selftests/bpf: Destroy the skeleton when CONFIG_PREEMPT is off

Destroy the created skeleton when CONFIG_PREEMPT is off, else will be
resource leak.

Fixes: 73b97bc78b32 ("selftests/bpf: Test concurrent updates on bpf_task_storage_busy")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921070035.2016413-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

selftests/bpf: Add test result messages for test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup

Add test result message when test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup()
succeeds or is skipped. The test case can be skipped due to the choose
of preemption model in kernel config, so export skips in test_maps.c and
increase it when needed.

The following is the output of test_maps when the test case succeeds or
is skipped:

test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup:PASS
test_maps: OK, 0 SKIPPED

test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup SKIP (no CONFIG_PREEMPT)
test_maps: OK, 1 SKIPPED

Fixes: 73b97bc78b32 ("selftests/bpf: Test concurrent updates on bpf_task_storage_busy")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220919035714.2195144-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

selftests/bpf: Test concurrent updates on bpf_task_storage_busy

Under full preemptible kernel, task local storage lookup operations on
the same CPU may update per-cpu bpf_task_storage_busy concurrently. If
the update of bpf_task_storage_busy is not preemption safe, the final
value of bpf_task_storage_busy may become not-zero forever and
bpf_task_storage_trylock() will always fail. So add a test case to
ensure the update of bpf_task_storage_busy is preemption safe.

Will skip the test case when CONFIG_PREEMPT is disabled, and it can only
reproduce the problem probabilistically. By increasing
TASK_STORAGE_MAP_NR_LOOP and running it under ARM64 VM with 4-cpus, it
takes about four rounds to reproduce:

> test_maps is modified to only run test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup()
$ export TASK_STORAGE_MAP_NR_THREAD=256
$ export TASK_STORAGE_MAP_NR_LOOP=81920
$ export TASK_STORAGE_MAP_PIN_CPU=1
$ time ./test_maps
test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup(135):FAIL:bad bpf_task_storage_busy got -2

real 0m24.743s
user 0m6.772s
sys 0m17.966s

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901061938.3789460-5-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>