arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

arm: drop eSDHC clock getting in mxc_get_clock() for layerscape

Although layerscape platforms reuse mxc_get_clock() of i.MX platforms,
eSDHC clock getting do not have to use it. It uses global data
gd->arch.sdhc_clk directly in fsl_esdhc driver. Even there are more
than one eSDHC controllers on SoC, they use same reference clock.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>

armv8: fsl-lsch3: add clock support for the second eSDHC

Layerscape began to use two eSDHC controllers, for example,
LS1028A. They are same IP block with same reference clock.
This patch is to add clock support for the second eSDHC.

Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>

arm: Don't include common.h in header files

It is bad practice to include common.h in other header files since it can
bring in any number of superfluous definitions. It implies that some C
files don't include it and thus may be missing CONFIG options that are set
up by that file. The C files should include these themselves.

Update some header files in arch/arm to drop this.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>