Searched hist:339034 (Results 1 - 25 of 39) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/sys/ | ||
| H A D | taskq.h | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern/ | ||
| H A D | opensolaris_taskq.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/ | ||
| H A D | range_tree.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | ddt.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | vdev_indirect.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | vdev_root.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | vdev_missing.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | arc.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | dmu_objset.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | dsl_scan.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | dmu_traverse.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | dbuf.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | vdev_raidz.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | zap.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | vdev_disk.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | zio.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | vdev_file.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/ | ||
| H A D | dsl_scan.h | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | arc.h | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | range_tree.h | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | zio.h | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| H A D | dsl_pool.h | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| /freebsd-11-stable/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/ | ||
| H A D | libzfs_status.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| /freebsd-11-stable/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzpool/common/ | ||
| H A D | taskq.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
| /freebsd-11-stable/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zdb/ | ||
| H A D | zdb.c | diff 339034 Mon Oct 01 04:12:02 MDT 2018 sef MFC r334844, r336180, r336458 r334844 This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems. r336180 Fix up some missed and mis-merges from the sequential scan code (r334844). Most of the changes involve moving some code around to reduce conflicts with future merges. One of the missing changes included a notification on scrub cancellation. r336458 Fix a couple of typos in r334844 noticed by Richard Kojedzinszky Approved by: mav Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc |
Completed in 662 milliseconds