net: ethernet: marvell: Convert to platform remove callback returning void

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert these drivers from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net: mvneta: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() to simplify code

Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() to simplify the code a bit.
This is detected by coccinelle.

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net: hwbm: Make the hwbm_pool lock a mutex

Based on review, `lock' is only acquired in hwbm_pool_add() which is
invoked via ->probe(), ->resume() and ->ndo_change_mtu(). Based on this
the lock can become a mutex and there is no need to disable interrupts
during the procedure.
Now that the lock is a mutex, hwbm_pool_add() no longer invokes
hwbm_pool_refill() in an atomic context so we can pass GFP_KERNEL to
hwbm_pool_refill() and remove the `gfp' argument from hwbm_pool_add().

Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net: mvneta: remove data pointer usage from device_node structure

On year ago Rob Herring wanted to remove the data pointer from the
device_node structure[1]. The mvneta driver seemed to be the only one
which used (abused ?) it. However, the proposal of Rob to remove this
pointer from the driver introduced a regression, and I tested and fixed an
alternative way, but it was never submitted as a proper patch.

Now here it is: Instead of using the device_node structure ->data
pointer, we store the BM private data as the driver data of the BM
platform_device. The core mvneta code can retrieve it by doing a lookup
on which platform_device corresponds to the BM device tree node using
of_find_device_by_node(), and get its driver data

[1]https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg445197.html

Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net: mvneta: Fix lacking spinlock initialization

The spinlock used by the hwbm functions must be initialized by the
network driver. This commit fixes this lack and the following erros when
lockdep is enabled:

INFO: trying to register non-static key.
the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
turning off the locking correctness validator.
[<c010ff80>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010bd08>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c010bd08>] (show_stack) from [<c032913c>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xe0)
[<c032913c>] (dump_stack) from [<c01670e4>] (__lock_acquire+0x1f58/0x2060)
[<c01670e4>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c0167dec>] (lock_acquire+0xa4/0xd0)
[<c0167dec>] (lock_acquire) from [<c06f6650>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x54/0x68)
[<c06f6650>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c058e830>] (hwbm_pool_add+0x1c/0xdc)
[<c058e830>] (hwbm_pool_add) from [<c043f4e8>] (mvneta_bm_pool_use+0x338/0x490)
[<c043f4e8>] (mvneta_bm_pool_use) from [<c0443198>] (mvneta_probe+0x654/0x1284)
[<c0443198>] (mvneta_probe) from [<c03b894c>] (platform_drv_probe+0x4c/0xb0)
[<c03b894c>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c03b7158>] (driver_probe_device+0x214/0x2c0)
[<c03b7158>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c03b72c4>] (__driver_attach+0xc0/0xc4)
[<c03b72c4>] (__driver_attach) from [<c03b5440>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0x9c)
[<c03b5440>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c03b65b8>] (bus_add_driver+0x1a0/0x218)
[<c03b65b8>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c03b79cc>] (driver_register+0x78/0xf8)
[<c03b79cc>] (driver_register) from [<c01018f4>] (do_one_initcall+0x90/0x1dc)
[<c01018f4>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c0900de4>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x15c/0x1fc)
[<c0900de4>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c06eed90>] (kernel_init+0x8/0x114)
[<c06eed90>] (kernel_init) from [<c0107910>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24)

Fixes: baa11ebc0c76 ("net: mvneta: Use the new hwbm framework")
Reported-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net: mvneta: Use the new hwbm framework

Now that the hardware buffer management framework had been introduced,
let's use it.

Tested-by: Sebastian Careba <nitroshift@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net: mvneta: bm: add support for hardware buffer management

Buffer manager (BM) is a dedicated hardware unit that can be used by all
ethernet ports of Armada XP and 38x SoC's. It allows to offload CPU on RX
path by sparing DRAM access on refilling buffer pool, hardware-based
filling of descriptor ring data and better memory utilization due to HW
arbitration for using 'short' pools for small packets.

Tests performed with A388 SoC working as a network bridge between two
packet generators showed increase of maximum processed 64B packets by
~20k (~555k packets with BM enabled vs ~535 packets without BM). Also
when pushing 1500B-packets with a line rate achieved, CPU load decreased
from around 25% without BM to 20% with BM.

BM comprise up to 4 buffer pointers' (BP) rings kept in DRAM, which
are called external BP pools - BPPE. Allocating and releasing buffer
pointers (BP) to/from BPPE is performed indirectly by write/read access
to a dedicated internal SRAM, where internal BP pools (BPPI) are placed.
BM hardware controls status of BPPE automatically, as well as assigning
proper buffers to RX descriptors. For more details please refer to
Functional Specification of Armada XP or 38x SoC.

In order to enable support for a separate hardware block, common for all
ports, a new driver has to be implemented ('mvneta_bm'). It provides
initialization sequence of address space, clocks, registers, SRAM,
empty pools' structures and also obtaining optional configuration
from DT (please refer to device tree binding documentation). mvneta_bm
exposes also a necessary API to mvneta driver, as well as a dedicated
structure with BM information (bm_priv), whose presence is used as a
flag notifying of BM usage by port. It has to be ensured that mvneta_bm
probe is executed prior to the ones in ports' driver. In case BM is not
used or its probe fails, mvneta falls back to use software buffer
management.

A sequence executed in mvneta_probe function is modified in order to have
an access to needed resources before possible port's BM initialization is
done. According to port-pools mapping provided by DT appropriate registers
are configured and the buffer pools are filled. RX path is modified
accordingly. Becaues the hardware allows a wide variety of configuration
options, following assumptions are made:
* using BM mechanisms can be selectively disabled/enabled basing
on DT configuration among the ports
* 'long' pool's single buffer size is tied to port's MTU
* using 'long' pool by port is obligatory and it cannot be shared
* using 'short' pool for smaller packets is optional
* one 'short' pool can be shared among all ports

This commit enables hardware buffer management operation cooperating with
existing mvneta driver. New device tree binding documentation is added and
the one of mvneta is updated accordingly.

[gregory.clement@free-electrons.com: removed the suspend/resume part]

Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>