perf/benchmark: fix seccomp_unotify benchmark for 32-bit

Commit 7d5cb68af638 (perf/benchmark: add a new benchmark for
seccom_unotify) added a reference to __NR_seccomp into perf. This is
fine as it added also a definition of __NR_seccomp for 64-bit. But it
failed to do so for 32-bit as instead of ifndef, ifdef was used.

Fix this typo (so fix the build of perf on 32-bit).

Fixes: 7d5cb68af638 (perf/benchmark: add a new benchmark for seccom_unotify)
Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017083019.31733-1-jirislaby@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

perf/benchmark: add a new benchmark for seccom_unotify

The benchmark is similar to the pipe benchmark. It creates two processes,
one is calling syscalls, and another process is handling them via seccomp
user notifications. It measures the time required to run a specified number
of interations.

$ ./perf bench sched seccomp-notify --sync-mode --loop 1000000
# Running 'sched/seccomp-notify' benchmark:
# Executed 1000000 system calls

Total time: 2.769 [sec]

2.769629 usecs/op
361059 ops/sec

$ ./perf bench sched seccomp-notify
# Running 'sched/seccomp-notify' benchmark:
# Executed 1000000 system calls

Total time: 8.571 [sec]

8.571119 usecs/op
116670 ops/sec

Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>
Acked-by: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308073201.3102738-7-avagin@google.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230630051953.454638-1-avagin@gmail.com
[kees: Added PRIu64 format string]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

perf bench syscall: Fix __NR_execve undeclared build error

The __NR_execve definition for i386 was deleted by mistake
in the commit ece7f7c0507c ("perf bench syscall: Add fork
syscall benchmark"), add it to fix the build error on i386.

Fixes: ece7f7c0507cc147 ("perf bench syscall: Add fork syscall benchmark")
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Cc: loongson-kernel@lists.loongnix.cn
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYvgBR1iB0CorM8OC4AM_w_tFzyQKHc+rF6qPzJL=TbfDQ@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1684480657-2375-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

perf bench syscall: Add fork syscall benchmark

This is a follow up patch for the execve bench which is actually
fork + execve, it makes sense to add the fork syscall benchmark
to compare the execve part precisely.

Some archs have no __NR_fork definition which is used only as a
check condition to call test_fork(), let us just define it as -1
to avoid build error.

Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: loongson-kernel@lists.loongnix.cn
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1679381821-22736-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

perf bench syscall: Add execve syscall benchmark

This commit adds the execve syscall benchmark, more syscall benchmarks
can be added in the future.

Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1668052208-14047-5-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

perf bench syscall: Add getpgid syscall benchmark

This commit adds a simple getpgid syscall benchmark, more syscall
benchmarks can be added in the future.

Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1668052208-14047-4-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

perf bench syscall: Introduce bench_syscall_common()

In the current code, there is only a basic syscall benchmark via
getppid, this is not enough. Introduce bench_syscall_common() so that we
can add more syscalls to benchmark.

This is preparation for later patch, no functionality change.

Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1668052208-14047-3-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

tools x86: Keep list sorted by number in unistd_{32,64}.h

It is better to keep list sorted by number in unistd_{32,64}.h,
so that we can add more syscall number to a proper position.

This is preparation for later patch, no functionality change.

Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1668052208-14047-2-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

tools: Move x86 syscall number fallbacks to .../uapi/

Move unistd_{32,64}.h from x86/include/asm to x86/include/uapi/asm so
that tools/selftests that install kernel headers, e.g. KVM selftests, can
include non-uapi tools headers, e.g. to get 'struct list_head', without
effectively overriding the installed non-tool uapi headers.

Swapping KVM's search order, e.g. to search the kernel headers before
tool headers, is not a viable option as doing results in linux/type.h and
other core headers getting pulled from the kernel headers, which do not
have the kernel-internal typedefs that are used through tools, including
many files outside of selftests/kvm's control.

Prior to commit cec07f53c398 ("perf tools: Move syscall number fallbacks
from perf-sys.h to tools/arch/x86/include/asm/"), the handcoded numbers
were actual fallbacks, i.e. overriding unistd_{32,64}.h from the kernel
headers was unintentional.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20210901203030.1292304-4-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>