locking/atomic: scripts: Clarify ordering of conditional atomics

Conditional atomic operations (e.g. cmpxchg()) only provide ordering
when the condition holds; when the condition does not hold, the location
is not modified and relaxed ordering is provided. Where ordering is
needed for failed conditional atomics, it is necessary to use
smp_mb__before_atomic() and/or smp_mb__after_atomic().

This is explained tersely in memory-barriers.txt, and is implied but not
explicitly stated in the kerneldoc comments for the conditional
operations. The lack of an explicit statement has lead to some off-list
queries about the ordering semantics of failing conditional operations,
so evidently this is confusing.

Update the kerneldoc comments to explicitly describe the lack of ordering
for failed conditional atomic operations.

For most conditional atomic operations, this is written as:

| If (${condition}), atomically updates @v to (${new}) with ${desc_order} ordering.
| Otherwise, @v is not modified and relaxed ordering is provided.

For the try_cmpxchg() operations, this is written as:

| If (${condition}), atomically updates @v to @new with ${desc_order} ordering.
| Otherwise, @v is not modified, @old is updated to the current value of @v,
| and relaxed ordering is provided.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240209124010.2096198-1-mark.rutland@arm.com

locking/atomic: scripts: fix ${atomic}_dec_if_positive() kerneldoc

The ${atomic}_dec_if_positive() ops are unlike all the other conditional
atomic ops. Rather than returning a boolean success value, these return
the value that the atomic variable would be updated to, even when no
update is performed.

We missed this when adding kerneldoc comments, and the documentation for
${atomic}_dec_if_positive() erroneously states:

| Return: @true if @v was updated, @false otherwise.

Ideally we'd clean this up by aligning ${atomic}_dec_if_positive() with
the usual atomic op conventions: with ${atomic}_fetch_dec_if_positive()
for those who care about the value of the varaible, and
${atomic}_dec_if_positive() returning a boolean success value.

In the mean time, align the documentation with the current reality.

Fixes: ad8110706f381170 ("locking/atomic: scripts: generate kerneldoc comments")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230615132734.1119765-1-mark.rutland@arm.com

locking/atomic: scripts: generate kerneldoc comments

Currently the atomics are documented in Documentation/atomic_t.txt, and
have no kerneldoc comments. There are a sufficient number of gotchas
(e.g. semantics, noinstr-safety) that it would be nice to have comments
to call these out, and it would be nice to have kerneldoc comments such
that these can be collated.

While it's possible to derive the semantics from the code, this can be
painful given the amount of indirection we currently have (e.g. fallback
paths), and it's easy to be mislead by naming, e.g.

* The unconditional void-returning ops *only* have relaxed variants
without a _relaxed suffix, and can easily be mistaken for being fully
ordered.

It would be nice to give these a _relaxed() suffix, but this would
result in significant churn throughout the kernel.

* Our naming of conditional and unconditional+test ops is rather
inconsistent, and it can be difficult to derive the name of an
operation, or to identify where an op is conditional or
unconditional+test.

Some ops are clearly conditional:
- dec_if_positive
- add_unless
- dec_unless_positive
- inc_unless_negative

Some ops are clearly unconditional+test:
- sub_and_test
- dec_and_test
- inc_and_test

However, what exactly those test is not obvious. A _test_zero suffix
might be clearer.

Others could be read ambiguously:
- inc_not_zero // conditional
- add_negative // unconditional+test

It would probably be worth renaming these, e.g. to inc_unless_zero and
add_test_negative.

As a step towards making this more consistent and easier to understand,
this patch adds kerneldoc comments for all generated *atomic*_*()
functions. These are generated from templates, with some common text
shared, making it easy to extend these in future if necessary.

I've tried to make these as consistent and clear as possible, and I've
deliberately ensured:

* All ops have their ordering explicitly mentioned in the short and long
description.

* All test ops have "test" in their short description.

* All ops are described as an expression using their usual C operator.
For example:

andnot: "Atomically updates @v to (@v & ~@i)"
inc: "Atomically updates @v to (@v + 1)"

Which may be clearer to non-naative English speakers, and allows all
the operations to be described in the same style.

* All conditional ops have their condition described as an expression
using the usual C operators. For example:

add_unless: "If (@v != @u), atomically updates @v to (@v + @i)"
cmpxchg: "If (@v == @old), atomically updates @v to @new"

Which may be clearer to non-naative English speakers, and allows all
the operations to be described in the same style.

* All bitwise ops (and,andnot,or,xor) explicitly mention that they are
bitwise in their short description, so that they are not mistaken for
performing their logical equivalents.

* The noinstr safety of each op is explicitly described, with a
description of whether or not to use the raw_ form of the op.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-26-mark.rutland@arm.com

locking/atomic: scripts: simplify raw_atomic*() definitions

Currently each ordering variant has several potential definitions,
with a mixture of preprocessor and C definitions, including several
copies of its C prototype, e.g.

| #if defined(arch_atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire)
| #define raw_atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire arch_atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire
| #elif defined(arch_atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed)
| static __always_inline int
| raw_atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire(int i, atomic_t *v)
| {
| int ret = arch_atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed(i, v);
| __atomic_acquire_fence();
| return ret;
| }
| #elif defined(arch_atomic_fetch_andnot)
| #define raw_atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire arch_atomic_fetch_andnot
| #else
| static __always_inline int
| raw_atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire(int i, atomic_t *v)
| {
| return raw_atomic_fetch_and_acquire(~i, v);
| }
| #endif

Make this a bit simpler by defining the C prototype once, and writing
the various potential definitions as plain C code guarded by ifdeffery.
For example, the above becomes:

| static __always_inline int
| raw_atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire(int i, atomic_t *v)
| {
| #if defined(arch_atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire)
| return arch_atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire(i, v);
| #elif defined(arch_atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed)
| int ret = arch_atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed(i, v);
| __atomic_acquire_fence();
| return ret;
| #elif defined(arch_atomic_fetch_andnot)
| return arch_atomic_fetch_andnot(i, v);
| #else
| return raw_atomic_fetch_and_acquire(~i, v);
| #endif
| }

Which is far easier to read. As we now always have a single copy of the
C prototype wrapping all the potential definitions, we now have an
obvious single location for kerneldoc comments.

At the same time, the fallbacks for raw_atomic*_xhcg() are made to use
'new' rather than 'i' as the name of the new value. This is what the
existing fallback template used, and is more consistent with the
raw_atomic{_try,}cmpxchg() fallbacks.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-24-mark.rutland@arm.com

locking/atomic: scripts: simplify raw_atomic_long*() definitions

Currently, atomic-long is split into two sections, one defining the
raw_atomic_long_*() ops for CONFIG_64BIT, and one defining the raw
atomic_long_*() ops for !CONFIG_64BIT.

With many lines elided, this looks like:

| #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
| ...
| static __always_inline bool
| raw_atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(atomic_long_t *v, long *old, long new)
| {
| return raw_atomic64_try_cmpxchg(v, (s64 *)old, new);
| }
| ...
| #else /* CONFIG_64BIT */
| ...
| static __always_inline bool
| raw_atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(atomic_long_t *v, long *old, long new)
| {
| return raw_atomic_try_cmpxchg(v, (int *)old, new);
| }
| ...
| #endif

The two definitions are spread far apart in the file, and duplicate the
prototype, making it hard to have a legible set of kerneldoc comments.

Make this simpler by defining the C prototype once, and writing the two
definitions inline. For example, the above becomes:

| static __always_inline bool
| raw_atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(atomic_long_t *v, long *old, long new)
| {
| #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
| return raw_atomic64_try_cmpxchg(v, (s64 *)old, new);
| #else
| return raw_atomic_try_cmpxchg(v, (int *)old, new);
| #endif
| }

As we now always have a single copy of the C prototype wrapping all the
potential definitions, we now have an obvious single location for kerneldoc
comments. As a bonus, both the script and the generated file are
somewhat shorter.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-23-mark.rutland@arm.com

locking/atomic: scripts: build raw_atomic_long*() directly

Now that arch_atomic*() usage is limited to the atomic headers, we no
longer have any users of arch_atomic_long_*(), and can generate
raw_atomic_long_*() directly.

Generate the raw_atomic_long_*() ops directly.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-20-mark.rutland@arm.com

atomics: Provide atomic_add_negative() variants

atomic_add_negative() does not provide the relaxed/acquire/release
variants.

Provide them in preparation for a new scalable reference count algorithm.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230323102800.101763813@linutronix.de

locking/atomic: add arch_atomic_long*()

Now that all architectures provide arch_{atomic,atomic64}_*(), we can
build arch_atomic_long_*() atop these, which can be safely used in
noinstr code. The regular atomic_long_*() wrappers are built atop these,
as we do for {atomic,atomic64}_*() atop arch_{atomic,atomic64}_*().

We don't provide arch_* versions of the cond_read*() variants, as we
don't have arch_* versions of the underlying atomic/atomic64 functions
(nor the smp_cond_load*() helpers these are typically based on).

Note that the headers in this patch under include/linux/atomic/ are
generated by the scripts in scripts/atomic/.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210713105253.7615-5-mark.rutland@arm.com

locking/atomic: centralize generated headers

The generated atomic headers are only intended to be included directly
by <linux/atomic.h>, but are spread across include/linux/ and
include/asm-generic/, where people mnay be encouraged to include them.

This patch centralizes them under include/linux/atomic/.

Other than the header guards and hashes, there is no change to any of
the generated headers as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210713105253.7615-4-mark.rutland@arm.com