| #
1.6 |
|
08-Jun-2024 |
rillig |
lint: add details to warnings about negative constant to unsigned
|
| #
1.5 |
|
07-Jul-2023 |
rillig |
lint: warn about function definitions without header declaration
The existing warning was only issued for function declarations, not for
function definitions.
The interesting change in the tests is in msg_351.c. Many other tests
use non-static functions due to their syntactic brevity. In these
tests, the warning is disabled individually, to allow new functions to
be added without generating warning 351.
|
|
Revision tags: netbsd-10-0-RELEASE netbsd-10-0-RC6 netbsd-10-0-RC5 netbsd-10-0-RC4 netbsd-10-0-RC3 netbsd-10-0-RC2 netbsd-10-0-RC1 netbsd-10-base
|
|
| #
1.4 |
|
16-Jun-2022 |
rillig |
tests/lint: make expectation lines in the tests more detailed
This commit migrates msg_100 until msg_199.
|
|
Revision tags: cjep_sun2x-base1 cjep_sun2x-base cjep_staticlib_x-base1
|
|
| #
1.3 |
|
16-May-2021 |
rillig |
lint: add more specific warning for bit-field of type plain 'int'
Previously, declaring a bit-field of type plain 'int' resulted in this
warning:
warning: nonportable bit-field type 'int' [34]
This warning was too unspecific to be actionable, and until yesterday it
didn't even include the type. In order to allow this warning to be
understood and properly fixed, describe the actual nonportability more
precisely:
warning: bit-field of type plain 'int' has
implementation-defined signedness [344]
|
|
Revision tags: cjep_staticlib_x-base
|
|
| #
1.2 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
rillig |
branches: 1.2.2;
lint: add test for lossy assignments to bit-fields (164, 166)
|
| #
1.1 |
|
02-Jan-2021 |
rillig |
lint: add a test for each message produced by lint1
Having a test for each message ensures that upcoming refactorings don't
break the basic functionality. Adding the tests will also discover
previously unknown bugs in lint.
The tests ensure that every lint message can actually be triggered, and
they demonstrate how to do so. Having a separate file for each test
leaves enough space for documenting historical anecdotes, rationale or
edge cases, keeping them away from the source code.
The interesting details of this commit are in Makefile and
t_integration.sh. All other files are just auto-generated.
When running the tests as part of ATF, they are packed together as a
single test case. Conceptually, it would have been better to have each
test as a separate test case, but ATF quickly becomes very slow as soon
as a test program defines too many test cases, and 50 is already too
many. The time complexity is O(n^2), not O(n) as one would expect.
It's the same problem as in tests/usr.bin/make, which has over 300 test
cases as well.
|
| #
1.5 |
|
07-Jul-2023 |
rillig |
lint: warn about function definitions without header declaration
The existing warning was only issued for function declarations, not for
function definitions.
The interesting change in the tests is in msg_351.c. Many other tests
use non-static functions due to their syntactic brevity. In these
tests, the warning is disabled individually, to allow new functions to
be added without generating warning 351.
|
|
Revision tags: netbsd-10-base
|
|
| #
1.4 |
|
16-Jun-2022 |
rillig |
tests/lint: make expectation lines in the tests more detailed
This commit migrates msg_100 until msg_199.
|
|
Revision tags: cjep_sun2x-base1 cjep_sun2x-base cjep_staticlib_x-base1
|
|
| #
1.3 |
|
16-May-2021 |
rillig |
lint: add more specific warning for bit-field of type plain 'int'
Previously, declaring a bit-field of type plain 'int' resulted in this
warning:
warning: nonportable bit-field type 'int' [34]
This warning was too unspecific to be actionable, and until yesterday it
didn't even include the type. In order to allow this warning to be
understood and properly fixed, describe the actual nonportability more
precisely:
warning: bit-field of type plain 'int' has
implementation-defined signedness [344]
|
|
Revision tags: cjep_staticlib_x-base
|
|
| #
1.2 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
rillig |
branches: 1.2.2;
lint: add test for lossy assignments to bit-fields (164, 166)
|
| #
1.1 |
|
02-Jan-2021 |
rillig |
lint: add a test for each message produced by lint1
Having a test for each message ensures that upcoming refactorings don't
break the basic functionality. Adding the tests will also discover
previously unknown bugs in lint.
The tests ensure that every lint message can actually be triggered, and
they demonstrate how to do so. Having a separate file for each test
leaves enough space for documenting historical anecdotes, rationale or
edge cases, keeping them away from the source code.
The interesting details of this commit are in Makefile and
t_integration.sh. All other files are just auto-generated.
When running the tests as part of ATF, they are packed together as a
single test case. Conceptually, it would have been better to have each
test as a separate test case, but ATF quickly becomes very slow as soon
as a test program defines too many test cases, and 50 is already too
many. The time complexity is O(n^2), not O(n) as one would expect.
It's the same problem as in tests/usr.bin/make, which has over 300 test
cases as well.
|
| #
1.4 |
|
16-Jun-2022 |
rillig |
tests/lint: make expectation lines in the tests more detailed
This commit migrates msg_100 until msg_199.
|
|
Revision tags: cjep_sun2x-base1 cjep_sun2x-base cjep_staticlib_x-base1
|
|
| #
1.3 |
|
16-May-2021 |
rillig |
lint: add more specific warning for bit-field of type plain 'int'
Previously, declaring a bit-field of type plain 'int' resulted in this
warning:
warning: nonportable bit-field type 'int' [34]
This warning was too unspecific to be actionable, and until yesterday it
didn't even include the type. In order to allow this warning to be
understood and properly fixed, describe the actual nonportability more
precisely:
warning: bit-field of type plain 'int' has
implementation-defined signedness [344]
|
|
Revision tags: cjep_staticlib_x-base
|
|
| #
1.2 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
rillig |
branches: 1.2.2;
lint: add test for lossy assignments to bit-fields (164, 166)
|
| #
1.1 |
|
02-Jan-2021 |
rillig |
lint: add a test for each message produced by lint1
Having a test for each message ensures that upcoming refactorings don't
break the basic functionality. Adding the tests will also discover
previously unknown bugs in lint.
The tests ensure that every lint message can actually be triggered, and
they demonstrate how to do so. Having a separate file for each test
leaves enough space for documenting historical anecdotes, rationale or
edge cases, keeping them away from the source code.
The interesting details of this commit are in Makefile and
t_integration.sh. All other files are just auto-generated.
When running the tests as part of ATF, they are packed together as a
single test case. Conceptually, it would have been better to have each
test as a separate test case, but ATF quickly becomes very slow as soon
as a test program defines too many test cases, and 50 is already too
many. The time complexity is O(n^2), not O(n) as one would expect.
It's the same problem as in tests/usr.bin/make, which has over 300 test
cases as well.
|
| #
1.3 |
|
16-May-2021 |
rillig |
lint: add more specific warning for bit-field of type plain 'int'
Previously, declaring a bit-field of type plain 'int' resulted in this
warning:
warning: nonportable bit-field type 'int' [34]
This warning was too unspecific to be actionable, and until yesterday it
didn't even include the type. In order to allow this warning to be
understood and properly fixed, describe the actual nonportability more
precisely:
warning: bit-field of type plain 'int' has
implementation-defined signedness [344]
|
|
Revision tags: cjep_staticlib_x-base
|
|
| #
1.2 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
rillig |
lint: add test for lossy assignments to bit-fields (164, 166)
|
| #
1.1 |
|
02-Jan-2021 |
rillig |
lint: add a test for each message produced by lint1
Having a test for each message ensures that upcoming refactorings don't
break the basic functionality. Adding the tests will also discover
previously unknown bugs in lint.
The tests ensure that every lint message can actually be triggered, and
they demonstrate how to do so. Having a separate file for each test
leaves enough space for documenting historical anecdotes, rationale or
edge cases, keeping them away from the source code.
The interesting details of this commit are in Makefile and
t_integration.sh. All other files are just auto-generated.
When running the tests as part of ATF, they are packed together as a
single test case. Conceptually, it would have been better to have each
test as a separate test case, but ATF quickly becomes very slow as soon
as a test program defines too many test cases, and 50 is already too
many. The time complexity is O(n^2), not O(n) as one would expect.
It's the same problem as in tests/usr.bin/make, which has over 300 test
cases as well.
|
| #
1.2 |
|
31-Jan-2021 |
rillig |
lint: add test for lossy assignments to bit-fields (164, 166)
|
| #
1.1 |
|
02-Jan-2021 |
rillig |
lint: add a test for each message produced by lint1
Having a test for each message ensures that upcoming refactorings don't
break the basic functionality. Adding the tests will also discover
previously unknown bugs in lint.
The tests ensure that every lint message can actually be triggered, and
they demonstrate how to do so. Having a separate file for each test
leaves enough space for documenting historical anecdotes, rationale or
edge cases, keeping them away from the source code.
The interesting details of this commit are in Makefile and
t_integration.sh. All other files are just auto-generated.
When running the tests as part of ATF, they are packed together as a
single test case. Conceptually, it would have been better to have each
test as a separate test case, but ATF quickly becomes very slow as soon
as a test program defines too many test cases, and 50 is already too
many. The time complexity is O(n^2), not O(n) as one would expect.
It's the same problem as in tests/usr.bin/make, which has over 300 test
cases as well.
|
| #
1.1 |
|
02-Jan-2021 |
rillig |
lint: add a test for each message produced by lint1
Having a test for each message ensures that upcoming refactorings don't
break the basic functionality. Adding the tests will also discover
previously unknown bugs in lint.
The tests ensure that every lint message can actually be triggered, and
they demonstrate how to do so. Having a separate file for each test
leaves enough space for documenting historical anecdotes, rationale or
edge cases, keeping them away from the source code.
The interesting details of this commit are in Makefile and
t_integration.sh. All other files are just auto-generated.
When running the tests as part of ATF, they are packed together as a
single test case. Conceptually, it would have been better to have each
test as a separate test case, but ATF quickly becomes very slow as soon
as a test program defines too many test cases, and 50 is already too
many. The time complexity is O(n^2), not O(n) as one would expect.
It's the same problem as in tests/usr.bin/make, which has over 300 test
cases as well.
|