#
34ad708d |
|
02-Jun-2023 |
Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> |
selftests: mlxsw: egress_vid_classification: Fix the diagram The topology diagram implies that $swp1 and $swp2 are members of the bridge br0, when in fact only their uppers, $swp1.10 and $swp2.10 are. Adjust the diagram. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
#
1623d571 |
|
17-Aug-2022 |
Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com> |
selftests: mlxsw: Add egress VID classification test After routing, the device always consults a table that determines the packet's egress VID based on {egress RIF, egress local port}. In the unified bridge model, it is up to software to maintain this table via REIV register. The table needs to be updated in the following flows: 1. When a RIF is set on a FID, for each FID's {Port, VID} mapping, a new {RIF, Port}->VID mapping should be created. 2. When a {Port, VID} is mapped to a FID and the FID already has a RIF, a new {RIF, Port}->VID mapping should be created. Add a test to verify that packets get the correct VID after routing, regardless of the order of the configuration. # ./egress_vid_classification.sh TEST: Add RIF for existing {port, VID}->FID mapping [ OK ] TEST: Add {port, VID}->FID mapping for FID with a RIF [ OK ] Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|