selftests/bpf: Add tests for RCU lock transfer between subprogs

Add selftests covering the following cases:
- A static or global subprog called from within a RCU read section works
- A static subprog taking an RCU read lock which is released in caller works
- A static subprog releasing the caller's RCU read lock works

Global subprogs that leave the lock in an imbalanced state will not
work, as they are verified separately, so ensure those cases fail as
well.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240205055646.1112186-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

bpf: Remove now-defunct task kfuncs

In commit 22df776a9a86 ("tasks: Extract rcu_users out of union"), the
'refcount_t rcu_users' field was extracted out of a union with the
'struct rcu_head rcu' field. This allows us to safely perform a
refcount_inc_not_zero() on task->rcu_users when acquiring a reference on
a task struct. A prior patch leveraged this by making struct task_struct
an RCU-protected object in the verifier, and by bpf_task_acquire() to
use the task->rcu_users field for synchronization.

Now that we can use RCU to protect tasks, we no longer need
bpf_task_kptr_get(), or bpf_task_acquire_not_zero(). bpf_task_kptr_get()
is truly completely unnecessary, as we can just use RCU to get the
object. bpf_task_acquire_not_zero() is now equivalent to
bpf_task_acquire().

In addition to these changes, this patch also updates the associated
selftests to no longer use these kfuncs.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230331195733.699708-3-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

selftests/bpf: fix lots of silly mistakes pointed out by compiler

Once we enable -Wall for BPF sources, compiler will complain about lots
of unused variables, variables that are set but never read, etc.

Fix all these issues first before enabling -Wall in Makefile.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230309054015.4068562-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.

bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() are only available in clang compiled kernels. Lack
of such key mechanism makes it impossible for sleepable bpf programs to use RCU
pointers.

Allow bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() in GCC compiled kernels (though GCC doesn't
support btf_type_tag yet) and allowlist certain field dereferences in important
data structures like tast_struct, cgroup, socket that are used by sleepable
programs either as RCU pointer or full trusted pointer (which is valid outside
of RCU CS). Use BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU and BTF_TYPE_SAFE_TRUSTED macros for such
tagging. They will be removed once GCC supports btf_type_tag.

With that refactor check_ptr_to_btf_access(). Make it strict in enforcing
PTR_TRUSTED and PTR_UNTRUSTED while deprecating old PTR_TO_BTF_ID without
modifier flags. There is a chance that this strict enforcement might break
existing programs (especially on GCC compiled kernels), but this cleanup has to
start sooner than later. Note PTR_TO_CTX access still yields old deprecated
PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Once it's converted to strict PTR_TRUSTED or PTR_UNTRUSTED the
kfuncs and helpers will be able to default to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS. KF_RCU will
remain as a weaker version of KF_TRUSTED_ARGS where obj refcnt could be 0.

Adjust rcu_read_lock selftest to run on gcc and clang compiled kernels.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230303041446.3630-7-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com

selftests/bpf: Fix a selftest compilation error with CONFIG_SMP=n

Kernel test robot reported bpf selftest build failure when CONFIG_SMP
is not set. The error message looks below:

>> progs/rcu_read_lock.c:256:34: error: no member named 'last_wakee' in 'struct task_struct'
last_wakee = task->real_parent->last_wakee;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
1 error generated.

When CONFIG_SMP is not set, the field 'last_wakee' is not available in struct
'task_struct'. Hence the above compilation failure. To fix the issue, let us
choose another field 'group_leader' which is available regardless of
CONFIG_SMP set or not.

Fixes: fe147956fca4 ("bpf/selftests: Add selftests for new task kfuncs")
Fixes: 48671232fcb8 ("selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_rcu_read_lock()")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221213012224.379581-1-yhs@fb.com

bpf: Don't use rcu_users to refcount in task kfuncs

A series of prior patches added some kfuncs that allow struct
task_struct * objects to be used as kptrs. These kfuncs leveraged the
'refcount_t rcu_users' field of the task for performing refcounting.
This field was used instead of 'refcount_t usage', as we wanted to
leverage the safety provided by RCU for ensuring a task's lifetime.

A struct task_struct is refcounted by two different refcount_t fields:

1. p->usage: The "true" refcount field which task lifetime. The
task is freed as soon as this refcount drops to 0.

2. p->rcu_users: An "RCU users" refcount field which is statically
initialized to 2, and is co-located in a union with
a struct rcu_head field (p->rcu). p->rcu_users
essentially encapsulates a single p->usage
refcount, and when p->rcu_users goes to 0, an RCU
callback is scheduled on the struct rcu_head which
decrements the p->usage refcount.

Our logic was that by using p->rcu_users, we would be able to use RCU to
safely issue refcount_inc_not_zero() a task's rcu_users field to
determine if a task could still be acquired, or was exiting.
Unfortunately, this does not work due to p->rcu_users and p->rcu sharing
a union. When p->rcu_users goes to 0, an RCU callback is scheduled to
drop a single p->usage refcount, and because the fields share a union,
the refcount immediately becomes nonzero again after the callback is
scheduled.

If we were to split the fields out of the union, this wouldn't be a
problem. Doing so should also be rather non-controversial, as there are
a number of places in struct task_struct that have padding which we
could use to avoid growing the structure by splitting up the fields.

For now, so as to fix the kfuncs to be correct, this patch instead
updates bpf_task_acquire() and bpf_task_release() to use the p->usage
field for refcounting via the get_task_struct() and put_task_struct()
functions. Because we can no longer rely on RCU, the change also guts
the bpf_task_acquire_not_zero() and bpf_task_kptr_get() functions
pending a resolution on the above problem.

In addition, the task fixes the kfunc and rcu_read_lock selftests to
expect this new behavior.

Fixes: 90660309b0c7 ("bpf: Add kfuncs for storing struct task_struct * as a kptr")
Fixes: fca1aa75518c ("bpf: Handle MEM_RCU type properly")
Reported-by: Matus Jokay <matus.jokay@stuba.sk>
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221206210538.597606-1-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

selftests/bpf: Fix rcu_read_lock test with new MEM_RCU semantics

Add MEM_RCU pointer null checking for related tests. Also
modified task_acquire test so it takes a rcu ptr 'ptr' where
'ptr = rcu_ptr->rcu_field'.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221203184607.478314-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_rcu_read_lock()

Add a few positive/negative tests to test bpf_rcu_read_lock()
and its corresponding verifier support. The new test will fail
on s390x and aarch64, so an entry is added to each of their
respective deny lists.

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221124053222.2374650-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>