable small discard functionality. Note that this mount option can not be changed by remount() due to related metadata need to be initialized during mount(). In order to save memory, let's use "discard_unit=section" for blkzoned device by default. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 3c16dc40 Mon Jun 07 17:31:22 MDT 2021 Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> f2fs: fix to avoid adding tab before doc section Otherwise whole section after tab will be invisible in compiled html format document. Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Fixes: 89272ca1102e ("docs: filesystems: convert f2fs.txt to ReST") Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 261eeb9c Mon Jan 18 17:00:42 MST 2021 Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com> f2fs: introduce checkpoint_merge mount option We've added a new mount options, "checkpoint_merge" and "nocheckpoint_merge", which creates a kernel daemon and makes it to merge concurrent checkpoint requests as much as possible to eliminate redundant checkpoint issues. Plus, we can eliminate the sluggish issue caused by slow checkpoint operation when the checkpoint is done in a process context in a cgroup having low i/o budget and cpu shares. To make this do better, we set the default i/o priority of the kernel daemon to "3", to give one higher priority than other kernel threads. The below verification result explains this. The basic idea has come from https://opensource.samsung.com. [Verification] Android Pixel Device(ARM64, 7GB RAM, 256GB UFS) Create two I/O cgroups (fg w/ weight 100, bg w/ wight 20) Set "strict_guarantees" to "1" in BFQ tunables In "fg" cgroup, - thread A => trigger 1000 checkpoint operations "for i in `seq 1 1000`; do touch test_dir1/file; fsync test_dir1; done" - thread B => gererating async. I/O "fio --rw=write --numjobs=1 --bs=128k --runtime=3600 --time_based=1 --filename=test_img --name=test" In "bg" cgroup, - thread C => trigger repeated checkpoint operations "echo $$ > /dev/blkio/bg/tasks; while true; do touch test_dir2/file; fsync test_dir2; done" We've measured thread A's execution time. [ w/o patch ] Elapsed Time: Avg. 68 seconds [ w/ patch ] Elapsed Time: Avg. 48 seconds Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> [Jaegeuk Kim: fix the return value in f2fs_start_ckpt_thread, reported by Dan] Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 3fde13f8 Fri Jan 22 02:46:43 MST 2021 Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> f2fs: compress: support compress level Expand 'compress_algorithm' mount option to accept parameter as format of <algorithm>:<level>, by this way, it gives a way to allow user to do more specified config on lz4 and zstd compression level, then f2fs compression can provide higher compress ratio. In order to set compress level for lz4 algorithm, it needs to set CONFIG_LZ4HC_COMPRESS and CONFIG_F2FS_FS_LZ4HC config to enable lz4hc compress algorithm. CR and performance number on lz4/lz4hc algorithm: dd if=enwik9 of=compressed_file conv=fsync Original blocks: 244382 lz4 lz4hc-9 compressed blocks 170647 163270 compress ratio 69.8% 66.8% speed 16.4207 s, 60.9 MB/s 26.7299 s, 37.4 MB/s compress ratio = after / before Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 093749e2 Tue Aug 04 07:14:49 MDT 2020 Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> f2fs: support age threshold based garbage collection There are several issues in current background GC algorithm: - valid blocks is one of key factors during cost overhead calculation, so if segment has less valid block, however even its age is young or it locates hot segment, CB algorithm will still choose the segment as victim, it's not appropriate. - GCed data/node will go to existing logs, no matter in-there datas' update frequency is the same or not, it may mix hot and cold data again. - GC alloctor mainly use LFS type segment, it will cost free segment more quickly. This patch introduces a new algorithm named age threshold based garbage collection to solve above issues, there are three steps mainly: 1. select a source victim: - set an age threshold, and select candidates beased threshold: e.g. 0 means youngest, 100 means oldest, if we set age threshold to 80 then select dirty segments which has age in range of [80, 100] as candiddates; - set candidate_ratio threshold, and select candidates based the ratio, so that we can shrink candidates to those oldest segments; - select target segment with fewest valid blocks in order to migrate blocks with minimum cost; 2. select a target victim: - select candidates beased age threshold; - set candidate_radius threshold, search candidates whose age is around source victims, searching radius should less than the radius threshold. - select target segment with most valid blocks in order to avoid migrating current target segment. 3. merge valid blocks from source victim into target victim with SSR alloctor. Test steps: - create 160 dirty segments: * half of them have 128 valid blocks per segment * left of them have 384 valid blocks per segment - run background GC Benefit: GC count and block movement count both decrease obviously: - Before: - Valid: 86 - Dirty: 1 - Prefree: 11 - Free: 6001 (6001) GC calls: 162 (BG: 220) - data segments : 160 (160) - node segments : 2 (2) Try to move 41454 blocks (BG: 41454) - data blocks : 40960 (40960) - node blocks : 494 (494) IPU: 0 blocks SSR: 0 blocks in 0 segments LFS: 41364 blocks in 81 segments - After: - Valid: 87 - Dirty: 0 - Prefree: 4 - Free: 6008 (6008) GC calls: 75 (BG: 76) - data segments : 74 (74) - node segments : 1 (1) Try to move 12813 blocks (BG: 12813) - data blocks : 12544 (12544) - node blocks : 269 (269) IPU: 0 blocks SSR: 12032 blocks in 77 segments LFS: 855 blocks in 2 segments Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> [Jaegeuk Kim: fix a bug along with pinfile in-mem segment & clean up] Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> |
| /linux-master/fs/f2fs/ | ||
| H A D | super.c | diff e21fc203 Mon Oct 23 12:07:59 MDT 2023 Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> exportfs: make ->encode_fh() a mandatory method for NFS export Rename the default helper for encoding FILEID_INO32_GEN* file handles to generic_encode_ino32_fh() and convert the filesystems that used the default implementation to use the generic helper explicitly. After this change, exportfs_encode_inode_fh() no longer has a default implementation to encode FILEID_INO32_GEN* file handles. This is a step towards allowing filesystems to encode non-decodeable file handles for fanotify without having to implement any export_operations. Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023180801.2953446-3-amir73il@gmail.com Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> diff 7e1b150f Mon Aug 28 08:04:17 MDT 2023 Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> f2fs: compress: fix to avoid redundant compress extension With below script, redundant compress extension will be parsed and added by parse_options(), because parse_options() doesn't check whether the extension is existed or not, fix it. 1. mount -t f2fs -o compress_extension=so /dev/vdb /mnt/f2fs 2. mount -t f2fs -o remount,compress_extension=so /mnt/f2fs 3. mount|grep f2fs /dev/vdb on /mnt/f2fs type f2fs (...,compress_extension=so,compress_extension=so,...) Fixes: 4c8ff7095bef ("f2fs: support data compression") Fixes: 151b1982be5d ("f2fs: compress: add nocompress extensions support") Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 40e13e18 Sun Sep 24 23:54:48 MDT 2023 Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> fscrypt: make the bounce page pool opt-in instead of opt-out Replace FS_CFLG_OWN_PAGES with a bit flag 'needs_bounce_pages' which has the opposite meaning. I.e., filesystems now opt into the bounce page pool instead of opt out. Make fscrypt_alloc_bounce_page() check that the bounce page pool has been initialized. I believe the opt-in makes more sense, since nothing else in fscrypt_operations is opt-out, and these days filesystems can choose to use blk-crypto which doesn't need the fscrypt bounce page pool. Also, I happen to be planning to add two more flags, and I wanted to fix the "FS_CFLG_" name anyway as it wasn't prefixed with "FSCRYPT_". Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230925055451.59499-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> diff 091a4dfb Mon Aug 21 09:22:25 MDT 2023 Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> f2fs: compress: fix to assign compress_level for lz4 correctly After remount, F2FS_OPTION().compress_level was assgin to LZ4HC_DEFAULT_CLEVEL incorrectly, result in lz4hc:9 was enabled, fix it. 1. mount /dev/vdb /dev/vdb on /mnt/f2fs type f2fs (...,compress_algorithm=lz4,compress_log_size=2,...) 2. mount -t f2fs -o remount,compress_log_size=3 /mnt/f2fs/ 3. mount|grep f2fs /dev/vdb on /mnt/f2fs type f2fs (...,compress_algorithm=lz4:9,compress_log_size=3,...) Fixes: 00e120b5e4b5 ("f2fs: assign default compression level") Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 091a4dfb Mon Aug 21 09:22:25 MDT 2023 Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> f2fs: compress: fix to assign compress_level for lz4 correctly After remount, F2FS_OPTION().compress_level was assgin to LZ4HC_DEFAULT_CLEVEL incorrectly, result in lz4hc:9 was enabled, fix it. 1. mount /dev/vdb /dev/vdb on /mnt/f2fs type f2fs (...,compress_algorithm=lz4,compress_log_size=2,...) 2. mount -t f2fs -o remount,compress_log_size=3 /mnt/f2fs/ 3. mount|grep f2fs /dev/vdb on /mnt/f2fs type f2fs (...,compress_algorithm=lz4:9,compress_log_size=3,...) Fixes: 00e120b5e4b5 ("f2fs: assign default compression level") Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 091a4dfb Mon Aug 21 09:22:25 MDT 2023 Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> f2fs: compress: fix to assign compress_level for lz4 correctly After remount, F2FS_OPTION().compress_level was assgin to LZ4HC_DEFAULT_CLEVEL incorrectly, result in lz4hc:9 was enabled, fix it. 1. mount /dev/vdb /dev/vdb on /mnt/f2fs type f2fs (...,compress_algorithm=lz4,compress_log_size=2,...) 2. mount -t f2fs -o remount,compress_log_size=3 /mnt/f2fs/ 3. mount|grep f2fs /dev/vdb on /mnt/f2fs type f2fs (...,compress_algorithm=lz4:9,compress_log_size=3,...) Fixes: 00e120b5e4b5 ("f2fs: assign default compression level") Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 51bf8d3c Fri Jul 07 02:31:49 MDT 2023 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> f2fs: don't reopen the main block device in f2fs_scan_devices f2fs_scan_devices reopens the main device since the very beginning, which has always been useless, and also means that we don't pass the right holder for the reopen, which now leads to a warning as the core super.c holder ops aren't passed in for the reopen. Fixes: 3c62be17d4f5 ("f2fs: support multiple devices") Fixes: 0718afd47f70 ("block: introduce holder ops") Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff a46bebd5 Thu Feb 09 11:18:19 MST 2023 Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com> f2fs: synchronize atomic write aborts To fix a race condition between atomic write aborts, I use the inode lock and make COW inode to be re-usable thoroughout the whole atomic file inode lifetime. Reported-by: syzbot+823000d23b3400619f7c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 3db1de0e582c ("f2fs: change the current atomic write way") Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 71644dff Thu Dec 01 18:37:15 MST 2022 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: add block_age-based extent cache This patch introduces a runtime hot/cold data separation method for f2fs, in order to improve the accuracy for data temperature classification, reduce the garbage collection overhead after long-term data updates. Enhanced hot/cold data separation can record data block update frequency as "age" of the extent per inode, and take use of the age info to indicate better temperature type for data block allocation: - It records total data blocks allocated since mount; - When file extent has been updated, it calculate the count of data blocks allocated since last update as the age of the extent; - Before the data block allocated, it searches for the age info and chooses the suitable segment for allocation. Test and result: - Prepare: create about 30000 files * 3% for cold files (with cold file extension like .apk, from 3M to 10M) * 50% for warm files (with random file extension like .FcDxq, from 1K to 4M) * 47% for hot files (with hot file extension like .db, from 1K to 256K) - create(5%)/random update(90%)/delete(5%) the files * total write amount is about 70G * fsync will be called for .db files, and buffered write will be used for other files The storage of test device is large enough(128G) so that it will not switch to SSR mode during the test. Benefit: dirty segment count increment reduce about 14% - before: Dirty +21110 - after: Dirty +18286 Signed-off-by: qixiaoyu1 <qixiaoyu1@xiaomi.com> Signed-off-by: xiongping1 <xiongping1@xiaomi.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 71644dff Thu Dec 01 18:37:15 MST 2022 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: add block_age-based extent cache This patch introduces a runtime hot/cold data separation method for f2fs, in order to improve the accuracy for data temperature classification, reduce the garbage collection overhead after long-term data updates. Enhanced hot/cold data separation can record data block update frequency as "age" of the extent per inode, and take use of the age info to indicate better temperature type for data block allocation: - It records total data blocks allocated since mount; - When file extent has been updated, it calculate the count of data blocks allocated since last update as the age of the extent; - Before the data block allocated, it searches for the age info and chooses the suitable segment for allocation. Test and result: - Prepare: create about 30000 files * 3% for cold files (with cold file extension like .apk, from 3M to 10M) * 50% for warm files (with random file extension like .FcDxq, from 1K to 4M) * 47% for hot files (with hot file extension like .db, from 1K to 256K) - create(5%)/random update(90%)/delete(5%) the files * total write amount is about 70G * fsync will be called for .db files, and buffered write will be used for other files The storage of test device is large enough(128G) so that it will not switch to SSR mode during the test. Benefit: dirty segment count increment reduce about 14% - before: Dirty +21110 - after: Dirty +18286 Signed-off-by: qixiaoyu1 <qixiaoyu1@xiaomi.com> Signed-off-by: xiongping1 <xiongping1@xiaomi.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> |
| H A D | f2fs.h | diff 4bf78322 Wed Mar 13 05:26:19 MDT 2024 Sunmin Jeong <s_min.jeong@samsung.com> f2fs: mark inode dirty for FI_ATOMIC_COMMITTED flag In f2fs_update_inode, i_size of the atomic file isn't updated until FI_ATOMIC_COMMITTED flag is set. When committing atomic write right after the writeback of the inode, i_size of the raw inode will not be updated. It can cause the atomicity corruption due to a mismatch between old file size and new data. To prevent the problem, let's mark inode dirty for FI_ATOMIC_COMMITTED Atomic write thread Writeback thread __writeback_single_inode write_inode f2fs_update_inode - skip i_size update f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write f2fs_commit_atomic_write set_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_COMMITTED) f2fs_do_sync_file f2fs_fsync_node_pages - skip f2fs_update_inode since the inode is clean Fixes: 3db1de0e582c ("f2fs: change the current atomic write way") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v5.19+ Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Yeongjin Gil <youngjin.gil@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Sunmin Jeong <s_min.jeong@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 4b99ecd3 Mon Feb 26 00:35:38 MST 2024 Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> f2fs: ro: compress: fix to avoid caching unaligned extent Mapping info from dump.f2fs: i_addr[0x2d] cluster flag [0xfffffffe : 4294967294] i_addr[0x2e] [0x 10428 : 66600] i_addr[0x2f] [0x 10429 : 66601] i_addr[0x30] [0x 1042a : 66602] f2fs_io fiemap 37 1 /mnt/f2fs/disk-58390c8c.raw Previsouly, it missed to align fofs and ofs_in_node to cluster_size, result in adding incorrect read extent cache, fix it. Before: f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range: dev = (253,48), ino = 5, pgofs = 37, len = 4, blkaddr = 66600, c_len = 3 After: f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range: dev = (253,48), ino = 5, pgofs = 36, len = 4, blkaddr = 66600, c_len = 3 Fixes: 94afd6d6e525 ("f2fs: extent cache: support unaligned extent") Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 4b99ecd3 Mon Feb 26 00:35:38 MST 2024 Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> f2fs: ro: compress: fix to avoid caching unaligned extent Mapping info from dump.f2fs: i_addr[0x2d] cluster flag [0xfffffffe : 4294967294] i_addr[0x2e] [0x 10428 : 66600] i_addr[0x2f] [0x 10429 : 66601] i_addr[0x30] [0x 1042a : 66602] f2fs_io fiemap 37 1 /mnt/f2fs/disk-58390c8c.raw Previsouly, it missed to align fofs and ofs_in_node to cluster_size, result in adding incorrect read extent cache, fix it. Before: f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range: dev = (253,48), ino = 5, pgofs = 37, len = 4, blkaddr = 66600, c_len = 3 After: f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range: dev = (253,48), ino = 5, pgofs = 36, len = 4, blkaddr = 66600, c_len = 3 Fixes: 94afd6d6e525 ("f2fs: extent cache: support unaligned extent") Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff a5393636 Sun Dec 10 02:20:35 MST 2023 Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> f2fs: delete obsolete FI_FIRST_BLOCK_WRITTEN Commit 3c6c2bebef79 ("f2fs: avoid punch_hole overhead when releasing volatile data") introduced FI_FIRST_BLOCK_WRITTEN as below reason: This patch is to avoid some punch_hole overhead when releasing volatile data. If volatile data was not written yet, we just can make the first page as zero. After commit 7bc155fec5b3 ("f2fs: kill volatile write support"), we won't support volatile write, but it missed to remove obsolete FI_FIRST_BLOCK_WRITTEN, delete it in this patch. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 5c13e238 Fri Aug 18 12:34:32 MDT 2023 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: avoid false alarm of circular locking ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc5-syzkaller-00353-gae545c3283dc #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor273/5027 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 but task is already holding lock: ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_dentry+0x92/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:783 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}: down_read+0x9c/0x470 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520 f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0xb1e/0x12c0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532 __f2fs_get_acl+0x5a/0x900 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0x15c/0xb30 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x159/0x1290 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558 f2fs_add_regular_entry+0x79e/0xb90 fs/f2fs/dir.c:740 f2fs_add_dentry+0x1de/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:788 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 do_mkdirat+0x2a9/0x330 fs/namei.c:4140 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4160 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4158 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0xf2/0x140 fs/namei.c:4158 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 down_write+0x93/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 f2fs_add_dentry+0xa6/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:784 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 ovl_do_mkdir fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:196 [inline] ovl_mkdir_real+0xb5/0x370 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:146 ovl_workdir_create+0x3de/0x820 fs/overlayfs/super.c:309 ovl_make_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:711 [inline] ovl_get_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:864 [inline] ovl_fill_super+0xdab/0x6180 fs/overlayfs/super.c:1400 vfs_get_super+0xf9/0x290 fs/super.c:1152 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x350 fs/super.c:1519 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3335 [inline] path_mount+0x1492/0x1ed0 fs/namespace.c:3662 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3861 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x293/0x310 fs/namespace.c:3861 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); lock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 5eda1ad1aaff "f2fs: fix deadlock in i_xattr_sem and inode page lock" Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 5c13e238 Fri Aug 18 12:34:32 MDT 2023 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: avoid false alarm of circular locking ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc5-syzkaller-00353-gae545c3283dc #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor273/5027 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 but task is already holding lock: ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_dentry+0x92/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:783 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}: down_read+0x9c/0x470 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520 f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0xb1e/0x12c0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532 __f2fs_get_acl+0x5a/0x900 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0x15c/0xb30 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x159/0x1290 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558 f2fs_add_regular_entry+0x79e/0xb90 fs/f2fs/dir.c:740 f2fs_add_dentry+0x1de/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:788 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 do_mkdirat+0x2a9/0x330 fs/namei.c:4140 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4160 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4158 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0xf2/0x140 fs/namei.c:4158 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 down_write+0x93/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 f2fs_add_dentry+0xa6/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:784 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 ovl_do_mkdir fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:196 [inline] ovl_mkdir_real+0xb5/0x370 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:146 ovl_workdir_create+0x3de/0x820 fs/overlayfs/super.c:309 ovl_make_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:711 [inline] ovl_get_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:864 [inline] ovl_fill_super+0xdab/0x6180 fs/overlayfs/super.c:1400 vfs_get_super+0xf9/0x290 fs/super.c:1152 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x350 fs/super.c:1519 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3335 [inline] path_mount+0x1492/0x1ed0 fs/namespace.c:3662 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3861 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x293/0x310 fs/namespace.c:3861 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); lock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 5eda1ad1aaff "f2fs: fix deadlock in i_xattr_sem and inode page lock" Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 5c13e238 Fri Aug 18 12:34:32 MDT 2023 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: avoid false alarm of circular locking ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc5-syzkaller-00353-gae545c3283dc #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor273/5027 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 but task is already holding lock: ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_dentry+0x92/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:783 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}: down_read+0x9c/0x470 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520 f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0xb1e/0x12c0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532 __f2fs_get_acl+0x5a/0x900 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0x15c/0xb30 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x159/0x1290 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558 f2fs_add_regular_entry+0x79e/0xb90 fs/f2fs/dir.c:740 f2fs_add_dentry+0x1de/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:788 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 do_mkdirat+0x2a9/0x330 fs/namei.c:4140 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4160 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4158 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0xf2/0x140 fs/namei.c:4158 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 down_write+0x93/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 f2fs_add_dentry+0xa6/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:784 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 ovl_do_mkdir fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:196 [inline] ovl_mkdir_real+0xb5/0x370 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:146 ovl_workdir_create+0x3de/0x820 fs/overlayfs/super.c:309 ovl_make_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:711 [inline] ovl_get_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:864 [inline] ovl_fill_super+0xdab/0x6180 fs/overlayfs/super.c:1400 vfs_get_super+0xf9/0x290 fs/super.c:1152 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x350 fs/super.c:1519 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3335 [inline] path_mount+0x1492/0x1ed0 fs/namespace.c:3662 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3861 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x293/0x310 fs/namespace.c:3861 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); lock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 5eda1ad1aaff "f2fs: fix deadlock in i_xattr_sem and inode page lock" Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 5c13e238 Fri Aug 18 12:34:32 MDT 2023 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: avoid false alarm of circular locking ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc5-syzkaller-00353-gae545c3283dc #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor273/5027 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 but task is already holding lock: ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_dentry+0x92/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:783 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}: down_read+0x9c/0x470 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520 f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0xb1e/0x12c0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532 __f2fs_get_acl+0x5a/0x900 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0x15c/0xb30 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x159/0x1290 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558 f2fs_add_regular_entry+0x79e/0xb90 fs/f2fs/dir.c:740 f2fs_add_dentry+0x1de/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:788 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 do_mkdirat+0x2a9/0x330 fs/namei.c:4140 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4160 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4158 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0xf2/0x140 fs/namei.c:4158 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 down_write+0x93/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 f2fs_add_dentry+0xa6/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:784 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 ovl_do_mkdir fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:196 [inline] ovl_mkdir_real+0xb5/0x370 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:146 ovl_workdir_create+0x3de/0x820 fs/overlayfs/super.c:309 ovl_make_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:711 [inline] ovl_get_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:864 [inline] ovl_fill_super+0xdab/0x6180 fs/overlayfs/super.c:1400 vfs_get_super+0xf9/0x290 fs/super.c:1152 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x350 fs/super.c:1519 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3335 [inline] path_mount+0x1492/0x1ed0 fs/namespace.c:3662 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3861 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x293/0x310 fs/namespace.c:3861 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); lock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 5eda1ad1aaff "f2fs: fix deadlock in i_xattr_sem and inode page lock" Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 5c13e238 Fri Aug 18 12:34:32 MDT 2023 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: avoid false alarm of circular locking ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc5-syzkaller-00353-gae545c3283dc #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor273/5027 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 but task is already holding lock: ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_dentry+0x92/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:783 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}: down_read+0x9c/0x470 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520 f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0xb1e/0x12c0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532 __f2fs_get_acl+0x5a/0x900 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0x15c/0xb30 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x159/0x1290 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558 f2fs_add_regular_entry+0x79e/0xb90 fs/f2fs/dir.c:740 f2fs_add_dentry+0x1de/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:788 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 do_mkdirat+0x2a9/0x330 fs/namei.c:4140 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4160 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4158 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0xf2/0x140 fs/namei.c:4158 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 down_write+0x93/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 f2fs_add_dentry+0xa6/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:784 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 ovl_do_mkdir fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:196 [inline] ovl_mkdir_real+0xb5/0x370 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:146 ovl_workdir_create+0x3de/0x820 fs/overlayfs/super.c:309 ovl_make_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:711 [inline] ovl_get_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:864 [inline] ovl_fill_super+0xdab/0x6180 fs/overlayfs/super.c:1400 vfs_get_super+0xf9/0x290 fs/super.c:1152 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x350 fs/super.c:1519 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3335 [inline] path_mount+0x1492/0x1ed0 fs/namespace.c:3662 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3861 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x293/0x310 fs/namespace.c:3861 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); lock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 5eda1ad1aaff "f2fs: fix deadlock in i_xattr_sem and inode page lock" Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 5c13e238 Fri Aug 18 12:34:32 MDT 2023 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: avoid false alarm of circular locking ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc5-syzkaller-00353-gae545c3283dc #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor273/5027 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 but task is already holding lock: ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_dentry+0x92/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:783 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}: down_read+0x9c/0x470 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520 f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0xb1e/0x12c0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532 __f2fs_get_acl+0x5a/0x900 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0x15c/0xb30 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x159/0x1290 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558 f2fs_add_regular_entry+0x79e/0xb90 fs/f2fs/dir.c:740 f2fs_add_dentry+0x1de/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:788 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 do_mkdirat+0x2a9/0x330 fs/namei.c:4140 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4160 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4158 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0xf2/0x140 fs/namei.c:4158 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 down_write+0x93/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 f2fs_add_dentry+0xa6/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:784 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 ovl_do_mkdir fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:196 [inline] ovl_mkdir_real+0xb5/0x370 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:146 ovl_workdir_create+0x3de/0x820 fs/overlayfs/super.c:309 ovl_make_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:711 [inline] ovl_get_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:864 [inline] ovl_fill_super+0xdab/0x6180 fs/overlayfs/super.c:1400 vfs_get_super+0xf9/0x290 fs/super.c:1152 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x350 fs/super.c:1519 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3335 [inline] path_mount+0x1492/0x1ed0 fs/namespace.c:3662 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3861 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x293/0x310 fs/namespace.c:3861 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); lock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 5eda1ad1aaff "f2fs: fix deadlock in i_xattr_sem and inode page lock" Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 5c13e238 Fri Aug 18 12:34:32 MDT 2023 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: avoid false alarm of circular locking ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc5-syzkaller-00353-gae545c3283dc #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor273/5027 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 but task is already holding lock: ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_dentry+0x92/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:783 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}: down_read+0x9c/0x470 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520 f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0xb1e/0x12c0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532 __f2fs_get_acl+0x5a/0x900 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0x15c/0xb30 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x159/0x1290 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558 f2fs_add_regular_entry+0x79e/0xb90 fs/f2fs/dir.c:740 f2fs_add_dentry+0x1de/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:788 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 do_mkdirat+0x2a9/0x330 fs/namei.c:4140 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4160 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4158 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0xf2/0x140 fs/namei.c:4158 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 down_write+0x93/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 f2fs_add_dentry+0xa6/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:784 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 ovl_do_mkdir fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:196 [inline] ovl_mkdir_real+0xb5/0x370 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:146 ovl_workdir_create+0x3de/0x820 fs/overlayfs/super.c:309 ovl_make_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:711 [inline] ovl_get_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:864 [inline] ovl_fill_super+0xdab/0x6180 fs/overlayfs/super.c:1400 vfs_get_super+0xf9/0x290 fs/super.c:1152 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x350 fs/super.c:1519 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3335 [inline] path_mount+0x1492/0x1ed0 fs/namespace.c:3662 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3861 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x293/0x310 fs/namespace.c:3861 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); lock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 5eda1ad1aaff "f2fs: fix deadlock in i_xattr_sem and inode page lock" Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 5c13e238 Fri Aug 18 12:34:32 MDT 2023 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: avoid false alarm of circular locking ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc5-syzkaller-00353-gae545c3283dc #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor273/5027 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 but task is already holding lock: ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_dentry+0x92/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:783 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}: down_read+0x9c/0x470 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520 f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0xb1e/0x12c0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532 __f2fs_get_acl+0x5a/0x900 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0x15c/0xb30 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x159/0x1290 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558 f2fs_add_regular_entry+0x79e/0xb90 fs/f2fs/dir.c:740 f2fs_add_dentry+0x1de/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:788 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 do_mkdirat+0x2a9/0x330 fs/namei.c:4140 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4160 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4158 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0xf2/0x140 fs/namei.c:4158 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 down_write+0x93/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 f2fs_add_dentry+0xa6/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:784 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 ovl_do_mkdir fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:196 [inline] ovl_mkdir_real+0xb5/0x370 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:146 ovl_workdir_create+0x3de/0x820 fs/overlayfs/super.c:309 ovl_make_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:711 [inline] ovl_get_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:864 [inline] ovl_fill_super+0xdab/0x6180 fs/overlayfs/super.c:1400 vfs_get_super+0xf9/0x290 fs/super.c:1152 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x350 fs/super.c:1519 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3335 [inline] path_mount+0x1492/0x1ed0 fs/namespace.c:3662 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3861 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x293/0x310 fs/namespace.c:3861 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); lock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 5eda1ad1aaff "f2fs: fix deadlock in i_xattr_sem and inode page lock" Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 5c13e238 Fri Aug 18 12:34:32 MDT 2023 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: avoid false alarm of circular locking ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc5-syzkaller-00353-gae545c3283dc #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor273/5027 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 but task is already holding lock: ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_dentry+0x92/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:783 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}: down_read+0x9c/0x470 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520 f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0xb1e/0x12c0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532 __f2fs_get_acl+0x5a/0x900 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0x15c/0xb30 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x159/0x1290 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558 f2fs_add_regular_entry+0x79e/0xb90 fs/f2fs/dir.c:740 f2fs_add_dentry+0x1de/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:788 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 do_mkdirat+0x2a9/0x330 fs/namei.c:4140 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4160 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4158 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0xf2/0x140 fs/namei.c:4158 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 down_write+0x93/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 f2fs_add_dentry+0xa6/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:784 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 ovl_do_mkdir fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:196 [inline] ovl_mkdir_real+0xb5/0x370 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:146 ovl_workdir_create+0x3de/0x820 fs/overlayfs/super.c:309 ovl_make_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:711 [inline] ovl_get_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:864 [inline] ovl_fill_super+0xdab/0x6180 fs/overlayfs/super.c:1400 vfs_get_super+0xf9/0x290 fs/super.c:1152 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x350 fs/super.c:1519 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3335 [inline] path_mount+0x1492/0x1ed0 fs/namespace.c:3662 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3861 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x293/0x310 fs/namespace.c:3861 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); lock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 5eda1ad1aaff "f2fs: fix deadlock in i_xattr_sem and inode page lock" Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 5c13e238 Fri Aug 18 12:34:32 MDT 2023 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: avoid false alarm of circular locking ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc5-syzkaller-00353-gae545c3283dc #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor273/5027 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 but task is already holding lock: ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_dentry+0x92/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:783 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}: down_read+0x9c/0x470 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520 f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0xb1e/0x12c0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532 __f2fs_get_acl+0x5a/0x900 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0x15c/0xb30 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x159/0x1290 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558 f2fs_add_regular_entry+0x79e/0xb90 fs/f2fs/dir.c:740 f2fs_add_dentry+0x1de/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:788 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 do_mkdirat+0x2a9/0x330 fs/namei.c:4140 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4160 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4158 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0xf2/0x140 fs/namei.c:4158 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 down_write+0x93/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 f2fs_add_dentry+0xa6/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:784 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 ovl_do_mkdir fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:196 [inline] ovl_mkdir_real+0xb5/0x370 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:146 ovl_workdir_create+0x3de/0x820 fs/overlayfs/super.c:309 ovl_make_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:711 [inline] ovl_get_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:864 [inline] ovl_fill_super+0xdab/0x6180 fs/overlayfs/super.c:1400 vfs_get_super+0xf9/0x290 fs/super.c:1152 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x350 fs/super.c:1519 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3335 [inline] path_mount+0x1492/0x1ed0 fs/namespace.c:3662 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3861 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x293/0x310 fs/namespace.c:3861 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); lock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 5eda1ad1aaff "f2fs: fix deadlock in i_xattr_sem and inode page lock" Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 5c13e238 Fri Aug 18 12:34:32 MDT 2023 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: avoid false alarm of circular locking ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc5-syzkaller-00353-gae545c3283dc #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor273/5027 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 but task is already holding lock: ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_dentry+0x92/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:783 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}: down_read+0x9c/0x470 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520 f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0xb1e/0x12c0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532 __f2fs_get_acl+0x5a/0x900 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0x15c/0xb30 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x159/0x1290 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558 f2fs_add_regular_entry+0x79e/0xb90 fs/f2fs/dir.c:740 f2fs_add_dentry+0x1de/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:788 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 do_mkdirat+0x2a9/0x330 fs/namei.c:4140 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4160 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4158 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0xf2/0x140 fs/namei.c:4158 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 down_write+0x93/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 f2fs_add_dentry+0xa6/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:784 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 ovl_do_mkdir fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:196 [inline] ovl_mkdir_real+0xb5/0x370 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:146 ovl_workdir_create+0x3de/0x820 fs/overlayfs/super.c:309 ovl_make_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:711 [inline] ovl_get_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:864 [inline] ovl_fill_super+0xdab/0x6180 fs/overlayfs/super.c:1400 vfs_get_super+0xf9/0x290 fs/super.c:1152 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x350 fs/super.c:1519 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3335 [inline] path_mount+0x1492/0x1ed0 fs/namespace.c:3662 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3861 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x293/0x310 fs/namespace.c:3861 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); lock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 5eda1ad1aaff "f2fs: fix deadlock in i_xattr_sem and inode page lock" Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> diff 5c13e238 Fri Aug 18 12:34:32 MDT 2023 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: avoid false alarm of circular locking ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc5-syzkaller-00353-gae545c3283dc #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor273/5027 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 but task is already holding lock: ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_dentry+0x92/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:783 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}: down_read+0x9c/0x470 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520 f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0xb1e/0x12c0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532 __f2fs_get_acl+0x5a/0x900 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0x15c/0xb30 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x159/0x1290 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558 f2fs_add_regular_entry+0x79e/0xb90 fs/f2fs/dir.c:740 f2fs_add_dentry+0x1de/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:788 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 do_mkdirat+0x2a9/0x330 fs/namei.c:4140 __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4160 [inline] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4158 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdir+0xf2/0x140 fs/namei.c:4158 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 down_write+0x93/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline] f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644 f2fs_add_dentry+0xa6/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:784 f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline] f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781 vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117 ovl_do_mkdir fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:196 [inline] ovl_mkdir_real+0xb5/0x370 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:146 ovl_workdir_create+0x3de/0x820 fs/overlayfs/super.c:309 ovl_make_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:711 [inline] ovl_get_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:864 [inline] ovl_fill_super+0xdab/0x6180 fs/overlayfs/super.c:1400 vfs_get_super+0xf9/0x290 fs/super.c:1152 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x350 fs/super.c:1519 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3335 [inline] path_mount+0x1492/0x1ed0 fs/namespace.c:3662 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3861 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x293/0x310 fs/namespace.c:3861 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); lock(&fi->i_xattr_sem); lock(&fi->i_sem); Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 5eda1ad1aaff "f2fs: fix deadlock in i_xattr_sem and inode page lock" Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> |
Completed in 808 milliseconds