History log of /u-boot/board/phytec/common/imx8m_som_detection.c
Revision Date Author Comments
(<<< Hide modified files)
(Show modified files >>>)
# d678a59d 18-May-2024 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet""

When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.

This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.

Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

# 9ac776b2 30-Apr-2024 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

board: phytec: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes

Remove <common.h> from this board vendor directory and when needed
add missing include files directly.

Acked-by: Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@phytec.de>
Acked-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

# 1e5de690 19-Apr-2024 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: check eeprom_data validity

For all of the functions that access the eeprom_data, make sure these
data are valid. Use the valid member of the phytec_eeprom_data struct.
This fixes a bug where only the API revision check guarded against
accessing rubbish. But if API revision was e.g. 6, eeprom setup failed
before, but phytec_get_imx8m_eth would still happily access the data.

Fixes: dc22188cdc8 ("board: phytec: Add common PHYTEC SoM detection")

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Schultz <d.schultz@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>

# 8fe6e9a0 19-Apr-2024 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: introduce eeprom struct member 'valid'

Add a new nember to the eeprom_data that indicates whether the
associated data is valid or not. Make use of this new member in the
phytec_eeprom_data_init function by setting the valid value
appropriately.
Move the eeprom data to a new struct payload that holds
the payload of the eeprom.

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Schultz <d.schultz@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>

# aa7858fe 20-Dec-2023 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: som_detection: move definitions to source file

Move all function definitions in {phytec|imx8m}_som_detection from the
header to the source file to prevent potential linker error regarding
multiple definitions. Also move the #if blocks with the definitions.

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# da37f785 20-Dec-2023 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: imx8m_som_detection: fix uninitialized pointer bug

Pointer in phytec_imx8m_detect was accessed without checking it first.
Fix this by moving the pointer check in front of any accesses.

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# e2be177c 20-Dec-2023 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: imx8m_som_detection: change phytec_imx8m_detect return type

phytec_imx8m_detect returns -1 on error, but the return type is u8
leading to 255 return values. Fix this by changing the return type to
int; there is no reason to keep it as u8 .

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# a9719ef0 17-Aug-2023 Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>

board: phytec: common: Add imx8m specific EEPROM detection support

Add imx8m specific detection part. Which includes checking the
EEPROM data for article number options.

Signed-off-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Tested-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# 9ac776b2 30-Apr-2024 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

board: phytec: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes

Remove <common.h> from this board vendor directory and when needed
add missing include files directly.

Acked-by: Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@phytec.de>
Acked-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

# 1e5de690 19-Apr-2024 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: check eeprom_data validity

For all of the functions that access the eeprom_data, make sure these
data are valid. Use the valid member of the phytec_eeprom_data struct.
This fixes a bug where only the API revision check guarded against
accessing rubbish. But if API revision was e.g. 6, eeprom setup failed
before, but phytec_get_imx8m_eth would still happily access the data.

Fixes: dc22188cdc8 ("board: phytec: Add common PHYTEC SoM detection")

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Schultz <d.schultz@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>

# 8fe6e9a0 19-Apr-2024 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: introduce eeprom struct member 'valid'

Add a new nember to the eeprom_data that indicates whether the
associated data is valid or not. Make use of this new member in the
phytec_eeprom_data_init function by setting the valid value
appropriately.
Move the eeprom data to a new struct payload that holds
the payload of the eeprom.

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Schultz <d.schultz@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>

# aa7858fe 20-Dec-2023 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: som_detection: move definitions to source file

Move all function definitions in {phytec|imx8m}_som_detection from the
header to the source file to prevent potential linker error regarding
multiple definitions. Also move the #if blocks with the definitions.

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# da37f785 20-Dec-2023 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: imx8m_som_detection: fix uninitialized pointer bug

Pointer in phytec_imx8m_detect was accessed without checking it first.
Fix this by moving the pointer check in front of any accesses.

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# e2be177c 20-Dec-2023 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: imx8m_som_detection: change phytec_imx8m_detect return type

phytec_imx8m_detect returns -1 on error, but the return type is u8
leading to 255 return values. Fix this by changing the return type to
int; there is no reason to keep it as u8 .

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# a9719ef0 17-Aug-2023 Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>

board: phytec: common: Add imx8m specific EEPROM detection support

Add imx8m specific detection part. Which includes checking the
EEPROM data for article number options.

Signed-off-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Tested-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# 1e5de690 19-Apr-2024 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: check eeprom_data validity

For all of the functions that access the eeprom_data, make sure these
data are valid. Use the valid member of the phytec_eeprom_data struct.
This fixes a bug where only the API revision check guarded against
accessing rubbish. But if API revision was e.g. 6, eeprom setup failed
before, but phytec_get_imx8m_eth would still happily access the data.

Fixes: dc22188cdc8 ("board: phytec: Add common PHYTEC SoM detection")

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Schultz <d.schultz@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>

# 8fe6e9a0 19-Apr-2024 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: introduce eeprom struct member 'valid'

Add a new nember to the eeprom_data that indicates whether the
associated data is valid or not. Make use of this new member in the
phytec_eeprom_data_init function by setting the valid value
appropriately.
Move the eeprom data to a new struct payload that holds
the payload of the eeprom.

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Schultz <d.schultz@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>

# aa7858fe 20-Dec-2023 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: som_detection: move definitions to source file

Move all function definitions in {phytec|imx8m}_som_detection from the
header to the source file to prevent potential linker error regarding
multiple definitions. Also move the #if blocks with the definitions.

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# da37f785 20-Dec-2023 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: imx8m_som_detection: fix uninitialized pointer bug

Pointer in phytec_imx8m_detect was accessed without checking it first.
Fix this by moving the pointer check in front of any accesses.

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# e2be177c 20-Dec-2023 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: imx8m_som_detection: change phytec_imx8m_detect return type

phytec_imx8m_detect returns -1 on error, but the return type is u8
leading to 255 return values. Fix this by changing the return type to
int; there is no reason to keep it as u8 .

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# a9719ef0 17-Aug-2023 Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>

board: phytec: common: Add imx8m specific EEPROM detection support

Add imx8m specific detection part. Which includes checking the
EEPROM data for article number options.

Signed-off-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Tested-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# aa7858fe 20-Dec-2023 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: som_detection: move definitions to source file

Move all function definitions in {phytec|imx8m}_som_detection from the
header to the source file to prevent potential linker error regarding
multiple definitions. Also move the #if blocks with the definitions.

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# da37f785 20-Dec-2023 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: imx8m_som_detection: fix uninitialized pointer bug

Pointer in phytec_imx8m_detect was accessed without checking it first.
Fix this by moving the pointer check in front of any accesses.

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# e2be177c 20-Dec-2023 Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

board: phytec: imx8m_som_detection: change phytec_imx8m_detect return type

phytec_imx8m_detect returns -1 on error, but the return type is u8
leading to 255 return values. Fix this by changing the return type to
int; there is no reason to keep it as u8 .

Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# a9719ef0 17-Aug-2023 Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>

board: phytec: common: Add imx8m specific EEPROM detection support

Add imx8m specific detection part. Which includes checking the
EEPROM data for article number options.

Signed-off-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Tested-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>

# a9719ef0 17-Aug-2023 Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>

board: phytec: common: Add imx8m specific EEPROM detection support

Add imx8m specific detection part. Which includes checking the
EEPROM data for article number options.

Signed-off-by: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Tested-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>