#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
12a8b0dc |
|
01-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
usb: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from this driver directory and when needed add missing include files directly. Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
12a8b0dc |
|
01-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
usb: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from this driver directory and when needed add missing include files directly. Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
12a8b0dc |
|
01-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
usb: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from this driver directory and when needed add missing include files directly. Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
12a8b0dc |
|
01-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
usb: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from this driver directory and when needed add missing include files directly. Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
12a8b0dc |
|
01-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
usb: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from this driver directory and when needed add missing include files directly. Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
12a8b0dc |
|
01-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
usb: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from this driver directory and when needed add missing include files directly. Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
12a8b0dc |
|
01-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
usb: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from this driver directory and when needed add missing include files directly. Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
12a8b0dc |
|
01-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
usb: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from this driver directory and when needed add missing include files directly. Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
12a8b0dc |
|
01-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
usb: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from this driver directory and when needed add missing include files directly. Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
12a8b0dc |
|
01-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
usb: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from this driver directory and when needed add missing include files directly. Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
3371edda |
|
12-Jun-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Convert CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to Kconfig This converts the following to Kconfig: CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
f7ae49fc |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop log.h from common header Move this header out of the common header. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
83d290c5 |
|
06-May-2018 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line) and with slightly different comment styles than us. In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style. This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag and have introduced one. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
c609775e |
|
16-Sep-2016 |
Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com> |
usb: fsl: Renaming fdt_fixup_erratum and fdt_fixup_usb_erratum The functions fdt_fixup_erratum and fdt_fixup_usb_erratum are fsl/nxp specific. So, make them explicit by renaming them fsl_fdt_fixup_erratum and fsl_fdt_fixup_usb_erratum Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
|
#
a5c289b9 |
|
16-Sep-2016 |
Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com> |
usb: fsl: Rename fdt_fixup_dr_usb The function fdt_fixup_dr_usb is specific to fsl/nxp. So, make the function name explicit and rename fdt_fixup_dr_usb into fsl_fdt_fixup_dr_usb. Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
|
#
ef53b8c4 |
|
12-Jun-2016 |
Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com> |
usb: xhci: fsl: Add workaround for USB erratum A008751 This patch is doing the following: 1. Implementing the errata for LS2080. 2. Adding fixup for fdt for LS2080. Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
|
#
92623672 |
|
12-Jun-2016 |
Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com> |
fsl: usb: make errata function common for PPC and ARM This patch does the following things: 1. Makes the errata checking code common for PPC and ARM 2. Moves all these static inline functions into a dedicated C file Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
|
#
bf655775 |
|
12-Jun-2016 |
Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com> |
usb: xhci: fsl: code cleanup for device tree fixup for fsl usb controllers Performs code cleanup for device tree fixup for fsl usb controllers by making functions to handle these similar errata checking code. Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
|
#
47435e5b |
|
05-Apr-2016 |
Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com> |
drivers:usb:common:fsl-dt-fixup: fix return value of fdt_usb_get_node_type Changes the return type of fdt_usb_get_node_type from char* to int Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
|
#
b9f6786a |
|
05-Apr-2016 |
Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com> |
drivers:usb:common:fsl-dt-fixup: Add device-tree fixup support for xhci controller Enables usb device-tree fixup code to incorporate xhci controller Signed-off-by: Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehresh@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
|
#
469e72bc |
|
05-Apr-2016 |
Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com> |
drivers:usb:common:fsl-dt-fixup: Remove code duplication for fdt_usb_get_node_type Call fdt_usb_get_node_type() from fdt_fixup_usb_mode_phy_type() to avoid code duplication. Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com> Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
|
#
93eb8f39 |
|
05-Apr-2016 |
Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com> |
drivers:usb:common:fsl-dt-fixup: Move device-tree fixup framework to common file Move usb device-tree fixup framework from ehci-fsl.c to common place so that it can be used by other drivers as well (xhci-fsl.c). Signed-off-by: Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehresh@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com> Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
|