#
c8ed6685 |
|
08-Mar-2023 |
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> |
selftests/bpf: fix lots of silly mistakes pointed out by compiler Once we enable -Wall for BPF sources, compiler will complain about lots of unused variables, variables that are set but never read, etc. Fix all these issues first before enabling -Wall in Makefile. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230309054015.4068562-4-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
#
73b97bc7 |
|
01-Sep-2022 |
Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> |
selftests/bpf: Test concurrent updates on bpf_task_storage_busy Under full preemptible kernel, task local storage lookup operations on the same CPU may update per-cpu bpf_task_storage_busy concurrently. If the update of bpf_task_storage_busy is not preemption safe, the final value of bpf_task_storage_busy may become not-zero forever and bpf_task_storage_trylock() will always fail. So add a test case to ensure the update of bpf_task_storage_busy is preemption safe. Will skip the test case when CONFIG_PREEMPT is disabled, and it can only reproduce the problem probabilistically. By increasing TASK_STORAGE_MAP_NR_LOOP and running it under ARM64 VM with 4-cpus, it takes about four rounds to reproduce: > test_maps is modified to only run test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup() $ export TASK_STORAGE_MAP_NR_THREAD=256 $ export TASK_STORAGE_MAP_NR_LOOP=81920 $ export TASK_STORAGE_MAP_PIN_CPU=1 $ time ./test_maps test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup(135):FAIL:bad bpf_task_storage_busy got -2 real 0m24.743s user 0m6.772s sys 0m17.966s Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901061938.3789460-5-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
|