#
1b4c7e20 |
|
04-Dec-2023 |
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> |
selftests/bpf: Test bpf_kptr_xchg stashing of bpf_rb_root There was some confusion amongst Meta sched_ext folks regarding whether stashing bpf_rb_root - the tree itself, rather than a single node - was supported. This patch adds a small test which demonstrates this functionality: a local kptr with rb_root is created, a node is created and added to the tree, then the tree is kptr_xchg'd into a mapval. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231204211722.571346-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
|
#
e9ed8df7 |
|
07-Nov-2023 |
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> |
selftests/bpf: Test bpf_refcount_acquire of node obtained via direct ld This patch demonstrates that verifier changes earlier in this series result in bpf_refcount_acquire(mapval->stashed_kptr) passing verification. The added test additionally validates that stashing a kptr in mapval and - in a separate BPF program - refcount_acquiring the kptr without unstashing works as expected at runtime. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231107085639.3016113-7-davemarchevsky@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
#
001fedac |
|
24-Aug-2023 |
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> |
selftests/bpf: Add a local kptr test with no special fields Add a local kptr test with no special fields in the struct. Without the previous patch, the following warning will hit: [ 44.683877] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 485 at kernel/bpf/syscall.c:660 bpf_obj_free_fields+0x220/0x240 [ 44.684640] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [ 44.685044] CPU: 3 PID: 485 Comm: kworker/u8:5 Tainted: G OE 6.5.0-rc5-01703-g260d855e9b90 #248 [ 44.685827] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 44.686693] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 44.687297] RIP: 0010:bpf_obj_free_fields+0x220/0x240 [ 44.687775] Code: e8 55 17 1f 00 49 8b 74 24 08 4c 89 ef e8 e8 14 05 00 e8 a3 da e2 ff e9 55 fe ff ff 0f 0b e9 4e fe ff ff 0f 0b e9 47 fe ff ff <0f> 0b e8 d9 d9 e2 ff 31 f6 eb d5 48 83 c4 10 5b 41 5c e [ 44.689353] RSP: 0018:ffff888106467cb8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 44.689806] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888112b3a200 RCX: 0000000000000001 [ 44.690433] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: dffffc0000000000 RDI: ffff8881128ad988 [ 44.691094] RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: ffffffff81370bd0 R09: 1ffff110216231a5 [ 44.691643] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed10216231a6 R12: ffff88810d68a488 [ 44.692245] R13: ffff88810767c288 R14: ffff88810d68a400 R15: ffff88810d68a418 [ 44.692829] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881f7580000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 44.693484] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 44.693964] CR2: 000055c7f2afce28 CR3: 000000010fee4002 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [ 44.694513] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 44.695102] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 44.695747] Call Trace: [ 44.696001] <TASK> [ 44.696183] ? __warn+0xfe/0x270 [ 44.696447] ? bpf_obj_free_fields+0x220/0x240 [ 44.696817] ? report_bug+0x220/0x2d0 [ 44.697180] ? handle_bug+0x3d/0x70 [ 44.697507] ? exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x50 [ 44.697887] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 44.698282] ? btf_find_struct_meta+0xd0/0xd0 [ 44.698634] ? bpf_obj_free_fields+0x220/0x240 [ 44.699027] ? bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1e2/0x240 [ 44.699414] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 44.699763] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 44.700154] process_one_work+0x46d/0x750 [ 44.700523] worker_thread+0x49e/0x900 [ 44.700892] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 44.701224] kthread+0x1ae/0x1d0 [ 44.701516] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 44.701860] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 44.702178] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 44.702508] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 44.702880] </TASK> With the previous patch, there is no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230824063422.203097-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
#
fb301594 |
|
21-Aug-2023 |
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> |
selftests/bpf: Add a failure test for bpf_kptr_xchg() with local kptr For a bpf_kptr_xchg() with local kptr, if the map value kptr type and allocated local obj type does not match, with the previous patch, the below verifier error message will be logged: R2 is of type <allocated local obj type> but <map value kptr type> is expected Without the previous patch, the test will have unexpected success. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230822050058.2887354-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
#
5d8d6634 |
|
10-Mar-2023 |
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> |
selftests/bpf: Add local kptr stashing test Add a new selftest, local_kptr_stash, which uses bpf_kptr_xchg to stash a bpf_obj_new-allocated object in a map. Test the following scenarios: * Stash two rb_nodes in an arraymap, don't unstash them, rely on map free to destruct them * Stash two rb_nodes in an arraymap, unstash the second one in a separate program, rely on map free to destruct first Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230310230743.2320707-4-davemarchevsky@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|