KVM: selftests: Remove redundant newlines

TEST_* functions append their own newline. Remove newlines from
TEST_* callsites to avoid extra newlines in output.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206170241.82801-8-ajones@ventanamicro.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

KVM: selftests: Introduce VM "shape" to allow tests to specify the VM type

Add a "vm_shape" structure to encapsulate the selftests-defined "mode",
along with the KVM-defined "type" for use when creating a new VM. "mode"
tracks physical and virtual address properties, as well as the preferred
backing memory type, while "type" corresponds to the VM type.

Taking the VM type will allow adding tests for KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD
without needing an entirely separate set of helpers. At this time,
guest_memfd is effectively usable only by confidential VM types in the
form of guest private memory, and it's expected that x86 will double down
and require unique VM types for TDX and SNP guests.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20231027182217.3615211-30-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

KVM: selftests: use unified time type for comparison

With test case kvm_page_table_test, start time is acquired with
time type CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, however end time in timespec_elapsed()
is acquired with time type CLOCK_MONOTONIC. This can cause inaccurate
elapsed time calculation due to mixing timebases, e.g. LoongArch in
particular will see weirdness.

Modify kvm_page_table_test to use unified time type CLOCK_MONOTONIC for
start time.

Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230731022405.854884-1-maobibo@loongson.cn
[sean: massage changelog]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

KVM: selftests: Drop now-unnecessary ucall_uninit()

Drop ucall_uninit() and ucall_arch_uninit() now that ARM doesn't modify
the host's copy of ucall_exit_mmio_addr, i.e. now that there's no need to
reset the pointer before potentially creating a new VM. The few calls to
ucall_uninit() are all immediately followed by kvm_vm_free(), and that is
likely always going to hold true, i.e. it's extremely unlikely a test
will want to effectively disable ucall in the middle of a test.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
Tested-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006003409.649993-7-seanjc@google.com

KVM: selftests: Automatically do init_ucall() for non-barebones VMs

Do init_ucall() automatically during VM creation to kill two (three?)
birds with one stone.

First, initializing ucall immediately after VM creations allows forcing
aarch64's MMIO ucall address to immediately follow memslot0. This is
still somewhat fragile as tests could clobber the MMIO address with a
new memslot, but it's safe-ish since tests have to be conversative when
accounting for memslot0. And this can be hardened in the future by
creating a read-only memslot for the MMIO page (KVM ARM exits with MMIO
if the guest writes to a read-only memslot). Add a TODO to document that
selftests can and should use a memslot for the ucall MMIO (doing so
requires yet more rework because tests assumes thay can use all memslots
except memslot0).

Second, initializing ucall for all VMs prepares for making ucall
initialization meaningful on all architectures. aarch64 is currently the
only arch that needs to do any setup, but that will change in the future
by switching to a pool-based implementation (instead of the current
stack-based approach).

Lastly, defining the ucall MMIO address from common code will simplify
switching all architectures (except s390) to a common MMIO-based ucall
implementation (if there's ever sufficient motivation to do so).

Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
Tested-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006003409.649993-4-seanjc@google.com

KVM: selftests: Add atoi_positive() and atoi_non_negative() for input validation

Many KVM selftests take command line arguments which are supposed to be
positive (>0) or non-negative (>=0). Some tests do these validation and
some missed adding the check.

Add atoi_positive() and atoi_non_negative() to validate inputs in
selftests before proceeding to use those values.

Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221103191719.1559407-7-vipinsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

KVM: selftests: Add atoi_paranoid() to catch errors missed by atoi()

atoi() doesn't detect errors. There is no way to know that a 0 return
is correct conversion or due to an error.

Introduce atoi_paranoid() to detect errors and provide correct
conversion. Replace all atoi() calls with atoi_paranoid().

Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Suggested-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221103191719.1559407-4-vipinsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

KVM: selftests: Drop @num_percpu_pages from __vm_create_with_vcpus()

Drop @num_percpu_pages from __vm_create_with_vcpus(), all callers pass
'0' and there's unlikely to be a test that allocates just enough memory
that it needs a per-CPU allocation, but not so much that it won't just do
its own memory management.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

KVM: selftests: Drop @slot0_mem_pages from __vm_create_with_vcpus()

All callers of __vm_create_with_vcpus() pass DEFAULT_GUEST_PHY_PAGES for
@slot_mem_pages; drop the param and just hardcode the "default" as the
base number of pages for slot0.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

KVM: selftests: Open code and drop 'struct kvm_vm' accessors

Drop a variety of 'struct kvm_vm' accessors that wrap a single variable
now that tests can simply reference the variable directly.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

KVM: selftests: Purge vm+vcpu_id == vcpu silliness

Take a vCPU directly instead of a VM+vcpu pair in all vCPU-scoped helpers
and ioctls.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

KVM: selftests: Convert kvm_page_table_test away from reliance on vcpu_id

Reference vCPUs by their 'struct kvm_vcpu' object in kvm_page_table_test
instead of by their ID. This moves selftests one step closer towards
taking a 'struct kvm_vcpu *' instead of VM+vcpu_id for vCPU helpers.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

KVM: selftests: Drop @vcpuids param from VM creators

Drop the @vcpuids parameter from VM creators now that there are no users.
Allowing tests to specify IDs was a gigantic mistake as it resulted in
tests with arbitrary and ultimately meaningless IDs that differed only
because the author used test X intead of test Y as the source for
copy+paste (the de facto standard way to create a KVM selftest).

Except for literally two tests, x86's set_boot_cpu_id and s390's resets,
tests do not and should not care about the vCPU ID.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

KVM: selftests: Add VM creation helper that "returns" vCPUs

Add a VM creator that "returns" the created vCPUs by filling the provided
array. This will allow converting multi-vCPU tests away from hardcoded
vCPU IDs.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

KVM: selftests: Silence compiler warning in the kvm_page_table_test

When compiling kvm_page_table_test.c, I get this compiler warning
with gcc 11.2:

kvm_page_table_test.c: In function 'pre_init_before_test':
../../../../tools/include/linux/kernel.h:44:24: warning: comparison of
distinct pointer types lacks a cast
44 | (void) (&_max1 == &_max2); \
| ^~
kvm_page_table_test.c:281:21: note: in expansion of macro 'max'
281 | alignment = max(0x100000, alignment);
| ^~~

Fix it by adjusting the type of the absolute value.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220414103031.565037-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

KVM: selftests: page_table_test: fix calculation of guest_test_phys_mem

A kvm_page_table_test run with its default settings fails on VMX due to
memory region add failure:
> ==== Test Assertion Failure ====
> lib/kvm_util.c:952: ret == 0
> pid=10538 tid=10538 errno=17 - File exists
> 1 0x00000000004057d1: vm_userspace_mem_region_add at kvm_util.c:947
> 2 0x0000000000401ee9: pre_init_before_test at kvm_page_table_test.c:302
> 3 (inlined by) run_test at kvm_page_table_test.c:374
> 4 0x0000000000409754: for_each_guest_mode at guest_modes.c:53
> 5 0x0000000000401860: main at kvm_page_table_test.c:500
> 6 0x00007f82ae2d8554: ?? ??:0
> 7 0x0000000000401894: _start at ??:?
> KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION IOCTL failed,
> rc: -1 errno: 17
> slot: 1 flags: 0x0
> guest_phys_addr: 0xc0000000 size: 0x40000000

This is because the memory range that this test is trying to add
(0x0c0000000 - 0x100000000) conflicts with LAPIC mapping at 0x0fee00000.

Looking at the code it seems that guest_test_*phys*_mem variable gets
mistakenly overwritten with guest_test_*virt*_mem while trying to adjust
the former for alignment.
With the correct variable adjusted this test runs successfully.

Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
Message-Id: <52e487458c3172923549bbcf9dfccfbe6faea60b.1637940473.git.maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

KVM: selftests: Expose align() helpers to tests

Refactor align() to work with non-pointers and split into separate
helpers for aligning up vs. down. Add align_ptr_up() for use with
pointers. Expose all helpers so that they can be used by tests and/or
other utilities. The align_down() helper in particular will be used to
ensure gpa alignment for hugepages.

No functional change intended.

[Added sepearate up/down helpers and replaced open-coded alignment
bit math throughout the KVM selftests.]

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Message-Id: <20211111000310.1435032-3-dmatlack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

KVM: selftests: Refactor help message for -s backing_src

All selftests that support the backing_src option were printing their
own description of the flag and then calling backing_src_help() to dump
the list of available backing sources. Consolidate the flag printing in
backing_src_help() to align indentation, reduce duplicated strings, and
improve consistency across tests.

Note: Passing "-s" to backing_src_help is unnecessary since every test
uses the same flag. However I decided to keep it for code readability
at the call sites.

While here this opportunistically fixes the incorrectly interleaved
printing -x help message and list of backing source types in
dirty_log_perf_test.

Fixes: 609e6202ea5f ("KVM: selftests: Support multiple slots in dirty_log_perf_test")
Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Message-Id: <20210917173657.44011-3-dmatlack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

KVM: selftests: Unconditionally use memslot '0' for page table allocations

Drop the memslot param from virt_pg_map() and virt_map() and shove the
hardcoded '0' down to the vm_phy_page_alloc() calls.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20210622200529.3650424-13-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

selftests: kvm: Add support for customized slot0 memory size

Until commit 39fe2fc96694 ("selftests: kvm: make allocation of extra
memory take effect", 2021-05-27), parameter extra_mem_pages was used
only to calculate the page table size for all the memory chunks,
because real memory allocation happened with calls of
vm_userspace_mem_region_add() after vm_create_default().

Commit 39fe2fc96694 however changed the meaning of extra_mem_pages to
the size of memory slot 0. This makes the memory allocation more
flexible, but makes it harder to account for the number of
pages needed for the page tables. For example, memslot_perf_test
has a small amount of memory in slot 0 but a lot in other slots,
and adding that memory twice (both in slot 0 and with later
calls to vm_userspace_mem_region_add()) causes an error that
was fixed in commit 000ac4295339 ("selftests: kvm: fix overlapping
addresses in memslot_perf_test", 2021-05-29)

Since both uses are sensible, add a new parameter slot0_mem_pages
to vm_create_with_vcpus() and some comments to clarify the meaning of
slot0_mem_pages and extra_mem_pages. With this change,
memslot_perf_test can go back to passing the number of memory
pages as extra_mem_pages.

Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20210608233816.423958-4-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
[Squashed in a single patch and rewrote the commit message. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

KVM: selftests: Add a test for kvm page table code

This test serves as a performance tester and a bug reproducer for
kvm page table code (GPA->HPA mappings), so it gives guidance for
people trying to make some improvement for kvm.

The function guest_code() can cover the conditions where a single vcpu or
multiple vcpus access guest pages within the same memory region, in three
VM stages(before dirty logging, during dirty logging, after dirty logging).
Besides, the backing src memory type(ANONYMOUS/THP/HUGETLB) of the tested
memory region can be specified by users, which means normal page mappings
or block mappings can be chosen by users to be created in the test.

If ANONYMOUS memory is specified, kvm will create normal page mappings
for the tested memory region before dirty logging, and update attributes
of the page mappings from RO to RW during dirty logging. If THP/HUGETLB
memory is specified, kvm will create block mappings for the tested memory
region before dirty logging, and split the blcok mappings into normal page
mappings during dirty logging, and coalesce the page mappings back into
block mappings after dirty logging is stopped.

So in summary, as a performance tester, this test can present the
performance of kvm creating/updating normal page mappings, or the
performance of kvm creating/splitting/recovering block mappings,
through execution time.

When we need to coalesce the page mappings back to block mappings after
dirty logging is stopped, we have to firstly invalidate *all* the TLB
entries for the page mappings right before installation of the block entry,
because a TLB conflict abort error could occur if we can't invalidate the
TLB entries fully. We have hit this TLB conflict twice on aarch64 software
implementation and fixed it. As this test can imulate process from dirty
logging enabled to dirty logging stopped of a VM with block mappings,
so it can also reproduce this TLB conflict abort due to inadequate TLB
invalidation when coalescing tables.

Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210330080856.14940-11-wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>