selftests/x86/syscall: Add tests under ptrace to syscall_numbering_64

Add tests running under ptrace for syscall_numbering_64. ptrace stopping on
syscall entry and possibly modifying the syscall number (regs.orig_rax) or
the default return value (regs.rax) can have different results than the
normal system call path.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210518191303.4135296-4-hpa@zytor.com

selftests/x86/syscall: Simplify message reporting in syscall_numbering

Reduce some boiler plate in printing and indenting messages.
This makes it easier to produce clean status output.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210518191303.4135296-3-hpa@zytor.com

selftests/x86/syscall: Update and extend syscall_numbering_64

Update the syscall_numbering_64 selftest to reflect that a system call is
to be extended from 32 bits. Add a mix of tests for valid and invalid
system calls in 64-bit and x32 space.

Use an explicit system call instruction, because the glibc syscall()
wrapper might intercept instructions, extend the system call number
independently, or anything similar.

Use long long instead of long to make it possible to compile this test
on x32 as well as 64 bits.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210518191303.4135296-2-hpa@zytor.com

x86/syscalls: Split the x32 syscalls into their own table

For unfortunate historical reasons, the x32 syscalls and the x86_64
syscalls are not all numbered the same. As an example, ioctl() is nr 16 on
x86_64 but 514 on x32.

This has potentially nasty consequences, since it means that there are two
valid RAX values to do ioctl(2) and two invalid RAX values. The valid
values are 16 (i.e. ioctl(2) using the x86_64 ABI) and (514 | 0x40000000)
(i.e. ioctl(2) using the x32 ABI).

The invalid values are 514 and (16 | 0x40000000). 514 will enter the
"COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE3(ioctl, ...)" entry point with in_compat_syscall()
and in_x32_syscall() returning false, whereas (16 | 0x40000000) will enter
the native entry point with in_compat_syscall() and in_x32_syscall()
returning true. Both are bogus, and both will exercise code paths in the
kernel and in any running seccomp filters that really ought to be
unreachable.

Splitting out the x32 syscalls into their own tables, allows both bogus
invocations to return -ENOSYS. I've checked glibc, musl, and Bionic, and
all of them appear to call syscalls with their correct numbers, so this
change should have no effect on them.

There is an added benefit going forward: new syscalls that need special
handling on x32 can share the same number on x32 and x86_64. This means
that the special syscall range 512-547 can be treated as a legacy wart
instead of something that may need to be extended in the future.

Also add a selftest to verify the new behavior.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/208024256b764312598f014ebfb0a42472c19354.1562185330.git.luto@kernel.org