History log of /linux-master/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_storage_nodeadlock.c
Revision Date Author Comments
# 0334b4d8 25-Oct-2022 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

selftests/bpf: Ensure no task storage failure for bpf_lsm.s prog due to deadlock detection

This patch adds a test to check for deadlock failure
in bpf_task_storage_{get,delete} when called by a sleepable bpf_lsm prog.
It also checks if the prog_info.recursion_misses is non zero.

The test starts with 32 threads and they are affinitized to one cpu.
In my qemu setup, with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y, I can reproduce it within
one second if it is run without the previous patches of this set.

Here is the test error message before adding the no deadlock detection
version of the bpf_task_storage_{get,delete}:

test_nodeadlock:FAIL:bpf_task_storage_get busy unexpected bpf_task_storage_get busy: actual 2 != expected 0
test_nodeadlock:FAIL:bpf_task_storage_delete busy unexpected bpf_task_storage_delete busy: actual 2 != expected 0

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025184524.3526117-9-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>