Searched hist:321547 (Results 1 - 18 of 18) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/ | ||
| H A D | dmu_impl.h | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | dmu_tx.h | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | dmu_objset.h | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | zap_impl.h | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | dsl_dir.h | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | dnode.h | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | dsl_dataset.h | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | spa.h | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | dmu.h | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/ | ||
| H A D | dmu_objset.c | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | dbuf.c | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | zap_micro.c | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | zap.c | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | dnode.c | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | dmu_tx.c | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | dsl_dir.c | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | dsl_dataset.c | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
| H A D | spa_misc.c | diff 321547 Wed Jul 26 16:47:15 MDT 2017 mav MFC r318821: MFV r316912: 7793 ztest fails assertion in dmu_tx_willuse_space illumos/illumos-gate@61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37fb75622 https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/61e255ce7267b52208af9daf434b77d37 fb75622 https://www.illumos.org/issues/7793 Background information: This assertion about tx_space_* verifies that we are not dirtying more stuff than we thought we would. We “need” to know how much we will dirty so that we can check if we should fail this transaction with ENOSPC/EDQUOT, in dmu_tx_assign(). While the transaction is open (i.e. between dmu_tx_assign() and dmu_tx_commit() — typically less than a millisecond), we call dbuf_dirty() on the exact blocks that will be modified. Once this happens, the temporary accounting in tx_space_* is unnecessary, because we know exactly what blocks are newly dirtied; we call dnode_willuse_space() to track this more exact accounting. The fundamental problem causing this bug is that dmu_tx_hold_*() relies on the current state in the DMU (e.g. dn_nlevels) to predict how much will be dirtied by this transaction, but this state can change before we actually perform the transaction (i.e. call dbuf_dirty()). This bug will be fixed by removing the assertion that the tx_space_* accounting is perfectly accurate (i.e. we never dirty more than was predicted by dmu_tx_hold_*()). By removing the requirement that this accounting be perfectly accurate, we can also vastly simplify it, e.g. removing most of the logic in dmu_tx_count_*(). The new tx space accounting will be very approximate, and may be more or less than what is actually dirtied. It will still be used to determine if this transaction will put us over quota. Transactions that are marked by dmu_tx_mark_netfree() will be excepted from this check. We won’t make an attempt to determine how much space will be freed by the transaction — this was rarely accurate enough to determine if a transaction should be permitted when we are over quota, which is why dmu_tx_mark_netfree() was introduced in 2014. We also won’t attempt to give “credit” when overwriting existing blocks, if those blocks may be freed. This allows us to remove the do_free_accounting logic in dbuf_dirty(), and associated routines. This Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com> Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> |
Completed in 351 milliseconds