can: j1939: Fix UAF in j1939_sk_match_filter during setsockopt(SO_J1939_FILTER)

Lock jsk->sk to prevent UAF when setsockopt(..., SO_J1939_FILTER, ...)
modifies jsk->filters while receiving packets.

Following trace was seen on affected system:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in j1939_sk_recv_match_one+0x1af/0x2d0 [can_j1939]
Read of size 4 at addr ffff888012144014 by task j1939/350

CPU: 0 PID: 350 Comm: j1939 Tainted: G W OE 6.5.0-rc5 #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
print_report+0xd3/0x620
? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x7d/0x200
? j1939_sk_recv_match_one+0x1af/0x2d0 [can_j1939]
kasan_report+0xc2/0x100
? j1939_sk_recv_match_one+0x1af/0x2d0 [can_j1939]
__asan_load4+0x84/0xb0
j1939_sk_recv_match_one+0x1af/0x2d0 [can_j1939]
j1939_sk_recv+0x20b/0x320 [can_j1939]
? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x20
? __pfx_j1939_sk_recv+0x10/0x10 [can_j1939]
? j1939_simple_recv+0x69/0x280 [can_j1939]
? j1939_ac_recv+0x5e/0x310 [can_j1939]
j1939_can_recv+0x43f/0x580 [can_j1939]
? __pfx_j1939_can_recv+0x10/0x10 [can_j1939]
? raw_rcv+0x42/0x3c0 [can_raw]
? __pfx_j1939_can_recv+0x10/0x10 [can_j1939]
can_rcv_filter+0x11f/0x350 [can]
can_receive+0x12f/0x190 [can]
? __pfx_can_rcv+0x10/0x10 [can]
can_rcv+0xdd/0x130 [can]
? __pfx_can_rcv+0x10/0x10 [can]
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x13d/0x150
? __pfx___netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x10/0x10
? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x20
? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x8c/0xe0
__netif_receive_skb+0x23/0xb0
process_backlog+0x107/0x260
__napi_poll+0x69/0x310
net_rx_action+0x2a1/0x580
? __pfx_net_rx_action+0x10/0x10
? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10
? handle_irq_event+0x7d/0xa0
__do_softirq+0xf3/0x3f8
do_softirq+0x53/0x80
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x6e/0x70
netif_rx+0x16b/0x180
can_send+0x32b/0x520 [can]
? __pfx_can_send+0x10/0x10 [can]
? __check_object_size+0x299/0x410
raw_sendmsg+0x572/0x6d0 [can_raw]
? __pfx_raw_sendmsg+0x10/0x10 [can_raw]
? apparmor_socket_sendmsg+0x2f/0x40
? __pfx_raw_sendmsg+0x10/0x10 [can_raw]
sock_sendmsg+0xef/0x100
sock_write_iter+0x162/0x220
? __pfx_sock_write_iter+0x10/0x10
? __rtnl_unlock+0x47/0x80
? security_file_permission+0x54/0x320
vfs_write+0x6ba/0x750
? __pfx_vfs_write+0x10/0x10
? __fget_light+0x1ca/0x1f0
? __rcu_read_unlock+0x5b/0x280
ksys_write+0x143/0x170
? __pfx_ksys_write+0x10/0x10
? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20
? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x62/0x70
__x64_sys_write+0x47/0x60
do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90
? do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x90
? irqentry_exit+0x3f/0x50
? exc_page_fault+0x79/0xf0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8

Allocated by task 348:
kasan_save_stack+0x2a/0x50
kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40
kasan_save_alloc_info+0x1f/0x30
__kasan_kmalloc+0xb5/0xc0
__kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x67/0x160
j1939_sk_setsockopt+0x284/0x450 [can_j1939]
__sys_setsockopt+0x15c/0x2f0
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0x6b/0x80
do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8

Freed by task 349:
kasan_save_stack+0x2a/0x50
kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40
kasan_save_free_info+0x2f/0x50
__kasan_slab_free+0x12e/0x1c0
__kmem_cache_free+0x1b9/0x380
kfree+0x7a/0x120
j1939_sk_setsockopt+0x3b2/0x450 [can_j1939]
__sys_setsockopt+0x15c/0x2f0
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0x6b/0x80
do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8

Fixes: 9d71dd0c70099 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
Reported-by: Sili Luo <rootlab@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Sili Luo <rootlab@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231020133814.383996-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

can: j1939: prevent deadlock by changing j1939_socks_lock to rwlock

The following 3 locks would race against each other, causing the
deadlock situation in the Syzbot bug report:

- j1939_socks_lock
- active_session_list_lock
- sk_session_queue_lock

A reasonable fix is to change j1939_socks_lock to an rwlock, since in
the rare situations where a write lock is required for the linked list
that j1939_socks_lock is protecting, the code does not attempt to
acquire any more locks. This would break the circular lock dependency,
where, for example, the current thread already locks j1939_socks_lock
and attempts to acquire sk_session_queue_lock, and at the same time,
another thread attempts to acquire j1939_socks_lock while holding
sk_session_queue_lock.

NOTE: This patch along does not fix the unregister_netdevice bug
reported by Syzbot; instead, it solves a deadlock situation to prepare
for one or more further patches to actually fix the Syzbot bug, which
appears to be a reference counting problem within the j1939 codebase.

Reported-by: <syzbot+1591462f226d9cbf0564@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ziqi Zhao <astrajoan@yahoo.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230721162226.8639-1-astrajoan@yahoo.com
[mkl: remove unrelated newline change]
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

can: j1939: j1939_xtp_rx_rts_session_new(): abort TP less than 9 bytes

The receiver should abort TP if 'total message size' in TP.CM_RTS and
TP.CM_BAM is less than 9 or greater than 1785 [1], but currently the
j1939 stack only checks the upper bound and the receiver will accept
the following broadcast message:

vcan1 18ECFF00 [8] 20 08 00 02 FF 00 23 01
vcan1 18EBFF00 [8] 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
vcan1 18EBFF00 [8] 02 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF

This patch adds check for the lower bound and abort illegal TP.

[1] SAE-J1939-82 A.3.4 Row 2 and A.3.6 Row 6.

Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1634203601-3460-1-git-send-email-zhangchangzhong@huawei.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzhong@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

can: j1939: extend UAPI to notify about RX status

To be able to create applications with user friendly feedback, we need be
able to provide receive status information.

Typical ETP transfer may take seconds or even hours. To give user some
clue or show a progress bar, the stack should push status updates.
Same as for the TX information, the socket error queue will be used with
following new signals:
- J1939_EE_INFO_RX_RTS - received and accepted request to send signal.
- J1939_EE_INFO_RX_DPO - received data package offset signal
- J1939_EE_INFO_RX_ABORT - RX session was aborted

Instead of completion signal, user will get data package.
To activate this signals, application should set
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE to the SO_TIMESTAMPING socket option. This
will avoid unpredictable application behavior for the old software.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210707094854.30781-3-o.rempel@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

can: j1939: rename J1939_ERRQUEUE_* to J1939_ERRQUEUE_TX_*

Prepare the world for the J1939_ERRQUEUE_RX_ version

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210707094854.30781-2-o.rempel@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol

SAE J1939 is the vehicle bus recommended practice used for communication
and diagnostics among vehicle components. Originating in the car and
heavy-duty truck industry in the United States, it is now widely used in
other parts of the world.

J1939, ISO 11783 and NMEA 2000 all share the same high level protocol.
SAE J1939 can be considered the replacement for the older SAE J1708 and
SAE J1587 specifications.

Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Bastian Stender <bst@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Elenita Hinds <ecathinds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Jayat <maxime.jayat@mobile-devices.fr>
Signed-off-by: Robin van der Gracht <robin@protonic.nl>
Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>