Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet""

When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.

This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.

Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

arm: tegra: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes

Remove <common.h> from all mach-tegra and include/asm/arch-tegra files
and when needed add missing include files directly.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet""

When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.

This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.

Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

arm: tegra: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes

Remove <common.h> from all mach-tegra and include/asm/arch-tegra files
and when needed add missing include files directly.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

arm: tegra: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes

Remove <common.h> from all mach-tegra and include/asm/arch-tegra files
and when needed add missing include files directly.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

arm: tegra: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes

Remove <common.h> from all mach-tegra and include/asm/arch-tegra files
and when needed add missing include files directly.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

arm: tegra: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes

Remove <common.h> from all mach-tegra and include/asm/arch-tegra files
and when needed add missing include files directly.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

arm: tegra: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes

Remove <common.h> from all mach-tegra and include/asm/arch-tegra files
and when needed add missing include files directly.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

ARM: tegra: Copy memory-region-names property

If multiple entries are present in the memory-region property, this new
memory-region-names property can be used to specify names for each of
them so that they can be more easily distinguished.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

ARM: tegra: Refactor DT update helpers

Rather than duplicate the Ethernet MAC address and carveout updating
code for each board, move it to a common location and make it more
reusable.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>

treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>