#
07f24dc9 |
|
19-Mar-2020 |
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> |
selftests/x86/vdso: Fix no-vDSO segfaults test_vdso would try to call a NULL pointer if the vDSO was missing. vdso_restorer_32 hit a genuine failure: trying to use the kernel-provided signal restorer doesn't work if the vDSO is missing. Skip the test if the vDSO is missing, since the test adds no particular value in that case. Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/618ea7b8c55b10d08b1cb139e9a3a957934b8647.1584653439.git.luto@kernel.org
|
#
65cacec1 |
|
12-Jan-2016 |
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> |
selftests/x86: Test __kernel_sigreturn and __kernel_rt_sigreturn The vdso-based sigreturn mechanism is fragile and isn't used by modern glibc so, if we break it, we'll only notice when someone tests an unusual libc. Add an explicit selftest. [ I wrote this while debugging a Bionic breakage -- my first guess was that I had somehow messed up sigreturn. I've caused problems in that code before, and it's really easy to fail to notice it because there's nothing on a modern distro that needs vdso-based sigreturn. ] Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/32946d714156879cd8e5d8eab044cd07557ed558.1452628504.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|