#
03de305e |
|
20-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Restore patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet" As part of bringing the master branch back in to next, we need to allow for all of these changes to exist here. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
03de305e |
|
20-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Restore patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet" As part of bringing the master branch back in to next, we need to allow for all of these changes to exist here. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
03de305e |
|
20-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Restore patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet" As part of bringing the master branch back in to next, we need to allow for all of these changes to exist here. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
03de305e |
|
20-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Restore patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet" As part of bringing the master branch back in to next, we need to allow for all of these changes to exist here. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"" When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master. This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35. Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6a718588 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Make <asm/global_data.h> include <asm/u-boot.h> This follows the example of RISC-V where <asm/global_data.h> includes <asm/u-boot.h> directly as "gd" includes a reference to bd_info already and so the first must include the second anyhow. We then remove <asm/u-boot.h> from all of the places which include references to "gd" an so have <asm/global_data.h> already. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
7410cde6 |
|
30-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
arm: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes Remove <common.h> from the remainder of the files under arch/arm and when needed add missing include files directly. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
3d6d5075 |
|
26-Sep-2023 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
spl: Use SYS_MALLOC_F instead of SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Use the new SPL/TPL/VPL_SYS_MALLOC_F symbols to determine whether the malloc pool exists. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
65cc0e2a |
|
16-Nov-2022 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
global: Move remaining CONFIG_SYS_* to CFG_SYS_* The rest of the unmigrated CONFIG symbols in the CONFIG_SYS namespace do not easily transition to Kconfig. In many cases they likely should come from the device tree instead. Move these out of CONFIG namespace and in to CFG namespace. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
85e68ae0 |
|
13-Sep-2022 |
Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com> |
common/board_f: move CONFIG_MACH_TYPE logic to arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c asm/mach_type.h header and CONFIG_MACH_TYPE macro are arm-specific, so move related bdinfo logic to arch_setup_bdinfo() in arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovpanait@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
401d1c4f |
|
30-Oct-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed. In a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header files that had been pulled in, very indirectly. Finally, we have a few cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so remove that include. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
6424fba1 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
#
98592c75 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> |
bdinfo: Rename function names to be clearer At present we have bdinfo_print_num() to print unsigned long numbers. We also have print_phys_addr() which accept numbers that might be 64-bit on a 32-bit platform. Rename these 2 functions to be clearer: bdinfo_print_num() => bdinfo_print_num_l() print_phys_addr() => bdinfo_print_num_ll() While we are here, make bdinfo_print_num_ll() public so that it can be used outside cmd/bdinfo.c in the future. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
b75d8dc5 |
|
26-Jun-2020 |
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> |
treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|
#
59b0d7d8 |
|
10-May-2020 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
bdinfo: arm: Move ARM-specific info into its own file We don't really want to have ARM-specific code in a generic file. Create a new arch-specific function to hold it, and move it into that. Make the function weak so that any arch can implement it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
|