#
1.16 |
|
31-Mar-2022 |
naddy |
man pages: add missing commas between subordinate and main clauses
jmc@ dislikes a comma before "then" in a conditional, so leave those untouched.
ok jmc@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_6_7_BASE OPENBSD_6_8_BASE OPENBSD_6_9_BASE OPENBSD_7_0_BASE
|
#
1.15 |
|
20-Mar-2020 |
cheloha |
tsleep_nsec(9): add MAXTSLP macro, the maximum sleep duration
This macro will be useful for truncating durations below INFSLP (UINT64_MAX) when converting from a timespec or timeval to a count of nanoseconds before calling tsleep_nsec(9), msleep_nsec(9), or rwsleep_nsec(9).
A relative timespec can hold many more nanoseconds than a uint64_t can. TIMESPEC_TO_NSEC() and TIMEVAL_TO_NSEC() check for overflow, returning UINT64_MAX if the conversion would overflow a uint64_t.
Thus, MAXTSLP will make it easy to avoid inadvertently passing INFSLP to tsleep_nsec(9) et al. when the caller intended to set a timeout.
The code in such a case might look something like this:
uint64_t nsecs = MIN(TIMESPEC_TO_NSEC(&ts), MAXTSLP);
The macro may also be useful for rejecting intervals that are "too large", e.g. for sockets with timeouts, if the timeout duration is to be stored as a uint64_t in an object in the kernel. The code in such a case might look something like this:
case SIOCTIMEOUT: { struct timeval *tv = (struct timeval *)data; uint64_t nsecs;
if (tv->tv_sec < 0 || !timerisvalid(tv)) return EINVAL;
nsecs = TIMEVAL_TO_NSEC(tv); if (nsecs > MAXTSLP) return EOVERFLOW;
obj.timeout = nsecs; break; }
Idea suggested by visa@.
ok visa@
|
#
1.14 |
|
12-Jan-2020 |
cheloha |
*sleep_nsec(9): sleep *at least* the given number of nanoseconds
The *sleep(9) interfaces are challenging to use when one needs to sleep for a given minimum duration: the programmer needs to account for both the current tick and any integer division when converting an interval to a count of ticks. This sort of input conversion is complicated and ugly at best and error-prone at worst.
This patch consolidates this conversion logic into the *sleep_nsec(9) functions themselves. This will allow us to use the functions at the syscall layer and elsewhere in the kernel where guaranteeing a minimum sleep duration is of vital importance.
With input from bluhm@, guenther@, ratchov@, tedu@, and kettenis@.
Requested by mpi@ and kettenis@.
Conversion algorithm from mpi@.
ok mpi@, kettenis@, deraadt@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_6_6_BASE
|
#
1.13 |
|
03-Jul-2019 |
cheloha |
Add tsleep_nsec(9), msleep_nsec(9), and rwsleep_nsec(9).
Equivalent to their unsuffixed counterparts except that (a) they take a timeout in terms of nanoseconds, and (b) INFSLP, aka UINT64_MAX (not zero) indicates that a timeout should not be set.
For now, zero nanoseconds is not a strictly valid invocation: we log a warning on DIAGNOSTIC kernels if we see such a call. We still sleep until the next tick in such a case, however. In the future this could become some sort of poll... TBD.
To facilitate conversions to these interfaces: add inline conversion functions to sys/time.h for turning your timeout into nanoseconds.
Also do a few easy conversions for warmup and to demonstrate how further conversions should be done.
Lots of input from mpi@ and ratchov@. Additional input from tedu@, deraadt@, mortimer@, millert@, and claudio@.
Partly inspired by FreeBSD r247787.
positive feedback from deraadt@, ok mpi@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_6_4_BASE OPENBSD_6_5_BASE
|
#
1.12 |
|
28-May-2018 |
cheloha |
rwsleep: generalize to support both read- and write-locks.
Wanted for tentative clock_nanosleep(2) diff, but maybe useful elsewhere in the future.
ok mpi@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_6_1_BASE OPENBSD_6_2_BASE OPENBSD_6_3_BASE
|
#
1.11 |
|
13-Sep-2016 |
mpi |
Introduce rwsleep(9), an equivalent to msleep(9) but for code protected by a write lock.
ok guenther@, vgross@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_9_BASE OPENBSD_6_0_BASE
|
#
1.10 |
|
14-Sep-2015 |
schwarze |
Remove useless quoting from .Fo and .Fn function names, to prevent development of a cargo cult in case people look at existing files for examples. This achieves a consistent .Fo and .Fn quoting style across the whole tree.
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_5_BASE OPENBSD_5_6_BASE OPENBSD_5_7_BASE OPENBSD_5_8_BASE
|
#
1.9 |
|
22-Jan-2014 |
jmc |
- add wakep_{n,one} to NAME and more fully into DESCRIPTION - zap eol whitespace
|
#
1.8 |
|
22-Jan-2014 |
tedu |
wakeup_n and wakeup_one blurbs
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_4_BASE
|
#
1.7 |
|
04-Jun-2013 |
schwarze |
Replace old-fashioned .Fd by new-fangled .In for #include lines. Diff from Jan Klemkow <j dot klemkow at wemelug dot de> on tech@. No objection from jmc@ against this type of change.
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_8_BASE OPENBSD_4_9_BASE OPENBSD_5_0_BASE OPENBSD_5_1_BASE OPENBSD_5_2_BASE OPENBSD_5_3_BASE
|
#
1.6 |
|
08-Apr-2010 |
tedu |
these functions are in systm.h now, reminded by kettenis
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_4_BASE OPENBSD_4_5_BASE OPENBSD_4_6_BASE OPENBSD_4_7_BASE
|
#
1.5 |
|
26-Jun-2008 |
ray |
First pass at removing clauses 3 and 4 from NetBSD licenses.
Not sure what's more surprising: how long it took for NetBSD to catch up to the rest of the BSDs (including UCB), or the amount of code that NetBSD has claimed for itself without attributing to the actual authors.
OK deraadt@
|
#
1.4 |
|
17-Apr-2008 |
oga |
Correct a typo: tsleep -> msleep
from Paul de Weerd, Thanks!
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_3_BASE
|
#
1.3 |
|
29-Nov-2007 |
jmc |
- better integrate msleep() into this page - art says bpendsleep has been removed, so kill it
ok art
|
#
1.2 |
|
28-Nov-2007 |
art |
<oga> art write me a manpage <art> What? Write it yourself. <oga> sudo art write me a manpage. <art> ok
Document msleep(9).
|
#
1.1 |
|
14-Sep-2007 |
mk |
sleep(9) was removed aeons ago according to miod, so remove references to it. Because man pages are named after functions (at least they should be) and sleep(9) doesn't exist anymore, sleep.9 is renamed to tsleep.9.
Input and reminders from jmc and ratchov.
|
#
1.15 |
|
20-Mar-2020 |
cheloha |
tsleep_nsec(9): add MAXTSLP macro, the maximum sleep duration
This macro will be useful for truncating durations below INFSLP (UINT64_MAX) when converting from a timespec or timeval to a count of nanoseconds before calling tsleep_nsec(9), msleep_nsec(9), or rwsleep_nsec(9).
A relative timespec can hold many more nanoseconds than a uint64_t can. TIMESPEC_TO_NSEC() and TIMEVAL_TO_NSEC() check for overflow, returning UINT64_MAX if the conversion would overflow a uint64_t.
Thus, MAXTSLP will make it easy to avoid inadvertently passing INFSLP to tsleep_nsec(9) et al. when the caller intended to set a timeout.
The code in such a case might look something like this:
uint64_t nsecs = MIN(TIMESPEC_TO_NSEC(&ts), MAXTSLP);
The macro may also be useful for rejecting intervals that are "too large", e.g. for sockets with timeouts, if the timeout duration is to be stored as a uint64_t in an object in the kernel. The code in such a case might look something like this:
case SIOCTIMEOUT: { struct timeval *tv = (struct timeval *)data; uint64_t nsecs;
if (tv->tv_sec < 0 || !timerisvalid(tv)) return EINVAL;
nsecs = TIMEVAL_TO_NSEC(tv); if (nsecs > MAXTSLP) return EOVERFLOW;
obj.timeout = nsecs; break; }
Idea suggested by visa@.
ok visa@
|
#
1.14 |
|
12-Jan-2020 |
cheloha |
*sleep_nsec(9): sleep *at least* the given number of nanoseconds
The *sleep(9) interfaces are challenging to use when one needs to sleep for a given minimum duration: the programmer needs to account for both the current tick and any integer division when converting an interval to a count of ticks. This sort of input conversion is complicated and ugly at best and error-prone at worst.
This patch consolidates this conversion logic into the *sleep_nsec(9) functions themselves. This will allow us to use the functions at the syscall layer and elsewhere in the kernel where guaranteeing a minimum sleep duration is of vital importance.
With input from bluhm@, guenther@, ratchov@, tedu@, and kettenis@.
Requested by mpi@ and kettenis@.
Conversion algorithm from mpi@.
ok mpi@, kettenis@, deraadt@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_6_6_BASE
|
#
1.13 |
|
03-Jul-2019 |
cheloha |
Add tsleep_nsec(9), msleep_nsec(9), and rwsleep_nsec(9).
Equivalent to their unsuffixed counterparts except that (a) they take a timeout in terms of nanoseconds, and (b) INFSLP, aka UINT64_MAX (not zero) indicates that a timeout should not be set.
For now, zero nanoseconds is not a strictly valid invocation: we log a warning on DIAGNOSTIC kernels if we see such a call. We still sleep until the next tick in such a case, however. In the future this could become some sort of poll... TBD.
To facilitate conversions to these interfaces: add inline conversion functions to sys/time.h for turning your timeout into nanoseconds.
Also do a few easy conversions for warmup and to demonstrate how further conversions should be done.
Lots of input from mpi@ and ratchov@. Additional input from tedu@, deraadt@, mortimer@, millert@, and claudio@.
Partly inspired by FreeBSD r247787.
positive feedback from deraadt@, ok mpi@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_6_4_BASE OPENBSD_6_5_BASE
|
#
1.12 |
|
28-May-2018 |
cheloha |
rwsleep: generalize to support both read- and write-locks.
Wanted for tentative clock_nanosleep(2) diff, but maybe useful elsewhere in the future.
ok mpi@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_6_1_BASE OPENBSD_6_2_BASE OPENBSD_6_3_BASE
|
#
1.11 |
|
13-Sep-2016 |
mpi |
Introduce rwsleep(9), an equivalent to msleep(9) but for code protected by a write lock.
ok guenther@, vgross@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_9_BASE OPENBSD_6_0_BASE
|
#
1.10 |
|
14-Sep-2015 |
schwarze |
Remove useless quoting from .Fo and .Fn function names, to prevent development of a cargo cult in case people look at existing files for examples. This achieves a consistent .Fo and .Fn quoting style across the whole tree.
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_5_BASE OPENBSD_5_6_BASE OPENBSD_5_7_BASE OPENBSD_5_8_BASE
|
#
1.9 |
|
22-Jan-2014 |
jmc |
- add wakep_{n,one} to NAME and more fully into DESCRIPTION - zap eol whitespace
|
#
1.8 |
|
22-Jan-2014 |
tedu |
wakeup_n and wakeup_one blurbs
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_4_BASE
|
#
1.7 |
|
04-Jun-2013 |
schwarze |
Replace old-fashioned .Fd by new-fangled .In for #include lines. Diff from Jan Klemkow <j dot klemkow at wemelug dot de> on tech@. No objection from jmc@ against this type of change.
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_8_BASE OPENBSD_4_9_BASE OPENBSD_5_0_BASE OPENBSD_5_1_BASE OPENBSD_5_2_BASE OPENBSD_5_3_BASE
|
#
1.6 |
|
08-Apr-2010 |
tedu |
these functions are in systm.h now, reminded by kettenis
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_4_BASE OPENBSD_4_5_BASE OPENBSD_4_6_BASE OPENBSD_4_7_BASE
|
#
1.5 |
|
26-Jun-2008 |
ray |
First pass at removing clauses 3 and 4 from NetBSD licenses.
Not sure what's more surprising: how long it took for NetBSD to catch up to the rest of the BSDs (including UCB), or the amount of code that NetBSD has claimed for itself without attributing to the actual authors.
OK deraadt@
|
#
1.4 |
|
17-Apr-2008 |
oga |
Correct a typo: tsleep -> msleep
from Paul de Weerd, Thanks!
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_3_BASE
|
#
1.3 |
|
29-Nov-2007 |
jmc |
- better integrate msleep() into this page - art says bpendsleep has been removed, so kill it
ok art
|
#
1.2 |
|
28-Nov-2007 |
art |
<oga> art write me a manpage <art> What? Write it yourself. <oga> sudo art write me a manpage. <art> ok
Document msleep(9).
|
#
1.1 |
|
14-Sep-2007 |
mk |
sleep(9) was removed aeons ago according to miod, so remove references to it. Because man pages are named after functions (at least they should be) and sleep(9) doesn't exist anymore, sleep.9 is renamed to tsleep.9.
Input and reminders from jmc and ratchov.
|
#
1.14 |
|
12-Jan-2020 |
cheloha |
*sleep_nsec(9): sleep *at least* the given number of nanoseconds
The *sleep(9) interfaces are challenging to use when one needs to sleep for a given minimum duration: the programmer needs to account for both the current tick and any integer division when converting an interval to a count of ticks. This sort of input conversion is complicated and ugly at best and error-prone at worst.
This patch consolidates this conversion logic into the *sleep_nsec(9) functions themselves. This will allow us to use the functions at the syscall layer and elsewhere in the kernel where guaranteeing a minimum sleep duration is of vital importance.
With input from bluhm@, guenther@, ratchov@, tedu@, and kettenis@.
Requested by mpi@ and kettenis@.
Conversion algorithm from mpi@.
ok mpi@, kettenis@, deraadt@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_6_6_BASE
|
#
1.13 |
|
03-Jul-2019 |
cheloha |
Add tsleep_nsec(9), msleep_nsec(9), and rwsleep_nsec(9).
Equivalent to their unsuffixed counterparts except that (a) they take a timeout in terms of nanoseconds, and (b) INFSLP, aka UINT64_MAX (not zero) indicates that a timeout should not be set.
For now, zero nanoseconds is not a strictly valid invocation: we log a warning on DIAGNOSTIC kernels if we see such a call. We still sleep until the next tick in such a case, however. In the future this could become some sort of poll... TBD.
To facilitate conversions to these interfaces: add inline conversion functions to sys/time.h for turning your timeout into nanoseconds.
Also do a few easy conversions for warmup and to demonstrate how further conversions should be done.
Lots of input from mpi@ and ratchov@. Additional input from tedu@, deraadt@, mortimer@, millert@, and claudio@.
Partly inspired by FreeBSD r247787.
positive feedback from deraadt@, ok mpi@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_6_4_BASE OPENBSD_6_5_BASE
|
#
1.12 |
|
28-May-2018 |
cheloha |
rwsleep: generalize to support both read- and write-locks.
Wanted for tentative clock_nanosleep(2) diff, but maybe useful elsewhere in the future.
ok mpi@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_6_1_BASE OPENBSD_6_2_BASE OPENBSD_6_3_BASE
|
#
1.11 |
|
13-Sep-2016 |
mpi |
Introduce rwsleep(9), an equivalent to msleep(9) but for code protected by a write lock.
ok guenther@, vgross@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_9_BASE OPENBSD_6_0_BASE
|
#
1.10 |
|
14-Sep-2015 |
schwarze |
Remove useless quoting from .Fo and .Fn function names, to prevent development of a cargo cult in case people look at existing files for examples. This achieves a consistent .Fo and .Fn quoting style across the whole tree.
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_5_BASE OPENBSD_5_6_BASE OPENBSD_5_7_BASE OPENBSD_5_8_BASE
|
#
1.9 |
|
22-Jan-2014 |
jmc |
- add wakep_{n,one} to NAME and more fully into DESCRIPTION - zap eol whitespace
|
#
1.8 |
|
22-Jan-2014 |
tedu |
wakeup_n and wakeup_one blurbs
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_4_BASE
|
#
1.7 |
|
04-Jun-2013 |
schwarze |
Replace old-fashioned .Fd by new-fangled .In for #include lines. Diff from Jan Klemkow <j dot klemkow at wemelug dot de> on tech@. No objection from jmc@ against this type of change.
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_8_BASE OPENBSD_4_9_BASE OPENBSD_5_0_BASE OPENBSD_5_1_BASE OPENBSD_5_2_BASE OPENBSD_5_3_BASE
|
#
1.6 |
|
08-Apr-2010 |
tedu |
these functions are in systm.h now, reminded by kettenis
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_4_BASE OPENBSD_4_5_BASE OPENBSD_4_6_BASE OPENBSD_4_7_BASE
|
#
1.5 |
|
26-Jun-2008 |
ray |
First pass at removing clauses 3 and 4 from NetBSD licenses.
Not sure what's more surprising: how long it took for NetBSD to catch up to the rest of the BSDs (including UCB), or the amount of code that NetBSD has claimed for itself without attributing to the actual authors.
OK deraadt@
|
#
1.4 |
|
17-Apr-2008 |
oga |
Correct a typo: tsleep -> msleep
from Paul de Weerd, Thanks!
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_3_BASE
|
#
1.3 |
|
29-Nov-2007 |
jmc |
- better integrate msleep() into this page - art says bpendsleep has been removed, so kill it
ok art
|
#
1.2 |
|
28-Nov-2007 |
art |
<oga> art write me a manpage <art> What? Write it yourself. <oga> sudo art write me a manpage. <art> ok
Document msleep(9).
|
#
1.1 |
|
14-Sep-2007 |
mk |
sleep(9) was removed aeons ago according to miod, so remove references to it. Because man pages are named after functions (at least they should be) and sleep(9) doesn't exist anymore, sleep.9 is renamed to tsleep.9.
Input and reminders from jmc and ratchov.
|
#
1.13 |
|
03-Jul-2019 |
cheloha |
Add tsleep_nsec(9), msleep_nsec(9), and rwsleep_nsec(9).
Equivalent to their unsuffixed counterparts except that (a) they take a timeout in terms of nanoseconds, and (b) INFSLP, aka UINT64_MAX (not zero) indicates that a timeout should not be set.
For now, zero nanoseconds is not a strictly valid invocation: we log a warning on DIAGNOSTIC kernels if we see such a call. We still sleep until the next tick in such a case, however. In the future this could become some sort of poll... TBD.
To facilitate conversions to these interfaces: add inline conversion functions to sys/time.h for turning your timeout into nanoseconds.
Also do a few easy conversions for warmup and to demonstrate how further conversions should be done.
Lots of input from mpi@ and ratchov@. Additional input from tedu@, deraadt@, mortimer@, millert@, and claudio@.
Partly inspired by FreeBSD r247787.
positive feedback from deraadt@, ok mpi@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_6_4_BASE OPENBSD_6_5_BASE
|
#
1.12 |
|
28-May-2018 |
cheloha |
rwsleep: generalize to support both read- and write-locks.
Wanted for tentative clock_nanosleep(2) diff, but maybe useful elsewhere in the future.
ok mpi@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_6_1_BASE OPENBSD_6_2_BASE OPENBSD_6_3_BASE
|
#
1.11 |
|
13-Sep-2016 |
mpi |
Introduce rwsleep(9), an equivalent to msleep(9) but for code protected by a write lock.
ok guenther@, vgross@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_9_BASE OPENBSD_6_0_BASE
|
#
1.10 |
|
14-Sep-2015 |
schwarze |
Remove useless quoting from .Fo and .Fn function names, to prevent development of a cargo cult in case people look at existing files for examples. This achieves a consistent .Fo and .Fn quoting style across the whole tree.
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_5_BASE OPENBSD_5_6_BASE OPENBSD_5_7_BASE OPENBSD_5_8_BASE
|
#
1.9 |
|
22-Jan-2014 |
jmc |
- add wakep_{n,one} to NAME and more fully into DESCRIPTION - zap eol whitespace
|
#
1.8 |
|
22-Jan-2014 |
tedu |
wakeup_n and wakeup_one blurbs
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_4_BASE
|
#
1.7 |
|
04-Jun-2013 |
schwarze |
Replace old-fashioned .Fd by new-fangled .In for #include lines. Diff from Jan Klemkow <j dot klemkow at wemelug dot de> on tech@. No objection from jmc@ against this type of change.
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_8_BASE OPENBSD_4_9_BASE OPENBSD_5_0_BASE OPENBSD_5_1_BASE OPENBSD_5_2_BASE OPENBSD_5_3_BASE
|
#
1.6 |
|
08-Apr-2010 |
tedu |
these functions are in systm.h now, reminded by kettenis
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_4_BASE OPENBSD_4_5_BASE OPENBSD_4_6_BASE OPENBSD_4_7_BASE
|
#
1.5 |
|
26-Jun-2008 |
ray |
First pass at removing clauses 3 and 4 from NetBSD licenses.
Not sure what's more surprising: how long it took for NetBSD to catch up to the rest of the BSDs (including UCB), or the amount of code that NetBSD has claimed for itself without attributing to the actual authors.
OK deraadt@
|
#
1.4 |
|
17-Apr-2008 |
oga |
Correct a typo: tsleep -> msleep
from Paul de Weerd, Thanks!
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_3_BASE
|
#
1.3 |
|
29-Nov-2007 |
jmc |
- better integrate msleep() into this page - art says bpendsleep has been removed, so kill it
ok art
|
#
1.2 |
|
28-Nov-2007 |
art |
<oga> art write me a manpage <art> What? Write it yourself. <oga> sudo art write me a manpage. <art> ok
Document msleep(9).
|
#
1.1 |
|
14-Sep-2007 |
mk |
sleep(9) was removed aeons ago according to miod, so remove references to it. Because man pages are named after functions (at least they should be) and sleep(9) doesn't exist anymore, sleep.9 is renamed to tsleep.9.
Input and reminders from jmc and ratchov.
|
#
1.12 |
|
28-May-2018 |
cheloha |
rwsleep: generalize to support both read- and write-locks.
Wanted for tentative clock_nanosleep(2) diff, but maybe useful elsewhere in the future.
ok mpi@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_6_1_BASE OPENBSD_6_2_BASE OPENBSD_6_3_BASE
|
#
1.11 |
|
13-Sep-2016 |
mpi |
Introduce rwsleep(9), an equivalent to msleep(9) but for code protected by a write lock.
ok guenther@, vgross@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_9_BASE OPENBSD_6_0_BASE
|
#
1.10 |
|
14-Sep-2015 |
schwarze |
Remove useless quoting from .Fo and .Fn function names, to prevent development of a cargo cult in case people look at existing files for examples. This achieves a consistent .Fo and .Fn quoting style across the whole tree.
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_5_BASE OPENBSD_5_6_BASE OPENBSD_5_7_BASE OPENBSD_5_8_BASE
|
#
1.9 |
|
22-Jan-2014 |
jmc |
- add wakep_{n,one} to NAME and more fully into DESCRIPTION - zap eol whitespace
|
#
1.8 |
|
22-Jan-2014 |
tedu |
wakeup_n and wakeup_one blurbs
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_4_BASE
|
#
1.7 |
|
04-Jun-2013 |
schwarze |
Replace old-fashioned .Fd by new-fangled .In for #include lines. Diff from Jan Klemkow <j dot klemkow at wemelug dot de> on tech@. No objection from jmc@ against this type of change.
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_8_BASE OPENBSD_4_9_BASE OPENBSD_5_0_BASE OPENBSD_5_1_BASE OPENBSD_5_2_BASE OPENBSD_5_3_BASE
|
#
1.6 |
|
08-Apr-2010 |
tedu |
these functions are in systm.h now, reminded by kettenis
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_4_BASE OPENBSD_4_5_BASE OPENBSD_4_6_BASE OPENBSD_4_7_BASE
|
#
1.5 |
|
26-Jun-2008 |
ray |
First pass at removing clauses 3 and 4 from NetBSD licenses.
Not sure what's more surprising: how long it took for NetBSD to catch up to the rest of the BSDs (including UCB), or the amount of code that NetBSD has claimed for itself without attributing to the actual authors.
OK deraadt@
|
#
1.4 |
|
17-Apr-2008 |
oga |
Correct a typo: tsleep -> msleep
from Paul de Weerd, Thanks!
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_3_BASE
|
#
1.3 |
|
29-Nov-2007 |
jmc |
- better integrate msleep() into this page - art says bpendsleep has been removed, so kill it
ok art
|
#
1.2 |
|
28-Nov-2007 |
art |
<oga> art write me a manpage <art> What? Write it yourself. <oga> sudo art write me a manpage. <art> ok
Document msleep(9).
|
#
1.1 |
|
14-Sep-2007 |
mk |
sleep(9) was removed aeons ago according to miod, so remove references to it. Because man pages are named after functions (at least they should be) and sleep(9) doesn't exist anymore, sleep.9 is renamed to tsleep.9.
Input and reminders from jmc and ratchov.
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_6_1_BASE OPENBSD_6_2_BASE
|
#
1.11 |
|
13-Sep-2016 |
mpi |
Introduce rwsleep(9), an equivalent to msleep(9) but for code protected by a write lock.
ok guenther@, vgross@
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_9_BASE OPENBSD_6_0_BASE
|
#
1.10 |
|
14-Sep-2015 |
schwarze |
Remove useless quoting from .Fo and .Fn function names, to prevent development of a cargo cult in case people look at existing files for examples. This achieves a consistent .Fo and .Fn quoting style across the whole tree.
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_5_BASE OPENBSD_5_6_BASE OPENBSD_5_7_BASE OPENBSD_5_8_BASE
|
#
1.9 |
|
22-Jan-2014 |
jmc |
- add wakep_{n,one} to NAME and more fully into DESCRIPTION - zap eol whitespace
|
#
1.8 |
|
22-Jan-2014 |
tedu |
wakeup_n and wakeup_one blurbs
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_5_4_BASE
|
#
1.7 |
|
04-Jun-2013 |
schwarze |
Replace old-fashioned .Fd by new-fangled .In for #include lines. Diff from Jan Klemkow <j dot klemkow at wemelug dot de> on tech@. No objection from jmc@ against this type of change.
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_8_BASE OPENBSD_4_9_BASE OPENBSD_5_0_BASE OPENBSD_5_1_BASE OPENBSD_5_2_BASE OPENBSD_5_3_BASE
|
#
1.6 |
|
08-Apr-2010 |
tedu |
these functions are in systm.h now, reminded by kettenis
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_4_BASE OPENBSD_4_5_BASE OPENBSD_4_6_BASE OPENBSD_4_7_BASE
|
#
1.5 |
|
26-Jun-2008 |
ray |
First pass at removing clauses 3 and 4 from NetBSD licenses.
Not sure what's more surprising: how long it took for NetBSD to catch up to the rest of the BSDs (including UCB), or the amount of code that NetBSD has claimed for itself without attributing to the actual authors.
OK deraadt@
|
#
1.4 |
|
17-Apr-2008 |
oga |
Correct a typo: tsleep -> msleep
from Paul de Weerd, Thanks!
|
Revision tags: OPENBSD_4_3_BASE
|
#
1.3 |
|
29-Nov-2007 |
jmc |
- better integrate msleep() into this page - art says bpendsleep has been removed, so kill it
ok art
|
#
1.2 |
|
28-Nov-2007 |
art |
<oga> art write me a manpage <art> What? Write it yourself. <oga> sudo art write me a manpage. <art> ok
Document msleep(9).
|
#
1.1 |
|
14-Sep-2007 |
mk |
sleep(9) was removed aeons ago according to miod, so remove references to it. Because man pages are named after functions (at least they should be) and sleep(9) doesn't exist anymore, sleep.9 is renamed to tsleep.9.
Input and reminders from jmc and ratchov.
|