History log of /linux-master/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_devlink.c
Revision Date Author Comments
# 4a54903f 02-May-2023 Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@amd.com>

ionic: catch failure from devlink_alloc

Add a check for NULL on the alloc return. If devlink_alloc() fails and
we try to use devlink_priv() on the NULL return, the kernel gets very
unhappy and panics. With this fix, the driver load will still fail,
but at least it won't panic the kernel.

Fixes: df69ba43217d ("ionic: Add basic framework for IONIC Network device driver")
Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# 226bf980 29-Nov-2022 Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>

net: devlink: let the core report the driver name instead of the drivers

The driver name is available in device_driver::name. Right now,
drivers still have to report this piece of information themselves in
their devlink_ops::info_get callback function.

In order to factorize code, make devlink_nl_info_fill() add the driver
name attribute.

Now that the core sets the driver name attribute, drivers are not
supposed to call devlink_info_driver_name_put() anymore. Remove
devlink_info_driver_name_put() and clean-up all the drivers using this
function in their callback.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> # mlxsw
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>


# ac73d4bf 02-Nov-2022 Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>

net: make drivers to use SET_NETDEV_DEVLINK_PORT to set devlink_port

Benefit from the previously implemented tracking of netdev events in
devlink code and instead of calling devlink_port_type_eth_set() and
devlink_port_type_clear() to set devlink port type and link to related
netdev, use SET_NETDEV_DEVLINK_PORT() macro to assign devlink_port
pointer to netdevice which is about to be registered.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>


# d1f24712 12-Oct-2021 Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>

ionic: no devlink_unregister if not registered

Don't try to unregister the devlink if it hasn't been registered
yet. This bit of error cleanup code got missed in the recent
devlink registration changes.

Fixes: 7911c8bd546f ("ionic: Move devlink registration to be last devlink command")
Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012231520.72582-1-snelson@pensando.io
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>


# 7911c8bd 25-Sep-2021 Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>

ionic: Move devlink registration to be last devlink command

This change prevents from users to access device before devlink is
fully configured.

Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# db4278c5 22-Sep-2021 Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>

devlink: Make devlink_register to be void

devlink_register() can't fail and always returns success, but all drivers
are obligated to check returned status anyway. This adds a lot of boilerplate
code to handle impossible flow.

Make devlink_register() void and simplify the drivers that use that
API call.

Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Acked-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> # dsa
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# 919d13a7 08-Aug-2021 Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>

devlink: Set device as early as possible

All kernel devlink implementations call to devlink_alloc() during
initialization routine for specific device which is used later as
a parent device for devlink_register().

Such late device assignment causes to the situation which requires us to
call to device_register() before setting other parameters, but that call
opens devlink to the world and makes accessible for the netlink users.

Any attempt to move devlink_register() to be the last call generates the
following error due to access to the devlink->dev pointer.

[ 8.758862] devlink_nl_param_fill+0x2e8/0xe50
[ 8.760305] devlink_param_notify+0x6d/0x180
[ 8.760435] __devlink_params_register+0x2f1/0x670
[ 8.760558] devlink_params_register+0x1e/0x20

The simple change of API to set devlink device in the devlink_alloc()
instead of devlink_register() fixes all this above and ensures that
prior to call to devlink_register() everything already set.

Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# c2255ff4 21-Jul-2021 Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>

ionic: cleanly release devlink instance

The failure to register devlink will leave the system with dangled
devlink resource, which is not cleaned if devlink_port_register() fails.

In order to remove access to ".registered" field of struct devlink_port,
require both devlink_register and devlink_port_register to success and
check it through device pointer.

Fixes: fbfb8031533c ("ionic: Add hardware init and device commands")
Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# b44cfd4f 18-Nov-2020 Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>

devlink: move request_firmware out of driver

All drivers which implement the devlink flash update support, with the
exception of netdevsim, use either request_firmware or
request_firmware_direct to locate the firmware file. Rather than having
each driver do this separately as part of its .flash_update
implementation, perform the request_firmware within net/core/devlink.c

Replace the file_name parameter in the struct devlink_flash_update_params
with a pointer to the fw object.

Use request_firmware rather than request_firmware_direct. Although most
Linux distributions today do not have the fallback mechanism
implemented, only about half the drivers used the _direct request, as
compared to the generic request_firmware. In the event that
a distribution does support the fallback mechanism, the devlink flash
update ought to be able to use it to provide the firmware contents. For
distributions which do not support the fallback userspace mechanism,
there should be essentially no difference between request_firmware and
request_firmware_direct.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Acked-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Acked-by: Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>


# bc75c054 25-Sep-2020 Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>

devlink: convert flash_update to use params structure

The devlink core recently gained support for checking whether the driver
supports a flash_update parameter, via `supported_flash_update_params`.
However, parameters are specified as function arguments. Adding a new
parameter still requires modifying the signature of the .flash_update
callback in all drivers.

Convert the .flash_update function to take a new `struct
devlink_flash_update_params` instead. By using this structure, and the
`supported_flash_update_params` bit field, a new parameter to
flash_update can be added without requiring modification to existing
drivers.

As before, all parameters except file_name will require driver opt-in.
Because file_name is a necessary field to for the flash_update to make
sense, no "SUPPORTED" bitflag is provided and it is always considered
valid. All future additional parameters will require a new bit in the
supported_flash_update_params bitfield.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Cc: Bin Luo <luobin9@huawei.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Cc: Danielle Ratson <danieller@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# 22ec3d23 25-Sep-2020 Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>

devlink: check flash_update parameter support in net core

When implementing .flash_update, drivers which do not support
per-component update are manually checking the component parameter to
verify that it is NULL. Without this check, the driver might accept an
update request with a component specified even though it will not honor
such a request.

Instead of having each driver check this, move the logic into
net/core/devlink.c, and use a new `supported_flash_update_params` field
in the devlink_ops. Drivers which will support per-component update must
now specify this by setting DEVLINK_SUPPORT_FLASH_UPDATE_COMPONENT in
the supported_flash_update_params in their devlink_ops.

This helps ensure that drivers do not forget to check for a NULL
component if they do not support per-component update. This also enables
a slightly better error message by enabling the core stack to set the
netlink bad attribute message to indicate precisely the unsupported
attribute in the message.

Going forward, any new additional parameter to flash update will require
a bit in the supported_flash_update_params bitfield.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Cc: Bin Luo <luobin9@huawei.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Cc: Danielle Ratson <danieller@mellanox.com>
Cc: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# 30b5191a 17-Sep-2020 Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>

ionic: add devlink firmware update

Add support for firmware update through the devlink interface.
This update copies the firmware object into the device, asks
the current firmware to install it, then asks the firmware to
select the new firmware for the next boot-up.

The install and select steps are launched as asynchronous
requests, which are then followed up with status request
commands. These status request commands will be answered with
an EAGAIN return value and will try again until the request
has completed or reached the timeout specified.

Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# 30b87ab4 27-Aug-2020 Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>

ionic: remove lif list concept

As we aren't yet supporting multiple lifs, we can remove
complexity by removing the list concept and related code,
to be re-engineered later when actually needed.

Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# 71ad8d55 09-Jul-2020 Danielle Ratson <danieller@mellanox.com>

devlink: Replace devlink_port_attrs_set parameters with a struct

Currently, devlink_port_attrs_set accepts a long list of parameters,
that most of them are devlink port's attributes.

Use the devlink_port_attrs struct to replace the relevant parameters.

Signed-off-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# 77f972a7 10-Jun-2020 Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>

ionic: remove support for mgmt device

We no longer support the mgmt device in the ionic driver,
so remove the device id and related code.

Fixes: b3f064e9746d ("ionic: add support for device id 0x1004")
Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# ecd2d8b0 16-Mar-2020 Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>

ionic: stop devlink warn on mgmt device

If we don't set a port type, the devlink code will eventually
print a WARN in the kernel log. Because the mgmt device is
not really a useful port, don't register it as a devlink port.

Fixes: b3f064e9746d ("ionic: add support for device id 0x1004")
Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# b3f064e9 06-Mar-2020 Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>

ionic: add support for device id 0x1004

Add support for the management port device id. This is to
capture the device and set it up for devlink use, but not set
it up for network operations. We still use a netdev object
in order to use the napi infrasucture for processing adminq
and notifyq messages, we just don't register the netdev.

Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# da0729e8 30-Sep-2019 Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>

ionic: simplify returns in devlink info

There is no need for a goto in this bit of code.

Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# beead698 03-Sep-2019 Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>

ionic: Add the basic NDO callbacks for netdev support

Set up the initial NDO structure and callbacks for netdev
to use, and register the netdev. This will allow us to do
a few basic operations on the device, but no traffic yet.

Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# fbfb8031 03-Sep-2019 Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>

ionic: Add hardware init and device commands

The ionic device has a small set of PCI registers, including a
device control and data space, and a large set of message
commands.

Also adds new DEVLINK_INFO_VERSION_GENERIC tags for
ASIC_ID, ASIC_REV, and FW.

Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


# df69ba43 03-Sep-2019 Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>

ionic: Add basic framework for IONIC Network device driver

This patch adds a basic driver framework for the Pensando IONIC
network device. There is no functionality right now other than
the ability to load and unload.

Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>